Multi-nomenclature, multi-resolution joint translation: an application to land-cover mapping

References

• Adamo, M., et al., 2014. Expert knowledge for translating land cover/use maps to general habitat categories (GHC). Landscape Ecology, 29 (6), 1045–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist, O., 2005. Using uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (7), 831–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist, O., 2008. In search of classification that supports the dynamics of science: the FAO land cover classification system and proposed modifications. Environment and Planning B, 35 (1), 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mubaid, H. and Nguyen, H., 2009. Measuring semantic similarity between biomedical concepts within multiple ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 39 (4), 389–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R., et al., 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Washington, D.C.: Geological Survey professional paper.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, S., et al., 2015. The EAGLE concept: a paradigm shift in land monitoring. Land use and land cover semantics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 107–144.
   Google Scholar
• Audebert, N., Saux, B.L., and Lefèvre, S., 2018. Beyond RGB: very high resolution urban remote sensing with multimodal deep networks. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 140, 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomé, E. and Belward, A.S., 2005. GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26 (9), 1959–1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudoux, L., 2022. Multiple land-use/land-cover dataset (mlulc). Genève, Switzerland: Zenodo.
   Google Scholar
• Baudoux, L., Inglada, J., and Mallet, C., 2021. Toward a yearly country-scale CORINE land-cover map without using images: a map translation approach. Remote Sensing, 13 (6), 1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, B., Demuzere, M., and Stewart, I.D., 2020. A weighted accuracy measure for land cover mapping: comment on Johnson. Local Climate Zone (LCZ) map accuracy assessments should account for land cover physical characteristics that affect the local thermal environment. Remote Sensing, 12 (11), 1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.G. and Duh, J.D., 2004. Spatial simulation for translating from land use to land cover. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (1), 35–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchhorn, M., et al., 2020. Copernicus global land cover layers—collection 2. Remote Sensing, 12 (6), 1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantelaube, P. and Carles, M., 2014. Le registre parcellaire graphique: des données géographiques pour décrire la couverture du sol agricole. Cahier des techniques de l’INRA, (Méthodes et techniques GPS et SIG pour la conduite de dispositifs expérimentaux). Paris, France: INRAE, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, S., Kitaev, N., and Klein, D., 2020. Multilingual alignment of contextual word representations. ICLR. Available from: https://openreview.net/forum?id=r1xCMyBtPS.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, P., Narayanan, P., and Roussel, T., 2019. GEN-SLAM: generative modeling for monocular simultaneous localization and mapping. 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 20–24 May 2019, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.C., et al., 2018. DeepLab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 40 (4), 834–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling techniques. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, A., Fisher, P., and Wadsworth, R., 2004. Assessment of a semantic statistical approach to detecting land cover change using inconsistent data sets. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70 (8), 931–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, A., Fisher, P., and Wadsworth, R., 2005. What is land cover? Environment and Planning B, 32 (2), 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conneau, A., et al., 2020. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 5–10 July 2020, Virtual. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., et al., 2019. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North, 2–7 June 2019, Minneapolis, USA. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, A., 2005. Land cover classification system: classification concepts and user manual: Lccs. vol. 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Farahani, A., et al., 2021. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 877–894.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, C.C. and Flewelling, D., 2004. Assessment of semantic similarity between land use/land cover classification systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28 (3), 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G.M., 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80 (1), 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, S. and See, L., 2005. Comparison of land cover maps using fuzzy agreement. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (7), 787–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghamisi, P., et al., 2019. Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing: a comprehensive review of the state of the art. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 7 (1), 6–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorio, A., 2000. Land cover classification system: LCCS: classification concepts and user manual. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Grekousis, G., Mountrakis, G., and Kavouras, M., 2015. An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36 (21), 5309–5335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, M., et al., 2008. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: an assessment of agreement nd accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (5), 2538–2556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heymann, Y., 1994. Corine land cover: technical guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D., et al., 2021a. More diverse means better: multimodal deep learning meets remote-sensing imagery classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59 (5), 4340–4354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D., et al., 2021b. Multimodal remote sensing benchmark datasets for land cover classification with a shared and specific feature learning model. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 178, 68–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W.C., et al., 2020. Unsupervised representation disentanglement using cross domain features and adversarial learning in variational autoencoder based voice conversion. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 4 (4), 468–479.
   Google Scholar
• Inamdar, S., et al., 2008. Multidimensional probability density function matching for preprocessing of multitemporal remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46 (4), 1243–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglada, J., et al., 2017. Operational high resolution land cover map production at the country scale using satellite image time series. Remote Sensing, 9 (1), 95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwao, K., et al., 2011. Creation of new global land cover map with map integration. Journal of Geographic Information System, 03 (02), 160–165.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, L.J., Groom, G., and Carrai, G., 2008. Land-cover harmonisation and semantic similarity: some methodological issues. Journal of Land Use Science, 3 (2–3), 131–160.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen, M.R. and Levin, G., 2013. Semantically based reclassification of Danish land-use and land-cover information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (12), 2375–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, D.U., et al., 2020. Associative variational auto-encoder with distributed latent spaces and associators. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34 (07), 11197–11204.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, M., et al., 2006. Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 101 (4), 534–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavouras, M. and Kokla, M., 2002. A method for the formalization and integration of geographical categorizations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (5), 439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., et al., 2020. MULE: multimodal universal language embedding. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34 (07), 11254–11261.
   Google Scholar
• Kouw, W.M. and Loog, M., 2021. A review of domain adaptation without target labels. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43 (3), 766–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lample, G. and Conneau, A., 2019. Cross-lingual language model pretraining. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 32, Curran Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Leiva-Murillo, J.M., Gomez-Chova, L., and Camps-Valls, G., 2013. Multitask remote sensing data classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (1), 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., et al., 2021. Land cover harmonization using latent dirichlet allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35 (2), 348–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, M., et al., 2017. A synergy cropland of china by fusing multiple existing maps and statistics. Sensors, 17 (7), 1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., et al., 2020. Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2. Geoscientific Model Development, 13 (7), 3203–3220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, G., et al., 2022. A review of location encoding for GeoAI: methods and applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36 (4), 639–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkin, K., et al., 2019. Label super-resolution networks. 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, 6–9 May 2019. New Orleans, LA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, C. and Le Bris, A., 2020. Current challenges in operational very high resolution land-cover mapping. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B2-2020, 703–710.
   Google Scholar
• Moiret-Guigand, A., et al., 2021. Clc2018/clcc1218 validation report. GMES Initial Operations/Copernicus Land monitoring services. Available from: https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/clc-2018-and-clc-change-2012-2018-validation-report/at_download/file.
   Google Scholar
• Mura, M.D., et al., 2015. Challenges and opportunities of multimodality and data fusion in remote sensing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103 (9), 1585–1601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, N., et al., 2013. Learning with noisy labels. In: C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani and K.Q. Weinberger, eds. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 26, 1196–1204. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/file/3871bd64012152bfb53fdf04b401193f-Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., et al., 2007. Comparative assessment of CORINE2000 and GLC2000: spatial analysis of land cover data for Europe. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9 (4), 425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyshabur, B., et al., 2017. Exploring generalization in deep learning. In: I. Guyon, U.V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan and R. Garnett, eds. Advances in neural information processing systems. Vol. 30, 5947–5956. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc. Available from: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/10ce03a1ed01077e3e289f3e53c72813-Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A.A., and Canty, M.J., 2009. Kernel principal component and maximum autocorrelation factor analyses for change detection. In: L. Bruzzone, C. Notarnicola and F. Posa, eds. SPIE Proceedings, 8 September 2009, Berlin, Germany. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, P., et al., 2014. Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 148, 42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, E., et al., 2017. Domain adaptation network for cross-scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (8), 4441–4456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, N., et al., 2018. Image transformer. In: J. Dy and A. Krause, eds. Proceedings of the 35th international conference on machine learning, 10–15 Jul, Stockholm, Sweden. PMLR, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 80, 4055–4064. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/parmar18a.html.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D., et al., 2019. Handling noisy labels for robustly learning from self-training data for low-resource sequence labeling. Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, June, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hoyos, A., García-Haro, F., and San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2012. A methodology to generate a synergetic land-cover map by fusion of different land-cover products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 19, 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hoyos, A., Udías, A., and Rembold, F., 2020. Integrating multiple land cover maps through a multi-criteria analysis to improve agricultural monitoring in Africa. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 88, 102064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hoyos, A., et al., 2017. Comparison of global land cover datasets for cropland monitoring. Remote Sensing, 9 (11), 1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, T., Schlinger, E., and Garrette, D., 2019. How multilingual is multilingual BERT? Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 28 July–2 August 2019, Florence, Italy. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Raposo, P., Brewer, C.A., and Sparks, K., 2017. An impressionistic cartographic solution for base map land cover with coarse pixel data. Cartographic Perspectives, (83), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.J., and Rugg, R.D., 1999. Assessing semantic similarities among geospatial feature class definitions. Interoperating geographic information systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T., 2015. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Schepaschenko, D., et al., 2015. Development of a global hybrid forest mask through the synergy of remote sensing, crowdsourcing and FAO statistics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 162, 208–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, L., et al., 2015. Building a hybrid land cover map with crowdsourcing and geographically weighted regression. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 103, 48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. and Komodakis, N., 2018. Cloud-gan: cloud removal for sentinel-2 imagery using a cyclic consistent generative adversarial networks. 2018 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 22–27 July 2018, Valencia, Spain. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, C., et al., 2021. Facebook AI WMT21 news translation task submission. CoRR, abs/2108.03265. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.03265.
   Google Scholar
• Tsendbazar, N.E., de Bruin, S., and Herold, M., 2017. Integrating global land cover datasets for deriving user-specific maps. International Journal of Digital Earth, 10 (3), 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsendbazar, N.E., et al., 2020. Copernicus global land service: land cover 100m: version 3 globe 2015–2019: validation report. Genève, Switzerland: Zenodo.
   Google Scholar
• Tuanmu, M.N., and Jetz, W., 2014. A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23 (9), 1031–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuia, D., Persello, C., and Bruzzone, L., 2016. Domain adaptation for the classification of remote sensing data: an overview of recent advances. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 4 (2), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84 (4), 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancutsem, C., et al., 2012. Harmonizing and combining existing land cover/land use datasets for cropland area monitoring at the African continental scale. Remote Sensing, 5 (1), 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani, A., et al., 2017. Attention is all you need. In: I. Guyon, U.V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan and R. Garnett, eds. Advances in neural information processing systems. Vol. 30. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc. Available from: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, Y. and Jawahar, C.V., 2014. Im2text and text2im: associating images and texts for cross-modal retrieval. Proceedings of the British machine vision conference 2014, September 2014, Nottingham, UK. London: British Machine Vision Association.
   Google Scholar
• Waser, L.T. and Schwarz, M., 2006. Comparison of large-area land cover products with national forest inventories and CORINE land cover in the European alps. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8 (3), 196–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. and He, K., 2018. Group normalization. Computer vision – ECCV 2018. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, N., et al., 2021. Zero-shot learning via discriminative dual semantic auto-encoder. IEEE Access, 9, 733–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Y., Zhong, L., and Zhong, X., 2020. An encoder-decoder network based FCN architecture for semantic segmentation. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2020, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, G., et al., 2014. A bayesian based method to generate a synergetic land-cover map from existing land-cover products. Remote Sensing, 6 (6), 5589–5613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, L., et al., 2020. Triplet adversarial domain adaptation for pixel-level classification of VHR remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58 (5), 3558–3573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., et al., 2017. The standardization and harmonization of land cover classification systems towards harmonized datasets: a review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (5), 154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., et al., 2019. Improving multilingual sentence embedding using bi-directional dual encoder with additive margin softmax. CoRR, abs/1902.08564. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08564.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., et al., 2020. Crossing variational autoencoders for answer retrieval. Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 5–10 July 2020, Virtual. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar