Graph-assisted landscape monitoring

References

• Barr, S. and Barnsley, M., 1997. A region-based, graph-theoretic data model for the inference of second-order thematic information from remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Geographical Information Sciences, 11, 555–576. doi:10.1080/136588197242194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorholm, S., et al., 2008. To what extent does Tobler’s 1st law of geography apply to macroecology? A case study using American palms (Arecaceae). BMC Ecology, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-8-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bollobás, B., 1998. Modern graph theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bonchev, B., 1991. Chemical graph theory: introduction and fundamentals. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, J.A. and Murty, U.S.R., 1976. Graph theory with applications. New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, L.J., et al., 2014. Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, doi:10.1002/esp.3635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brierley, G., et al., 2013. Reading the landscape: integrating the theory and practice of geomorphology to develop place-based understandings of river systems. Progress in Physical Geography, 37, 601–621. doi:10.1177/0309133313490007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., and Jain, V., 2006. Landscape connectivity: the geographic basis of geomorphic applications. Area, 38, 165–174. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, D., et al., 2004. Thirty years of graph matching in pattern recognition. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 18, 265–298. doi:10.1142/S0218001404003228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, M.R.T. and Fortin, M.-J., 2010. From graphs to spatial graphs. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 21–38. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, J.-P., Morley, J.G., and Dowmand, I.J., 2013. A graph-based algorithm to define urban topology from unstructured geospatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27, 1514–1529. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.756881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Mondo, G., et al., 2010. A graph model for spatio-temporal evolution. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16, 1452–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L., 2005. When is a landscape perspective important? In: J.A. Wiens and M.R. Moss, eds. Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fall, A., et al., 2007. Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems, 10, 448–461. doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, M. and Bunke, H., 2012. Graph edit distance – theory, algorithms, and applications. In: O. Lezoray and L. Grady, eds. Image processing and analysis with graphs: theory and practice. London: CRC Press, 383–422.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R.T.T., 1981. Interaction among landscape elements: a core of landscape ecology. In: S.P. Tjallingii and A.A. de Veer, eds. Perspectives in landscape ecology: contributions to research, planning and management of our environment. Wageningen: Pudoc, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M., 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience, 31, 733–740. doi:10.2307/1308780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K.A., et al., 2007. Buffers, barriers and blankets: the (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades. Catena, 70, 49–67. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., et al., 2010. A survey of graph edit distance. Pattern Analysis Applications, 13, 113–129. doi:10.1007/s10044-008-0141-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaucherel, C., et al., 2012. Understanding patchy landscape dynamics: towards a landscape language. PLoS ONE, 7 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 1992. Geographical data modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 18, 401–408. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(92)90069-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 1994. Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 615–626. doi:10.2307/3235878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggett, P. and Chorley, R.J., 1969. Network analysis in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harju, T., 2011. Lecture notes on graph theory. Turku: Department of Mathematics, University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., 2001. On reductionism and emergence in geomorphology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 327–339. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. and Bowers, M.A., 1999. Experimental design at the landscape scale. In: G.W. Barrett and J.D. Peles, eds. Landscape ecology of small mammals. New York: Springer, 263–285.
   Google Scholar
• Kansky, K., 1963. Structure of transportation networks: relationships between network geometry and regional characteristics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., Hardisty, F., and Li, R., 2011. Interpreting spatial patterns: an inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler’s first law of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (5), 1011–1031. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.577364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupfer, J.A., 2012. Landscape ecology and biogeography: rethinking landscape metrics in a post-FRAGSTATS landscape. Progress in Physical Geography, 36, 400–420. doi:10.1177/0309133312439594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E.F., et al., 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.K., 2006. A graph-based approach for modelling and indexing video data. Arlington: The University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. and Wu, J., 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology, 19, 389–399. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, M.G. and Congalton, R., 2010. Mapping and analysis of fragmentation in southeastern New Hampshire. In: ASPRS/CaGUS 2010 fall specialty conference, 15–19 November, Orlando, FL. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks, 2013. Create a structure array. In: MatLab documentation center. Natick, MA: MathWorks.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS. Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, In: General technical report PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, B.H., et al., 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89, 2712–2724. doi:10.1890/07-1861.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minor, E.S. and Urban, D., 2008. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 22, 297–307. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00871.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel, M.C., McGarigal, K., and Cushman, S.A., 2004. Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecology, 19, 435–455. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030521.19856.cb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D., 2014. Spatial network analysis. In: M.M. Fischer and P. Nijkamp, eds. Handbook of regional science. Berlin: Springer, 1253–1273.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Hortal, L. and Saura, S., 2006. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 21, 959–967. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.D., 2004. Doing justice to the law. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 290–293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.D., 2007. The perfect landscape. Geomorphology, 84 (3–4), 159–169. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.D., 2009. Changes, perturbations, and responses in geomorphic systems. Progress in Physical Geography, 33, 17–30. doi:10.1177/0309133309103889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, S.T.A. and Cadenasso, M.L., 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 269, 331–334. doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, J.S., 1961. The level-of-integration concept and ecology. Ecology, 42 (2), 420–427. doi:10.2307/1932098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, D.S., 1979. Spatial foundations of urbanism. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J.G., Ludwig, J.A., and McAlpine, C.A., 2007. Complex adaptive landscapes (CAL): a conceptual framework of multi-functional, non-linear ecohydrological feedback systems. Ecological Complexity, 4, 113–127. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfeliu, A. and Fu, K.-S., 1983. A distance measure between attributed relational graphs for pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, SMC-13, 353–362. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stell, J., et al., 2011. Spatio-temporal evolution as bigraph dynamics. In: M.J. Egenhofer, et al., eds. COSIT 2011. Belfast, ME: Springer-Verlag, 148–167.
   Google Scholar
• Takeyama, M. and Couclelis, H., 1997. Map dynamics: integrating cellular automata and GIS through Geo-Algebra. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11, 73–91. doi:10.1080/136588197242509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarjan, R.E., 1974. A note on finding the bridges of a graph. Information Processing Letters, 2, 160–161. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(74)90003-9
   Google Scholar
• Thibaud, R., et al., 2013. A spatio-temporal graph model for marine dune dynamics analysis and representation. Transactions in GIS, 17, 742–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W.R., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., 1988. A spatial simulation model of land use changes in a piedmont county in Georgia. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 27, 39–51. doi:10.1016/0096-3003(88)90097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., and O’Neill, R.V., 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, D. and Keitt, T., 2001. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82, 1205–1218. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elverfeldt, K., 2012. Second problem area: openness and determinacy, In: System theory in geomorphology: challenges, epistemological consequences and practical implications. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, A.S., 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. The Journal of Ecology, 35, 1–22. doi:10.2307/2256497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westman, W.E., 1978. Measuring the inertia and resilience of ecosystems. BioScience, 28 (11), 705–710. doi:10.2307/1307321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdows, D. and Dorow, B., 2002. A graph model for unsupervised lexical acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on computational linguistics – Volume 1. Taipei: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., and Shah, M., 2006. Object tracking: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 38 (4), 13–es. doi:10.1145/1177352.1177355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar