Ripe for the picking? Dataset maturity assessment based on temporal dynamics of feature definitions

References

• Ali, A.L., et al., 2014. Ambiguity and plausibility: managing classification quality in volunteered geographic information. Proceedings 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference Advancement Geographic Information Systems - SIGSPATIAL ’14, 143–152. doi.org/10.1145/2666310.2666392
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A.L., et al., 2016a. Rule-guided human classification of volunteered geographic information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A.L., et al. 2016b. Guided classification system for conceptual overlapping classes in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5 (6), 87. doi:10.3390/ijgi5060087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, V. and Skopeliti, A., 2015. Measures and indicators of VGI quality: an overview. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2 (3), 345–351. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W5-345-2015
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, J., et al., 2015a. OpenStreetMap in GIScience: experiences, research, and applications. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography Berlin Heidelberg. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, J.J., et al. 2015b. An exploration of future patterns of the contributions to OpenStreetMap and development of a Contribution Index. Transactions in GIS, 19 (6), 896–914. doi:10.1111/tgis.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballatore, A., Bertolotto, M., and Wilson, D.C., 2013. Geographic knowledge extraction and semantic similarity in OpenStreetMap. Knowl Information Systems, 37 (1), 61–81. doi:10.1007/s10115-012-0571-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballatore, A. and Mooney, P., 2015. Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced cartography. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (12), 2310–2327. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1076825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, C., Neis, P., and Zipf, A., 2014. A comprehensive framework for intrinsic openstreetmap quality analysis. Transactions In Gis, 18 (6), 877-895. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devillers, R., et al. 2007. Towards spatial data quality information analysis tools for experts assessing the fitness for use of spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (3), 261–282. doi:10.1080/13658810600911879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., 2008. Volunteered geographic information: key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72 (3), 133–135. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9187-z
   Google Scholar
• Gini, C., 1921. Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal, 31 (121), 124–126. doi:10.2307/2223319
   Google Scholar
• Girres, J.F. and Touya, G., 2010. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions GIS, 14 (4), 435–459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F. and Li, L., 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gröchenig, S., Brunauer, R., and Rehrl, K., 2014. Digging into the history of VGI data-sets: results from a worldwide study on OpenStreetMap mapping activity. Journal of Location Based Services, 8 (3), 198–210. doi:10.1080/17489725.2014.978403
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2010a. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment Plan B Plan Design, 37 (4), 682–703. doi:10.1068/b35097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M.M., et al. 2010b. How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ Law to volunteered geographic information. Cartogr Journal, 47 (4), 315–322. doi:10.1179/000870410X12911304958827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, R., Kunze, C., and Hahmann, S., 2013. Measuring completeness of building footprints in OpenStreetMap over space and time. ISPRS International Journal Geo-Information, 2, 1066–1091. (November 2011). doi:10.3390/ijgi2041066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, J.R., 2010. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. OpenGIS implementation standard for geographic information – simple feature access – Part 2: SQL option. [online], (v 1.2.1). Wayland, MA: Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Accessed 12 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2013. ISO 19157:2013: Geographic information – data quality. [online]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation. Accessed 12 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Keßler, C. and De Groot, R.T.A., 2013. Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of OpenStreetMap. In: D. Vandenbroucke, B. Bucher, and J. Crompvoets, eds. Geographic information science at the heart of Europe. Cham: Springer, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Keßler, C., Trame, J., and Kauppinen, T., 2011. Tracking editing processes in volunteered geographic information: the case of OpenStreetMap. In: M. Duckham, et al., eds. Proceedings of Identifying Objects Processes and Events in Spatio-Temporally Distributed Data (IOPE). Belfast, Maine, USA. 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, I., Voss, A., and Krause-Traudes, M., 2011. A comparison of the street networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany. In: S. Geertman, W. Reinhardt, and F. Toppen, eds. Adv. Geoinf. Sci. a Chang. World. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P. and Corcoran, P., 2012. Characteristics of heavily edited objects in OpenStreetMap. Future Internet, 4 (4), 285–305. doi:10.3390/fi4010285
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P. and Corcoran, P., 2014. Analysis of interaction and co-editing patterns amongst openstreetmap contributors. Transactions GIS, 18 (5), 633–659. doi:10.1111/tgis.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., and Winstanley, A., 2010a. A study of data representation of natural features in OpenStreetMap. September, In: R. Purves and R. Weibel, eds. Proceedings of GIScience 2010, short paper. UZH Zürich, Switzerland, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, P., Corcoran, P., and Winstanley, A.C., 2010b. Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. Proc. 18th SIGSPATIAL Int. Conf. Adv. Geogr. Inf. Systems GIS, 10, 514–517.
   Google Scholar
• Mülligann, C. 2011. Analyzing the spatial-semantic interaction of points of interest in volunteered geographic information. In: M. Egenhofer, et al., eds. Spatial Information Theory: 10th International Conference, COSIT 2011, Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 350–370.
   Google Scholar
• Senaratne, H., Mobasheri, A., Ali, A. L., Capineri, C., and Haklay, M., 2017. A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (1), 139-167. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1189556
   Google Scholar
• Törnros, T., et al., 2015. Uncertainties of completeness measures in OpenStreetMap; a case study for buildings in a medium-sized German city. ISPRS Annals Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Information Sciences, II-3/W5, 353–357. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W5-353-2015
   Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele, A. and Devillers, R., 2013. Improving volunteered geographic data quality using semantic similarity measurements. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1 (1), 143–148. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W1-143-2013
   Google Scholar
• van Exel, M., Dias, E., and Fruijtier, S., 2010. The impact of crowdsourcing on spatial data quality indicators. In: R. Purves and R. Weibel, eds. Proceedings of GIScience 2010, short paper UZH Zürich, Switzerland, 4.
   Google Scholar