Are opinions expressed in land-use planning documents?

References

• Abolhassani, M., et al., 2003. Information extraction and automatic markup for XML documents. In: Blanken, et al., Intelligent search on XML data. Berlin: Springer, 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Agirre, E., et al., 2000. Enriching very large ontologies using the WWW. In: ECAI workshop on ontology learning[online], Berlin. Available from: CEUR-WS.org 
   Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., 2008. Building affective lexicons from specific corpora for automatic sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of LREC, Trento, 496–500.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnefoy, L. and Bellot, P., 2011. LIA-iSmart at the TREC 2011 entity track: entity list completion using contextual unsupervised scores for candidate entities ranking. In: TREC. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
   Google Scholar
• Buléon, P. and Méo, G.D., 2005. L’espace social. Armand Colin: Annales de la recherche urbaine.
   Google Scholar
• Carreras, X., Arque, L.S.M., and Padro, L.S., 2003. A simple named entity extractor using AdaBoost. In: Proceedings of CoNLL-2003. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 152–155.
   Google Scholar
• Debarbieux, B. and Vanier, M., 2002. Ces territorialités qui se dessinent. Datar: Editions de l’Aube, 267 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Derungs, C. and Purves, R.S., 2013. From text to landscape: locating, identifying and mapping the use of landscape features in a Swiss Alpine corpus. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (12), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Duthil, B., et al., 2011. Towards an automatic characterization of criteria. In: International conference on database and expert systems applications (DEXA’11), Vol. 1. Toulouse: Springer-Verlag, LNCS, 457–465.
   Google Scholar
• Esuli, A. and Sebastiani, F., 2006. SentiWordNet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: 5th conference on language resources and evaluation. Genoa: European Assoc. Language Resources, 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, W., Sun, S., and Song, G., 2011. Sentiment classification for Chinese Netnews comments based on multiple classifiers integration. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on computer sciences and optimization. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 829–834.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, C., Flach, P., and Hernandez-Orallo, J., 2002. Learning decision trees using the area under the ROC curve. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on machine learning, ICML’02, University of New South Wales, Sydney. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, C., Lavelli, A., and Romano, L., 2006. Exploiting shallow linguistic information for relation extraction from biomedical literature. In: Proceedings of the 11th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (EACL 2006), April, Trento.
   Google Scholar
• Grefenstette, G., 1994. Explorations in automatic thesaurus discovery. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Grčar, M., Klien, E., and Novak, B., 2009. Using term-matching algorithms for the annotation of geo-services. In: B. Berendt, et al., eds. Knowledge discovery enhanced with semantic and social information. Vol. 220 Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Chap. 8, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Jing, L.P., Kuan Huang, H., and Shi, H.B., 2002. Improved feature selection approach TFIDF in text mining. In: Proceedings of machine learning and cybernetics, Vol. 2. Beijing, 944–946.
   Google Scholar
• Joachims, T., 1998. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: ECML Chemnitz. Berlin: Springer, 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., et al., 2011. C-feel-it: a sentiment analyzer for microblogs. In: Proceedings of HLT. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. and Inkpen, D., 2006. Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters. Computational Intelligence, 22 (2), 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafourcade, M., 2007. Making people play for Lexical Acquisition. In: Proceedings 7th symposium on natural language processing (SNLP 2007). Pattaya: IEEE + Kasetsart University, 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lesbegueries, J., Gaio, M., and Loustau, P., 2006a. Geographical information access for non-structured data. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on applied computing, SAC ’06. Dijon. New York: ACM, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lesbegueries, J., Sallaberry, C., and Gaio, M., 2006b. Associating spatial patterns to text-units for summarizing geographic information. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006. GIR, geographic information retrieval, Workshop, August. Seattle, WA: ACM, 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., 2012. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool, 167 p.
   Google Scholar
• Maurel, D., et al., 2011. CasEN: a transducer cascade to recognize French Named Entities. TAL, 52 (1), 69–96.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, D. and Sekine, S., 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30 (1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, A. and Paroubek, P., 2010. Microblogging for micro sentiment analysis and opinion mining. TAL, 51 (3), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Piolat, A., et al., 2011. La version française du dictionnaire pour le LIWC: modalités de construction et exemples d’utilisation. Psychologie Française, 56 (3), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantié, M., et al., 2008. Is a voting approach accurate for opinion mining? In: Proceedings of Data Warehousing and Knowledge discovery (DaWaK’08). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 413–422.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J.C., 1999. Advances in Kernel methods. In: B. Schölkopf, C.J.C. Burges, and A.J. Smola, eds. Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H., 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: International conference on new methods in language processing, Manchester
   Google Scholar
• Tahrat, S., et al., 2013. Text2Geo: from textual data to geospatial information. In: The 3rd international conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS’13), Madrid. New York: ACM, 23:1–23:4.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Moreno, J.M., et al., 2009. Peut on voir la détection d’opinions comme un problème de classification thématique ?. In: Eric Gausier and François Yvon, eds. Modèles statistiques pour l’accès à l’information textuelle. Paris: Hermes Lavoisier, 40 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, P., 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of ACL, Philadelphia, PA. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 417–424.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, M., 2009. Territoires, territorialité, territorialisation, Controverses et perspectives, Rennes, PUR, coll. Espace et territoires, Rennes: Norois 1/2009 (n° 210), 228 p.
   Google Scholar
• Velardi, P., Fabriani, P., and Missikoff, M., 2001. Using text processing techniques to automatically enrich a domain ontology. In: FOIS, Ogunquit, ME. New York: ACM, 270–284.
   Google Scholar
• Weissenbacher, D. and Nazarenko, A., 2007. Identifier les pronoms anaphoriques et trouver leurs antécédents: l’intérêt de la classification bayésienne. In: Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, 06. Toulouse: ATALA, 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, J. and Riloff, E., 2011. Finding mutual benefit between subjectivity analysis and information extraction. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2 (4), 175–191.
   Google Scholar