Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance

REFERENCES

• Acs, Z. A., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B. and Carlsson, B. (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 32, pp. 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. D. (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth, Journal of Political Economy, 98, pp. 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A. (1996) Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: a note, Economics Letters, 50, pp. 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. and Geuna, A. (2004) Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 13(6), pp. 559–580.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B. and Sofka, W. (2008) Successful Patterns of Scientific Knowledge Sourcing: Mix and Match. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-033, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, S. and Stern, S. (1998) An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design. NBER Working Paper No. 6600, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. and Lehmann, E. (2005) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and technological diffusion, in: LibecapGary D. (Ed.), University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property, Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 16, pp. 69–91 (Bingley: Emerald)
   Google Scholar
• Belkhodja, O. and Landry, R. (2007) The triple-helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?Scientometrics, 70(2), pp. 301–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, 29, pp. 627–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. and Corley, E. (2004) Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, 33(4), pp. 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006) In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition, Management Science, 52(1), pp. 68–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. and Zungia, P. (2007) Science Linkages and Innovation Performance: An Analysis on CIS-3 Firms in Belgium. IESE Business School, University of Navarra Working Paper No. 671, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. and Zuniga, M. P. (2008) In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links, Industrial & Corporate Change, 17, pp. 611–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catozzella, A. and Vivarelli, M. (2007) The Catalysing Role of in-House R&D in Fostering the Complementarity of Innovative Inputs. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3126, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, I. M. and Henderson, R. M. (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), pp. 157–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99(397), pp. 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48(1), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A. and Verspagen, B. (2006) University IPRs and Knowledge Transfer: Is the IPR Ownership Model More Efficient? SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series No. 154, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W. and Hussinger, K. (2007) Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity, Research Evaluation, 16(4), pp. 311–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W. and Hussinger, K. (2009a) Heterogeneity of patenting and implications for basic research, Research Policy, 38, pp. 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K. and Schneider, C. (2009b) Why challenge the ivory tower? New evidence on the basicness of academic patents, Kyklos, 62(4), pp. 488–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K. and Schneider, C. (2011) Commercializing academic research: The quality of faculty patenting, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5), pp. 1403–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K. and Schneider, C. (2012) The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), pp. 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. and David, P. (1994) Towards a new economics of science, Research Policy, 3, pp. 487–521.
   Google Scholar
• Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R. (2005) The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry-science links, Research Policy, 34(3), pp. 321–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007) University-industry linkages in the Uk: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?Research Policy, 36(9), pp. 1295–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K. (2009) Absorptive capacity and innovation: evidence from pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, Research Policy, 38(2), pp. 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J. and Burton, R. (2002) Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities, Management Science, 48, pp. 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, W. D. and Ginsberg, A. (1990) Guest editor's introduction: corporate entrepreneurship, Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C. (2012) Extramural research grants and scientists' funding strategies: beggars can't be choosers?Research Policy, 41, pp. 1448–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C. and Fier, H. (2010) Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany, Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, pp. 637–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960, Research Policy, 31(4), pp. 477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Link, A. N. and Scott, J. T. (2003) Universities as research partners, Journal of Economic Studies, 85, pp. 485–491.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N. and Vonortas, N. S. (2006) Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships, Research Policy, 35, pp. 825–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1989) The real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, 97(5), pp. 957–970.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. A. and Thursby, M. C. (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, U. (2003) Strategic Complementarities between Different Types of ICT-Expenditures. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-46, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Kilger, C. and Bartenbach, K. (2002) New rules for German Professors, Science, 298(8), pp. 1173–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S. and Bozeman, B. (2007) An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, Industrial & Corporate Change, 16(4), pp. 641–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokshin, B., Carree, M. and Belderbos, R. (2007) Testing for Complementarity and Substitability in Case of Multiple Practices. Available online at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1101447 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1101447.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E. and Stoto, M. A. (1989) Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists, Administrative Science Quaterly, 34, pp. 110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1995) Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, pp. 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P. and Röller, L.-H. (2005) Complementarities in innovation policy, European Economic Review, 49, pp. 1431–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2001) To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, pp. 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity, Research Policy, 32, pp. 1695–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. (2007) University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), pp. 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomariov, B. L. and Boardman, P. C. (2010) Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: university research centers and scientific and technical human capital, Resarch Policy, 39, pp. 613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P. (1998) On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified, Research Policy, 26(7–8), pp. 843–856.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S. and Phan, P. (2005) Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: implications for entrepreneurship education, in: G.Liebcap (Ed.), Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, pp. 1–38 (Amsterdam: Emerald)
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy, 32, pp. 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., Fuller, A. and Thursby, M. C. (2009) US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university, Research Policy, 38, pp. 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G. and Kemp, S. (2002) Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy, 31, pp. 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G. and Thursby, M. C. (2002) Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48, pp. 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. and Jaffe, A. (1997) University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of inventions, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 5, pp. 19–50.
   Google Scholar