Patenting Behaviour and the Survival of Newly Listed European Software Firms

References

• AgarwalR., and D. B.Audretsch. 2001. “Does Entry Size Matter? The Impact of the Life Cycle and Technology on Firm Survival.” Journal of Industrial Economics49 (1): 21–43. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AgarwalR., and M.Gort. 2002. “Firm and Product Life Cycles and Firm Survival.” American Economic Review92 (2): 184–190. doi:10.1257/000282802320189221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmbroseB., and W.Megginson. 1992. “The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis27 (4): 575–589. doi:10.2307/2331141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AudretschD. B.1991. “New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime.” The Review of Economics and Statistics73 (3): 441–450. doi:10.2307/2109568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AudretschD. B.1995. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• AudretschD. B., and E. E.Lehmann. 2004. “The Effects of Experience, Ownership, and Knowledge on IPO Survival: Evidence from the Neuer Markt.” Discussion Paper 04/10. Diskussionspa-pier der Forschergruppe (Nr. 3468269275) Heterogene Arbeit: Positive und Normative Aspekte der Qualifikationsstruktur der Arbeit, Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• AudretschD. B., E.Santarelli, and M.Vivarelli. 1999. “Start-up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing.” International Journal of Industrial Organization17 (7): 965–983. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEPA. 2008. Innovation and Growth in the EU: The Role of SME Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• BessenJ.2003. “Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies.” ROI Working Paper. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract = 327760.
   Google Scholar
• BessenJ., and M.Meurer. 2008. “Do Patents Perform Like Property?” Boston University School of Law Working Paper Series, Law and Economics. No 08-08.
   Google Scholar
• BottazziL., and M.Da Rin. 2001. “Europe's ‘New’ (Stock) Markets: Euro.nm, 1997–2000.” IGIER Working Paper n.171. http://www.igier.uni-bocconi.it.
   Google Scholar
• BottazziL., and M.Da Rin. 2002. “Venture Capital in Europe and the Financing of Innovative Companies.” Economic Policy 17 (34): 229–270.
   Google Scholar
• Box-SteffensmeierJ. M., and C.Zorn. 2001. “Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science45 (4): 972–988. doi:10.2307/2669335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuehlerS., C.Kaiser, and F.Jaeger. 2005. “Merger or Fail? The determinants of Merger and Bankruptcies in Switzerland, 1995–2000.” Working Paper No. 0506. Socioeconomic Institute University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• CavesR. E.1998. “Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature36 (4): 1947–1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CavesR. E., and M. E.Porter. 1977. “From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics91 (2): 241–261. doi:10.2307/1885416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CefisE., and O.Marsili. 2006. “Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms’ Survival.” Research Policy35 (5): 626–641. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CefisE., and O.Marsili. 2007. “Going, Going, Gone. Innovation and Exit in Manufacturing Firms.” Rim. Report Series Research in Management. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/9732.
   Google Scholar
• CefisE., and O.Marsili. 2012. “Going, Going, Gone. Exit Forms and the Innovative Capabilities of Firms.” Research Policy41 (5): 795–807. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoffR. W.1999. “How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty When Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: Caveat Emptor.” Organization Science10 (2): 144–161. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenW. M., and D.Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly35 (1): 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColomboM. G., and L.Grilli. 2005. “Founders’ Human Capital and the Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: A Competence-Based View.” Research Policy34 (6): 795–816. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooleyT. F., and V.Quadrini. 2001. “Financial Markets and Firm Dynamics.” American Economic Review91 (5): 1286–1310. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxD. R.1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society34: 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• CoxD. R., and D.Oakes. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• DunneT., M. J.Roberts, and L.Samuelson. 1989. “The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics104 (4): 671–698. doi:10.2307/2937862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EricsonR., and A.Pakes. 1995. “Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work.” The Review of Economic Studies62 (1): 53–82. doi:10.2307/2297841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euro.nm. 1999. The Successful Alliance of Growth Markets in Europe. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• FontanaR., and L.Nesta. 2009. “Product Innovation and Survival in a High-Tech Industry.” Review of Industrial Organization34 (4): 287–306. doi:10.1007/s11151-009-9210-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GansJ. S., and S.Stern. 2003. “The Product Market and the Market for ‘Ideas’: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs.” Research Policy32 (2): 333–350. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeroskiP. A.1995. “What Do We Know About Entry?” International Journal of Industrial Organization13 (4): 421–440. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(95)00498-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrambschP. M., and T. M.Therneau. 1994. “Proportional Hazards Tests and Diagnostics Based on Weighted Residuals.” Biometrika81 (3): 515–526. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GranstrandO., and S.Sjölander. 1990. “The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization13 (3): 367–386. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(90)90006-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallB. H.1987. “The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector.” The Journal of Industrial Economics35 (4): 583–606. doi:10.2307/2098589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallB. H., and R. H.Ziedonis. 2001. “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995.” The RAND Journal of Economics32 (1): 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenslerD., R.Rutherford, and T.Springer. 1997. “The Survival of Initial Public Offerings in the Aftermarket.” Journal of Financial Research20 (1): 93–110. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.1997.tb00238.x.
   Google Scholar
• JainB. A., and O.Kini. 2000. “Does the Presence of Venture Capitalists Improve the Survival Profile of IPO Firms?” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting27 (9–10): 1139–1183.
   Google Scholar
• JovanovicB.1982. “Selection and the Evolution of Industry.” Econometrica50 (3): 649–670. doi:10.2307/1912606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KauffmanR., and B.Wang. 2003. “Duration in the Digital Economy.” In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, edited by R.Sprague. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computing Society.
   Google Scholar
• KayR.1986. “Treatment Effects in Competing-Risks Analysis of Prostate Cancer Data.” Biometrics42 (1): 203–211. doi:10.2307/2531258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeeleL.2010. “Proportionally Difficult: Testing for Nonproportional Hazards in Cox Models.” Political Analysis18 (2): 189–205. doi:10.1093/pan/mpp044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlepperS.1996. “Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle.” American Economic Review86 (3): 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LippoldtD., and P.Stryszowski. 2009. Innovation in the Software Sector. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• ManigartS., K.Baeyens, and W. V.Van hyfte. 2002. “The Survival of Venture Capital Backed Companies.” Venture Capital4 (2): 103–124. doi:10.1080/13691060110103233.
   Google Scholar
• MannR.2005. “Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry?” Texas Law Review83 (4): 961–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MannR., and T.Sager. 2007. “Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Start-Ups.” Research Policy36 (2): 193–208. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MullerP., and J.Pénin. 2006. “Why Do Firms Disclose Knowledge and How Does It Matter?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics16 (1–2): 85–108. doi:10.1007/s00191-005-0009-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonR. R., and S. G.Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NESSI. 2008. “European Software Strategy, a NESSI Proposition Paper.” The Networked European Software and Services Initiative, June. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• NoelM. D., and M. A.Schankermann. 2006. “Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5701. London, UK: CEPR.
   Google Scholar
• PalepuK.1986. “Predicting Takeover Targets.” Journal of Accounting and Economics8 (1): 3–35. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(86)90008-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeelM. J., and N.Wilson. 1989. “The Liquidation/Merger Alternative Some Results for the UK Corporate Sector.” Managerial and Decision Economics10 (3): 209–220. doi:10.1002/mde.4090100304.
   Google Scholar
• PellegrinoG., M.Piva, and M.Vivarelli. 2012. “Young Firms and Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics23 (4): 329–340. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2011.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• PeristianiS., and G.Hong. 2004. Pre-IPO Financial Performance and Aftermarket Survival. Current Issues in Economics and Finance. Vol. 10, No. 2. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
   Google Scholar
• PérezE. S., A.Llopis, and J. A.Llopis. 2004. “The Determinants of Survival of Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Review of Industrial Organization25 (3): 251–273. doi:10.1007/s11151-004-1972-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PommetS.2012. “Capital-investissement et performances des firmes: le cas de la France.” Vie & sciences de l'entrepriseN°190: 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• PorterM. E.1979. “The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance.” The Review of Economics and Statistics61 (2): 214–227. doi:10.2307/1924589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowellR.1997. “Modelling Takeover Likelihood.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting24 (7–8): 1009–1030. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00148.
   Google Scholar
• RanftA. L., and M. D.Lord. 2002. “Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation.” Organization Science13 (4): 420–441. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.420.2952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RentocchiniF.2011. “Sources and Characteristics of Software Patents in the European Union: Some Empirical Considerations.” Information Economics and Policy 23 (1): 141–157. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RitterJ. R.1991. “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings.” The Journal of Finance46 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SantarelliE., and M.Vivarelli. 2007. “Entrepreneurship and the Process of Firms' Entry, Survival and Growth.” Industrial and Corporate Change16 (3): 455–488. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScharyM. A.1991. “The Probability of Exit.” The RAND Journal Of Economics22 (3): 339–353. doi:10.2307/2601051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchererF. M.1965. “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions.” American Economic Review55 (5): 1097–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneiderC., and R.Veugelers. 2010. “On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them.” Industrial and Corporate Change19 (4): 969–1007. doi:10.1093/icc/dtp052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchultzP.1993. “Unit Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics34 (2): 199–229. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90018-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoreyD. J., and B. S.Tether. 1998. “New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union: An Introduction.” Research Policy26 (9): 933–946. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00052-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syntec Informatique. 2008. “Position Paper: Towards a European Software Strategy.” Collection ThémaTic-Software Numéro 22.
   Google Scholar
• UsecheD.2014. “Are Patents Signals for the IPO Market? An EU-US Comparison for the Software Industry.” Research Policy43 (8): 1299–1311. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van ZeebroeckN., and B.van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2011. “Filing Strategies and Patent Value.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology20 (6): 539–561. doi:10.1080/10438591003668646.
   Google Scholar
• VeugelersR., and M.Cincera. 2010. “Young Leading Innovators and EU's R&D Intensity Gap.” . Bruegel Policy Contribution, No. 2010/09.
   Google Scholar
• WagnerS., and I.Cockburn. 2010. “Patents and the Survival of Internet-Related IPOs.” Research Policy39 (2): 214–228. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinterS. G.1987. “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets.” In The Competitive Challenge. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, edited by D. J.Teece, 159–184. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• ZiedonisR. H.2004. “Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms.” Management Science50 (6): 804–820. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar