A comparative study of heterogeneous ensemble-learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping

References

• Aditian, A., Kubota, T., and Shinohara, Y., 2018. Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia. Geomorphology, 318 (2018), 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Akgun, A., Dag, S., and Bulut, F., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environmental Geology, 54 (6), 1127–1143. doi:10.1007/s00254-007-0882-8.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, M., et al., 2018. Social vulnerability assessment using artificial neural network (ANN) model for earthquake hazard in Tabriz city, Iran. Sustainability, 10 (10), 3376. doi:10.3390/su10103376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee, O.F., et al., 2014. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena, 114, 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvioli, M. and Baum, R.L., 2016. Parallelization of the TRIGRS model for rainfall-induced landslides using the message passing interface. Environmental Modelling and Software, 81, 122–135. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, G.G., Fatichi, S., and Burlando, P., 2015. An advanced process‐based distributed model for the investigation of rainfall‐induced landslides: the effect of process representation and boundary conditions. Water Resources Research, 51 (9), 7501–7523. doi:10.1002/2015WR016909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew, L. and Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, 65 (1), 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., and Ugawa, N., 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides, 1 (1), 73–81. doi:10.1007/s10346-003-0006-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, A.P., 1997. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30 (7), 1145–1159. doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueechi, E., et al., 2019. Regional-scale landslide susceptibility modelling in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru—a comparison of different approaches. Landslides, 16 (2), 395–407. doi:10.1007/s10346-018-1090-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2016. GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75 (14), 1101. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5919-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al., 2019. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using gis-based data mining techniques of anfis with whale optimization algorithm (woa) and grey wolf optimizer (gwo). Applied Sciences, 9 (18), 3755. doi:10.3390/app9183755.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Panahi, M., and Pourghasemi, H. R., 2017. Performance evaluation of GIS-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for landslide spatial modelling. Catena, 157, 310–324. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin, B., et al., 2019. An Ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurleo, M., Cascini, L., and Calvello, M., 2017. A comparison of statistical and deterministic methods for shallow landslide susceptibility zoning in clayey soils. Engineering Geology, 223, 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collobert, R., and Weston, J., 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. Helsinki, Finland: ACM, 160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V., 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20 (3), 273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich, T.G., 1997. Machine-learning research. Ai Magazine, 18 (4), 97. doi:10.1609/aimag.v18i4.1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann, C.F., et al., 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36 (1), 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, J., et al., 2019. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eker, A.M., et al., 2015. Evaluation and comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methods: a case study for the Ulus district, Bartın, northern Turkey. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (1), 132–158. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.953164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erener, A., Mutlu, A., and Düzgün, H.S., 2016. A comparative study for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), logistic regression (LR) and association rule mining (ARM). Engineering Geology, 203, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., et al., 2020. Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 139, 104470. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh, B. and Blaschke, T., 2013. GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Natural Hazards, 65 (3), 2105–2128. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0463-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, M., et al., 2008. Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology, 94 (3–4), 268–289. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh, O., et al., 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sensing, 11 (2), 196. doi:10.3390/rs11020196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., and Hinton, G., 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE, 6645–6649.
   Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir, D., Below, R., and Hoyois, P., 2020. EM-DAT: international disaster database. Brussels, Belgium: Université Catholique de Louvain. Available from: http://www.emdat.be [Accessed 3 March 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, F., et al., 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology, 31 (1–4), 181–216. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, F., et al., 2006. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology, 81 (1–2), 166–184. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimoradlou, A., 2019. Predicting landslides using contour aligning convolutional neural networks. Thesis (PhD). University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., et al., 2018. Advanced deep-learning techniques for salient and category-specific object detection: a survey. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35 (1), 84–100. doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2749125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H., et al., 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena, 163, 399–413. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F., et al., 2019. A deep learning algorithm using a fully connected sparse autoencoder neural network for landslide susceptibility prediction. Landslides, 17, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01274-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari, A., et al., 2019. Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena, 175, 430–445. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu, T., Sahin, E.K., and Colkesen, I., 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides, 11 (3), 425–439. doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. and Zeng, L., 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9 (2), 137–163. doi:10.18637/jss.v008.i02.
   Google Scholar
• Kira, K. and Rendell, L., 1992. A practical approach to feature selection. In: International conference on machine learning. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann, 249–256
   Google Scholar
• Ko, F.W. and Lo, F.L., 2018. From landslide susceptibility to landslide frequency: A territory-wide study in Hong Kong. Engineering Geology, 242, 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornejady, A., Ownegh, M., and Bahremand, A., 2017. Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena, 152, 144–162. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzh, O., et al., 2017. Stacking approach for CNN transfer learning ensemble for remote sensing imagery. In: 2017 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys). London, UK: IEEE, 599–608.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., et al., 2017. Landslide susceptibility mapping & prediction using support vector machine for Mandakini River Basin, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Geomorphology, 295, 115–125. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521 (7553), 436. doi:10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kim, J., and Ko, W., 2019a. Day-ahead electric load forecasting for the residential building with a small-size dataset based on a self-organizing map and a stacking ensemble learning method. Applied Sciences, 9 (6), 1231. doi:10.3390/app9061231.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., et al., 2019b. Sevucas: A novel gis-based machine learning software for seismic vulnerability assessment. Applied Sciences, 9 (17), 3495. doi:10.3390/app9173495.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. and Pradhan, B., 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides, 4 (1), 33–41. doi:10.1007/s10346-006-0047-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L.-J., et al., 2010. Object bank: A high-level image representation for scene classification & semantic feature sparsification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, Canada: MIT Press, 1378–1386
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, L. and Mai, P.M., 2018. Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Engineering Geology, 244, 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, S. and Mandal, K., 2018. Modeling and mapping landslide susceptibility zones using GIS based multivariate binary logistic regression (LR) model in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 4 (1), 69–88. doi:10.1007/s40808-018-0426-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo, G., et al., 2013. GIS techniques for regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment: the Sicily (Italy) case study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (7), 1433–1452. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.693614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, B., et al., 2019. An experimental research on the use of recurrent neural networks in landslide susceptibility mapping. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8 (12), 578. doi:10.3390/ijgi8120578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H.-J. and Pradhan, B., 2011. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computers & Geosciences, 37 (9), 1264–1276. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, A.A., et al., 2018. Improving landslide susceptibility mapping using morphometric features in the Mawat area, Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq: comparison of different statistical models. Geomorphology, 319, 147–160. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2017. Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS. Catena, 149, 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2018. A hybrid machine learning ensemble approach based on a radial basis function neural network and rotation forest for landslide susceptibility modeling: A case study in the Himalayan area, India. International Journal of Sediment Research, 33 (2), 157–170. doi:10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2019a. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modelling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto International, 1–25. doi:10.1080/10106049.2018.1559885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2019b. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. Catena, 175, 203–218. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T. and Prakash, I., 2018. Machine learning methods of kernel logistic regression and classification and regression trees for landslide susceptibility assessment at part of Himalayan area, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11. doi:10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i12/99745.
   Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi, H.R., et al., 2019. Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 692, 556–571. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi, H.R., Pradhan, B., and Gokceoglu, C., 2012. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards, 63 (2), 965–996. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi, H.R. and Rahmati, O., 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? Catena, 162, 177–192. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B., 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 51, 350–365. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, P., et al., 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-science Reviews, 180, 60–91. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameen, M.I. and Pradhan, B., 2019. Landslide detection using residual networks and the fusion of spectral and topographic information. IEEE Access, 7, 114363–114373. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameen, M.I., Pradhan, B., and Lee, S., 2019. Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena, 186, 104249. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesmero, M.P., Ledezma, A.I., and Sanchis, A., 2015. Generating ensembles of heterogeneous classifiers using stacked generalization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5 (1), 21–34. doi:10.1002/widm.1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., et al., 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahri, A.A., et al., 2019. Landslide susceptibility hazard map in southwest Sweden using artificial neural network. Catena, 183, 104225. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi, A., et al., 2017. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76 (2), 60. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6374-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörensen, R., Zinko, U., and Seibert, J., 2006. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10 (1), 101–112. doi:10.5194/hess-10-101-2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S., et al., 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125 (125), 91–101. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh, S.V.R., et al., 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 438–451. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töscher, A. and Jahrer, M., 2009. The BigChaos Solution to the Netflix Grand Prize [online]. Available from: https://www.netflixprize.com/assets/GrandPrize2009_BPC_BigChaos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Truong, X., et al., 2018. Enhancing prediction performance of landslide susceptibility model using hybrid machine learning approach of bagging ensemble and logistic model tree. Applied Sciences, 8 (7), 1046. doi:10.3390/app8071046.
   Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos, P., et al., 2017. Applying information theory and GIS-based quantitative methods to produce landslide susceptibility maps in Nancheng County, China. Landslides, 14 (3), 1091–1111. doi:10.1007/s10346-016-0769-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos, P. and Ilia, I., 2016. Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: the influence of models complexity and training dataset size. Catena, 145, 164–179. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullo, S.L., et al., 2019. Landslide Geohazard assessment with convolutional neural networks using Sentinel-2 imagery data. In: IGARSS 2019-2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Yokohama, Japan: IEEE, 9646–9649.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., et al., 2011. A comparative assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (1), 223–230. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., et al., 2017. Integration of information theory, K-means cluster analysis and the logistic regression model for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Area, China. Remote Sensing, 9 (9), 938. doi:10.3390/rs9090938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2019c. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 712–729. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2019d. Stacking-based ensemble learning of decision trees for interpretable prostate cancer detection. Applied Soft Computing, 77, 188–204. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2020a. Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks. Journal Of Hydrology, 582, 124482. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2020b. Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. Computers & Geosciences, 138, 104445. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Duan, H., and Hong, H., 2019a. A comparative study of composite kernels for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in Yongxin County, China. Catena, 183, 104217. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Fang, Z., and Hong, H., 2019b. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Science of the Total Environment, 666, 975–993. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, I.H., et al., 2016. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D.H., 1992. Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5 (2), 241–259. doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, L., Zhang, Y., and Peng, G., 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China-Nepal Highway. Sensors, 18 (12), 4436. doi:10.3390/s18124436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, A., 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena, 72 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. and Cervone, G., 2019. Analysis of remote sensing imagery for disaster assessment using deep learning: a case study of flooding event. Soft Computing, 23 (24), 13393–13408. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-03878-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., et al., 2016. A combination of geographically weighted regression, particle swarm optimization and support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (5), 487. doi:10.3390/ijerph13050487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar