From text to landscape: locating, identifying and mapping the use of landscape features in a Swiss Alpine corpus

References

• Amitay, E., et al., 2004. Web-a-where: Geotagging web content. In: M. Sanderson, K. Järvelin, J. Allan, P. Bruza, eds. Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 25–29 July 2004. Sheffield: ACM, 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, G., et al., 2010. Extracting events from spatial time series. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information visualisation. London: IEEE Computer Society, 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Baeza-Yates, R.A. and Ribeiro-Neto, B.A., 2011. Modern information retrieval – the concepts and technology behind search. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W.F. and Montague, W.E., 1969. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: a replication and extension of the Connecticut Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80 (2), 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D.M., 2012. Understanding digital humanities. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blaylock, N., Swain, B., and Allen, J. 2009. TESLA: A tool for annotating geospatial language corpora. Proceedings in the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics, 31 May–5 June 2009. Boulder: NAACL, 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnemeyer, J., et al., 2004. Landscape terms and place names elicitation guide. Field Manual Volume, 9, 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Burenhult, N. and Levinson, S.C., 2008. Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences, 30 (2), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscaldi, D., 2011. Approaches to disambiguating toponyms. In: R.S. Purves and C.B. Jones, eds. Letters on geographic information retrieval. SIGSPATIAL Special. Melbourne: ACM, 3 (2), 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., 2005. Extracting metadata for spatially-aware information retrieval on the Internet. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. and Gregory, I.N., 2010. Mapping the English Lake district: A literary GIS. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36 (1), 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, D., Antani, S., and Kasturi, R., 2009. Mapping the worlds’s photos. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web, 20–24 April 2009. Madrid: ACM, 761–770.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., et al., 2009. User needs and implications for modelling vague named places. Spatial Cognition Computation, 9, 174–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeReKo, 2011. Deutsches Referenzkorpus, Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2011-I [online]. Mannheim, Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Available from: http://www.ids-mannheim.de/kl/projekte/korpora/archiv.html [Accessed 14 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Derungs, C., Palacio, D., and Purves, R.S., 2012. Resolving fine granularity toponyms: Evaluation of a disambiguation approach. Proceedings of GIScience 2012 7th international conference on geographic information science, 18–21 September. Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J. and Franzosa, R.M., 1991. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (2), 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M.J. and Mark, D.M., 1995. Naive geography. In: A.U. Frank and W. Kuhn, eds. Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. and Leydesdorff, L., 2009. The relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (5), 1027–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontiera, P., Larson, R., and Radke, J., 2008. A comparison of geometric approaches to assessing spatial similarity for GIR. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (3), 337–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, L., 2009. Georeferencing: The geographic associations of information. Cambirdge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D.J. and King, G., 2010. A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54 (1), 229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwahashi, J. and Pike, R.J., 2007. Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature. Geomorphology, 15 (3), 409–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAH, 2008. Interchange: The promise of digital history. The Journal of American History [online]. Available from: http://journalofamericanhistory.org/issues/952/interchange/index.html [Accessed 14 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, A., et al., 2011. GeoCAM: A geovisual analytics workspace to contextualize and interpret statements about moveme. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 3, 33–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C.B., et al., 2008. Modelling vague places with knowledge from the Web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (10), 1045–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C.B. and Purves, R.S., 2008. Geographical information retrieval. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (3), 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, K.T., Foltz, P.W., and Laham, D., 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analyis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, J. 2004. Toponym resolution in text: Which Sheffield is it? Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 25–29 July 2004. Sheffield: ACM, 602–610.
   Google Scholar
• Leidner, J. 2007. Toponym resolution in text: Annotation, evaluation and applications of spatial grounding of place names. Thesis (PhD). University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., et al., 2011. Landscape in Language. In: D.M. Mark, A.G. Turk, N. Burenthult, and D. Stea, eds. Landscape in language. New York: Berghahn Books, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M. and Turk, A.G., 2003. Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, environment, and language. COSIT 2003, 2825, 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G., and Stea, D., 2010. Ethnophysiography of Arid lands: Categories for landscape features. In: L.M. Johnson and E.S. Hunn, eds. Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, B., Anastacio, I., and Calado, P., 2010. A machine learning approach for resolving place references in text. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 221–236.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H.J., 2010. The data avalanche is here. Shouldn’t we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 50 (1), 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S., 1984. Landscape ecology theory and applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., Hampson, J., and Shaw, L.K., 1993. Nouns in early lexicons: evidence, explanations and implications. Journal of Child Language, 20, 61–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann, F., Tomko, M., and Purves, R.S., in press. User evaluation of automatically generated keywords and toponyms for geo-referenced images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Available online at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.22738/abstract.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overell, S. and Rüger, S., 2008. Using co-occurrence models for placename disambiguation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (3), 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overschelde Van, J.P., Rawson, K.A., and Dunlosky, J., 2004. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatti, B., 2008. Die Geografie der Literatur. Schauplätze, Handlungsräume, Raumphantasien. Thesis (PhD). ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J., 1995. Ground truth. The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rattenbury, T. and Naaman, M., 2009. Methods for extracting place semantics from Flickr tags. ACM Transactions on the Web, 3 (1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., 1978. Principles of categorization. In: E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd, eds. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Salton, G. and McGill, M., 1983. Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sennrich, R., et al., 2009. A new hybrid dependency parser for German. In: C. Chiarcos, R.E. de Castilho, and M. Stede, eds. Proceedings of Biennial GSCL conference 2009, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Skupin, A. and Esperbé, A., 2011. An alternative map of the United States based on an n-dimensional model of geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 22 (4), 290–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. and Mark, D.M. 1998. Ontology and geographic kinds. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on spatial data handling, 12–15 July 1998. Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., 2001. Geographic categories: An ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (7), 591–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., 2003. Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30 (3), 411–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southall, H., Mostern, R., and Berman, M., 2011. On historical gazetteers. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 5 (2), 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46 (2), 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk, A.G., Mark, D.M., and Stea, D., 2011. Ethnophysiography. In: D.M. Mark, A.G. Turk, N. Burenthult, and D. Stea, eds. Landscape in language. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K., 1983. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaid, S., et al., 2005. Spatio-textual indexing for geographical search on the web. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on spatial and temporal databases, 22–24 August 2005. Angra dos Reis: Springer, 218–235.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, M., et al., 2009. Classifying named entities in an Alpine Heritage Corpus. Künstliche Intelligenz, 4, 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. 1996. The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation models. Thesis (PhD). University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J., Dykes, J., and Slingsby, A., 2007. Interactive visual exploration of a large spatio-temporal dataset: Reflections on a geovisualization mashup. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13 (6), 1176–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G.K., 1935. The psychobiology of language; an introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
   Google Scholar