A distributed framework for extracting maritime traffic patterns

References

• Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G., 2011. Spatial generalization and aggregation of massive movement data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17, 205–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G., 2013. Visual analytics of movement: an overview of methods, tools, and procedures. Information Visualization, 12 (1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1473871612457601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguedas, V.F., Pallotta, G., and Vespe, M., 2017. Maritime traffic networks: from historical positioning data to unsupervised maritime traffic monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19 (3), 722–732. doi:10.1109/TITS.2017.2699635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrut, J.P. and Trefethen, L.N., 1984. Barycentric Lagrange interpolation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 46 (3), 501–517.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzikokolakis, K., et al., 2018. Mining vessel trajectory data for patterns of search and rescue. In: Proceedings of the Workshops of the EDBT/ICDT 2018 Joint Conference (EDBT/ICDT 2018), 26 March. Vienna, Austria, 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. and Meng, X., 2010. Clustering analysis of moving objects. In: Moving Objects Management, Chapter 11, 151–171. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coscia, P., et al. 2018. Multiple ornstein–uhlenbeck processes for maritime traffic graph representation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 54 (5), 2158–2170. doi:10.1109/TAES.2018.2808098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., et al., 2017. An algorithm for vessel’s missing trajectory restoration based on polynomial interpolation. In: 4th international conference on transportation information and safety, ICTIS 2017. Edmonton, Canada, 825–830.
   Google Scholar
• Ester, M., et al., 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters a density- based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD’96. Portland: Oregon AAAI Press, 226–231.
   Google Scholar
• Etemad, M., et al., 2019. A trajectory segmentation algorithm based on interpolation- based change detection strategies. In: Workshop Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2019 Joint Conference, Vol. 2322. Lisbon, Portugal: CEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Etemad, M., Júnior, A.S., and Matwin, S., 2018. Predicting transportation modes of GPS trajectories using feature engineering and noise removal. In: 31st Canadian conference on artificial intelligence. Toronto, ON, 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Fornberg, B. and Zuev, J., 2007. The Runge phenomenon and spatially variable shape parameters in RBF interpolation. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 54 (3), 379–398. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Z., Hu, W., and Tan, T., 2005. Similarity based vehicle trajectory clustering and anomaly detection. In: IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP 2005, Vol. 2. Genoa, Italy, II–602.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R.L. and Yao, F.F., 1983. Finding the convex hull of a simple polygon. Journal of Algorithms, 4 (4), 324–331. doi:10.1016/0196-6774(83)90013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero, M., et al., 2008. Radar/AIS data fusion and SAR tasking for maritime surveillance. In: 11th international conference on information fusion. Cologne, Germany, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hexeberg, S., et al., 2017. AIS-based vessel trajectory prediction. In: 20th international conference on information fusion, FUSION 2017. Xi’an, China, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, A., et al., 2012. A joint statistical and symbolic anomaly detection system: increasing performance in maritime surveillance. In: 15th international conference on information fusion, FUSION 2012. Singapore, 1919–1926.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, A. and Ekman, J., 2003. Anomaly detection in vessel motion. Internal Report Saab Systems, Järfälla, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., et al., 2014. An algorithm for interpolating ship motion vectors. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 8, 35–40. doi:10.12716/1001.08.01.04.
   Google Scholar
• Jie, X., et al., 2017. A novel estimation algorithm for interpolating ship motion. In: 4th international conference on transportation information and safety, ICTIS 2017. Banff, Alberta, Canada, 557–562.
   Google Scholar
• Kontopoulos, I., et al., 2020. Real-time maritime anomaly detection: detecting intentional AIS switch-off. International Journal of Big Data Intelligence. doi:10.1504/IJBDI.2020.107375.
   Google Scholar
• Kontopoulos, I., Varlamis, I., and Tserpes, K., 2019. Uncovering hidden concepts from AIS data: A network abstraction of maritime traffic for anomaly detection. In: “Multiple-aspect analysis of semantic trajectories” workshop of the ECML/PKDD 2019 joint conference. Wurzburg, Germany: Springer, 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Laxhammar, R., 2008. Anomaly detection for sea surveillance. In: 11th international conference on information fusion, FUSION 2008. Cologne, Germany, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Laxhammar, R., Falkman, G., and Sviestins, E., 2009. Anomaly detection in sea traffic- a comparison of the Gaussian mixture model and the Kernel density estimator. In: 12th international conference on information fusion, FUSION 2009. Seattle, Washington, 756–763.
   Google Scholar
• Le Guillarme, N. and Lerouvreur, X., 2013. Unsupervised extraction of knowledge from S-AIS data for maritime situational awareness. In: 16th international conference on information fusion, FUSION 2013. Istanbul, Turkey, 2025–2032.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.G., Han, J., and Whang, K.Y., 2007. Trajectory clustering: a partition-and-group framework. In: ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD/PODS 2007. Beijing, China, 593–604.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Han, J., and Yang, J., 2004. Clustering moving objects. In: 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD 2004. Seattle, WA, 617–622.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., et al., 2014. Knowledge-based clustering of ship trajectories using density-based approach. In: IEEE international conference on big data, big data 2014. Washington DC, 603–608.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Wang, Z., and Feng, J., 2008. Continuous clustering of moving objects in spatial networks. In: I. Lovrek, R.J. Howlett, and L.C. Jain, ed. Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 543–550.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., 2015. Kinematic interpolation of movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzarella, F., et al., 2017. A novel anomaly detection approach to identify intentional AIS on-off switching. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 110–123. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montewka, J., Kujala, P., and Ylitalo, J., 2009. The quantitative assessment of marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland, on the basis of AIS data. Proceedings of the 14th international scientific and technical conference on marine traffic engineering. Malmö, Sweden, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V., Im, N.K., and Lee, S.M., 2015. The interpolation method for the missing AIS data of ship. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 39, 377–384. doi:10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.5.377
   Google Scholar
• Ossama, O., Mokhtar, H.M., and El-Sharkawi, M.E., 2011. An extended k-means technique for clustering moving objects. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 12 (1), 45–51. doi:10.1016/j.eij.2011.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Pallotta, G., Vespe, M., and Bryan, K., 2013. Vessel pattern knowledge discovery from AIS data: A framework for anomaly detection and route prediction. Entropy, 15 (6), 2218–2245. doi:10.3390/e15062218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, L.Z., et al., 2015. A novel method for restoring the trajectory of the inland waterway ship by using AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 110, 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanakis, E., 2017. mR-V: line simplification through mnemonic rasterization. Geomatica, 70 (4), 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Tampakis, P., et al., 2018. Time-aware sub-trajectory clustering in Hermes@ PostgreSQL. In: 2018 IEEE 34th international conference on data engineering (ICDE). Paris, France, 1581–1584.
   Google Scholar
• Varlamis, I., et al., 2019. A network abstraction of multi-vessel trajectory data for detecting anomalies. In: Workshop proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2019 joint conference, Vol. 2322. Lisbon: Portugal CEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Varlamis, I., Tserpes, K., and Sardianos, C., 2018. Detecting search and rescue missions from AIS data. In: IEEE 34th international conference on data engineering workshops, ICDEW 2018. Paris, France, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, W., 1984. Polynomial interpolation: Lagrange versus Newton. Mathematics of Computation, 43 (167), 205–217. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1984-0744931-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, P., 2002. Grid-based path-finding. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference of the Canadian society for computational studies of intelligence on advances in artificial intelligence, AI ’02. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 44–55.
   Google Scholar