Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap

References

• Arkin, E.M., et al., 1991. An efficiently computable metric for comparing polygonal shapes. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13 (3), 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, D.H. and Peucker, T.K., 1973. Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitalized line or its caricature. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 10 (2), 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Girres, J.F. and Touya, G., 2010. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14 (4), 435–459.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, M., 2013. Towards generating highly detailed 3D CityGML models from OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS), 27 (5), 845–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, M. and Zipf, A., 2012. Towards defining a framework for the automatic derivation of 3D CityGML models from volunteered geographic information. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling, 1, 496–507.
   Google Scholar
• Gösseln, G. and Sester, M., 2003. Semantic and geometric integration of geoscientific data sets with ATKIS-applied to geo-objects from geology and soil science. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS commission IV joint workshop ‘challenges in geospatial analysis, Integration and Visualization II’, 8–10 September, Stuttgart [on CDROM].
   Google Scholar
• Gröger, G., et al., 2008. OpenGIS city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard – Version 1.0.0. OGC Doc. No. 08-007r1.
   Google Scholar
• Grünreich, D., 2000. Spatial data infrastructures and geoinformation engineering – Germany’s approach and experiences. In: Proceedings of the United Nations regional cartographic conference for Asia and the Pacific, 11–14 April, Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• Guptill, S. and Morrison, J., eds., 1995. Elements of spatial data quality. Pergamon: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenauer, J. and Helbich, M., 2012. Mining urban land use patterns from volunteered geographic information by means of genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (6), 963–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4), 682–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., et al., 2010. How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ Law to volunteered geographic information. Cartographic Journal, 47, 315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbich, M., Amelunxen, C., and Neis, P., 2012. Comparative spatial analysis of positional accuracy of OpenStreetMap and proprietary geodata. In: J. Strobl, et al., eds. Angewandte Geoinformatik. Berlin: Herbert Wichmann Verlag, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Huh, Y., et al., 2013. Line segment confidence region-based string matching method for map conflation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 78, 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.O., et al., 2010. A new method for matching objects in two different geospatial datasets based on the geographic context. Computers and Geosciences, 36 (9), 1115–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukoletsos, T., Haklay, M., and Ellul, C., 2012. Assessing data completeness of VGI through an automated matching procedure for linear data. Transactions in GIS, 16 (4), 477–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kresse, W. and Fadaie, K., 2003. ISO standards for geographic information. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, C., 2012. Vergleichsanalyse des Gebäudedatenbestandes aus OpenStreetMap mit amtlichen Datenquellen [online]. Student research project at the Technical University of Dresden. Available from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88141 [Accessed 8 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. and Goodchild, M.F., 2011. An optimisation model for linear feature matching in geographical data conflation. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 2 (4), 309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Min, D., Zhilin, L., and Xiaoyong, C., 2007. Extended Hausdorff distance for spatial objects in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (4), 459–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., and Winstanley, A.C., 2010. Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. In: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. New York: ACM, 514–517.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. and Seyfert, E., 1998. Quality assurance for 2.5D building data of the ATKIS DLM 25/2. In: D. Fritsch, M. Englich, and M. Sester, eds. ‘IAPRS’, Vol. 32/4, ISPRS commission IV symposium on GIS – between visions and applications, 7–10 September, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Mustière, S. and Devogele, T., 2007. Matching networks with different levels of detail. Geoinformatica, 12 (4), 435–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neis, P., et al., 2010. Empirische Untersuchungen zur Datenqualität von OpenStreetMap – Erfahrungen aus zwei Jahren Betrieb mehrerer OSM-Online-Dienste. In: AGIT 2010. Symposium für Angewandte Geoinformatik, Salzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Neis, P., Zielstra, D., and Zipf, A., 2012. The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet, 4 (1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Olteanu, A. and Mustière, S., 2008. Data matching – a matter of belief. In: A. Ruas and C. Gold, eds. Headway in spatial data mining, Lecture Notes in geoinformation and cartography. Berlin: Springer, 501–519.
   Google Scholar
• OSM, 2013a. Stats – OpenStreetMap Wiki [online]. Available from: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Statistics [Accessed 5 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• OSM, 2013b. Bing –- OpenStreetMap Wiki [online]. Available from: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing [Accessed 10 April 2013].
   Google Scholar
• OSM, 2013c. Buildings – OpenStreetMap Wiki [online]. Available from: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings [Accessed 10 April 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rutzinger, M., Rottensteiner, F., and Pfeifer, N., 2009. A comparison of evaluation techniques for building extraction from airborne laser scanning. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2 (1), 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal, A., Seth, S., and Cueto, K., 2004. A feature-based approach to conflation of geospatial sources. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (5), 459–489.
   Google Scholar
• Uden, M. and Zipf, A., 2012. OpenBuildingModels – towards a platform for crowdsourcing virtual 3D cities. In: 7th 3D GeoInfo Conference, 16–17 May, Quebec City, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Volz, S. 2006. An iterative approach for matching multiple representations of street data. In: M. Hampe, M. Sester, and L. Harrie, eds. ISPRS workshop – multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data, 22–24 February. Hannover: ISPRS, 101–110. 
   Google Scholar
• Walter, V. and Fritsch, D., 1999. Matching spatial data sets: a statistics approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (5), 445–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, D. and Sperling, J., 2004. Semiautomated matching for network database integration. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 59 (1-2), 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Zhang, Y., and Luan, X., 2013. A probabilistic relaxation approach for matching road networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (2), 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., 2009. Methods and implementations of road-network matching. Thesis (PhD). Institute for Photogrammetry and Cartography, Technical University of Munich, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Zielstra, D. and Zipf, A., 2010. A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In: Proceedings of 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, 10–14 May, Guimarães.
   Google Scholar