A land-use mix allocation model considering adjacency, intensity, and proximity

References

• Abolhasani, S., et al., 2016. Simulating urban growth under planning policies through parcel-based cellular automata (ParCA) model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (11), 2276–2301. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1184271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angotti, T. and Hanhardt, E., 2001. Problems and prospects for healthy mixed-use communities in New York City. Planning Practice and Research, 16 (2), 145–154. doi:10.1080/02697450120077352.
   Google Scholar
• Badoe, D. and Miller, E., 2000. Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5, 235–263. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00036-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T. and Baer, W.C., 1984. Beyond the neighborhood unit: residential environments and public policy. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, J., 2013. The neighbourhood unit concept and the shaping of land planning in the United States 1912–1968. Journal of Urban Design, 18 (3), 340–362. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.800453.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B.B., et al., 2009. Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health & Place, 15 (4), 1130–1141. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., et al., 2011. Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (12), 1949–1969. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.570269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., et al., 2012. Sustainable land use optimization using boundary-based fast genetic algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36 (3), 257–269. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. and Duncan, M., 2004. Neighbourhood composition and residential land prices: does exclusion raise or lower values? Urban Studies, 41 (2), 299–315. doi:10.1080/0042098032000165262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K., 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2 (3), 199–219. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, K., et al., 2008. Quantitative analysis of urban form: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Urbanism, 1 (1), 17–45.
   Google Scholar
• Congress for the New Urbanism, 2000. Charter of the New Urbanism. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 20 (4), 339–341. doi:10.1177/027046760002000417.
   Google Scholar
• de Abreu E Silva, J., Morency, C., and Goulias, K.G., 2012. Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (8), 1252–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. and Suzuki, T., 2016. On the quantification of mixed land use pattern focusing on adjacency, intensity, and proximity. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 51 (3), 867–874. [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Eom, S. and Suzuki, T., 2017. Evaluation of land use pattern by analyzing residential land price focusing on spatial indices of land use mix. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 52 (3), 1356–1363. [in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Haque, A. and Asami, Y., 2011. Optimizing urban land-use allocation: case study of Dhanmondi residential area, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38 (3), 388–410. doi:10.1068/b35041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, M., Couclelis, H., and Clarke, K.C., 2005. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29 (4), 369–399. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, S., 2012. Mixed Use by Default. Journal of Planning Literature, 27 (4), 375–393. doi:10.1177/0885412212451029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzkämper, A., Lausch, A., and Seppelt, R., 2006. Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements. Ecological Modelling, 198 (3–4), 277–292. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K., 1997. Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: evidence from San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1607, 116–125. doi:10.3141/1607-16
   Google Scholar
• Kowe, P., et al., 2015. An analysis of changes in the urban landscape composition and configuration in the Sancaktepe district of Istanbul metropolitan city, Turkey using landscape metrics and satellite data. Geocarto International, 30 (5), 506–519. doi:10.1080/10106049.2014.905638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Church, R., and Jankowski, P., 2008. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (6), 601–622. doi:10.1080/13658810701587495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manaugh, K. and Kreider, T., 2013. What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6 (1), 63–72. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v6i1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoomi, Z., Mesgari, M.S., and Hamrah, M., 2013. Allocation of urban land uses by multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (3), 542–566. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.698016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayor’s Office of Environmental Coordination, New York, NY, US, 2019. CEQR basics [online]. Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/oec/environmental-quality-review/ceqr-basics.page [Accessed 15 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., Nastaran, M., and Sahebgharani, A., 2016. Development, application, and comparison of hybrid meta-heuristics for urban land-use allocation optimization: Tabu search, genetic, GRASP, and simulated annealing algorithms. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 60, 23–36. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Capital Planning Commission, 2006. The comprehensive plan for the national capital: district elements [electronic version]. Available from: https://planning.dc.gov/page/comprehensive-plan [Accessed 29 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Parchomovsky, G. and Siegelman, P., 2012. Cities, property, and positive externalities. William & Mary Law Review, 54 (1), 211–261.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C.A., 1929. Regional study of New York and its environs, VIII, neighborhood and community planning, monograph 1. New York: Regional Plan of New York and its Environs.
   Google Scholar
• Pogodzinski, J.M. and Sass, T.R., 1991. Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: a survey. Urban Studies, 28 (4), 597–621. doi:10.1080/00420989120080681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, J.P., Silva, E.A., and Pinho, P., 2016. Spatial metrics to study urban patterns in growing and shrinking cities. Urban Geography, 37 (2), 246–271. doi:10.1080/02723638.2015.1096118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmel, T.K. and Fortin, M.J., 2013. Categorical, class-focused map patterns: characterization and comparison. Landscape Ecology, 28 (8), 1587–1599. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9905-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, A., 1996. Mixed-use development: ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice and Research, 11 (1), 85–98. doi:10.1080/02697459650036477.
   Google Scholar
• Slager, C.T.J. and de Vries, B., 2013. Landscape generator: method to generate landscape configurations for spatial plan-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y. and Knaap, G.-J., 2004. Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34 (6), 663–680. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Merlin, L., and Rodriguez, D., 2013. Comparing measures of urban land use mix. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 42, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M.R., 2017. Does compact development make people drive less? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83 (1), 7–18. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.J., 1991. A multi-criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42 (1), 17. doi:10.1057/jors.1991.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.J. and Janssen, R., 2014. A multiobjective GIS-based land use planning algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 46, 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T.J., Janssen, R., and van Herwijnen, M., 2004. A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Computers & Operations Research, 31 (14), 2293–2313. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00188-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleai, M., et al., 2007. Evaluating the compatibility of multi-functional and intensive urban land uses. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9 (4), 375–391. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Strien, M.J., et al., 2016. An improved neutral landscape model for recreating real landscapes and generating landscape series for spatial ecological simulations. Ecology and Evolution, 6 (11), 3808–3821. doi:10.1002/ece3.2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., Huang, G., and Cadenasso, M.L., 2011. Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102 (1), 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar