A matrix factorization model with local and global consistency for flow prediction in bike-sharing systems

References

• Ahmed, N.M., et al., 2016. Sampling-based algorithm for link prediction in temporal networks. Information Sciences, 374, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, N.M., et al., 2018. Deepeye: link prediction in dynamic networks based on non-negative matrix factorization. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 1 (1), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Austwick, M.Z., et al., 2013. The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PloS One., 8 (9), e74685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgnat, P., et al., 2011. Shared bicycles in a city: a signal processing and data analysis perspective. Advances in Complex Systems, 14 (03), 415–438.
   Google Scholar
• Caggiani, L., et al., 2018. A modeling framework for the dynamic management of free-floating bike-sharing systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 87, 159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, D., et al., 2008. Non-negative matrix factorization on manifold. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE international conference on data mining. Pisa, Italy: IEEE, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, P., et al., 2016a. A spatiotemporal correlative k-nearest neighbor model for short-term traffic multistep forecasting. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 62, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., et al., 2016b. Bike-sharing prediction system. In: International conference on technologies for E-learning and digital entertainment. Cham: Springer, 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, M., et al., 2020. Analysis of the spatiotemporal riding modes of dockless shared bicycles based on tensor decomposition. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (11), 2225–2242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, S., Lu, W., and Xu, Q., 2015. Grarep: learning graph representations with global structural information. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. Melbourne, Australia: Association for Computing Machinery, 891–900.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S., et al., 2018. Short-term traffic forecasting: an adaptive ST-KNN model that considers spatial heterogeneity. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 71, 186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crucitti, P., Latora, V., and Porta, S., 2006. Centrality in networks of urban streets. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 16 (1), 015113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattorro, J., 2010. Convex optimization & Euclidean distance geometry. Palo Alto, CA: Lulu.com.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Deng, F., and Liao, F., 2019. A model framework for discovering the spatio-temporal usage patterns of public free-floating bike-sharing system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 103, 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneş, İ., Gündüz-Öğüdücü, Ş., and Çataltepe, Z., 2016. Link prediction using time series of neighborhood-based node similarity scores. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 30 (1), 147–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S., and Shin, K.G., 2020. Towards fine-grained flow forecasting: a graph attention approach for bike sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the web conference 2020. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, K., et al., 2018. Adaptive multiple non-negative matrix factorization for temporal link prediction in dynamic networks. In: Proceedings of the 2018 workshop on network meets AI & ML. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., He, Z., and Peeta, S., 2018. Predicting station-level hourly demand in a large-scale bike-sharing network: a graph convolutional neural network approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 97, 258–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and Zheng, Y., 2020. Citywide bike usage prediction in a bike-sharing system. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32 (6), 1079–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., et al., 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Sun, P., and Qin, G., 2017. Nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for link prediction in temporal networks using graph communicability. Pattern Recognition, 71, 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Sun, P., and Wang, Y., 2018. Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for temporal link prediction in dynamic networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 496, 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, S., Lowry, M.B., and Dixon, M., 2014. Using origin–destination centrality to estimate directional bicycle volumes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2430 (1), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz-Mendez, F., et al., 2018. Community structures, interactions and dynamics in London’s bicycle sharing network. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM international joint conference and 2018 international symposium on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and wearable computers, 1015–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, J., and Holder, L., 2014. Feature engineering for supervised link prediction on dynamic social networks, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2752, USA, 7 Oct. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Potgieter, A., et al., 2009. Temporality in link prediction: understanding social complexity. Emergence: Complexity & Organization (E: CO), 11 (1), 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Puzis, R., et al., 2013. Augmented betweenness centrality for environmentally aware traffic monitoring in transportation networks. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17 (1), 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim Taleqani, A., Vogiatzis, C., and Hough, J., 2020. Maximum closeness centrality-clubs: a study of dock-less bike sharing. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranaiefar, F., and Rixey, R.A., 2016. Bike sharing ridership forecast using structural equation modeling. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, number 16–6573, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., and Dong, A., 2011. Community detection in graphs using singular value decomposition. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 83 (4 Pt 2), 046114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., and Chan, N., 2016. Mobility and the sharing economy: potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment, 42 (4), 573–588.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J-g., et al., 2018. Critical factors to achieve dockless bike-sharing sustainability in china: a stakeholder-oriented network perspective. Sustainability, 10 (6), 2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shui, C., and Chan, W., 2019. Optimization of a bikeway network with selective nodes. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si, H., et al., 2019. Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: a scientometric review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2017. Community preserving network embedding. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 31, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, T.-H., et al., 2015. Geographically modified pagerank algorithms: identifying the spatial concentration of human movement in a geospatial network. PloS One, 10 (10), e0139509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., et al., 2016. Mobility modeling and prediction in bike-sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., et al., 2019. Analysis of network structure of urban bike-sharing system: a case study based on real-time data of a public bicycle system. Sustainability, 11 (19), 5425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A., 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences, arXiv preprint cs/0008005.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., Aggarwal, C.C., and Wang, W., 2017. Temporally factorized network modeling for evolutionary network analysis. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, NY, 455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., et al., 2017. Link prediction with spatial and temporal consistency in dynamic networks. In: IJCAI. New York, NY, 3343–3349.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and Mi, Z., 2018. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: a big data-based analysis. Applied Energy, 220, 296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., and Huang, Y., 2018. Context aware flow prediction of bike sharing systems. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). Manhattan, NY: IEEE, 2393–2402.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., et al., 2019. A reliable traffic prediction approach for bike-sharing system by exploiting rich information with temporal link prediction strategy. Transactions in GIS, 23 (5), 1125–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar