A participatory framework for developing public participation GIS solutions to improve resource management systems

References

• Adinarayana, J., Raj, F., and Sharma, V., 2004. Village level information system - a tool for decentralized planning at district level in India. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 4 (2), 56–64. doi:10.3808/jei.200400037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agriculture Census Division, 2012. All India report on number and area of operational holdings. New Delhi: Department of Agriculture and Co-Operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y. and Mazur, G., 2003. The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20 (1), 20–35. doi:10.1108/02656710310453791
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, G., et al., 2007. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (8), 839–857. doi:10.1080/13658810701349011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas, G., Janssen, R., and Rietveld, P., 2013. Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 159–175. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baye, S., et al., 2012. Assessment on the approaches used for water and sanitation programs in Southern Ethiopia. Water Resources Management, 26 (15), 4295–4309. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0145-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossert, J.L., 1991. Quality function deployment: a practitioner’s approach. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 2005. Participatory mapping for change. In: Mapping for change: international conference on participatory spatial information management and communication, 7–10 September Nairobi. Nairobi: Kenya College of Communications Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 2008. Revolutions in development inquiry. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdary, V.M., et al., 2013. Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resources Management, 27 (10), 3555–3571. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0364-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comair, G.F., et al., 2014. Hydrology of the jordan river basin: a GIS-based system to better guide water resources management and decision making. Water Resources Management, 28 (4), 933–946. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0525-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M., and Weiner, D., 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., 2008. Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (1), 71–90. doi:10.1080/13658810701348971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuillette, S., Bousquet, F., and Le Goulven, P., 2003. SINUSE: A multi-agent model to negotiate water demand management on a free access water table. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18 (5), 413–427. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrgott, M., eds., 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E.H., et al. 1985. Expert choice. Pittsburgh: Decision Support Software Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 2006. GIScience ten years after ground truth. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 687–692. doi:10.1111/tgis.2006.10.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Govers, C.P.M., 1996. What and how about quality function deployment (QFD). International Journal of Production Economics, 46, 575–585. doi:10.1016/0925-5273(95)00113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R., 1993. The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1287/mksc.12.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz, S. and Higgins, A., 2008. A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184 (1), 255–265. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S.R. and Qureshi, M.E., 2000. Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum, 24 (1), 11–19. doi:10.1111/narf.2000.24.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D., 1988. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66 (3), 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, R., van Delden, H., and Escobar, F., 2014. Participatory land use modelling, pathways to an integrated approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 52, 149–165. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossard, L., et al., 2013. A participatory approach to design spatial scenarios of cropping systems and assess their effects on phoma stem canker management at a regional scale. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 17–26. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A.F., 1991. A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21 (11), 1649–1659. doi:10.1139/x91-228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., 2006. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods: ten years after. In: P. Fisher, ed. Classics from IJGIS: twenty years of the international journal of geographical information science and systems. London: Taylor and Francis, 291–296.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., 2009. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (6), 1966–1971. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T., 2001. GIS-supported collaborative decision making: results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91 (1), 48–70. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraiedi, M. and Ritz, D., 1994. Total quality management applied to engineering education. Quality Assurance in Education, 2 (1), 32–40. doi:10.1108/09684889410054563
   Google Scholar
• Johannes, M.R.S., et al., 2002. Assembly of map-based stream narratives to facilitate stakeholder involvement in watershed management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (2), 555–562. doi:10.1111/jawr.2002.38.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolagani, N., Ramu, P., and Varghese, K., 2015. Participatory model calibration for improving resource management systems: case study of rainwater harvesting in an Indian Village. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51 (6), 1708–1721. doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., et al., 2012. The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 4–18. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, T., Gautam, A.K., and Kumar, T., 2014. Appraising the accuracy of GIS-based multi-criteria decision making technique for delineation of groundwater potential zones. Water Resources Management, 28 (13), 4449–4466. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0663-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labiosa, W.B., et al., 2013. An integrated multi-criteria scenario evaluation web tool for participatory landuse planning in urbanized areas: the ecosystem portfolio model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 41, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafleur, J.M., 2011. Probabilistic AHP and TOPSIS for multi-attribute decision-making under uncertainty. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, 5–12 March Big Sky, MT. IEEE, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lippe, M., et al., 2011. Building on qualitative datasets and participatory processes to simulate land use change in a mountain watershed of Northwest Vietnam. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 1454–1466. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Jia, R., and Viswanathan, R., 1998. An intelligent tool for analysis of imprecise software quality requirements from different perspectives. Concurrent Engineering, 6 (3), 207–223. doi:10.1177/1063293X9800600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, S.H., Alazba, A.A., and Amin, M.T., 2014. Identification of potential sites for groundwater recharge using a GIS-based decision support system in Jazan Region-Saudi Arabia. Water Resources Management, 28 (10), 3319–3340. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0681-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R.C., Guertin, D.P., and Heilman, P., 2004. Information technology in watershed management decision making. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40 (2), 347–357. doi:10.1111/jawr.2004.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minang, P.A. and McCall, M.K., 2006. Participatory GIS and local knowledge enhancement for community carbon forestry planning: an example from Cameroon. Participatory Learning and Action, 54 (1), 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, R. and van Ast, J.A., 2012. Implementation of GIS-based applications in water governance. Water Resources Management, 26 (2), 517–529. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9929-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, N., 2002. Participatory learning and action: with 100 field methods. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj, N., Frasier, W.M., and Sampath, R.K., 2000. A comparative study of groundwater institutions in the Western United States and Peninsular India for sustainable and equitable resource use. In: Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, 31 May–4 June Bloomington. IASC.
   Google Scholar
• National Rainfed Area Authority, 2011. Common guidelines for watershed development projects-2008 revised edition-2011. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., and Drew, C., 2002. Data-gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/13658810110075987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, G.P., et al., 2012. Mapping urban water demands using multi-criteria analysis and GIS. Water Resources Management, 26 (5), 1347–1363. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9962-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanasiou, J. and Kenward, R., 2014. Design of a data-driven environmental decision support system and testing of stakeholder data-collection. Environmental Modelling & Software, 55, 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles, J., 1991. Geography, GIS, and the surveillant society. Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 14 (8), 80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J., 1995. Representations in an electronic age: geography, GIS, and democracy. In: J. Pickles, ed. Ground truth: the social implications of geographic information systems. London: Guilford, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, E.S., 1997. A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 96 (2), 371–378. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00049-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rykiel, E.J., 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling, 90 (3), 229–244. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, O., et al., 2016. Paradigm shift to enhanced water supply planning through augmented grids, scarcity pricing and adaptive factory water: a system dynamics approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 348–361. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheer, A.M.S., et al., 2013. Developing a new operations plan for the bow river basin using collaborative modeling for decision support. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 49 (3), 654–668. doi:10.1111/jawr.2013.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R.K., Alavalapati, J.R.R., and Kalmbacher, R.S., 2004. Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems, 81 (3), 185–199. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2003.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, R., 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, W., et al., 2013. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to a sustainability assessment of coastal beach exploitation: a case study of the wind power projects on the coastal beaches of Yancheng, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 251–256. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajjhala, S.P., 2005. Integrating GIS and Participatory Mapping in community development planning. In: ESRI International User Conference, July San Diego, CA. ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Voinov, A., et al., 2016. Modelling with stakeholders - next generation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196–220. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., et al., 2013. CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (11), 2122–2145. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.776049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, D. and Harris, T.M., 2003. Community-integrated GIS for land reform in South Africa. URISA Journal, 15 (2), 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, D., et al., 2009. How well is the demand-driven, community management model for rural water supply systems doing? Evidence from Bolivia, Peru and Ghana. Water Policy, 11 (6), 696–718. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaim, S., et al., 2014. Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (9), 4464–4474. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar