Integrative representation and inference of qualitative locations about points, lines, and polygons

References

• Abdelmoty, I. and El-Geresy, B.A., 1995. A general method for spatial reasoning in spatial databases. In: N. Pissinou, et al., eds. International conference on information and knowledge management. Baltimore, MD: ACM press, 312–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, T. and Stell, J.G., 1998. A boundary-sensitive approach to qualitative location. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 24, 93–114. doi:10.1023/A:1018945131135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, T. and Stell, J.G., 2000. Approximate qualitative spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 435–466. doi:10.1023/A:1015598320584
   Google Scholar
• Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., and Hernández, D. 1997. Qualitative representation of positional information. Artificial Intelligence, 95 (2), 317–356. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00046-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, A.G., et al., 1997. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus. Geoinformatica, 1 (3), 275–316. doi:10.1023/A:1009712514511
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A.G., et al., 2014. Reasoning about topological and cardinal direction relations between 2-dimensional spatial objects. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 51, 493–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, A.G. and Renz, J., 2007. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In: F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, and B. Porter, eds. Handbook of knowledge representation. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V, 551–596.
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., Feng, C.-C., and Wang, Q. 2013. Multi-scale qualitative location: a direction-based model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 151–166. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M., 1994. Deriving the composition of binary topological relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 5 (2), 133–149. doi:10.1006/jvlc.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. and Herring, J., 1991. Categorizing binary topological relations between regions, lines and points in geographic databases. Technical report. Orono, ME: Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1992. Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 3 (4), 343–371. doi:10.1016/1045-926X(92)90007-9
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1996. Qualitative spatial reasoning: cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10, 269–290. doi:10.1080/02693799608902079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, R.K., 2000. Similarity assessment for cardinal directions between extended spatial objects. Thesis (PhD). University of Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L. and Du, S., 2009. Deriving topological relations between regions from direction relations. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 20 (6), 368–384. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2009.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., et al., 2013. The Egenhofer-Cohn hypothesis: Or, topological relativity? In: M. Raubal, A.U. Frank, and D.M. Mark, eds. Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Berlin: Springer, 195–215. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_11
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M., Rauh, R., and Renz, J. 1997. A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: results from an empirical investigation. In: S.C. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, eds. Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer, 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Kurata, Y. and Shi, H., 2009. Toward heterogeneous cardinal direction calculus. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 5803, 452–459.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Liu, W., and Wang, S. 2013. Qualitative constraint satisfaction problems: an extended framework with landmarks. Artificial Intelligence, 201, 32–58. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., et al., 2010. Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects. Artificial Intelligence, 174 (12–13), 951–983. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., 1999. Spatial representation: a cognitive view. In: P.A. Longley, et al., eds. Geographical information systems: principles and applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Papadias, D. and Sellis, T., 1992. Spatial reasoning using symbolic arrays. In: A.U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, eds. Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Vol. 639, 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Papadias, D. and Theodoridis, Y., 1997. Spatial relations, minimum bounding rectangles, and spatial data structures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11, 111–138. doi:10.1080/136588197242428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhizadeh, M., Coyne, B., and Sproat, R. 2011. Collecting semantic information for locations in the scenario-based lexical knowledge resource of a text-to-scene conversion system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6884, 378–387. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23866-6_40
   Google Scholar
• Skiadopoulos, S. and Koubarakis, M., 2004. Composing cardinal direction relations. Artificial Intelligence, 152, 143–171. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00137-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallgrün, J.O., et al., 2007. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning in the SparQ-Toolbox. In: T. Barkowsky, ed. Spatial cognition V, lecture note in artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Vol. 4387, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X. and Jiang, B., 2005. Visualization of qualitative locations in geographic information systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32 (4), 219–229. doi:10.1559/152304005775194683
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X. and Thill, J.C., 2006. Spatial queries with qualitative locations in spatial information systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30 (4), 485–502. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar