Multi-label class assignment in land-use modelling

References

• Basse, R.M., et al., 2014. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Applied Geography, 53, 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M., 2011. Modeling and simulation in geographic information science: integrated models and grand challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, J.M. and Smith, A.F., 2009. Bayesian theory. Vol. 405. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Boutell, M.R., et al., 2004. Learning multi-label scene classification. Pattern Recognition, 37, 1757–1771. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charif, O., et al., 2012. Cellular automata model based on machine learning methods for simulating land use change. In: O. Rose, ed. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 9–12 December, Berlin. IEEE, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H., 2005. “Where has the future gone?” Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1353–1371. doi:10.1068/a3785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, J.R., Solórzano, L.A., and Fossen, M.E.V., 2005. Transition potential modeling for land-cover change. In: D. Maguire, M. Batty, and M. Goodchild, eds. GIS, spatial analysis and modeling. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 357–385.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, R.E. and Lin, C.J., 2007. A study on threshold selection for multi-label classification. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, S. and Guisan, A., 2006. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 393–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grekousis, G., Manetos, P., and Photis, Y.N., 2013. Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: the case of the Athens metropolitan area. Cities, 30, 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J., et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Xie, C., and Tay, R., 2010. Support vector machines for urban growth modeling. Geoinformatica, 14, 83–99. doi:10.1007/s10707-009-0077-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Lin, M., and Zhao, J., 2011. Woodland cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and artificial neural networks classification algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), Vol. 2, 28–29 March, Shenzhen. IEEE, 312–315.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., Miller, J., and White, M., 2011. Multi-label classification for multi-species distribution modeling. In: L. Getoor and T. Scheffer, eds. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning, New York, NY, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, K., et al., 2001. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 223–238. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00186-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., et al., 2005. Modeling urban sprawl and land use change in a coastal area – a neural network approach. In: Proceedings of the 2005 annual meeting, 24–27 July, Providence, RI.
   Google Scholar
• Mas, J.F., et al., 2004. Modelling deforestation using GIS and artificial neural networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19, 461–471. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00161-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, X., Shao, C., and Wang, X., 2006. A survey of digital vector map watermarking. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 2, 1301–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omrani, H., et al., 2012. Simulation of land use changes using cellular automata and artificial neural network. Technical report, CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Pijanowski, B., et al., 2002. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 553–575. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1
   Google Scholar
• Pijanowski, B.C., et al., 2014. A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: configuring the GIS and neural network based Land Transformation Model to run in a High Performance Computing (HPC) environment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 250–268. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius Jr. R.G. and Cheuk, M.L., 2006. A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 1–30. doi:10.1080/13658810500391024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius Jr. R.G., Cornell, J.D., and Hall, C.A., 2001. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 191–203. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00183-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangermano, F., Eastman, J.R., and Zhu, H., 2010. Similarity weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Transactions in GIS, 14, 569–580. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyromitros, E., Tsoumakas, G., and Vlahavas, I., 2008. An empirical study of lazy multilabel classification algorithms. In: J. Darzentas et al., eds. Proceedings of the artificial intelligence: theories, models and applications, 2–4 October, Syros. Berlin: Springer, 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• Tayyebi, A., et al., 2013. Hierarchical modeling of urban growth across the conterminous USA: developing meso-scale quantity drivers for the Land Transformation Model. Journal of Land Use Science, 8, 422–442. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2012.675364
   Google Scholar
• Tayyebi, A. and Pijanowski, B.C., 2014. Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28, 102–116. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyebi, A., et al., 2014. Comparing three global parametric and local non-parametric models to simulate land use change in diverse areas of the world. Environmental Modelling & Software, 59, 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyebi, A., Pijanowski, B.C., and Tayyebi, A.H., 2011. An urban growth boundary model using neural networks, GIS and radial parameterization: an application to Tehran, Iran. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, C., et al., 2012. Development of an activity-based cellular automata land-use model: the case of Flanders, Belgium. In: R. Seppelt et al., eds. Proceedings of the international Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), 1–5 July, Leipzig, 2000–2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoumakas, G. and Katakis, I., 2007. Multi-label classification: an overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 3, 1–13. doi:10.4018/jdwm.2007070101
   Google Scholar
• Verburg, P.H., Eickhout, B., and Van Meijl, H., 2008. A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 42, 57–77. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg, P.H., et al., 2004. Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B, 31, 125–150. doi:10.1068/b307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. and Engelen, G., 2000. High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, 383–400. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00012-0
   Google Scholar
• White, R., Uljee, I., and Engelen, G., 2012. Integrated modelling of population, employment and land-use change with a multiple activity-based variable grid cellular automaton. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 1251–1280. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.635146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., et al., 2008. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14, 1–37. doi:10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Li, X., and Shi, X., 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 592–602. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., et al., 2012. Multi-label classification models for sustainable flood retention basins. Environmental Modelling & Software, 32, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., 1999. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval, 1, 69–90. doi:10.1023/A:1009982220290
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M.L. and Zhang, K., 2010. Multi-label learning by exploiting label dependency. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 999–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M.L. and Zhou, Z.H., 2007. ML-KNN: a lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern Recognition, 40, 2038–2048. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar