883
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The invisible college of cluster research: a bibliometric core–periphery analysis of the literature

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Asheim, B. T. 1996. “Industrial Districts as ‘Learning Regions’: A Condition for Prosperity.” European Planning Studies 4 (4): 379–400. doi:10.1080/09654319608720354.
  • Barsky, N. P. 1999. “A Core/Periphery Structure in A Corporate Budgeting Process.” Connections 22 (2): 22–29.
  • Bartle, R. G. 1995. “A Brief History of the Mathematical Literature.” Publishing Research Quarterly 11: 3–9. doi:10.1007/BF02680421.
  • Blondel, V. D., J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. “Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10): P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
  • Borgatti, S. P., and M. G. Everett. 1999. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures.” Social Networks 21: 375–395. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2.
  • Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgman, C. L., and J. Furner. 2002. “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 (1): 2–72. doi:10.1002/aris.1440360102.
  • Bradford, S. C. 1948. Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood.
  • Cancino, C., J. M. Merigó, and F. Coronado. 2017a. “Leading Universities in Innovation Research.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 2: 106–124. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2017.03.006.
  • Cancino, C., J. M. Merigó, F. Coronado, Y. Dessouky, and M. Dessouky. 2017b. “Forty Years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 113 (2017b): 614–629. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033.
  • Cattani, G., and S. Ferriani. 2008. “A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry.” Organization Science 19 (6): 824–844. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350.
  • Chubin, D. E. 1976. “State of the Field the Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties.” The Sociological Quarterly 17 (4): 448–476. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1976.tb01715.x.
  • Cole, J. R. 2000. “A Short History of the Use of Citations as A Measure of the Impact of Scientific and Scholarly Work.” In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, 281–300. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Collier, D., and J. E. Mahon. 1993. “Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855. doi:10.2307/2938818.
  • Collins, H. M. 1974. “The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks.” Science Studies 4 (2): 165–185. doi:10.1177/030631277400400203.
  • Cooke, P. 1992. “Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe.” Geoforum 23: 365–382. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9.
  • Cooke, P. 2008. “Regional Innovation Systems: Origin of the Species.” International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1 (3): 393–409. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2008.019980.
  • Cozzens, S. 1989. “What Do Citations Count? the Rhetoric-First Model.” Scientometrics 15 (5–6): 437–447. doi:10.1007/BF02017064.
  • Crane, D. 1969. “Social Structure in A Group of Scientists: A Test of the “Invisible College” Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 34 (3): 335–352. doi:10.2307/2092499.
  • Crane, D. 1970. “The Nature of Scientific Communication and Influence.” International Social Science Journal 22 (1): 28–41.
  • Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cronin, B. 1998. “Metatheorizing Citation.” Scientometrics 43 (1): 45–55. doi:10.1007/BF02458393.
  • Cronin, B., and H. B. Atkins. 2000. “The Scholar’s Spoor.” In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, 1–7. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Cruz, S., and A. Teixeira. 2010. “The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies.” Regional Studies 44: 1263–1288. doi:10.1080/00343400903234670.
  • Cummings, J. N., and R. Cross. 2003. “Structural Properties of Work Groups and Their Consequences for Performance.” Social Networks 25 (3): 197–210. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7.
  • de Nooy, W., A. Mrvar, and V. Batagelj. 2011. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (Vol. 27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Durisin, B., G. Calabretta, and V. Parmeggiani. 2010. “The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (3): 437–451. doi:10.1111/jpim.2010.27.issue-3.
  • Fagerberg, J., and B. Verspagen. 2009. “Innovation studies—The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field.” Research Policy 38 (2): 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006.
  • Fagerberg, J., H. Landström, and B. R. Martin. 2012. “Exploring the Emerging Knowledge Base of ‘The Knowledge Society’.” Research Policy 41 (7): 1121–1131. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.007.
  • Foss, N. J. 1996. “Research in Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter.” Journal of Management Studies 33 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1111/joms.1996.33.issue-1.
  • Foss, N. J. 2012. “The Evolution and Eclecticism of Porter’s Thinking.” In Competition, Competitive Advantage, and Clusters: The Ideas of Michael Porter, edited by R. Huggins and H. Izushi, 93–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fröhlich, K., and R. Hassink. 2018. “Regional Resilience: a Stretched Concept?” European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1763–1778.
  • Garfield, E., M. V. Malin, and H. Small. 1978. “Citation Data as Science Indicators.” In Toward a Metric of Science, edited by Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, A. Thackray, R. K. Merton, and H. Zuckerman, 179–207. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Garfield, E. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Garfield, E., I. H. Sher, and R. J. Torpie. 1964. The Use of Citation Data in Writing History of Science. Philadelphia, PA: Institute of Scientific Information.
  • Giuliani, E., P. A. Balland, and A. Matta. Forthcoming. “Straining but Not Thriving: Understanding Network Dynamics in Underperforming Industrial Clusters.” Journal of Economic Geography. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx046.
  • Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311.
  • Granovetter, M. S. 1974. Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hagstrom, W. O. 1970. “Factors Related to the Use of Different Modes of Publishing Research in Four Scientific Fields.” In Communication among Scientists and Engineers, edited by C. E. Nelson and D. K. Pollock, 85–124. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath Lexington BookComm.
  • Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., G. Gonzalez, P. Caja, and F. Sempere-Ripoll. 2015. “Clusters and Industrial Districts: Where Is the Literature Going? Identifying Emerging Sub-Fields of Research.” European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1827–1872. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1021300.
  • Hummon, N. P., and P. Dereian. 1989. “Connectivity in a Citation Network: The Development of DNA Theory.” Social Networks 11 (1): 39–63. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8.
  • Kadushin, C. 1966. “The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: On Social Circles in Urban Life.” American Sociological Review 786–802. doi:10.2307/2091658.
  • Kadushin, C. 1968. “Power, Influence and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers.” American Sociological Review 685–699. doi:10.2307/2092880.
  • Khun, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Krugman, P. 1991. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499. doi:10.1086/261763.
  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lazzeretti, L., S. R. Sedita, and A. Caloffi. 2014. “Founders and Disseminators of Cluster Research.” Journal of Economic Geography 14 (1): 21–43. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs053.
  • Leydesdorff, L., and O. Amsterdamska O. 1990. “Dimensions of Citation Analysis. Science.” Technology, & Human Values 15 (3): 305–335. doi:10.1177/016224399001500303.
  • Lievrouw, L. A. 1989. “The Invisible College Reconsidered Bibliometrics and the Development of Scientific Communication Theory.” Communication Research 16 (5): 615–628. doi:10.1177/009365089016005004.
  • Lievrow, L. A. 1990. “Reconciling Structure and Process in the Study of Scholarly Communication.” In Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, edited by Borgman, 59–69. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lingwood, D. A. 1969. Interpersonal Communication, Research Productivity and Invisible Colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Stanford, CA.
  • Maggioni, M. A., T. E. Uberti, and F. Gambarotto. 2009. Mapping the Evolution of ‘Clusters’: A Meta-Analysis. Working paper 74.2009, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Markusen, A. 1999. “Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence and Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies.” Regional Studies 33 (9): 869–886. doi:10.1080/00343409950075506.
  • Martin, B. R. 2012. “The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies.” Research Policy 41 (7): 1219–1239. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012.
  • Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2001. “Rethinking the “Economic” in Economic Geography: Broadening Our Vision or Losing Our Focus?” Antipode 33 (2): 148–161. doi:10.1111/anti.2001.33.issue-2.
  • Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2003. “Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept or Policy Panacea?” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (1): 5–35. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.5.
  • Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2015. “On the Notion of Regional Economic Resilience: Conceptualization and Explanation.” Journal of Economic Geography 15 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu015.
  • Merigó, J. M., C. Cancino, F. Coronado, and D. Urbano. 2016. “Academic Research in Innovation: A Country Analysis.” Scientometrics 108: 559–593. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4.
  • Merton, R. K. 2000. “On the Garfield Input to the Sociology of Science: A Retrospective Collage.” In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, 435–448. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Mintz, B., and M. Schwartz. 1981. “Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group Formation.” American Sociological Review 46: 851–868. doi:10.2307/2095083.
  • Nerur, S. P., A. A. Rasheed, and V. Natarajan. 2008. “The Intellectual Structure of the Strategic Management Field: An Author Co-Citation Analysis.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (3): 319–336. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
  • Persson, O., R. Danell, and J. Wiborg Schneider. 2009. “How to Use Bibexcel for Various Types of Bibliometric Analysis.” In Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, edited by F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, and J. Schneider, 9–24. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M. E. 1990. “The Competitive Advantage Of Nations.” Harvard Business Review 68 (2): 71–91.
  • Powell, W. W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Network Forms of Organization.” Research on Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.
  • Powell, W. W., D. R. White, K. W. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith. 2005. “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences 1.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (4): 1132–1205. doi:10.1086/421508.
  • Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 116–145. doi:10.2307/2393988.
  • Price, D. J. D. S. 1961. Science since Babylon. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Price, D. J. D. S. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Price, D. J. D. S. 1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.” Science 510–515. doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510.
  • Raasch, C., V. Lee, S. Spaeth, and C. Herstatt. 2013. “The Rise and Fall of Interdisciplinary Research: The Case of Open Source Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (5): 1138–1151. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.010.
  • Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., and J. Ruíz‐Navarro. 2004. “Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000.” Strategic Management Journal 25 (10): 981–1004. doi:10.1002/smj.397.
  • Sartori, G. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053.
  • Small, H. 1973. “Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (1973): 265–269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
  • Small, H., and B. C. Griffith. 1974. “The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties.” Science Studies 4 (1): 17–40. doi:10.1177/030631277400400102.
  • Small, H. G. 1977. “A Co-Citation Model of A Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research.” Social Studies of Science 7 (2): 139–166. doi:10.1177/030631277700700202.
  • Small, H. G. 1978. “Cited Documents as Concept Symbols.” Social Studies of Science 8 (3): 327–340. doi:10.1177/030631277800800305.
  • Stokes, T. D., and J. A. Hartley. 1989. “Coauthorship, Social Structure and Influence within Specialties.” Social Studies of Science 19 (1): 101–125. doi:10.1177/030631289019001003.
  • Van Meeteren, M., A. Poorthuis, B. Derudder, and F. Witlox. 2016. “Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A Scientometric Analysis of Polycentricity in Urban Research.” Urban Studies 53 (6): 1278–1298. doi:10.1177/0042098015573455.
  • Verspagen, B., and C. Werker. 2004. “Keith Pavitt and the Invisible College of the Economics of Technology and Innovation.” Research Policy 33 (9): 1419–1431. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.010.
  • Williamson, O. E. 1973. “Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations.” The American Economic Review 63 (2): 316–325.
  • Zuccala, A. 2006. “Modeling the Invisible College.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (2): 152–168. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.