Detecting spatiotemporal propagation patterns of traffic congestion from fine-grained vehicle trajectory data

References

• Anbaroğlu, B., Cheng, T., and Heydecker, B., 2015. Non-recurrent traffic congestion detection on heterogeneous urban road networks. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 11 (9), 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, 2016. Time table of trains in Chengdu [online]. Available from: http://www.czstation.com/huochezhan/chengdu.html [Accessed 19 October 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Anon, 2021. TLC trip record data [online]. Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/tlc/about/tlc-trip-record-data.page [Accessed 1 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Anon, 2018. The Gaia Initiative [online]. Available from: https://outreach.didichuxing.com/research/opendata/en/ [Accessed 13 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Asif, M.T., et al., 2014. Spatiotemporal patterns in large-scale traffic speed prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15 (2), 794–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak, S., Dubey, A., and Bruno, L., 2019. Analyzing the cascading effect of traffic congestion using LSTM networks. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2019, Los Angeles, CA, 2144–2153.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D.A. and Tang, W., 2006. Modelling adaptive, spatially aware, and mobile agents: elk migration in Yellowstone. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20 (9), 1039–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 2018. Discovering urban traffic congestion propagation patterns with taxi trajectory data. IEEE Access., 6, 69481–69491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. and Adepeju, M., 2014. Modifiable temporal unit problem (MTUP) and its effect on space-time cluster detection. PloS One, 9 (6), e100465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chengdu Daily, 2016. Chengdu: bypass the northern half first ring via other rings, bypass the southern half of first ring via local streets [online]. Available from: https://www.weizhang8.cn/Article/24949.html [Accessed 13 May 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Chengdu Statistic Bureau, NBS Survey Office in Chengdu and Chengdu Statistical Association, 2017. Chengdu statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Codeca, L., et al., 2017. Luxembourg sumo traffic (lust) scenario: traffic demand evaluation. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 9 (2), 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, E. and Marcelloni, F., 2017. Detection of traffic congestion and incidents from GPS trace analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 73, 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, X., et al., 2019. Traffic congestion prediction by spatiotemporal propagation patterns. 2019 20th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), 10–13 June 2019, Hong Kong, 298–303.
   Google Scholar
• Eamthanakul, B., Ketcham, M., and Chumuang, N., 2017. The traffic congestion investigating system by image processing from CCTV camera. 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 1–4 March 2017, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 240–245.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sayed, H. and Thandavarayan, G., 2018. Congestion detection and propagation in urban areas using histogram models. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5 (5), 3672–3682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., et al., 2021. A novel image-based convolutional neural network approach for traffic congestion estimation. Expert Systems with Applications, 180, 115037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidófalvi, G., 2015. Scalable selective traffic congestion notification. Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Mobile Geographic Information Systems, 3 November 2015, Bellevue Washington, 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, J.S., 2002. Matching GPS observations to locations on a digital map. 81th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 13–17 January 2002. Washington, DC, 576–582.
   Google Scholar
• Kamga, C. and Yazıcı, M.A., 2014. Temporal and weather related variation patterns of urban travel time: considerations and caveats for value of travel time, value of variability, and mode choice studies. Transportation Research Part c: Emerging Technologies, 45, 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, X., et al., 2016. Urban traffic congestion estimation and prediction based on floating car trajectory data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 61, 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., et al., 2020. Congestion propagation based bottleneck identification in urban road networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69 (5), 4827–4841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. and Zhu, Z., 2021. Spatial-temporal fusion graph neural networks for traffic flow forecasting. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35 (5), 4189–4196.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., et al., 2018. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: data-driven traffic forecasting. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, 30 April–3 May 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., Jiang, Z., and Zheng, Y., 2017. Inferring traffic cascading patterns. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 7–10 November 2017, Redondo Beach, CA, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., et al., 2011. Discovering spatio-temporal causal interactions in traffic data streams. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 21–24 August 2011, San Diego, CA, 1010–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, T., Schrank, D., and Eisele, W., 1999. The keys to estimating mobility in urban areas, applying definitions and measures that everyone understands. College Station: Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, T.J., 1997. Quantifying congestion. Washington: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, P.A., et al., 2018. Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 4–7 November 2018, Maui, HI, 2575–2582.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., et al., 2009. Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 4–6 November 2009, Seattle, WA, 352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, M., et al., 2015. A road congestion detection system using undedicated mobile phones. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16 (6), 3060–3072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., et al., 2015. Large-scale transportation network congestion evolution prediction using deep learning theory. PloS One, 10 (3), e0119044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., et al., 2017. Learning traffic as images: a deep convolutional neural network for large-scale transportation network speed prediction. Sensors, 17 (4), 818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., 2007. Dynamic time warping. In Information retrieval for music and motion. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., Liu, W., and Chen, F., 2017. Discovering congestion propagation patterns in spatio-temporal traffic data. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 3 (2), 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, C., Zhang, X., and Xv, J., 2016. Big data report of smart travel - Chengdu [online]. Available from: https://www.cbndata.com/report/374/detail?isReading=report&page=1.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A.M. and Rao, K.R., 2012. Measuring urban traffic congestion-a review. International Journal for Traffic & Transport Engineering, 2 (4), 286–305.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank, D., Eisele, B., and Lomax, T., 2019. Urban mobility report. Bryan: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., et al., 2021. Detecting spatiotemporal extents of traffic congestion: a density-based moving object clustering approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35 (7), 1449–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Djahel, S., and Murphy, J., 2014. A SUMO based evaluation of road incidents’ impact on traffic congestion level in smart cities. 39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops, 8–11 September 2014, Edmonton, 702–710.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, X. and Zhang, Y., 2021. Entropy-based traffic congestion propagation pattern mining with GPS data. 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), 24–26 April 2021, Chengdu, 128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W. and Bennett, D.A., 2010. The explicit representation of context in agent-based models of complex adaptive spatial systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (5), 1128–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Wan, J., and Yuan, Y., 2018. Locality constraint distance metric learning for traffic congestion detection. Pattern Recognition, 75, 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., et al., 2015. Citywide traffic congestion estimation with social media. Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 3–6 November 2015, Seattle, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, H., et al., 2018. Predicting traffic congestion propagation patterns: a propagation graph approach. 11th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science (IWCTS’18), 6 November 2018, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, B., et al., 2016. Real-time detection and classification of traffic jams from probe data. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 31 October–3 November 2016, Burlingame, CA, 79.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, A., Ozguven, E.E., and Kocatepe, A., 2017a. Urban travel time variability: a spatio-temporal analysis within congestion pricing context. New York: University Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, M.A., Kamga, C., and Mouskos, K.C., 2012. Analysis of travel time reliability in New York city based on day-of-week and time-of-day periods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2308 (1), 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, M.A., Kamga, C., and Singhal, A., 2013. Weather’s impact on travel time and travel time variability in New York city. Transportation Research, 40, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, M.A., Kocatepe, A., and Ozguven, E.E., 2017b. Breakdown of weather, intersection and recurrent congestion impacts on urban delay in New York city. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 399–408.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, W., Li, C., and Mao, G., 2018. Urban traffic bottleneck identification based on congestion propagation. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 20–24 May 2018, Kansas, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., et al., 2019. The effect of temporal sampling intervals on typical human mobility indicators obtained from mobile phone location data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33 (7), 1471–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar