A method for checking the quality of geographic metadata based on ISO 19157

References

• Boin, A.T. and Hunter, G.J., 2007. What communicates quality to the spatial data consumer. In: Proc. 2007 Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Quality (ISSDQ 2007). 320–329.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T.R. and Hillmann, D.I., 2004. The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting.. In: D.I. Hillmann and E.L. Westbrooks, eds. Metadata in practice. ALA editions. Chicago: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Corona, D., Lacasta, J., and Nogueras-Iso, J., 2017. The quality of thesauri used in geographic metadata. In: Proc. AGILE 2017 conference.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2008. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1205/2008 of 3 December 2008 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Huerta, J., 1959. Medidas sencillas de lecturabilidad. Consigna, 214, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R., 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psycology, 32, 221–233. doi:10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Figueroa, Z., Carreras-Riudavets, F.J., and Rodríguez-Rodríguez, G., 2013. Automatic syllabification for spanish using lemmatization and derivation to solve the prefixs prominence issue. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 7122–7131. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., 2004. Metadata quality evaluation: experience from the open language archives community. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Asian Digital Libraries. 320–329.
   Google Scholar
• INSPIRE MIG, 2017. Technical Guidelines for implementing dataset and service metadata based on ISO/TS 19139:2007. INSPIRE Maintenance and Implementation Group (MIG). Version 2.0.1. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/id/document/tg/metadata-iso19139.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 1985. ISO 2859–2:1985 Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes – Part 2: Sampling plans indexed by limiting quality (LQ) for isolated lot inspection.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 1994. ISO 8402: 1994- Quality management and quality assurance.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2007. ISO/TS 19139: 2007.Geographic information - Metadata - XML schema implementation.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2013. ISO 19157:2013 Geographic information - Data quality.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2014. ISO 19115–1:2014. Geographic information - Metadata - Part 1: Fundamentals.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2016a. ISO 19119:2016. Geographic information - Services.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2016b. ISO/TS 19115–3:2016. Geographic information - Metadata - Part 3: XML schema implementation for fundamental concepts.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2016c. ISO/TS 19157–2:2016 Geographic information - Data quality - Part 2: XML schema implementation.
   Google Scholar
• JGSI, 2002. User’s Manual for Spatial Data Product Specification Description, GSI TR A1- No.264. Technical Report of the Japan Geographical Survey Institute. http://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/RESEARCH/GIS/jsgi-manual.pdf. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
   Google Scholar
• Lacasta, J., et al., 2014. Improving the visibility of geospatial data on the web. In: Proc. IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2014) and Int. Conf. on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2014). 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, S., et al., 2009. Evaluating the metadata quality of the IPL. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. vol. 46, 117.
   Google Scholar
• Milenov, P., Sagris, V., and Wojda, P., 2010. Report on LPIS Quality Assessment feasibility trial. JRC technical notes.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, W.E., Stewart, E.L., and McClure, C.R., 1998. Assessing metadata quality: findings and methodological considerations from an evaluation of the US government information locator service (GILS). In: Proc. IEEE Int. Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, ADL 98. IEEE, 246–255.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueras-Iso, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J., and Muro-Medrano, P.R., 2005. Geographic information metadata for spatial data infrastructures – resources, interoperability and information retrieval. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• NTHA, 2004. Standards for geospatial locators. Officials Committee for Geospatial Information. New Zealand by the National Topographic Hydrographic Authority, ESA Core Data Specification.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa, X. and Duval, E., 2006. Towards automatic evaluation of learning object metadata quality. In: J.F. Roddick et al., eds. Advances in conceptual modeling - theory and practice. ER 2006 Workshops BP-UML, CoMoGIS, COSS, ECDM, OIS, QoIS, SemWAT Proceedings,  6–9 November, Tucson, AZ, 372–381.
   Google Scholar
• Olfat, H., et al. 2012. Spatial metadata automation: A key to spatially enabling platform. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 7, 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.R., 2009. Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47 (3–4), 213228. doi:10.1080/01639370902737240
   Google Scholar
• Renteria-Agualimpia, W., et al., 2015. Identifying geospatial inconsistency of web services metadata using spatial ranking. Earth Science Informatics, 8, 427–437. doi:10.1007/s12145-014-0172-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, R., Gonalves, M.A., and Fox, E.A., 2013. Key issues regarding digital libraries: evaluation and integration. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, vol. 5. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shreeves, S.L., et al., 2005. Is ‘quality’ metadata shareable metadata? the implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In: H. Thompson, ed. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, April 7–10 2005, Minneapolis, MN. Chicago, IL. Association of College and Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Tolosana-Calasanz, R., et al. 2006. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries. In: J. Gonzalo et al., eds. ECDL 2006. LNCS. Vol. 4172 On the problem of identifying the quality of geographic metadata. Springer. 232–243. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11863878_20
   Google Scholar
• Weagley, J., Gelches, E., and Park, J.R., 2010. Interoperability and metadata quality in digital video repositories: a study of Dublin Core. Journal of Library Metadata, 10 (1), 37–57. doi:10.1080/19386380903546984
   Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Tong, X., and Jiang, Z., 2008. The quality assessment and sampling model for the geological spatial data in china. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Beijing, Vol. XXXVII, Part B2. ISPRS, 819–824.
   Google Scholar