From land cover-graphs to urban structure types

References

• Anders, K.H., Sester, M., and Fritsch, D., 1999. Analysis of settlement structures by graph-based clustering. Semantische Modellierung, Smati, 99, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrecht, C., et al., 2009. Integrating earth observation and GIScience for high resolution spatial and functional modeling of urban land use. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (1), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz, M. and Schäpe, A., 2000. Multiresolution Segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: J. Strobl, T. Blaschke and G. Griesebner, eds. Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung XII, Beiträge zum AGIT-Symposium Salzburg 2000. Heidelberg: Wichmann-Verlag, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, E. and Höfer, R., 2008. Monitoring urban structure types as spatial indicators with CIR aerial photographs for a more effective urban environmental management. IEEE Journal of selected topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 1 (2), 129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnsley, M.J. and Barr, S.L., 1996. Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62 (8), 949–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnsley, M.J. and Barr, S.L., 1997. Distinguishing urban land-use categories in fine spatial resolution land-cover data using a graph-based, structural pattern recognition system. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 21 (3–4), 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Barnsley, M.J. and Barr, S.L., 2000. Monitoring urban land use by earth observation. Surveys in Geophysics, 21 (2–3), 269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, S.L. and Barnsley, M.J., 1997. A region-based, graph-theoretic data model for the inference of second-order thematic information from remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11 (6), 555–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, S.L. and Barnsley, M.J., 1998. Application of structural pattern-recognition techniques to infer urban land use from ordnance survey digital map data. In: GeoComputation98, 3rd international conference on geocomputation. [CD-ROM collection], 7–9 September, Bristol. Available from: http://www.geocomputation.org/1998/43/gc_43.htm [Accessed 16 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, D.S., et al., 2011. Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity. NeuroImage, 54 (2), 1262–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. and Longley, P.A., 1994. Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, T. and Steinnocher, K., 2001. Per-parcel land use classification in urban areas applying a rule-based technique. GeoBIT/GIS, 6, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, U.C., et al., 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 58 (3–4), 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., et al., 2013. Robust extraction of urban land cover information from HSR multi-spectral and LiDAR data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 6 (6), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T., 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T., et al., 2011. Collective sensing: integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems – an overview. Remote Sensing, 3 (8), 1743–1776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T., Gläßer, C., and Lang, S., 2002. Bildverarbeitung in einer integrierten GIS/Fernerkundungsumgebung – Trends und Konsequenzen. In: T. Blaschke, ed. Fernerkundung und GIS. Neue Sensoren – innovative Methoden. Heidelberg: Herbert Wichmann Verlag, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, S.Hinzen, A. and Libbe, J., eds., 2011. Nachhaltiges Flächenmanagement – Ein Handbuch für die Praxis: Ergebnisse aus der REFINA-Forschung. Berlin: Spree Druck Berlin GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaert, J., et al., 2000. Alternative area-perimeter ratios for measurement of 2D shape compactness of habitats. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 111 (1), 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P. and Halgin, D.S., 2011. Analyzing affiliation networks. In: J. Scott and P.J. Carrington, eds. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 417–433.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2002. Manual on setting up, using, and understanding random forests v3.1. Available from: http://oz.berkeley.edu/users/breiman/Using_random_forests_V3.1.pdf [Accessed 26 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Breuste, J., Wächter, M., and Bauer, B., eds., 2001. Beiträge zur umwelt- und sozialverträglichen Entwicklung von Stadtregionen: CD-ROM. Leipzig: UFZ, Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle, Projektbereich Urbane Landschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L., and Keitt, T.H., 2000. Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldarelli, G., 2007. Scale-free networks: complex webs in nature and technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P., et al., 2003. QuickBird – geometric correction, path and block processing and data fusion. Earth Observation Magazine, 12 (3), 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, A.J., Brunsdon, C., and Farmer, C., 2012. Community detection in spatial networks: inferring land use from a planar graph of land cover objects. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 274–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1), 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Almeida, J.P., Morley, J.G., and Dowman, I.J., 2007. Graph theory in higher order topological analysis of urban scenes. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31 (4), 426–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuker, L., et al., 2009. Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain functional networks. NeuroImage, 47 (4), 1460–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogrusoz, E. and Aksoy, S., 2007. Modeling urban structures using graph-based spatial patterns. In: IEEE International Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2007. Barcelona: IGARSS, 4826–4829. 
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and Directorate-General for Regional Policy, ed., 2009. Promoting sustainable urban development in Europe: achievements and opportunities. Belgium: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G.M., 2004. Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70 (5), 627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody, G.M., 2008. Sample size determination for image classification accuracy assessment and comparison. In: J. Zhang and M.F. Goodchild, eds. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences, 25–27 June, Shanghai. P.R. China: World Academic Union, 154–162. 
   Google Scholar
• Gamba, P., et al., 2012. Urban climate zone detection and discrimination using object-based analysis of VHR scenes. In: R. Feitosa, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 4th GEOBIA, 7–9 May, Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: São José dos Campos, Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE), 70–74. 
   Google Scholar
• Geiß, C., et al., 2011. Remote sensing-based characterization of settlement structures for assessing local potential of district heat. Remote Sensing, 3 (12), 1447–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girvan, M. and Newman, M.E.J., 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. PNAS, 99 (12), 7821–7826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gislason, P.O., Benediktsson, J.A., and Sveinsson, J.R., 2006. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27 (4), 294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunduz, C., Yener, B., and Gultekin, S.H., 2004. The cell graphs of cancer. Bioinformatics, 20 (Suppl. 1), i145–i151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J., 2011. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J. and Castilla, G., 2008. Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): a new name for a new discipline. In: T. Blaschke, S. Lang and G.J. Hay, eds. Object-based image analysis. Berlin: Springer, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hermosilla, T., et al., 2012. Change detection in peri-urban areas based on contextual classification. PFG Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinformation, 2012 (4), 359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, M., Liu, X., and Clarke, K.C., 2003. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69 (9), 991–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, M., Scepan, J., and Clarke, K.C., 2002. The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment and Planning, 34 (34), 1443–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, P., et al., 2008. Detecting informal settlements from Quickbird data in Rio de Janeiro using an object based approach. In: T. Blaschke, S. Lang and G.J. Hay, eds. Object-based image analysis. Berlin: Springer, 531–553.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., and Zeileis, A., 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15 (3), 651–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttich, C., et al., 2011. Assessing effects of temporal compositing and varying observation periods for large-area land-cover mapping in semi-arid ecosystems: implications for global monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (10), 2445–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, F., et al., 2010. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95 (1–2), 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoes, C.C., et al., 2000. The potential of kernel classification techniques for land use mapping in urban areas using 5m-spatial resolution IRS-1C imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (16), 3145–3151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, A. and Wiener, M., 2002. Classification and regression by random forest. R News, 2 (3), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Longbotham, N., et al., 2012. Very high resolution multiangle urban classification analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (4), 1155–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosvelt, L., et al., 2012. Impact of reducing polarimetric SAR input on the uncertainty of crop classifications based on the random forests algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (10), 4185–4200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q., 1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12 (2), 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Statistisches Amt, 2012. Bevölkerung, Haushalte, Familien, Fläche: Landesdaten im Überblick. Available from: http://www.statistik-mv.de [Accessed 26 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, G., et al., 2008. Automatische Ableitung von stadtstrukturellen Grundlagendaten und Integration in einem Geographischen Informationssystem: Abschlussbericht. Heft 134 Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, G., Neubert, M., and Reder, J., 2001. The potential use of very high resolution satellite data for urban areas – first experiences with ikonos data, their classification and application in urban planning and environmental monitoring. In: C. Jürgens, ed. Remote sensing of urban areas/Fernerkundung in urbanen Räumen., Vol. 35 of Regensburger Geographische Schriften. Regensburg: Geographisches Institut der Universität, 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mesev, V., 2010. Classification of urban areas: inferring land use from the interpretation of land cover. In: T. Rashed and C. Jürgens, eds. Remote sensing of urban and suburban areas, Vol. 10 of remote sensing and digital image processing. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Myint, S.W., et al., 2011. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (5), 1145–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J., 2001a. Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64 (1), 016131–1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J., 2001b. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64 (1), 016132–1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack, T., et al., 2011. Machine learning comparison between WorldView-2 and QuickBird-2-simulated imagery regarding object-based urban land cover classification. Remote Sensing, 3 (10), 2263–2282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F., 2000. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52 (1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puissant, A., Zhang, W., and Skupinski, G., 2012. Urban morphology analysis by high and very high spatial resolution remote sensing. In: R. Feitosa, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 4th GEOBIA, 7–9 May, Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: São José dos Campos, Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE), 524–529. 
   Google Scholar
• Richter, R., Schläpfer, D., and Müller, A., 2006. An automatic atmospheric correction algorithm for visible/NIR imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27 (10), 2077–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C., and Slack, B., 2009. The geography of transport systems. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano, V., et al., 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöpfer, E., Lang, S., and Albrecht, F., 2008. Object-fate analysis: spatial relationships for the assessment of object transition and correspondence. In: T. Blaschke, S. Lang and G.J. Hay, eds. Object-based image analysis. Berlin: Springer, 785–801.
   Google Scholar
• Seto, K.C., et al., 2011. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE, 6 (8), e23777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanov, W.L. and Netzband, M., 2010. Characterization and monitoring of urban/peri-urban ecological function and landscape structure using satellite data. In: T. Rashed and C. Jürgens, eds. Remote sensing of urban and suburban areas, Vol. 10 of remote sensing and digital image processing. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Strano, E., et al., 2012. Elementary processes governing the evolution of road networks. Scientific Reports, 2, 296. doi:10.1038/srep00296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., et al., 2007. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics, 8 (25), 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., et al., 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9 (307), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., Hothorn, T., and Zeileis, A., 2009. Party on! A new, conditional variable-importance measure for random forests available in the party package. The R Journal, 1 (2), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Strogatz, S.H., 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubenböck, H., et al., 2012. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117, 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubenböck, H., Esch, T., and Roth, A., 2006. An urban classification approach based on an object-oriented analysis of high resolution satellite imagery for a spatial structuring within urban areas. In: First Workshop of the EARSeL special interest group on urban remote sensing ‘challenges and solutions’, 2–3 March 2006, Berlin. Berlin: The European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories, Humboldt-University, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• UN Habitat, ed., 2008. State of the worlds cities 2010/2011: bridging the urban divide. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhaegen, S. and Canters, F., 2010. Using remote sensing data for improving the distinction between distinct types of urban land use and form using spatial metrics. In: R. Reuter, ed. Remote sensing for science, education and natural and cultural heritage, proceedings of the 30th EARSeL symposium, 31 May–3 June, Paris. Oldenburg: University of Oldenburg, 757–764. 
   Google Scholar
• Walde, I., et al., 2013. Graph based mapping of urban structure types from high resolution satellite image objects – a case study of the German cities Rostock and Erfurt. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10 (4), 932–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, R., 1982. Spatial resolution requirements for urban studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 3 (2), 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, M., et al., 2011. Object-based image information fusion using multisensor earth observation data over urban areas. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 2 (2), 121–147.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, M. and Taubenböck, H., 2010. Fernerkundung als Grundlage zur Identifikation von Stadtstrukturtypen. In: H. Taubenböck and S. Dech, eds. Fernerkundung im urbanen Raum. Darmstadt: WBG (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 94–103. 
   Google Scholar