676
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

High-resolution space–time processes for agents at the built–human interface of urban earthquakes

Pages 964-986 | Received 03 Jun 2013, Accepted 13 Aug 2013, Published online: 03 Oct 2013

References

  • Aitken, M., et al., 2004. The Lord of the Rings: the visual effects that brought Middle Earth to the screen. ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Course Notes. Los Angeles, CA: ACM.
  • Alam, S. and Goulias, K., 1999. Dynamic emergency evacuation management system using Geographic Information System and Spatiotemporal models of behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1660 (1), 92–99.
  • Anagnostopoulos, S.A., 1988. Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 16 (3), 443–456.
  • Anagnostopoulos, S.A. and Spiliopoulos, K.V., 1992. An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21 (4), 289–302.
  • Arnold, C., et al., 1982. Occupant behavior in a six-storey office building fallowing severe earthquake damage. Disasters, 6 (3), 207–214.
  • Badawi, H.S. and Mourad, S.A., 1994. Observations from the 12 October 1992 Dahshour earthquake in Egypt. Natural Hazards, 10 (3), 261–274.
  • Badler, N.I., Manoochehri, K.H., and Walters, G., 1987. Articulated figure positioning by multiple constraints. Computer Graphics and Applications, 7 (6), 28–38.
  • Batty, M., 1997. The computable city. International Planning Studies, 2 (2), 155–173.
  • Batty, M. and Torrens, P.M., 2001. Modeling complexity: the limits to prediction. CyberGeo, 201(1), Online 1035. Available from: http://cybergeo.revues.org/1035 [Accessed 1 January 2013].
  • Batty, M. and Torrens, P.M., 2005. Modeling and prediction in a complex world. Futures, 37 (7), 745–766.
  • Baudrillard, J., 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arobor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Benenson, I. and Torrens, P.M., 2004. Geosimulation: automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bengtsson, L., et al., 2011. Improved response to disasters and outbreaks by tracking population movements with mobile phone network data: a post-earthquake geospatial study in Haiti. PLoS Medicine, 8 (8), e1001083.
  • Bird, J.F., et al., 2006. Modelling liquefaction-induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26 (1), 15–30.
  • Bosher, L., 2008. Hazards and the built environment: adaptating and attaining built-in resilience. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Chau, K.T., et al., 2003. Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32 (4), 537–554.
  • Ciolek, T.M., 1981. Pedestrian behaviour in pedestrian spaces: some findings of a naturalistic field study. In: S.V. Szokolay, ed. Understanding the built environment – proceedings of the annual conference of the ANZAScA. Canberra: Australian and New Zealand Architectural Science Association, 95–112.
  • Cocking, C. and Drury, J., 2008. The mass psychology of disasters and emergency evacuations: a research report and implications for the fire and rescue service. Fire Safety, Technology and Management, 10 (1), 13–19.
  • Comfort, L.K., et al., 2004. Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2 (1), 62–80.
  • Couclelis, H., et al., 1987. Exploring the anchorpoint hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7 (2), 99–122.
  • Cova, T.J. and Johnson, J.P., 2003. A network flow model for lane-based evacuation routing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37 (7), 579–604.
  • Crooks, A., et al., 2013. #Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17 (1), 124–147.
  • Crooks, A.T. and Heppenstall, A.J., 2012. Introduction to agent-based modelling. In: A. T. Crooks, A. J. Heppenstall, L. M. See & M. Batty, eds. Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems, New York: Springer, 85–105.
  • Cutter, S.L., 2003. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93 (1), 1–12.
  • D‘agostino, F., et al., 2002. Monitoring and information fusion for search and rescue operations in large-scale disasters. In: IEEE ed. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. New York: IEEE, 672–679.
  • Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J.I., and Goodno, B.J., 2006. Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36 (2), 285–306.
  • Duman, H., Kulahci, Y., and Sengezer, M., 2003. Fasciotomy in crush injury resulting from prolonged pressure in an earthquake in Turkey. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20 (3), 251–252.
  • Earle, P., et al., 2010. OMG Earthquake! can Twitter improve earthquake response? Seismological Research Letters, 81 (2), 246–251.
  • Eberly, D.H., 2007. 3D game engine architecture: a practical approach to real-time computer graphics. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
  • Edkins, A., Menzies, H., and Slorach, C., 2012. Knife in the water. In: Metz, ed. Seattle, WA: Sub Pop, Track 5.
  • Engdahl, E.R. and Villaseñor, A., 2002. Global seismicity: 1900–1999. In: W.H.K. Lee, et al. eds. International geophysics. New York: Academic Press, 665–689.
  • Evans, G.W., et al., 1984. The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4 (4), 323–335.
  • Farkas, I., Helbing, D., and Vicsek, T., 2002. Crowd behaves as excitable media during Mexican wave. Nature, 419, 131.
  • Federal Highway Administration, 2007. Managing pedestrians during evacuation of metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, FHWA-HOP–07–066.
  • Fiedrich, F., Gehbauer, F., and Rickers, U., 2000. Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Safety Science, 35 (1–3), 41–57.
  • Godschalk, D.R., 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4 (3), 136–143.
  • Golledge, R.A., 1999. Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Granovetter, M., 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 83 (6), 1420–1443.
  • Hart, P.E., Nilsson, N.J., and Raphael, B., 1968. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4 (2), 100–107.
  • Helbing, D. and Molnár, P., 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, 51, 4282–4286.
  • Henein, C.M. and White, T., 2007. Macroscopic effects of microscopic forces between agents in crowd models. Physica A, 373, 694–712.
  • Kagaya, S., et al., 2005. An application of multi-agent simulation to traffic behavior for evacuation in earthquake disaster. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6 (4), 4224–4236.
  • Kamat, V.R. and El-Tawil, S., 2007. Evaluation of augmented reality for rapid assessment of earthquake-induced building damage. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 21 (5), 303–310.
  • Kameda, H., 2000. Engineering management of lifeline systems under earthquake risk. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33 (3), 248–264.
  • Kavan, L., et al., 2008. Polypostors: 2D polygonal impostors for 3D crowds. Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games. Redwood City, CA: ACM, 149–155.
  • Kendra, J., Rozdilsky, J., and Mcentire, D.A., 2008. Evacuating large urban areas: challenges for emergency management policies and concepts. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5 (1), 1–22.
  • Kitazawa, K. and Fujiyama, T., 2010. Pedestrian vision and collision avoidance behavior: investigation of the information process space of pedestrians using an eye tracker. In: W.W.F. Klingsch, et al., eds. Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Berlin: Springer, 95–108.
  • Klein, R.J.T., Nicholls, R.J., and Thomalla, F., 2003. Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 5 (1), 35–45.
  • Lund, L.V., 1996. Lifeline utilities performance in the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86 (1B), S350–S361.
  • Mcphail, C., 1991. The myth of the madding crowd. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Mcphail, C. and Miller, D., 1973. The assembling process: a theoretical and empirical examination. American Sociological Review, 38 (6), 721–735.
  • Menache, A., 2000. Understanding motion capture for computer animation and video games. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
  • Mennis, J.L., Peuquet, D.J., and Qian, L., 2000. A conceptual framework for incorporating cognitive principles into geographical database representation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (6), 501–520.
  • Menoni, S., 2001. Chains of damages and failures in a metropolitan environment: some observations on the Kobe earthquake in 1995. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86 (1), 101–119.
  • Millington, I., 2007. Game physics engine development. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • Naeim, F., 2013. Real-time damage detection and performance evaluation for buildings. In: M. Garevski, ed. Earthquakes and health monitoring of civil structures. Amsterdam: Springer, 167–196.
  • Newton, I., 1687. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge.
  • Nvidia, 2012. PhysX. 9.11.0621 ed. Santa Clara, CA: NVIDIA Corporation.
  • Parker, E.G. and O‘brien, J.F., 2009. Real-time deformation and fracture in a game environment. In: R. Tamstorf, D. Fellner, and S. Spencer, eds. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation. New Orleans, LA: Assocation for Computing Machinery, 156–166.
  • Peek-Asa, C., et al., 1998. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. International Journal of Epidemiology, 27 (3), 459–465.
  • Peek-Asa, C., et al., 2003. Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Injury Prevention, 9 (1), 62–66.
  • Pelechano, N. and Badler, N.I., 2006. Modeling crowd and trained leader behavior during building evacuation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26 (6), 80–86.
  • Pretto, E.A., et al., 1994. An analysis of prehospital mortality in an earthquake. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 9 (2), 107–117.
  • Ramirez, M. and Peek-Asa, C., 2005. Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27 (1), 47–55.
  • Ratti, C., et al., 2006. Mobile landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and Planning B, 33 (5), 727–748.
  • Reynolds, C.W., 1999. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. In: Game Developers Conference ed. Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, 1999. San Jose, CA: Miller Freeman Game Group, 763–782.
  • Richter, C.F., 1935. An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 25 (1), 1–32.
  • Roth, C., et al., 2011. Structure of urban movements: polycentric activity and entangled hierarchical flows. PLoS ONE, 6 (1), e15923.
  • Scawthorn, C., Schneider, P.J., and Schauer, B.A., 2006. Natural hazards – the multihazard approach. Natural Hazards Review, 7 (2), 39–39.
  • Schneider, P.J. and Eberly, D.H., 2003. Geometric tools for computer graphics. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
  • Schneider, P.J. and Schauer, B.A., 2006. HAZUS – its development and its future. Natural Hazards Review, 7 (2), 40–44.
  • Schultz, C.H., Koenig, K.L., and Lewis, R.J., 2007. Decision-making in hospital earthquake evacuation: does distance from the epicenter matter? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 50 (3), 320–326.
  • Schultz, C.H., Koenig, K.L., and Noji, E.K., 1996. A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. New England Journal of Medicine, 334 (7), 438–444.
  • Schweingruber, D. and Wohlstein, R.T., 2005. The madding crowd goes to school: myths about crowds in introductory sociology textbooks. Teaching Sociology, 33, (April), 136–153.
  • Selçuk, A.S. and Yücemen, M.S., 1999. Reliability of lifeline networks under seismic hazard. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 65 (3), 213–227.
  • Sharma, A.S., Bunde, A., Dimri, V.P., and Baker, D.N., eds., 2012. Extreme events and natural hazards: the complexity perspective. Washington, DC: American Geophyiscal Union.
  • Sime, J.D., 1995. Crowd psychology and engineering. Safety Science, 21 (1), 1–14.
  • Simpson, D.M., 2002. Earthquake drills and simulations in community-based training and preparedness programmes. Disasters, 26 (1), 55–69.
  • Torrens, P.M., 2012. Moving agent pedestrians through space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (1), 35–66.
  • Torrens, P.M., et al., 2012. An extensible simulation environment and movement metrics for testing walking behavior in agent-based models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36 (1), 1–17.
  • Torrens, P.M., et al., 2013. Simple urban simulation atop complicated models: multi-scale equation-free computing of sprawl using geographic automata. Entropy, 15 (7), 2606–2634.
  • Torrens, P.M. and Benenson, I., 2005. Geographic Automata Systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (4), 385–412.
  • Treuille, A., Cooper, S., and Popović, Z., 2006. Continuum crowds. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 25 (3), 1160–1168.
  • Vadim, M.. 2009. RayFire. 1.57.05 ed. Moscow: Orange-Lab.
  • Vishton, P.M. and Cutting, J.E., 1995. Wayfinding, displacements, and mental maps: velocity fields are not typically used to determine one’s aimpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21 (5), 978–995.
  • Vranes, K. and Czuchlewski, K.R., 2003. Integrating complexity of social systems in natural hazards planning: an example from Caracas, Venezuela. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 84 (6), 55.
  • Wagoum, A.U.K., Seyfried, A., and Holl, S., 2012. Modeling the dynamic route choice of pedestrians to assess the criticality of building evacuation. Advances in Complex Systems, 15 (7), 1–15.
  • Xu, W., et al., 2006. Conceptual model of shelter planning based on the Vitae system. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 49 (B), 181–187.
  • Xu, F., et al., 2008. Earthquake disaster simulation for an urban area, with GIS, CAD, FEA, and VR integration. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13 (2), 311–316.
  • Yang, W., et al., 2004. Planning construction of earthquake emergency shelters and urban disaster reduction. Journal of Natural Disasters, 13 (1), 126–131.
  • Yi, W. and Özdamar, L., 2007. A dynamic logistics coordination model for evacuation and support in disaster response activities. European Journal of Operational Research, 179 (3), 1177–1193.
  • Zou, Y., et al., 2012. Accelerating agent-based computation of complex urban systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (10), 1917–1937.
  • Zyda, M., 2005. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38 (9), 25–33.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.