A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management

References

• Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., and Brown, G., 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85 (1), 27–39. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, B.L., 2018. Strongly participatory science and knowledge justice in an environmentally contested region. Science, Technology & Human Values, 43 (6), 947–971. doi:10.1177/0162243918758380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagstad, K.J., et al., 2017. Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning. Landscape Ecology, 32 (1), 77–97. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0430-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, R.A. and Sijtsma, F.J., 2017. A portfolio of natural places: using a participatory GIS tool to compare the appreciation and use of green spaces inside and outside urban areas by urban residents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., and Fagerholm, N., 2013. Child-friendly urban structures: bullerby revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8 (2), 101–113. 10.1002./jtr.52.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2012. Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24 (4), 534–545. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., 2013. Relationships between spatial and non-spatial preferences and place-based values in national forests. Applied Geography, 44, 1–11. doi:10.1016/J.APGEOG.2013.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2014b. An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods’. Applied Geography, 48, 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., 2017. A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Transactions in GIS, 21 (1), 39–56. doi:10.1111/tgis.12207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2017a. Mixed methods participatory GIS: an evaluation of the validity of qualitative and quantitative mapping methods. Applied Geography, 79, 153–166. doi:10.1016/J.APGEOG.2016.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2017b. Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Society & Natural Resources, 30 (12), 1458–1475. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1347977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2018a. Assessing the validity of crowdsourced wildlife observations for conservation using public participatory mapping methods. Biological Conservation, 227, 141–151. doi:10.1016/J.BIOCON.2018.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Brabyn, L., 2012a. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107 (3), 317–331. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2012.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Brabyn, L., 2012b. The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification. Applied Geography, 35 (1–2), 84–94. doi:10.1016/J.APGEOG.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Donovan, S., 2014. Measuring change in place values for environmental and natural resource planning using public participation GIS (PPGIS): results and challenges for longitudinal research. Society & Natural Resources, 27 (1), 36–54. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.840023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Fagerholm, N., 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119–133. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Glanz, H., 2018. Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Applied Geography, 99, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Hausner, V., and Lægreid, E., 2015c. Physical landscape associations with mapped ecosystem values with implications for spatial value transfer: an empirical study from Norway. Ecosystem Services, 15, 19–34. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Hausner, V.H., 2017. An empirical analysis of cultural ecosystem values in coastal landscapes. Ocean & Coastal Management, 142, 49–60. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Kelly, M., and Whitall, D., 2014a. Which “public”? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (2), 190–214. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.741045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Kyttä, M., 2014. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Kyttä, M., 2018. Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 95, 1–8. doi:10.1016/J.APGEOG.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Pullar, D., and Hausner, V.H., 2016. An empirical evaluation of spatial value transfer methods for identifying cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 69, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Raymond, C., 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27 (2), 89–111. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Raymond, C.M., 2014. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Raymond, C.M., and Corcoran, J., 2015b. Mapping and measuring place attachment. Applied Geography, 57, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Reed, P., 2012b. Values compatibility analysis: using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) for decision support in national forest management. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 5 (4), 317–332. doi:10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Reed, P., and Raymond, C.M., 2020. Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Applied Geography, 116, 102156. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Rhodes, J., and Dade, M., 2018b. An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Sanders, S., and Reed, P., 2018c. Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 64–74. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2018.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Weber, D., 2012. Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography, 34, 316–324. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Weber, D., and de Bie, K., 2015a. Is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning. Land Use Policy, 43, 228–238. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G.G. and Pullar, D.V., 2012. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (2), 231–246. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.585139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G.G. and Reed, P., 2012a. Social landscape metrics: measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Landscape Research, 37 (1), 73–90. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.591487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, B.A., et al., 2010. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning, 97 (2), 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, B.A., et al., 2011. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conservation Biology, 25 (1), 172–181. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01560.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, W.H., 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24 (3), 346–352. doi:10.2307/1374834.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., 2012. The legacy of positivism and the emergence of interpretive tradition in spatial planning. Regional Studies, 46 (4), 429–441. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.618120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smith, M.J. et al., 2020. Geospatial analysis. 6th ed. The Winchelsea Press. Available from: https://www.spatialanalysisonline.com/extractv6.pdf [Accessed 15 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, J., et al., 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat doi:10.5281/zenodo.3553579.
   Google Scholar
• Elith, J., et al., 2010. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity & Distributions, 17 (1), 43–57. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, S., et al., 2018. Assessing local acceptance of protected area management using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 27–34. doi:10.1016/J.JNC.2017.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ester, M., et al., 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise’. In: E. Simoudis, J. Han, and U. Fayyad, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 226–231. Available from: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.121.9220 [Accessed 15 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., et al., 2016. Assessing linkages between ecosystem services, land-use and well-being in an agroforestry landscape using public participation GIS. Applied Geography, 74, 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., et al., 2019a. Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 56, 134–147. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., et al., 2019b. Place-based landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landscape Ecology, 34 (7), 1769–1787. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00847-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Martin, M., et al., 2017. Participatory mapping of landscape values in a Pan-European perspective. Landscape Ecology, 32 (11), 2133–2150. doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0531-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis, A. and Ord, J.K., 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24 (3), 189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald, S., Laatikainen, T.E., and Kyttä, M., 2016. Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (12), 2321–2338. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., et al., 2018. Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: four Ps to advance participatory socio-environmental modeling. Ecological Applications, 28 (1), 46–61. doi:10.1002/eap.1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, eds. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 105–122. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G.B., et al., 2010. Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (5), 761–781. doi:10.1080/13658810903213288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, K., 2019. Exploring centricity of activity spaces: from measurement to the identification of personal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society, 14, 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, K., Broberg, A., and Kyttä, M., 2017. Where is my neighborhood? A dynamic individual-based definition of home ranges and implementation of multiple evaluation criteria. Applied Geography, 84, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, K., Kyttä, M., and Brown, G., 2019. Beyond housing preferences: urban structure and actualisation of residential area preferences. Urban Science, 3 (1), 21. doi:10.3390/urbansci3010021.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, K., Laatikainen, T., and Kyttä, M., 2018. A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 20 (3), 227–252. doi:10.1007/s10109-017-0264-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausner, V.H., Brown, G., and Lægreid, E., 2015. Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy, 49, 446–461. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, C.D., et al., 2018. Spatial scale influences how people value and perceive green open space. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61 (12), 2133–2150. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1388219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., et al., 2016. Geo-questionnaire: a method and tool for public preference elicitation in land use planning. Transactions in GIS, 20 (6), 903–924. doi:10.1111/tgis.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabisch, N., et al., 2017. Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas - linkages between science, policy and practice. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1.
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., et al., 2016. Let the citizens map - public participation GIS as a planning support system in Helsinki 2050 master planning process. Planning Practice and Research, 31 (2), 195–214. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., and Nummi, P., 2018. Crowdsourcing place-based memories. In: A.-M. Halme et al., ed. Heritage is ours - citizens participating in decision making. Helsinki: Europa Nostra Finland, 128–131. Available from: http://www.europanostra.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/HeritageisOursBook9.3.pdf [Accessed 15 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., and Geertman, S., 2019. Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajosaari, A., Hasanzadeh, K., and Kyttä, M., 2019. Residential dissonance and walking for transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 134–144. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, S., et al., 2018. Tourism resort users’ participation in planning: testing the public participation geographic information system method in Levi, Finnish Lapland. Tourism Management Perspectives, 27, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, A. and Brown, G., 2017. Assessing multiple approaches for modelling land-use conflict potential from participatory mapping data. Land Use Policy, 67, 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, A., Brown, G., and Hockings, M., 2015. Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots. Applied Geography, 63, 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelling, S., et al., 2015. Taking a “Big Data” approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio, 44 (S4), 601–611. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendal, D. and Raymond, C.M., 2018. Understanding pathways to shifting people’s values over time in the context of social–ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 14 (5), 1333–1342. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0648-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter, J.O., 2016. Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21, 291–307. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2016.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter, J.O., et al., 2019. Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 14 (5), 1439–1461. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., et al., 2013. Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., et al., 2014. Perceived safety of the retrofit neighborhood: a location-based approach. Urban Design International, 19 (4), 311–328. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., et al., 2015. Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 43 (1), 34–57. doi:10.1177/0265813515600121.
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Kahila-Tani, M., and Broberg, A., 2018a. Social sustainability of urban settings - contextually sensitive, participatory approach utilizing PPGIS methodology. In: S. Darchen and G. Searle, eds. Global planning innovations for urban sustainability. London: Routledge, 26–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., et al., 2018b. Children as urbanites: mapping the affordances and behavior settings of urban environments for Finnish and Japanese children. Children’s Geographies, 16 (3), 319–332. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1453923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., and Kahila, M., 2012. Urban environment and children’s active lifestyle: softGIS revealing children’s behavioral patterns and meaningful places. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26 (5), e137–e148. doi:10.4278/ajhp.100914-QUAN-310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laatikainen, T.E., et al., 2017. PPGIS approach for defining multimodal travel thresholds: accessibility of popular recreation environments by the water. Applied Geography, 79, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, T.E., Haybatollahi, M., and Kyttä, M., 2019. Environmental, individual and personal goal influences on older adults’ walking in the helsinki metropolitan area. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (1), 58. doi:10.3390/ijerph16010058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, A.M., et al., 2014. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 28 (6), 1497–1511. doi:10.1111/cobi.12409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, A.M., Brown, G., and Raymond, C.M., 2015. Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology, 30 (4), 699–713. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J., 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning, 62 (1), 3–65. doi:10.1016/J.PROGRESS.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. doi:10.2737/PNW-GTR-351.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, A., 2007. Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation, 134 (4), 571–579. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, F., 2015. Public participatory GIS. Geography Compass, 9 (7), 384–394. doi:10.1111/gec3.12223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, L., et al., 2019. Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic- and international tourists to protected areas. Tourism Management, 71, 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, J., et al., 2017. Identifying ‘public values’ for marine and coastal planning: are residents and non-residents really so different? Ocean & Coastal Management, 148, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummi, P., 2018. Crowdsourcing local knowledge with PPGIS and social media for urban planning to reveal intangible cultural heritage. Urban Planning, 3 (1), 100. doi:10.17645/up.v3i1.1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pánek, J., et al., 2017. Mapping emotions: spatial distribution of safety perception in the city of Olomouc. In: W. Cartwright, ed. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Cham: Springer, 211–224. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_16.
   Google Scholar
• Pánek, J., 2018. Mapping citizens’ emotions: participatory planning support system in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Journal of Maps, 15 (1), 8–12. doi:10.1080/17445647.2018.1546624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä, M. and Fagerholm, N., 2016. Visitors’ place-based evaluations of unacceptable tourism impacts in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Tourism Geographies, 18 (3), 258–279. doi:10.1080/14616688.2016.1169313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä, M. and Fagerholm, N., 2019. A management perspective to using Public Participation GIS in planning for visitor use in national parks. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62 (7), 1133–1148. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1473757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., et al., 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., et al., 2018. Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands. Global Environmental Change, 52, 162–180. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocewicz, A. and Nielsen-Pincus, M., 2013. Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential development. Applied Geography, 43, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplin, A., 2015. How user-friendly are online interactive maps? Survey based on experiments with heterogeneous users. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42 (4), 358–376. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.991427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall, E., et al., 2017. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecological Indicators, 77, 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall, E., Hansen, R., and Pauleit, S., 2019. The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40, 26–274. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaldi, G., et al., 2006. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Gomez, S.O.I., et al., 2017. Participatory 3D modelling as a socially engaging and user-useful approach in ecosystem service assessments among marginalized communities. Applied Geography, 83, 63–77. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Gomez, S.O.I., Brown, G., and Fat, A.T.S., 2013. Participatory mapping with indigenous communities for conservation: challenges and lessons from suriname. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 58 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2013.tb00409.x.
   Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., and Bennett, E.M., 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (11), 5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. and Brown, G., 2006. A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49 (6), 797–812. doi:10.1080/09640560600945331.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. and Brown, G., 2007. A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes towards tourism growth and development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15 (5), 520–540. doi:10.2167/jost681.0.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.M., et al., 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68 (5), 1301–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.M., et al., 2014. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 107, 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.M., et al., 2016. Integrating multiple elements of environmental justice into urban blue space planning using public participation geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 198–208. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2016.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.M. and Brown, G., 2011. Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning. Climatic Change, 104 (3–4), 653–678. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9806-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, P. and Brown, G., 2003. Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46 (5), 643–658. doi:10.1080/0964056032000138418.
   Google Scholar
• Ridding, L.E., et al., 2018. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1145–1154. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbach, B., Anderson, S., and Laube, P., 2016. The effects of sample size on data quality in participatory mapping of past land use. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 43 (4), 681–697. doi:10.1177/0265813515618578.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33 (2), 163–180. doi:10.1177/0165551506070706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6 (1), 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161.
   Google Scholar
• Rzotkiewicz, A., et al., 2018. Systematic review of the use of google street view in health research: major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research. Health & Place, 25, 240–246. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, K., et al., 2018. Impact of environment on people’s everyday experiences in Stockholm. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 7–17. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarjala, S.-M., Broberg, A., and Hynynen, A., 2015. Children and youth transport in different urban morphological types. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9, 87–103. doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, L., et al., 2016. Crowdsourcing, citizen science or volunteered geographic information? The current state of crowdsourced geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5 (5), 55. doi:10.3390/ijgi5050055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse, B.C., Clement, J.M., and Semmens, D.J., 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31 (2), 748–760. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse, B.C., Semmens, D.J., and Clement, J.M., 2014. An application of social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 36, 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, R., 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Snizek, B., Sick Nielsen, T.A., and Skov-Petersen, H., 2013. Mapping bicyclists’ experiences in Copenhagen. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swobodzinski, M. and Jankowski, P., 2014. Understanding user interaction patterns within online systems for public-participation transportation planning. Transactions in GIS, 18 (3), 401–420. doi:10.1111/tgis.12099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Society of Participatory Mapping (2020). The international society of participatory mapping. Available from: https://pmappingsociety.mn.co/ [Accessed 15 October 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen, T., et al., 2019. Social media data for conservation science: a methodological overview. Biological Conservation, 233, 298–315. doi:10.1016/J.BIOCON.2019.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riper, C.J., et al., 2017. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecological Indicators, 72, 278–287. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riper, C.J. and Kyle, G.T., 2014. Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 374–384. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanke, J., et al., 2016. A shared perspective for PGIS and VGI. The Cartographic Journal, 53 (4), 308–317. doi:10.1080/00087041.2016.1227552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A.L., et al., 2014. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 28 (4), 992–1003. doi:10.1111/cobi.12257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, I.D., et al., 2015. The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: a case study of mountain biking. Tourism Management, 51, 112–130. doi:10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, I.D., Brown, G., and Wohlfart, T., 2018. Applying public participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform and manage visitor conflict along multi-use trails. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26 (3), 470–495. doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1360315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., et al., 2010. Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management, 45 (5), 896–911. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolkafli, A., Brown, G., and Liu, Y., 2017b. An evaluation of participatory GIS (PGIS) for land use planning in Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 83 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00610.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolkafli, A., Liu, Y., and Brown, G., 2017a. Bridging the knowledge divide between public and experts using PGIS for land use planning in Malaysia. Applied Geography, 83, 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar