2,098
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Research themes of geographical information science during 1991–2020: a retrospective bibliometric analysis

, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 243-275 | Received 28 Feb 2022, Accepted 27 Aug 2022, Published online: 13 Sep 2022

References

  • Abler, R.F., 1987. The National Science Foundation National Center for geographic information and analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1 (4), 303–326.
  • Albrechts, L., 2004. Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (5), 743–758.
  • Andrienko, G., et al., 2007. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (8), 839–857.
  • Andrienko, G., and Andrienko, N., 1999. Interactive maps for visual data exploration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (4), 355–374.
  • Andrienko, G., et al., 2010. Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (10), 1577–1600.
  • Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2), 93–115.
  • Batty, M., 2001. Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (1), 123–150.
  • Biljecki, F., 2016. A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (7), 1302–1335.
  • Blaschke, T., and Merschdorf, H., 2014. Geographic information science as a multidisciplinary and multiparadigmatic field. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (3), 196–213.
  • Brinkhoff, T., 2002. A framework for generating network-based moving objects. GeoInformatica, 6 (2), 153–180.
  • Caron, C., et al., 2008. GIScience journals ranking and evaluation: an international Delphi study. Transactions in GIS, 12 (3), 293–321.
  • Carver, S., 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (3), 321–339.
  • Chen, S., 1987. Geographical data handling and GIS in China. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1 (3), 219–228.
  • Chen, S., 1991. Geo-system and geo-informaiton system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 46 (1), 1–17.
  • Chen, S., Yue, T., and Li, H., 2000. Studies on geo-informatic Tupu and its application. Geographical Research, 19 (4), 337–343.
  • Chun, Y., and Griffith, D.A., 2011. Modeling network autocorrelation in space-time migration flow data: an eigenvector spatial filtering approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (3), 523–536.
  • Chun, Y., Kwan, M.P., and Griffith, D.A., 2019. Uncertainty and context in GIScience and geography: challenges in the era of geospatial big data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33 (6), 1131–1134.
  • Clarke, K.C., and Gaydos, L.J., 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (7), 699–714.
  • Clarke, K.C., Hoppen, S., and Gaydos, L.J., 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (2), 247–261.
  • Cohn, A.G., et al., 1997. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus. Geoinformatica, 1 (3), 275–316.
  • Cruz-Cardenas, J., et al., 2021. COVID-19, consumer behavior, technology, and society: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121179.
  • de la Cruz-Lovera, C., et al., 2019. Analysis of research topics and scientific collaborations in energy saving using bibliometric techniques and community detection. Energies, 12 (10), 2030.
  • de Melo, A.V.F., and de Queiroz, A.P., 2019. Bibliometric mapping of papers on geographical information systems (2007-2016). Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences, 25 (3), e20190015.
  • DiBiase, D., et al., 2006. Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
  • Dong, W., et al., 2022. Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge acquisition: are they the same in virtual reality and in real-world environments? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112 (1), 226–246.
  • Drǎguţ, L., Tiede, D., and Levick, S.R., 2010. ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (6), 859–871.
  • Du, Z., et al., 2020. Geographically neural network weighted regression for the accurate estimation of spatial non-stationarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (7), 1353–1377.
  • Duckham, M., 2015. GI expertise. Transactions in GIS, 19 (4), 499–515.
  • Egenhofer, M.J., and Franzosa, R.D., 1991. Point-set topological relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (2), 161–174.
  • Egenhofer, M.J., and Mark, D.M., 1995. Naive geography. In: International conference on spatial information theory. Springer, 1–15.
  • Eicher, C., and Brewer, C., 2001. Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: implementation and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (2), 125–138.
  • Fan, H., et al., 2014. Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (4), 700–719.
  • Fortunato, S., and Barthelemy, M., 2007. Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (1), 36–41.
  • Gessler, P.E., et al., 1995. Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (4), 421–432.
  • Getis, A., and Ord, J.K., 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24 (3), 189–206.
  • Girres, J.F., and Touya, G., 2010. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14 (4), 435–459.
  • Gong, J., and Xia, Z., 1999. An integrated data model in three dimensional GIS. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2 (1), 1–8.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 1990. GIS and basic research: the national center for geographic information and analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 7 (3), 343–355.
  • Goodchild, M.F., and Li, L., 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110–120.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 1992. Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (1), 31–45.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 2004. GIScience, geography, form, and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (2), 300–303.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 2013. The quality of big (geo)data. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3 (3), 280–284.
  • Goodell, J.W., et al., 2021. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: identifying foundations, themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100577.
  • Grenon, P., and Smith, B., 2004. SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 4 (1), 69–104.
  • Haklay, M., 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4), 682–703.
  • Hawelka, B., et al., 2014. Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (3), 260–271.
  • Healey, P., 1996. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23 (2), 217–234.
  • Hillier, B., et al., 1993. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20 (1), 29–66.
  • Huang, W., 2022. What were GIScience scholars interested in during the past decades? Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 6 (1), 1–21.
  • Huang, X., et al., 2021. 30 m global impervious surface area dynamics and urban expansion pattern observed by Landsat Satellites: from 1972 to 2019. Science China Earth Sciences, 64 (11), 1922–1933.
  • Hutchinson, M., 1995. Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (4), 385–403.
  • Jankowski, P., 1995. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (3), 251–273.
  • Janowicz, K., et al., 2020. GeoAI: spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (4), 625–636.
  • Jiang, B., and Claramunt, C., 2004. A structural approach to the model generalization of an urban street network. GeoInformatica, 8 (2), 157–171.
  • Keenan, P.B., and Jankowski, P., 2019. Spatial decision support systems: three decades on. Decision Support Systems, c116, 64–76.
  • Kemp, K., Kuhn, W., and Brox, C., 2013. Results of a survey to rate GIScience publication outlets. In: AGILE 2013. Leuven: Belgium.
  • Kimerling, J.A., et al., 1999. Comparing geometrical properties of global grids. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26 (4), 271–288.
  • Kwan, M.P., 2010. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30 (3), 191–216.
  • Kyriakidis, P., 2004. A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 36 (3), 259–289.
  • Li, L., et al., 2017. A bibliometric and visual analysis of global geo-ontology research. Computers & Geosciences, 99, 1–8.
  • Li, W., Batty, M., and Goodchild, M.F., 2020. Real-time GIS for smart cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (2), 311–324.
  • Li, W., and Hsu, C.Y., 2020. Automated terrain feature identification from remote sensing imagery: a deep learning approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (4), 637–660.
  • Li, X., et al., 2022. Information geography: The information revolution reshapes geography. Science China Earth Sciences, 65 (2), 379–382.
  • Li, Z., et al., 2004. Automated building generalization based on urban morphology and gestalt theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (5), 513–534.
  • Liao, H., et al., 2022. Detecting individuals’ spatial familiarity with urban environments using eye movement data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 93, 101758.
  • Liu, J.S., Ho, M.H.C., and Lu, L.Y.Y., 2017. Recent themes in social networking service research. PLOS One, 12 (1), e0170293.
  • Liu, X., et al., 2019. Global urban expansion offsets climate-driven increases in terrestrial net primary productivity. Nature Communications, 10 (1), 5558.
  • Liu, Y., 2022. Core or edge? revisiting giscience from the geography-discipline perspective. Science China Earth Sciences, 65 (2), 387–390.
  • Liu, Y., et al., 2015a. Social sensing: a new approach to understanding our socioeconomic environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105 (3), 512–530.
  • Liu, Y., Tong, D., and Liu, X., 2015b. Measuring spatial autocorrelation of vectors. Geographical Analysis, 47 (3), 300–319.
  • Liu, Z., et al., 2015c. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103 (1), 135–158.
  • Longley, P.A., et al., 2015. Geographic information science and systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing.
  • Luo, W., and Wang, F., 2003. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 30 (6), 865–884.
  • Ma, J., et al., 2020. Assessing mobility-based real-time air pollution exposure in space and time using smart sensors and GPS trajectories in Beijing. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110 (2), 434–448.
  • Malczewski, J., 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20 (7), 703–726.
  • Mark, D.M., 2000. Geographic information science: critical issues in an emerging cross-disciplinary research domain. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 12 (1), 45–54.
  • McMaster, R.B., and Usery, E.L., 2004. A research agenda for geographic information science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Miller, H.J., 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (3), 287–301.
  • Miller, H.J., 2005. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37 (1), 17–45.
  • Newman, M.E.J., and Girvan, M., 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 69 (2 Pt 2), 026113.
  • Ord, J.K., and Getis, A., 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27 (4), 286–306.
  • Parr, D.A., and Lu, Y., 2010. The landscape of GIScience publications 1997–2007: an empirical investigation with latent semantic analysis. Transactions in GIS, 14 (5), 689–708.
  • Pei, T., et al., 2017. Spatial analysis and simulation. In: The geographical sciences during 1986—2015, Singapore: Springer Geography, 339–366.
  • Pei, T., et al., 2021. Giscience and remote sensing in natural resource and environmental research: status quo and future perspectives. Geography and Sustainability, 2 (3), 207–215.
  • Pendall, R., 1999. Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 (4), 555–571.
  • Peng, Y., et al., 2015. Global trends in DEM-related research from 1994 to 2013: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105 (1), 347–366.
  • Peuquet, D.J., and Duan, N., 1995. An event-based spatiotemporal data model (ESTDM) for temporal analysis of geographical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (1), 7–24.
  • Groos, O.V., and Pritchard, A.L.A.N., 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25 (4), 344–349.
  • Saalfeld, A., 1999. Topologically consistent line simplification with the Douglas-Peucker algorithm. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26 (1), 7–18.
  • Sahr, K., White, D., and Kimerling, A.J., 2003. Geodesic discrete global grid systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30 (2), 121–134.
  • Shaw, S.L., and Sui, D., 2020. Understanding the new human dynamics in smart spaces and places: toward a splatial framework. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110 (2), 339–348.
  • Silva, F.N., et al., 2016. Using network science and text analytics to produce surveys in a scientific topic. Journal of Informetrics, 10 (2), 487–502.
  • Stockwell, D., and Peters, D.P., 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (2), 143–158.
  • Sun, S., and Manson, S.M., 2011. Social network analysis of the academic GIScience community. The Professional Geographer, 63 (1), 18–33.
  • Tao, R., and Thill, J.C., 2020. BiFlowLISA: measuring spatial association for bivariate flow data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 83, 101519.
  • Turner, A., 2006. Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  • Turner, A., et al., 2001. From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (1), 103–121.
  • UCGIS, 1996. Research priorities for geographic information science. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 23 (3), 115–127.
  • van Eck, N.J., and Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538.
  • van Eck, N.J., and Waltman, L., 2017. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111 (2), 1053–1070.
  • Waltman, L., and van Eck, N.J., 2013. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. European Physical Journal B, 86 (11), 471.
  • Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., and Noyons, E.C.M., 2010. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4), 629–635.
  • Wang, J., et al., 2010. Geographical detectors based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (1), 107–127.
  • Wei, F., Grubesic, T.H., and Bishop, B.W., 2015. Exploring the GIS knowledge domain using citespace. The Professional Geographer, 67 (3), 374–384.
  • White, D., Kimerling, J.A., and Overton, S.W., 1992. Cartographic and geometric components of a global sampling design for environmental monitoring. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 19 (1), 5–22.
  • Wiginton, L.K., Nguyen, H.T., and Pearce, J.M., 2010. Quantifying rooftop solar photovoltaic potential for regional renewable energy policy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (4), 345–357.
  • Yan, Y., et al., 2020. Volunteered geographic information research in the first decade: a narrative review of selected journal articles in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (9), 1765–1791.
  • Yuan, M., 2017. 30 years of IJGIS: the changing landscape of geographical information science and the road ahead. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (3), 425–434.
  • Yuan, Y., et al., 2020. The missing parts from social media-enabled smart cities: who, where, when, and what? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110 (2), 462–475.
  • Zeng, A., et al., 2017. The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports, 714–715, 1–73.
  • Zhang, F., et al., 2018. Measuring human perceptions of a large-scale urban region using machine learning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 148–160.
  • Zhang, J.Z., et al., 2021. Big data analytics and machine learning: a retrospective overview and bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 184, 115561.
  • Zheng, Y., et al., 2014. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5 (3), 1–55.
  • Zhu, D., et al., 2020. Spatial interpolation using conditional generative adversarial neural networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (4), 735–758.
  • Zhu, D., et al., 2021. Spatial regression graph convolutional neural networks: a deep learning paradigm for spatial multivariate distributions. GeoInformatica. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-021-00454-x.
  • Zou, S., and Wang, L., 2020. Individual vacant house detection in very-high-resolution remote sensing images. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110 (2), 449–461.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.