Estimating the prediction performance of spatial models via spatial k-fold cross validation

References

• Akaike, H., 1998. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Springer series in statistics. In: E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, and G. Kitagawa, eds. Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York: Springer New York, 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ala-Ilomäki, J., et al., 2015. New computational methods for efficient utilisation of public data. Technical report, Espoo, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Araghinejad, S., 2014. Regression-based models. In: A. Shahab, ed. Data-Driven Modeling: Using MATLAB® in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 49–83.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2216-10, 2010. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini, A. and Diggle, P., 1994. Prediction of soil respiration rates from temperature, moisture and soil type. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society - Series C: Applied Statistics, 43 (3), 505–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn, V., O’Connor, R.J., and Krohn, W.B., 2006. Importance of spatial autocorrelation in modeling bird distributions at a continental scale. Ecography, 29 (6), 835–844. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale, C.M., et al. 2010. Regression analysis of spatial data. Ecology Letters, 13 (2), 246–264. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01422.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, M.G., et al. 2009. Comment on ‘Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review’. Ecography, 32 (3), 374–378. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. and Kirkby, M., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24 (1), 43–69. doi:10.1080/02626667909491834
   Google Scholar
• Brenning, A., 2005. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5 (6), 853–862. doi:10.5194/nhess-5-853-2005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenning, A., 2012. Spatial cross-validation and bootstrap for the assessment of prediction rules in remote sensing: the R package sperrorest. In: L. Bruzzone, et al., eds. Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2012 IEEE International. Munich, Germany: IEEE, 5372–5375. July.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N.A.C., 2015a. In: Geostatistics. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N.A.C., 2015b. In: Geostatistics. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., and Hawkins, B.A., 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12 (1), 53–64. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkoh, E.K. and Opoku, A.A., 2016. Optimal geometric disks covering using tessellable regular polygons. Journal of Mathematics Research, 8 (2), 25. doi:10.5539/jmr.v8n2p25
   Google Scholar
• Dormann, F., et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography, 30 (5), 609–628. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feichtinger, H. and Strohmer, T., 1997. Gabor analysis and algorithms: theory and applications. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, R.C., 1954. The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5 (3), 115–146. doi:10.2307/2986645
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A. and Ord, J.K., 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24 (3), 189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R.J., 2012. Cross-validation of species distribution models: removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. Ecology, 93 (3), 679–688. doi:10.1890/11-0826.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeting, J.A., et al. 2006. Model selection for geostatistical models. Ecological Applications, 16 (1), 87–98. doi:10.1890/04-0576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvönen, E., et al. 2003. Assessing site suitability for Scots pine using airborne and terrestrial gamma-ray measurements in Finnish Lapland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33 (5), 796–806. doi:10.1139/x03-005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, W.D., 1999. Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14 (1), 22–26. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01533-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74 (6), 1659–1673. doi:10.2307/1939924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichstein, J.W., et al. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecological Monographs, 72 (3), 445–463. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0445:SAAAMI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P.A.P., 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37 (1–2), 17–23. doi:10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennanen, O. and Mäkelä, O., 2003. Raakapuukuljetusten kelirikkohaittojen vähentäminen, Metsätehon raportti. In: Technical report 153. Kuopio, Finland: Metsäteho Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen, M., et al., 2011. Computer vision using local binary patterns. London, UK: Computational Imaging and Vision Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjankukka, J., et al., 2014a. Predicting water permeability of the soil based on open data. In: L. Iliadis, I. Maglogiannis, and H. Papadopoulos, eds. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (AIAI 2014), Vol. 436 of IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 436–446. January.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjankukka, J., et al., 2014b. Arctic soil hydraulic conductivity and soil type recognition based on aerial gamma-ray spectroscopy and topographical data. In: M. Borga, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2014). Stockholm, Sweden: IEEE, 1822–1827. August.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjankukka, J., et al. 2016. Predictability of boreal forest soil bearing capacity by machine learning. Journal of Terramechanics, 68, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jterra.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rest, K.L., et al. 2014. Spatial leave-one-out cross-validation for variable selection in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23 (7), 811–820. doi:10.1111/geb.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruß, G. and Kruse, R., 2010. Regression models for spatial data: an example from precision agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 10th Industrial Conference on Advances in Data Mining: applications and theoretical aspects, ICDM’10, Berlin, Germany. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 450–463.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, R., et al., 2005. Predicting the soil moisture conditions of Irish grasslands. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 44, 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J. and McGlynn, B., 2007. A new triangular multiple flow direction algorithm for computing upslope areas from gridded digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 43 (4), W04501. doi:10.1029/2006WR005128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirén, M., et al. 2013. Harvesting damage caused by thinning of Norway spruce in unfrozen soil. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 24 (1), 60–75. doi:10.1080/19132220.2013.792155
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, P., 1991. Kangasmaan ravinnetunnusten ilmaiseminen ja viljavuuden alueellinen vaihtelu etelä-suomessa: expression of soil nutrient status and regional variation in soil fertility of forested sites in southern Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Folia Forestalia. Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W.R., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomppo, E., et al., 2008. Multi-source national forest inventory - methods and applications. In: E. Tomppo, M. Haakana, M. Katila and J. Peräsaari, eds. Managing forest ecosystems. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, Vol. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J., 1996. The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation models. Thesis (PhD). University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J., 2009. Geomorphometry in LandSerf. In: T. Hengl and H. Reuter, eds. Developments in soil science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Vols. 33,12, 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, L. and Thorne, C., 1987. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12 (1), 47–56. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. and Wang, Y., 2010. Kriging and cross-validation for massive spatial data. Environmetrics, 21 (3–4), 290–304. doi:10.1002/env.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar