References
- Albacete, X., et al., 2017. Measuring the accessibility of public transport: a critical comparison between methods in Helsinki. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 10 (2), 161–188. doi:10.1007/s12061-015-9177-8
- Anderson, P., Owen, A., and Levinson, D., 2013. The time between: continuously-defined accessibility functions for schedule-based transportation systems. In: 92nd transportation research board annual meeting, 13–17 January 2013, Washington DC, USA.
- Androutsopoulos, K.N. and Zografos, K.G., 2009. Solving the multi-criteria time-dependent routing and scheduling problem in a multimodal fixed scheduled network. European Journal of Operational Research, 192 (1), 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.004
- Bast, H., 2009. Car or public transport – two worlds. In: S. Albers, H. Alt, and S. Naher, eds. Festschrift mehlhorn, LNCS 5760. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 355–367.
- Bast, H., Hertel, M., and Storandt, S., 2016. Scalable transfer patterns. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth workshop on algorithm engineering and experiments (ALENEX), 10 January 2016. Arlington, Virginia, USA.
- Bast, H., Sternisko, J., and Storandt, S., 2013. Delay-robustness of transfer patterns in public transportation route planning. In: 13th workshop on algorithmic approaches for transportation modelling, optimization, and systems (ATMOS), September 2013, Sophia Antipolis, France.
- Bellman, R., 1958. On a routing problem. Quarter Application Mathematics, 16 (1), 87–90. doi:10.1090/qam/102435
- Benenson, I., et al., 2017. The benefits of a high-resolution analysis of transit accessibility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (2), 213–236. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1191637
- Brube, J., Potvin, J., and Vaucher, J., 2006. Time-dependent shortest paths through fixed sequence of nodes: application to a travel planning problem. Computers & Operations Research, 33 (6), 1838–1856. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.11.021
- Chen, B., Lam, W., and Tam, M., 2008. Using a multi-criteria approach to solve path finding problem in road network with uncertainty. In: Proceeding of 13th conference of the Hong Kong society for transportation studies, 13–15 December 2008. Hong Kong, China.
- Chen, B., et al., 2013a. Finding reliable shortest paths in road networks under uncertainty. Networks and Spatial Economics, 13 (2), 123–148. doi:10.1007/s11067-012-9175-1
- Chen, B., et al., 2014. Reliable shortest path problems in stochastic time-dependent networks. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 18 (2), 177–189. doi:10.1080/15472450.2013.806851
- Chen, B., et al., 2013b. Reliable space–time prisms under travel time uncertainty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103 (6), 1502–1521. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.834236
- Chen, X., et al., 2009. Analyzing urban bus service reliability at the stop, route, and network levels. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43 (8), 722–734. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.07.006
- Delafontaine, M., Neutens, T., and Van De Weghe, N., 2012. A GIS toolkit for measuring and mapping space–time accessibility from a place-based perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (6), 1131–1154. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.635593
- Delling, D., et al., 2017. Faster transit routing by hyper partitioning. In: 17th workshop on algorithmic approaches for transportation modelling, optimization, and systems (ATMOS), 7–8 September 2017. Vienna, Austria, 1–14.
- Delling, D., Pajor, T., and Werneck, R., 2014. Round-based public transit routing. Transportation Science, 49 (3), 591–604. doi:10.1287/trsc.2014.0534
- Dibbelt, J., et al., 2017. Connection scan algorithm [online]. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05997 [Accessed 10 October 2017].
- Dijkstra, E., 1959. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390
- Firmani, D., et al., 2013. Is timetabling routing always reliable for public transport. In: ATMOS-13th workshop on algorithmic approaches for transportation modelling, optimization, and systems, 5 September, 2013. Sophia Antipolis, France, Vol. 33, 15–26.
- Frank, H., 1969. Shortest paths in probabilistic graphs. Operations Research, 17 (4), 583–599. doi:10.1287/opre.17.4.583
- Geurs, K. and Van Wee, B., 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
- Guagliardo, M., 2004. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3, 1–13. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-3-3
- Hägerstrand, T., 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7–21. doi:10.1007/BF01936872
- Handy, S. and Niemeier, D., 1997. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29, 1175–1194. doi:10.1068/a291175
- Hutson, K. and Shier, D., 2009. Extended dominance and a stochastic shortest path problem. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 584–596. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2007.10.016
- Lei, T. and Church, R., 2010. Mapping transit‐based access: integrating GIS, routes and schedules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (2), 283–304. doi:10.1080/13658810902835404
- Liao, F., Rasouli, S., and Timmermans, H., 2014. Incorporating activity-travel time uncertainty and stochastic space–time prisms in multistate supernetworks for activity-travel scheduling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (5), 928–945. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.887086
- Liu, S. and Zhu, X., 2004. Accessibility analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (1), 105–124. doi:10.1068/b305
- Mamun, S., et al., 2013. A method to define public transit opportunity space. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 144–154. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.007
- Mavoa, S., et al., 2012. GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 20 (1), 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001
- Mazloumi, E., Currie, G., and Rose, G., 2010. Using GPS data to gain insight into public transport travel time variability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (7), 623–631. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000126
- Mirchandani, P., 1976. Shortest distance and reliability of probabilistic networks. Computers and Operations Research, 3 (4), 347–355. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(76)90017-4
- Modesti, P. and Siomachen, A., 1998. A utility measure for finding multiobjective shortest paths in urban multimodal transportation networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 111 (3), 495–508. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00376-7
- Müller-Hannemann, M., et al., 2007. Timetable information: models and algorithms. In: F. Geraets, et al., eds. Algorithmic methods for railway optimization, LNCS 4359. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 67–90.
- Murray, A., 2001. Strategic analysis of transport coverage. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35 (3), 175–188. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00004-0
- Neutens, T., Versichele, M., and Schwanen, T., 2010. Arranging place and time: A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities. Applied Geography, 30, 561–575. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.006
- Nie, Y., et al., 2012. Reliable route guidance: a case study from Chicago. Transportation Research Part A, 46, 403–419. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.10.008
- Nie, Y. and Wu, X., 2009. Shortest path problem considering on-time arrival probability. Transportation Research Part B, 43, 597–613. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2009.01.008
- O’Sullivan, D., Morrison, A., and Shearer, J., 2000. Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (1), 85–104. doi:10.1080/136588100240976
- Páez, A., Scott, D., and Morency, C., 2012. Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
- Pyrga, E., et al., 2008. Efficient models for timetable information in public transportation systems. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 12, Article No. 2.4. doi:10.1145/1227161.1227166
- Silva, C., 2008. Comparative accessibility for mobility management: the structural accessibility layer. Thesis (PhD). Oporto University.
- Tasic, I., Zhou, X., and Zlatkovic, M., 2014. Using spatio-temporal constraints to quantify transit accessibility: case study of a potential transit oriented development location in West Valley, Utah. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2417, 130–138. doi:10.3141/2417-14
- Tribby, C. and Zandbergen, P., 2012. High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility. Applied Geography, 34, 345–355. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.008
- Xu, W., et al., 2015. Transit accessibility measures incorporating the temporal dimension. Cities, 46, 55–66. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.002
- Zeng, Z., et al., 2016. Curvedness feature constrained map matching for low-frequency probe vehicle data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (4), 660–690. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1086922