The impact of the abolishment of the professor’s privilege on European university-owned patents

References

• Arqué-Castells, P., R. M. Cartaxo, J. García-Quevedo, and M. M. Godinho. 2016. “Royalty Sharing, Effort and Invention in Universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1858–1872. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backs, S., M. Günther, and C. Stummer. 2019. “Stimulating Academic Patenting in a University Ecosystem: An Agent-based Simulation Approach.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (2): 434–461. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9697-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development.” Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 175–188. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z.
   Google Scholar
• Bessen J. 2008. The Value of US Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics. Research Policy 5, 932–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, S., C. Hayter, and A. Link. 2013. “Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 9 (6): 571–650. doi:10.1561/0300000048.
   Google Scholar
• Callaert, J., M. Du Plessis, J. Grouwels, C. Lecocq, T. Magerman, B. Peeters, X. Song, B. Van Looy, and C. Vereyen 2011. “Patent Statistics at Eurostat: Methods for Regionalisation, Sector Allocation and Name Harmonisation.” Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers, 72 pp. Luxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and E. Carpentier. 2019. “Two Decades of Academic Inventions in France.” Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and V. Sterzi. 2019. The Transfer and Value of Academic Inventions When The TTO is one option. Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Chardonnens, F. 2010. “Legislation and Technology Transfer in Switzerland.” Les Nouvelles, Licensing Executives Society International Journal. December.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. A., E. E. Lehmann, M. Menter, and N. Seitz. 2019. “The Impact of University Focused Technology Transfer Policies on Regional Innovation and Entrepreneurship.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44(5): 1451–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., D. Thorsten, K. Hussinger, P. Schliessler, and A. A. Toole. 2015. “Individual versus Institutional Ownership of University-discovered Inventions.” ZEW Discussion paper, no. 15-007.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger, and C. Schneider. 2012. “The Nexus between Science and Industry: Evidence from Faculty Inventions.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (5): 755–776. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9214-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, E. F., and M. C. Thursby. 2013. “University Entrepreneurship and Professor Privilege.” Industrial and Corporate Change 22 (1): 183–218. doi:10.1093/icc/dts047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Malva, A., F. Lissoni, and P. Llerena. 2013. “Institutional Change and Academic Patenting: French Universities and the Innovation Act of 1999.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23 (1): 211–239. doi:10.1007/s00191-011-0243-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, F., U. Schmoch, N. Schulze, and N. Bethke. 2012. “Identification of University-based Patents: A New Large-scale Approach.” Research Evaluation 22 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, R. S. 1996. “Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-sponsored Research.” Virginia Law Review 1663–1727. doi:10.2307/1073686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O., and H. Toivanen. 2018. “University Invention and the Abolishment of the Professor’s Privilege in Finland.” Research Policy 47 (4): 814–825. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D., and L. S. Leighton. 1989. “Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship.” American Economic Review 79 (3): 519–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and F. Rossi. 2011. “Changes to University IPR Regulations in Europe and the Impact on Academic Patenting.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1068–1076. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, D., and C. Scott. 2010. “Hochschullehrerprivileg - Modern Incarnation of the Professor’s Privilege to Promote University to Industry Technology Transfer.” Science, Technology and Society 15: 55–76. doi:10.1177/097172180901500103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., M. Kenney, D. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2011. “30 Years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40: 1045–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” Rand Journal of Economics 36(1): 16–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, B. H. 2000. “Does Entrepreneurship Pay? an Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self‐Employment.” Journal of Political Economy 108 (3): 604–631. doi:10.1086/262131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 1999. “Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3): 511–515.
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 2003. “Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights.” Research Policy 32 (8): 1343–1363. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., and M. Reitzig. 2004. “Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants - the Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (4): 443–480. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzl, J., A. Kor, G. Orange, and H. Kaufmann, 2008. “Technology Transfer Model for Austrian Higher Education Institutions.” paper presented at the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Dubai (UAE), May 25-26.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 1998. “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1): 119–127. doi:10.1162/003465398557221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovenkamp, H., M. Janis, M. Lemley, and C. Leslie. 2013. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. Austin: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hvide, H. K., and B. F. Jones. 2018. “University Innovation and the Professor’s Privilege.” American Economic Review 108 (7): 1860–1898. doi:10.1257/aer.20160284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, E., M. Gulbrandsen, and A. Klitkou. 2007. “A Baseline for the Impact of Academic Patenting Legislation in Norway.” Scientometrics 70: 393–414. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0209-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A., and G. De Rassenfosse. 2017. “Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (6): 1360–1374. doi:10.1002/asi.2017.68.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., and D. Patton. 2011. “Does Inventor Ownership Encourage University Research-derived Entrepreneurship? A Six University Comparison.” Research Policy 40: 1100–1112. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach, S., and M. Schankerman. 2008. “Incentives and invention in Universities.” RAND Journal of Economics 39 (2): 403–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. “Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators.” The Economic Journal 114 (495): 441–465. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F. 2012. “Academic Patenting in Europe: An Overview of Recent Research and New Perspectives.” World Patent Information 34 (3): 197–205. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., M. Pezzoni, B. Poti, and S. Romagnosi. 2013. “University Autonomy, the Professor’s Privilege and Academic Patenting: Italy, 1996–2007.” Industry and Innovation 20 (5): 399–421. doi:10.1080/13662716.2013.824192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., P. Llerena, M. Mckelvey, and B. Sanditov. 2008. “Academic Patenting in Europe: newevidence from the KENIS database.” Research Evaluation 17 (2): 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loise, V., and A. J. Stevens. 2010. “The Bayh-Dole Act Turns 30.” Science translational medicine (52): 52.
   Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., and C. Martínez. 2014. “Identifying author–inventors from Spain: Methods and a firstinsight into Results.” Scientometrics 101 (1): 445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, C. 2011. “Patent Families: When Do Different Definitions Really Matter?” Scientometrics 86 (1): 39–63. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0251-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, C., and V. Sterzi. 2019. “University Patenting and the Quest for Technology Transfer Policy Models in Europe.” In Handbook of Universities and Regional Development, Chapter 8, edited by A. Varga and K. Erdos (pp. 111–150). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, C., J. M. Azagra-Caro, and S. Maraut. 2013. “Academic inventors, scientific impact and the institutionalisation of Pasteur’s Quadrant in Spain.” Industry and Innovation 20 (5): 438–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, C., and L. Bares. 2018. “The Link between Technology Transfer and International Extension of University Patents: Evidence from Spain.” Science and Public Policy 45 (6): 827–842. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejer, M. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Scientists and Their Publication Performance. An Insight from Belgium. ECARES Working Paper 2011–017.” European Center for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics. Université Libre de Bruxelles. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., and B. Sampat. 2005. “The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?” Journal of Technology Transfer 30: 115–127. doi:10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z.
   Google Scholar
• Rosell, C., and A. Agrawal. 2009. “Have University Knowledge Flows Narrowed? Evidence from Patent Data.” Research Policy 38: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D.B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role Of The Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampat, B. N., D. C. Mowery, and A. A. Ziedonis. 2003. “Changes in University Patent Quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: A Re-examination.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (9): 1371–1390. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacht, W. 2012. “The Bayh-Dole Act: Selected Issues in Patent Policy and the Commercialization of Technology.” CRS Report for Congress. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32076.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. 2007. “Patentanmeldungen Aus Deutschen Hochschulen.” Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem no. 10-2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. 2008. “Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons.” Final report to the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, A., D. Heinisch, and G. Buenstorf. 2014. “Playing the ‘name Game’to Identify Academic Patents in Germany.” Scientometrics 101 (1): 527–545. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1400-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., E. A. Locke, and C. J. Collins. 2003. “Entrepreneurial Motivation.” Human Resource Management Review 13 (2): 257–279. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Spilling, O. R., S. B. Brorstad, E. J. Iversen, E. Rasmussen, and E. Solberg. 2015. “Virkemiddelapparatet for Kommersialisering Av Forskning – Status Og Utfordringer (Kap 2: Patentering) Rapport 18/2015.”
   Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M., H. Dernis, and C. Criscuolo 2013. “Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. 1996. “The Economics of Science.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1199–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzi, V. 2013. “Patent Quality and Ownership: An Analysis of UK Faculty Patenting.” Research Policy 42 (2): 564–576. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzi, V., M. Pezzoni, and F. Lissoni. 2019. “Patent Management by Universities: Evidence from Italian Academic Inventions.” Industrial and Corporate Change 28 (2): 309–330. doi:10.1093/icc/dty070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takenaka, T. 2005. “Technology Licensing and University Research in Japan.” International Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Economy and Management 1 (1): 27–36. doi:10.2321/ijip.1.27.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin, F., and R. L. Jensen. 2007. “Effects on Academia-industry Collaboration of Extending University Property Rights.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (3): 251–276. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9015-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Proff, S., G. Buenstorf, and M. Hummel. 2012. “University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors’ Privilege Play?” Industry and Innovation 19: 23–44. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.649060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, C., H. Dernis, D. Harhoff, and K. Hoisl. 2005. “Analysing European and International Patent Citations: A Set of EPO Patent Database Building Blocks.” OECD STI Working Paper 2005/9.
   Google Scholar
• Zuniga, P. 2011. “The State of Patenting at Research Institutions in Developing Countries: Policy Approaches and Practices.” WIPO Economic Research Working Papers, 4.
   Google Scholar