Dancing with wolves: how value creation and value capture dynamics affect complementor participation in industry platforms

References

• Alexy, O., and G. George. 2013. “Category Divergence, Straddling, and Currency: Open Innovation and the Legitimation of Illegitimate Categories.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (2): 173–203. doi:10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and J. C. Woodard. 2009. “The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View.” In Platforms, Markets and Innovation, edited by A. Gawer, 19–44. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., A. Zobel, A. Afuah, E. Almirall, S. Brunswicker, L. Dahlander, L. Frederiksen, et al. 2017. “The open innoation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis.” Industry and Innovation 24 (1): 8–40. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. 2010. “Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access versus devolving control.” Management Science 56 (10): 1849–1872. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. 2012. “Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation.” Organization Science 23 (5): 1409–1427. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., and L. B. Jeppesen. 2015. “Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage.” Strategic Management Journal 36 (12): 1761–1777. doi:10.1002/smj.2324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M., C. Forman, P. Huang, and D. Wu. 2012. “Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 263–290. doi:10.2307/41410417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C. 2016. “Building The Value of Next-generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns.” Journal of Management 44 (8): 3038–3069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and J. Santalo. 2013. “Platform competition: Strategic tradee Paradox of orm ecosystem.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (11): 1331–1350. doi:10.1002/smj.2066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., and K. D. Miller. 2007. “Situational and institutional determinants of firms‘ R&D search intensity.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (4): 369–381. doi:10.1002/smj.594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, M. T., and H. Ohashi. 2005. “Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the US, 1994–2002.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 53 (4): 515–542. doi:10.1111/joie.2005.53.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., and A. Gawer. 2002. “The elements of platform leadership.” MIT Sloan Management Review 43 (3): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBona, C., M. Stone, and D. Cooper. 2005. Open sources 2.0: The continuing evolution. CA: O‘Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., G. Parker, and M. Van Alstyne. 2011. “Platform envelopment.” Strategic Management Journal 32 (12): 1270–1285. doi:10.1002/smj.v32.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R., G. Parker, and M. Van Alstyne. 2009. “Opening platforms: how, when and why?.” In Platforms, Markets and Innovation, edited by A. Gawer, 131–162. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., and R. Schmalensee. 2010. “Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses.” Review of Network Economics 9 (4). doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, E., R. W. Palmatier, and J.-B. E. Steenkamp. 2008. “Effect of service transition strategies on firm value.” Journal of Marketing 72 (5): 1–14. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.5.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, B. 2006. “The transformation of open source software.” MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 587–598. doi:10.2307/25148740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosfuri, A., M. S. Giarratana, and A. Luzzi. 2008. “The penguin has entered the building: The commercialization of open source software products.” Organization Science 19 (2): 292–305. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L. S., and B. Iyer. 2006. “Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions.” Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (2): 119–147. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., S. Jain, and A. Kumaraswamy. 2002. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Sponsorship of Common Technological Standards: The Case of Sun Microsystems and Java.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. 2009. “Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services.” In Platforms, markets and innovation, edited by A. Gawer, 45–76. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. 2014. “Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1239–1249. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and M. A. Cusumano. 2002. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and M. A. Cusumano. 2008. “How Companies Become Platform Leaders.” MIT Sloan Management Review 49 (2): 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and R. Henderson. 2007. “Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., D. C. Jain, and M. S. Sawhney. 1999. “Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television.” Marketing Science 18 (3): 396–416. doi:10.1287/mksc.18.3.396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1979. “Sample selection bias as a specification error.” Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P., M. Ceccagnoli, C. Forman, and D. Wu. 2013. “Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: evidence from enterprise software.” Management Science 59 (1): 102–121. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., P. Rouvinen, T. Seppälä, and J. Zysman. 2019. “Platforms and industrial change.” Industry and Innovation.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., M. W. Van Alstyne, and S. P. Choudary. 2016. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York: Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Patrucco, P. P. 2014. “The evolution of knowledge organization and the emergence of a platform for innovation in the car industry.” Industry and Innovation 21 (3): 243–266. doi:10.1080/13662716.2014.910892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. 2006. “Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution.” Research Policy 35 (8): 1122–1130. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1980. “Industry Structure and Competitive Strategy: Keys to Profitability.” Financial Analysts Journal 36 (4): 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. 1999. The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., and J. T. Mahoney. 1996. “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design.” Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter): 63–76. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171107.
   Google Scholar
• Taudes, A., M. Feurstein, and A. Mild. 2000. “Options analysis of software platform decisions: a case study.” MIS Quarterly 24 (2): 227–243. doi:10.2307/3250937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tee, R., and C. J. Woodard. 2013. Architectural control and value migration in layered ecosystems: The case of open-source cloud management platforms. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1986. “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.” Research Policy 15 (6): 285–305. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. D., E. Autio, and D. M. Gann. 2014. “Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context.” The Academy of Management Perspectives 28 (2): 198–219. doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2013. Platform ecosystems: aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2015a. “Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems.” Information Systems Research 26 (2): 266–281. doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2015b. “Platform Desertion by App Developers.” Journal of Management Information Systems 32 (4): 40–77. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1138365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., B. Konsynski, and A. A. Bush. 2010. “Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics.” Information Systems Research 21 (4): 675–687. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. 2003. “How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies.” Research Policy 32 (7): 1259–1285. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., and J. Dedrick. 2000. “Innovation and control in standards architectures: the rise and fall of Japan‘s PC-98.” Information Systems Research 11 (2): 197–216. doi:10.1287/isre.11.2.197.11778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., V. Venkatesh, K. Y. Tam, and S.-J. Hong. 2010. “Model of migration and use of platforms: role of hierarchy, current generation, and complementarities in consumer settings.” Management Science 56 (8): 1304–1323. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., and Q. Liu. 2018. “Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon. com.” Strategic Management Journal 39 (10): 2618–2642. doi:10.1002/smj.2932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar