Uncertainty interval estimates for computing slope and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model

References

• Caha, J., and Dvorský, J., 2017. First derivatives of fuzzy surfaces. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, 47, 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J.R., 1992. The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect using gridded DEMs. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 29 (1), 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, T.H., and Tsai, T.H., 1995. Comparison of accuracy and algorithms of slope and aspect measures from DEM. In: Proceedings of GIS AM/FM ASIA’95. 21–24 August, Bangkok, I-1-1–I-1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Crippen, R., et al., 2016. NASADEM Global Elevation Model: methods and progress. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B4, 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M.D., and Hoffer, R.M., 1979. Machine processing of Landsat MSS data and DMA topographic data for forest cover type mapping. LARS technical report 062879, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Florinsky, I.V., 1998. Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (1), 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky, I.V., 2009. Computation of the third-order partial derivatives from a digital elevation model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (2), 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky, I.V., 2016. Digital Terrain Analysis in Soil Science and Geology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant, J.C., and Wilson, J.P., 1996. TAPES-G: a grid-based terrain analysis program for the environmental sciences. Computers & Geosciences, 22 (7), 713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, G., and Santos, J., 2005. Propagation of DEM uncertainty: an interval arithmetic approach. In: XXII International Cartographic Conference, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Guth, P.L., 2021. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Guth, P.L., et al., 2021. Digital elevation models: terminology and definitions. Remote Sensing, 13 (18), 3581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, B.K.P., 1981. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 69 (1), 14–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K.H., 1998. A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM. Computers & Geosciences, 24 (4), 315–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovesi, P., 2015. Good colour maps: how to design them. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.03700.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and Bian, L., 2008. Accuracy assessment of DEM slope algorithms related to spatial autocorrelation of DEM errors. In: Q. Zhou, B. Lees, and G. Tang, eds. Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 307–322.
   Google Scholar
• Minár, J., et al., 2013. Third-order geomorphometric variables (derivatives): definition, computation and utilization of changes of curvatures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (7), 1381–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R., Kearfott, R.B., and Cloud, M.J., 2009. Introduction to interval analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D., Gessler, P.E., Nielsen, G.A. and Peterson, G.A., 1993. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J.L., 1971. Method-produced error in isarithmic mapping. American Congress on Surveying and Mapping. Technical Monograph No. CA-5, 75
   Google Scholar
• Polidori, L., and El Hage, M., 2020. Digital elevation model quality assessment methods: a critical review. Remote Sensing, 12 (21), 3522–3536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, H.I., et al., 2009. Preparation of DEMs for geomorphometric analysis. In: Tomislav Hengl and Hannes I. Reuter, eds. Developments in Soil Science. Vol. 33. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpnack, D.A., and Akin, G., 1969. An algorithm for computing slope and aspect from elevations. Photogrammetric Survey, 35, 247–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shary, P. A., 1995. Land surface in gravity points classification by complete system of curvatures. Mathematical Geology, 27, 373–390.
   Google Scholar
• Shary, P.A., Sharaya, L.S., and Mitusov, A.V., 2002. Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis. Geoderma, 107 (1-2), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shary, P.A., 2008. Models of topography. In: Q. Zhou, B. Lees, and G. Tang, eds. Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A.K., 1989. A comparison of techniques for calculating gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 3 (4), 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J., and Pilesjö, P., 2011. Estimating slope from raster data: a test of eight different algorithms in flat, undulating and steep terrain. In: C.A. Brebbia, ed. River Basin Management VI, Riverside, California, USA. UK: Wessex Institute of Technology, 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, D., 1981. Introductory Spatial Analysis. London and New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Vaze, J., Teng, J., and Spencer, G., 2010. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (10), 1086–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S.D., et al., 2004. An evaluation of methods to determine slope using digital elevation data. CATENA, 58 (3), 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., and Evans, I.S., 1978. Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices. Report No. 5, Grant DA-ERO-591-73-G0040. England: Dept. of Geography, University of Durham, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, L.W., and Thorne, C.R., 1987. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12 (1), 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., and Liu, X., 2004. Error analysis on grid-based slope and aspect algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70 (8), 957–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., and Liu, X., 2008. Assessing uncertainties in derived slope and aspect from a Grid DEM. In: Q. Zhou, B. Lees, and G. Tang, eds. Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis SE – 15, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 279–306.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatev, Z., et al., 2017. Richardson Extrapolation: Practical Aspects and Applications, De Gruyter Series in Applied and Numerical Mathematics. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar