The role of firm R&D effort and collaboration as mediating drivers of innovation policy effectiveness

References

• Aerts, K., and D. Czarnitzki. 2004. “Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Belgium.” ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04‐55, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Aerts, K., and D. Czarnitzki. 2006. The Impact of Public R&D Funding in Flanders, 54. IWT M&A Study, Brussel.
   Google Scholar
• Aerts, K., and T. Schmidt. 2008. “Two for the Price of One? Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies: Comparison between Flanders and Germany.” Research Policy 37: 806–822.10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aho, E., J. Cornu, L. Gheorgiou, and A. Subirà. 2006. Creating an Innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation Appointed following the Hampton Court Summit. Brussel: EU.
   Google Scholar
• Almus, M., and D. Czarnitzki. 2003. “The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms’ Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21 (2): 226–236.10.1198/073500103288618918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonioli, D., and A. Marzucchi. 2012. “Evaluating the Additionality of Innovation Policy. A Review Focused on the Behavior Dimension.” World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9 (2/3/4): 124–148.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B., and T. Schmidt. 2008. “Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation – Happy Together?” Review of Industrial Organization 33: 41–62.10.1007/s11151-008-9179-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, L., and M. Matt. 2005. “Rationale for Science and Technology Policy.” In Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-based Economy: Theory and Practice, edited by L. Gheorgiou, J. Rigby, and H. Cameron, 17–45. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzini, R., and P. Piselli. 2013. “The Impact of R&D Subsidies on Firm Innovation.” Paper Presented at the Workshop Innovazione, Produttività E Crescita in Italia Organized by Università Di Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (Cosenza), March 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 2000. “Mysteries of the Region: Knowledge Dynamics in Silicon Valley.” In The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, edited by Chong-Moon, Lee, 16–39. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buisseret, T. J., H. M. Cameron, and L. Georghiou. 1995. “What Difference Does It Make – Additionality in the Public Support of R-and-D in Large Firms.” International Journal of Technology Management 10 (4–6): 587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busom, I. 2000. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9 (2): 111–148.10.1080/10438590000000006
   Google Scholar
• Busom, I., and A. Fernandez-Ribas. 2008. “The Impact of Firm Participation in R&D Programmes on R&D Partnerships.” Research Policy 37: 240–257.10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium.” American Economic Review 92 (4): 1169–1184.10.1257/00028280260344704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G. 2014. “IVTREATREG: A Stata Routine for Estimating Binary Treatment Models with Heterogeneous Response to Treatment and Unobservable Selection.” The Stata Journal 14 (3): 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G., and B. Potì. 2012. “Designing Ex-Post Assessment of Corporate RDI Policies: Conceptualization, Indicators and Modeling.” World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9 (2/3/4): 96–123.
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., V. Bilsen, and G. Steurs. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of the R&D Subsidies Programs of IWT Flanders (Belgium).” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behavior: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, edited by OECD, 91–114. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., M. Wright, and P. Mustar. 2009. “Behavioural Additionality of R&D Subsidies: A Learning Perspective.” Research Policy 38: 1517–1533.10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. H., E. Ljunggren, and E. L. Madsen. 2008. “Input, Output and Behavioral Additionality: Concepts and Relationships.” Paper Presented at the 25th Celebration DRUID Conference 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Corsino, M., R. Gabriele, and A. Giunta. 2015. “Research and Development Subsidies: The Effectiveness of a Regional Policy.” In The Economics of Knowledge Generation and Distribution, edited by P. Patrucco, 223–251. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningam, P., A. Gok, and P. Laredo. 2013. “The Impact of Direct Support to R&D and Innovation in Firms.” NESTA Working Paper 13/03.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., B. Ebersberger, and A. Fier. 2007. “The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1347–1366.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and A. Fier. 2002. Do Innovation Subsidies Crowd out Private Investment?: Evidence from the German Service Sector, 02–04. Mannheim: ZEW, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and K. Hussinger. 2004. “The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance.” ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 04-056.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.” American Economic Review 78 (5): 1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A., B. H. Hall, and A. A. Toole. 2000. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.” Research Policy 29 (4/5): 407–529.
   Google Scholar
• Duguet, E. 2004. “Are R&D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded R&D? Evidence from France Using Propensity Score Methods for Non Experimental Data.” Revue D’Economie Politique 114 (2): 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of Austria’s Industrial Research Promotion Fund (FFF).” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, 59–74. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Folster, S. 1995. “Do Subsidies to Cooperative R & D Actually Stimulate R & D Investment and Cooperation?” Research Policy 24: 403–417.10.1016/0048-7333(93)00773-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemünden, H. G., T. Ritter, and A. Walter, eds. 1997. Relationships and Networks in International Markets. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. 2002. “Impact and Additionality of Innovation Policy.” Innovation Science and Technology IWT Studies, 40: 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. 2007. “What Lies beneath: Avoiding the Risk of under-Evaluation.” Science and Public Policy 34: 743–752.10.3152/030234207X259003
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., and B. Clarysse. 2006. Introduction and Synthesis in Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour. Measuring Behavioural Additionality. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., and D. Roessner. 2000. “Evaluating Technology Programs: Tools and Methods.” Research Policy 29 (4): 657–678.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00094-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. 1993. “Antitrust Policy towards Cooperative R and D Ventures.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 5: 20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gok, A., and J. Edler. 2010. “Exploring the Use of Behavioural Additionality.” In Final report of the project: INNO Appraisal: Understanding Evaluation of Innovation Policy in Europe, edited by J. Edler, 151–201. Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Gok, A., and J. Edler. 2012. “The Use of Behavioural Additionality Evaluation in Innovation Policy Making.” Research Evaluation 21 (4): 306–318.10.1093/reseval/rvs015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, X., J. Jaumandreu, and C. Pazó. 2005. “Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness.” The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (4): 930–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, X., and C. Pazó. 2008. “Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?” Research Policy 37: 371–389.10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg, H., and E. Strobl. 2007. “Money for Nothing? Do R&D Subsidies Add to or Crowd out Private R&D?” Economica 74: 215–234.10.1111/ecca.2007.74.issue-294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijs, J., and L. Herrera. 2004. “The Distribution of R&D Subsidies and Its Effect on the Final Outcome of Innovation Policy.” Working paper Instituto de Analisis Industrial y Financiero 46, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Hinloopen, J. 2001. “Subsidizing R&D Cooperatives.” De Economist 149 (3): 313–345.
   Google Scholar
• Hussinger, K. 2008. “R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Two-Step Selection Models.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 729–747.10.1002/jae.v23:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, J. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of Public R&D Funding in Finland.” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, edited by L. Georghiou and B. Clarysse, 115–125. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, U. 2004. “Private R&D and Public Subsidies: Microeconomic Evidence from Denmark.” Danish Journal of Economics 144 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., and J. A. Ordover. 1990. “R&D Cooperation and Competition.” In Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, edited by M. N. Baily, and C. Winston, 137–202. Washington, DC: Boorking Instistution.
   Google Scholar
• Lach, S. 2002. “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel.” Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (4): 369–390.10.1111/joie.2002.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2006. “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (2): 131–150.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, A. 2008. “Determinants for R&D Cooperation: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 26: 113–136.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., and A. Broström. 2008. “Does Knowledge Diffusion between University and Industry Increase Innovativeness?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 33 (1): 73–90.10.1007/s10961-006-9001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf H., and Heshmati P. 2005. “The Impact of Public Funding on Private R&D Investment. New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study.” Centre of Excellence for Studies in Science and Innovation. http://www.infra.kth.se/cesis/research/publications/workingpapers.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, E. L., and Brastad, B. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of Innovation Norway’s Financial Support Programmes.” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, 181–204. París: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, K., Georghiou, L., and Cameron, H. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of the UK SMART and LINK Schemes.” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour, 205–218. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merito, M., S. Giannangeli, and A. Bonaccorsi. 2007. “Do R&D subsidies stimulate the research productivity and the growth of firms?” l’Industria 27 (2): 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S., L. Georghiou, and A. James. 1997. “Adaptation and Learning in European Technology Policy.” Paper Presented to the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Seattle, WA, February 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, T. 2006. “Behavioural Additionality of Public R&D Funding in Korea.” In Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour, 167–180. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steurs, G., A. Verbeek, H. Vermeulen, and B. Clarysse. 2006. “A Look into the Black Box: What Difference Do IWT R&D Grants Make for Their Clients?” IWT-Studies 93: 1–109.
   Google Scholar
• Suetens, S. 2002. “R&D Subsidies and Production Effects of R&D Personnel: Evidence from the Flemish Region.” CESIT Discussion Paper 2002/03, Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, S. J. 2000. “The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program.” The RAND Journal of Economics 31 (1): 82–100.10.2307/2601030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar