Synthesizing location semantics from street view images to improve urban land-use classification

References

• Abadi, M., et al., 2016. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. ed. In: 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Savannah, 2–4 November, 265–283.
   Google Scholar
• Abdikan, S., et al. 2016. Land cover mapping using sentinel-1 SAR data. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI (B7), 757. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B7-757-2016
   Google Scholar
• Bengio, Y., 2012. Deep learning of representations for unsupervised and transfer learning. ed. Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning, 2012, 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, S., et al., 2018. From Google Maps to a fine-grained catalog of street trees. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 135, 13–30. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, R., et al. 2018. Integrating aerial and street view images for urban land use classification. Remote Sensing, 10 (10), 1553. doi:10.3390/rs10101553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, R. and Qiu, G., 2018. Urban land use classification based on aerial and ground images. ed. In: 2018 International Conference on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI), La Rochelle, France, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Castelluccio, M., et al. 2015. Land use classification in remote sensing images by convolutional neural networks. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1508, 00092.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X.-L., et al. 2006. Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104 (2), 133–146. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, J., et al., 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. ed. In: 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPR Workshops), Miami, FL, 2009 pp. 248–255. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, J., et al. 2014. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. ed. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2014, 647–655.
   Google Scholar
• Feyisa, G.L., et al., 2016. Locally optimized separability enhancement indices for urban land cover mapping: exploring thermal environmental consequences of rapid urbanization in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 175, 14–31. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K., et al. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. ed. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, 770–778.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D., et al. 2019. Learnable manifold alignment (LeMA): A semi-supervised cross-modality learning framework for land cover and land use classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147, 193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Zhao, B., and Song, Y., 2018. Urban land-use mapping using a deep convolutional neural network with high spatial resolution multispectral remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 214, 73–86. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J., et al., 2018. Building instance classification using street view images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 145, 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassawmar, T., et al. 2018. Reducing landscape heterogeneity for improved land use and land cover (LULC) classification across the large and complex Ethiopian highlands. Geocarto International, 33 (1), 53–69. doi:10.1080/10106049.2016.1222637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E., 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. ed. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012, 1097–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Krylov, V., Kenny, E., and Dahyot, R., 2018. Automatic discovery and geotagging of objects from street view imagery. Remote Sensing, 10 (5), 661. doi:10.3390/rs10050661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussul, N., et al. 2017. Deep learning classification of land cover and crop types using remote sensing data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14 (5), 778–782. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2017.2681128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S., et al. 2020. Street-Frontage-Net: urban image classification using deep convolutional neural networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (4), 681-707, doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1555832
   Google Scholar
• Leung, D. and Newsam, S., 2012. Exploring geotagged images for land-use classification. ed. In: Proceedings of the ACM multimedia 2012 workshop on Geotagging and its applications in multimedia, Nara, Japan, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhang, C., and Li, W., 2017. Building block level urban land-use information retrieval based on Google Street View images. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 54 (6), 819–835. doi:10.1080/15481603.2017.1338389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R.W., and Chipman, J., 2015. Remote sensing and image interpretation. 7th Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Y. and Zhou, Y., 2017. Pictorial urbanism: a new approach for human scale urban morphology study. Planner, 033 (2), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdianpari, M., et al. 2018. Very deep convolutional neural networks for complex land cover mapping using multispectral remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing, 10 (7), 1119. doi:10.3390/rs10071119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas, J.-F. and González, R., 2015. Change detection and land use/land cover database updating using image segmentation, GIS analysis and visual interpretation. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40 (3), 61. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W3-61-2015
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, W.B., Meyer, W.B., and Bl Turner, I., 1994. Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective. vol 4. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S.J. and Yang, Q., 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22 (10), 1345–1359. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2009.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalaby, A. and Tateishi, R., 2007. Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Applied Geography, 27 (1), 28–41. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, J., et al., 2020. Weakly supervised deep learning for objects detection from images. In: International Conference on Urban Intelligence and Applications (ICUIA 2019). Wuhan,China: Springer International Publishing, 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Shivangi Srivastava, John E. Vargas Muñoz, Sylvain Lobry & Devis Tuia. 2020. Fine-grained landuse characterization using ground-based pictures: a deep learning solution based on globally available data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (6), 1117–1136. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1542698
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S., Vargas-Muñoz, J.E., and Tuia, D., 2019. Understanding urban landuse from the above and ground perspectives: A deep learning, multimodal solution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 228, 129–143. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, G., et al., 2016. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) based classifiers for land applications in Germany. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 1187. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B1-1187-2016
   Google Scholar
• Veness, C., 2010. Calculate distance, bearing and more between Latitude/Longitude points [online]. Available from: https://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html [Accessed 7 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Workman, S., et al. 2017. A unified model for near and remote sensing. ed. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, 2688–2697.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, H., et al., 2018. Exploring geo-tagged photos for land cover validation with deep learning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 141, 237–251. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., et al., 2020. Superpixel generation for polarimetric SAR using hierarchical energy maximization. Computers and Geosciences, 135, 104395. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Y., et al. 2017. Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (4), 658–675. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., et al., 2019. Joint Deep Learning for land cover and land use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 221, 173–187. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., et al., 2017. Parcel-based urban land use classification in megacity using airborne LiDAR, high resolution orthoimagery, and Google Street View. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 215–228. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Deng, X., and Newsam, S., 2019. Fine-grained Land Use classification at the city scale using ground-level images. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. doi:10.1109/TMM.2019.2891999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. and Newsam, S., 2015. Land use classification using convolutional neural networks applied to ground-level images. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL '15). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Article 61, 1–4. doi:10.1145/2820783
   Google Scholar