The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach

References

• Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42 (2): 40822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Afuah, A., and C. L. Tucci. 2012. “Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search.” Academy of Management Review 37 (3): 355–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., K. Miller, and S. Fielding. 2015. “Open for Business: Universities, Entrepreneurial Academics and Open Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 19 (6): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400137.
   Google Scholar
• Alperin, J. P., C. M. Nieves, L. A. Schimanski, G. E. Fischman, M. T. Niles, and E. C. McKiernan. 2019. “Meta-Research: How Significant are the Public Dimensions of Faculty Work in Review, Promotion and Tenure Documents?” ELife 8: e42254. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuler, J. S., E. Balogh, A. D. Barker, S. L. Eck, S. H. Friend, G. S. Ginsburg, R. S. Herbst, S. J. Nass, C. M. Streeter, and J. A. Wagner. 2010. “Opening up to Precompetitive Collaboration.” Science Translational Medicine 2 (52): 52cm26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. V. 1994. “Creativity and Play: A Systematic Approach to Managing Innovation.” Business Horizons 37 (2): 80–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(94)90037-X.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoli-Versbach, P., and F. Mueller-Langer. 2014. “Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised.” Research Policy 43 (9): 1621–1633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apuzzo, M., and D. D. Kirkpatrick. 2020. “Covid-19 Changed How the World Does Science, Together.” New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Arazy, O., J. Daxenberger, H. Lifshitz-Assaf, O. Nov, and I. Gurevych. 2016. “Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-organizing Knowledge Coproduction.” Information Systems Research 27 (4): 792–812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza, V., and M. Fressoli. 2017. “Systematizing Benefits of Open Science Practices.” Information Services & Use 37 (4): 463–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170861.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B., and C. Grimpe. 2014. “Contemporaneous Peer Effects, Career Age and the Industry Involvement of Academics in Biotechnology.” Research Policy 43 (2): 367–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attard, J., F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, and S. Auer. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Open Government Data Initiatives.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (4): 399418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M. 2007. “What Type of Faculty Member Interacts with What Type of Firm? Some Reasons for the Delocalisation of University–industry Interaction.” Technovation 27 (11): 704–715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., N. Carayol, and P. Llerena. 2006. “Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level.” Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (2): 257–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6110-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bahlai, C., L. J. Bartlett, K. R. Burgio, A. M. V. Fournier, C. N. Keiser, T. Poisot, and K. S. Whitney. 2019. “Open Science Isn’t Always Open to All Scientists.” American Scientist 107 (2): 78–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.2.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2007. “To Patent or Not to Patent? A Survey of Italian Inventors on Motivations, Incentives, and Obstacles to University Patenting.” Scientometrics 70 (2): 333–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., and E. Von Hippel. 2011. “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation.” Organization Science 22 (6): 1399–1417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. 2008. “Enhancing Research Collaborations: Three Key Management Challenges.” Research Policy 37 (5): 875–887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., I. Macho-Stadler, and D. Pérez-Castrillo. 2019. “Evaluation in Research Funding Agencies: Are Structurally Diverse Teams Biased Against?” Research Policy 48 (7): 1823–1840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., and A. Furnham. 2006. “Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature.” Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 132 (4): 355–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerril-García, A., E. Aguado-López, K. Batthyány, R. Melero, F. Beigel, G. V. Cuartas, G. Banzato, C. Rozemblum, C. A. García, and O. Gallardo. 2019. AmeliCA: A Community-driven Sustainable Framework for Open Knowledge in Latin America and the Global South. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México; CLACSO; Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Universidad de Antioquia.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and S. Parry. 2005. “The Endurance of the Disciplines.” In Governing Knowledge, edited by I. Bleiklie and M. Henkel, 133–144. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., M. Mahdad, K. Beukel, and M. Poetz. 2019. “The Value of Scientific Knowledge Dissemination for Scientists—A Value Capture Perspective.” Publications 7 (3): 54. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., T.-M. Brasseur, M. Poetz, and H. Sauermann. 2020. “What Is the Problem? Crowdsourcing Research Questions in Science.” SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3598181
   Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2008. “Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level.” Organization Science 19 (1): 69–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, D. 2009. “Play as the Learning Medium for Future Scientists, Mathematicians, and Engineers.” American Journal of Play 1 (4): 413–428.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. P. 2011. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. New York, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigliardi, B., F. Galati, and C. Verbano. 2013. “Evaluating Performance of University Spin-off Companies: Lessons from Italy.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 8 (2): 178–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000200015.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco, A., M. G. Endres, R. A. Sergeev, A. Jonchhe, N. J. Maximilian Macaluso, R. Narayan, T. Natoli, J. H. Paik, B. Briney, and W. Chunlei. 2019. “Advancing Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research through Open Innovation Competitions.” PloS One 14 (9): e0222165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222165.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, D. N., and T. Hogan. 2014. “‘A Jack of All Trades’: The Role of PIs in the Establishment and Management of Collaborative Networks in Scientific Knowledge Commercialisation.” Journal of Technology Transfer 39 (1): 134–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9273-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., A.-K. Zobel, A. Afuah, E. Almirall, S. Brunswicker, L. Dahlander, L. Frederiksen, A. Gawer, M. Gruber, and S. Haefliger. 2017. “The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis.” Industry and Innovation 24 (1): 8–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., H. Chesbrough, and C. Moedas. 2018. “Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies.” California Management Review 60 (2): 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., H. Ballard, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, T. Phillips, J. Shirk, and C. C. Wilderman. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L. 2015. Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, USA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. 2013. “What Is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It Be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (2): 217–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and J. Edler. 2014. The Governance of Socio-technical Systems: Explaining Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, N., A. Zimmerman, J. Olson, J. Yew, J. Yerkie, E. Dahl, and G. Olson. 2007. “From Shared Databases to Communities of Practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2): 652–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., J. Elyachar, M. Kornberger, A. Mennicken, P. Miller, J. R. Nucho, and N. Pollock. 2019. “Introduction to Thinking Infrastructures.” In Thinking Infrastructures, edited by M. Kornberger, G. C. Bowker, J. Elyachar, A. Mennicken, P. Miller, J. R. Nucho, and N. Pollock, 1–13, Wagon Lane, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 2000. “Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory.” Research Policy 29 (4–5): 627–655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and J. Youtie. 2017. The Strength in Numbers: The New Science of Team Science. New York, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brembs, B., K. Button, and M. Munafò. 2013. “Deep Impact: Unintended Consequences of Journal Rank.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (291): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., and M. Trajtenberg. 1995. “General Purpose technologies‘Engines of Growth’?” Journal of Econometrics 65 (1): 83–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breunig, K. J., T. H. Aas, and K. M. Hydle. 2014. “Incentives and Performance Measures for Open Innovation Practices.” Measuring Business Excellence 18 (1): 45–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-10-2013-0049.
   Google Scholar
• Bromham, L., R. Dinnage, and X. Hua. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Research Has Consistently Lower Funding Success.” Nature 534 (7609): 684–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. R., A. Deletic, and T. H. F. Wong. 2015. “Interdisciplinarity: How to Catalyse Collaboration.” Nature 525 (7569): 315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/525315a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bultitude, K., D. McDonald, and S. Custead. 2011. “The Rise and Rise of Science Festivals: An International Review of Organised Events to Celebrate Science.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 1 (2): 165–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.588851.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. W., D. J. O’Connor, and S. M. Stocklmayer. 2003. “Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition.” Public Understanding of Science 12 (2): 183–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier; a Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Washington, DC: Office of Scientific Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World. Cambridge, USA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., E. M. Rogers, K. Kurihara, and M. M. Allbritton. 1998. “High-technology Spin-offs from Government R&D Laboratories and Research Universities.” Technovation 18 (1): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00101-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaguturu, R. 2014. Collaborative Innovation in Drug Discovery: Strategies for Public and Private Partnerships. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L., A. Okune, R. Hillyer, A. Posada, and D. Albornoz. 2019. Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chassanoff, A., and M. Altman. 2020. “Curation as “Interoperability with theFuture”: Preserving Scholarly Research Software in Academic Libraries.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (3): 325–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24244.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., and M. Bogers. 2014. “Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation.” In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, edited by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2020. Open Innovation Results: Going beyond the Hype and Getting down to Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, USA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. 1987. The Academic Life. Small Worlds, Different Worlds. A Carnegie Foundation Special Report. New York, USA: Princton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., V. Tartari, and A. Salter. 2011. “The Impact of Entrepreneurial Capacity, Experience and Organizational Support on Academic Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1084–1093. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocos, M., and B. Lepori. 2020. “What We Know about Research Policy Mix.” Science and Public Policy 47 (2): 235–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz061.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., H. Sauermann, and P. Stephan. 2020. “Not in the Job Description: The Commercial Activities of Academic Scientists and Engineers.” Management Science in press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3535.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2002. “Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.” Management Science 48 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição, C. P., P. Ávila, A. R. Coelho, and A. F. Costa. 2020. “European Action Plans for Science–Society Relations: Changing Buzzwords, Changing the Agenda.” Minerva 58 (1): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09380-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., F. Khatib, A. Treuille, J. Barbero, J. Lee, M. Beenen, A. Leaver-Fay, D. Baker, and Z. Popović. 2010. “Predicting Protein Structures with a Multiplayer Online Game.” Nature 466 (7307): 756–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curral, L. A., R. H. Forrester, J. F. Dawson, and M. A. West. 2001. “It’s What You Do and the Way that You Do It: Team Task, Team Size, and Innovation-related Group Processes.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (2): 187–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000627.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., C. Grimpe, and M. Pellens. 2015. “Access to Research Inputs: Open Science versus the Entrepreneurial University.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (6): 1050–1063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9392-0.
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? the Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (3): 316–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and P. Patel. 2007. “University–industry Linkages in the UK: What are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry?” Research Policy 36 (9): 1295–1313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ippolito, B., and C.-C. Rüling. 2019. “Research Collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration Types and Policy Implications.” Research Policy 48 (5): 1282–1296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and D. M. Gann. 2010. “How Open Is Innovation?” Research Policy 39 (6): 699–709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., and P. A. David. 1994. “Toward a New Economics of Science.” Research Policy 23 (5): 487–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. 2008. “Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists about Talking to the Public.” Science Communication 29 (4): 413–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2015. “Crafting the Group: Care in Research Management.” Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 371–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715585820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L., M. T. Larsen, and P. Lotz. 2011. “Scientists’ Perspectives Concerning the Effects of University Patenting on the Conduct of Academic Research in the Life Sciences.” Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (1): 14–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9142-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2018. “Reimagining Publics and (Non) Participation: Exploring Exclusion from Science Communication through the Experiences of Low-income, Minority Ethnic Groups.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (7): 772–786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517750072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rijcke, S., P. F. Wouters, A. D. Rushforth, T. P. Franssen, and B. Hammarfelt. 2016. “Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—a Literature Review.” Research Evaluation 25 (2): 161–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit-de Vries, E., W. A. Dolfsma, H. J. van der Windt, and M. P. Gerkema. 2019. “Knowledge Transfer in University–industry Research Partnerships: A Review.” Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (4): 1236–1255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvenne, P., and H. Macq. 2019. “Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments.” Science as Culture 29 (2): 245–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1668369.
   Google Scholar
• Derrick, G. E., R. Faria, P. Benneworth, D. Budtz-Petersen, and G. Sivertsen. 2018. “Towards Characterising Negative Impact: Introducing Grimpact.” Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018), Leiden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 34 (3): 349–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, W., and E. Choi. 2011. “Divergent Paths to Commercial Science: A Comparison of Scientists’ Founding and Advising Activities.” Research Policy 40 (1): 69–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, W. W. 2011. “The Impact of Founders’ Professional-education Background on the Adoption of Open Science by For-profit Biotechnology Firms.” Management Science 57 (2): 257–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, W. W., F. Murray, and T. E. Stuart. 2006. “Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences.” Science 313 (5787): 665–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L., and M. Heimstädt. 2019. “Predatory Publishing in Management Research: A Call for Open Peer Review.” Management Learning 50 (5): 607–619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619878820.
   Google Scholar
• Dorland, J., C. Clausen, and M. S. Jørgensen. 2019. “Space Configurations for Empowering University-community Interactions.” Science and Public Policy 46 (5): 689–701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druilhe, C., and E. Garnsey. 2003. “Do Academic Spin-off Companies Differ and Does It Matter?” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Entrepreneurship and New Venture Creation Conference, Durham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E. 2014. “A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 2 (3): eP1167. doi:https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1167.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J. R., G. A. Evans, and G. P. Thomas. 1989. “The Public Understanding of Science.” Nature 340 (6228): 11–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelie, K. J., H. T. Lie, C. Grimpe, and S. Roger. 2019. “Access and Openness in Biotechnology Research Collaborations between Universities and Industry.” Nature Biotechnology 37 (12): 1413–1419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0324-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eitzel, M., J. Cappadonna, C. Santos-Lang, R. Duerr, S. E. West, A. Virapongse, C. Kyba, A. Bowser, C. Cooper, and A. Sforzi. 2017. “Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O., and H. Toivanen. 2018. “University Invention and the Abolishment of the Professor’s Privilege in Finland.” Research Policy 47 (4): 814–825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, C., D. Kapiszewski, and A. Lupia. 2018. “Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 21 (1): 29–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-025429.
   Google Scholar
• English, P. B., M. J. Richardson, and C. Garzón-Galvis. 2018. “From Crowdsourcing to Extreme Citizen Science: Participatory Research for Environmental Health.” Annual Review of Public Health 39 (1): 335–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ensley, M. D., and K. M. Hmieleski. 2005. “A Comparative Study of New Venture Top Management Team Composition, Dynamics and Performance between University-based and Independent Start-ups.” Research Policy 34 (7): 1091–1105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From NationalSystems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–industry–government Relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commision. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commision. “Trends for Open Access to Publications.” European Commision. Accessed 20 June 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research-andinnovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor/trends-open-accesspublications_en
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. A., and J. Reimer. 2009. “Open Access and Global Participation in Science.” Science 323 (5917): 1025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. Majchrzak. 2011. “Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities.” Organization Science 22 (5): 1224–1239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.-L., E. Gkeredakis, and N. Levina. 2016. “Framing Innovation Opportunities while Staying Committed to an Organizational Epistemic Stance.” Information Systems Research 27 (2): 302–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecher, B., S. Friesike, M. Hebing, and S. Linek. 2017. “A Reputation Economy: How Individual Reward Considerations Trump Systemic Arguments for Open Access to Data.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.51.
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T., and T. R. Zenger. 2014. “Closed or Open Innovation? Problem Solving and the Governance Choice.” Research Policy 43 (5): 914–925. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, M. J. 2019. “The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment.” Publications 7 (3): 46–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030046.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, I., and M. Feldman. 2010. “The Commercialization of Academic Patents: Black Boxes, Pipelines, and Rubik’s Cubes.” Journal of Technology Transfer 35 (6): 597–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9123-5.
   Google Scholar
• Finholt, T. A. 2002. “Collaboratories.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 (1): 73–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini, R., R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2009. “Factors Fostering Academics to Start up New Ventures: An Assessment of Italian Founders’ Incentives.” Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (4): 380–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., I. Kollar, S. Ufer, B. Sodian, H. Hussmann, R. Pekrun, B. Neuhaus, B. Dorner, S. Pankofer, and M. Fischer. 2014. “Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education.” Frontline Learning Research 2 (3): 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. 2004. “Science as a Map in Technological Search.” Strategic Management Journal 25 (8‐9): 909–928. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, S., C. T. Bergstrom, K. Börner, J. A. Evans, D. Helbing, S. Milojević, A. M. Petersen, F. Radicchi, R. Sinatra, and B. Uzzi. 2018. “Science of Science.” Science 359 (6379): eaao0185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenhuis, W. E., and D. Nettle. 2018. “Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (4): 439–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618767878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franssen, T., W. Scholten, L. K. Hessels, and S. de Rijcke. 2018. “The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation: Comparing Institutional Affordances and Constraints of Different Types of Research Funding.” Minerva 56 (1): 11–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9338-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franza, R. M., K. P. Grant, and W. A. Spivey. 2012. “Technology Transfer Contracts between R&D Labs and Commercial Partners: Choose Your Words Wisely.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (4): 577–587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9191-6.
   Google Scholar
• Franzoni, C., and H. Sauermann. 2014. “Crowd Science: The Organization of Scientific Research in Open Collaborative Projects.” Research Policy 43 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and S. Krabel. 2012. “Ready to Leave the Ivory Tower?: Academic Scientists’ Appeal to Work in the Private Sector.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (3): 271–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9174-7.
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J., K. Hutter, J. Hautz, and K. Matzler. 2017. “The Role of Professionalism in Innovation Contest Communities.” Long Range Planning 50 (2): 243–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J. L., and S. Stern. 2011. “Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research.” American Economic Review 101 (5): 1933–1963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganna, A., K. J. H. Verweij, M. G. Nivard, R. Maier, R. Wedow, A. S. Busch, A. Abdellaoui, S. Guo, J. F. Sathirapongsasuti, and P. Lichtenstein. 2019. “Large-scale GWAS Reveals Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Same-sex Sexual Behavior.” Science 365 (6456): eaat7693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and A. Muscio. 2009. “The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Minerva 47 (1): 93–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scrott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., and G. Laudel. 2016. “Governing Science: How Science Policy Shapes Research Content.” European Journal of sociology/Archives Européennes De Sociologie 57 (1): 117–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B., and D. Vinck. 2017. Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-innovation Bias. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., and Y. Gingras. 2000. “What Is Scientific and Technological Culture and How Is It Measured? A Multidimensional Model.” Public Understanding of Science 9 (1): 43–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., E. M. Bergman, and G. Maier. 2013. “University MissionCreep? Comparing EU and US Faculty Views of University Involvement in Regional Economic Development and Commercialization.” Annals of Regional Science 50 (2): 453–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0513-5.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., M. Kenney, D. S. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2011. “30 Years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40 (8): 104557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., and H. Fier. 2010. “Informal University Technology Transfer: A Comparison between the United States and Germany.” Journal of Technology Transfer 35 (6): 637–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., and U. Kaiser. 2010. “Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (8): 1483–1509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, R. L., A. Heath, M. Murphy, M. Patterson, and W. Wells. 2016. “A Case for Data Commons: Toward Data Science as A Service.” Computing in Science & Engineering 18 (5): 10–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2016.92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., D. Harhoff, and K. Hoisl. 2013. “Knowledge Recombination across Technological Boundaries: Scientists Vs. Engineers.” Management Science 59 (4): 83751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1572.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., I. C. MacMillan, and J. D. Thompson. 2008. “Look before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms.” Management Science 54 (9): 1652–1665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., I. C. MacMillan, and J. D. Thompson. 2013. “Escaping the Prior Knowledge Corridor: What Shapes the Number and Variety of Market Opportunities Identified before Market Entry of Technology Start-ups?” Organization Science 24 (1): 280–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., D. Urbano, and A. Fayolle. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness: Evidence from European Entrepreneurial Universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer 41 (1): 105–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan, E., K. J. Boudreau, and K. R. Lakhani. 2013. “Experiments in Open Innovation at Harvard Medical School: What Happens When an Elite Academic Institution Starts to Rethink How Research Gets Done?” MIT Sloan Management Review 54 (3): 45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J. 2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 787–826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705056045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C., and H. Sauermann. 2020. “Division of Labor in Collaborative Knowledge Production: The Role of Team Size and Interdisciplinarity.” Research Policy 49 (6): 103987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C., and J. A. Colyvas. 2011. “Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany.” Research Policy 40 (1): 4154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C., L. Jiang, J. Thursby, and M. Thursby. 2014. “Specific and General Information Sharing among Competing Academic Researchers.” Research Policy 43 (3): 465–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. 2016. “Use and Productivity of Contemporary, Multidisciplinary Big Science.” Research Evaluation 25 (4): 486–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., S. Raman, A. Smith, and B. Nerlich. 2018. Science and the Politics of Openness: Here Be Monsters. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2015. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-class Excellence. 2nd ed. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R., O. Vuculescu, J. J. Sørensen, J. Zoller, M. G. Andreasen, M. G. Bason, P. Ejlertsen, O. Elíasson, P. Haikka, and J. S. Laustsen. 2018. “Remote Optimization of an Ultracold Atoms Experiment by Experts and Citizen Scientists.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (48): E11231–E7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716869115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heigl, F., B. Kieslinger, K. T. Paul, J. Uhlik, and D. Daniel. 2019. “Opinion: Toward an International Definition of Citizen Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (17): 8089–8092. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903393116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinström, J. 2003. “Five Personality Dimensions and Their Influence on Information Behaviour.” Information Research 9 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. 2005. “Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Policy Environment.” Higher Education 49 (1–2): 155–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heradio, R., L. De La Torre, D. Galan, F. J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, and S. Dormido. 2016. “Virtual and Remote Labs in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Computers & Education 98 (6): 14–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelstein, D. S., A. R. Romero, J. G. Levernier, T. A. Munro, S. R. McLaughlin, B. G. Tzovaras, and C. S. Greene. 2018. “Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly All Scholarly Literature.” ELife 7: e32822. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., K. Weinkauf, and H. G. Gemuenden. 2004. “Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study.” Organization Science 15 (1): 38–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. B. 2005. “Assessing the Science–society Relation: The Case of the US National Science Foundation’s Second Merit Review Criterion.” Technology in Society 27 (4): 437–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S. K., and I. B. Horwitz. 2007. “The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-analytic Review of Team Demography.” Journal of Management 33 (6): 987–1015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. A., Y. K. Dwivedi, and N. P. Rana. 2016. “State-ofthe-art in Open Data Research: Insights from Existing Literature and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 26 (1–2): 14–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., and M. Seeber. 2019. “Higher Education Developments and the Effects on Science.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler. Gent, pp. 227-242, Belgium: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Husemann, M., R. Rogers, S. Meyer, and J. C. Habel. 2017. ““Publicationism” and Scientists’ Satisfaction Depend on Gender, Career Stage and the Wider Academic System.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K., J. T. Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators.” Research Policy 39 (1): 7988. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• Huyghe, A., and M. Knockaert. 2015. “The Influence of Organizational Culture and Climate on Entrepreneurial Intentions among Research Scientists.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (1): 138–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., M. Lundqvist, and H. Hellsmark. 2003. “Entrepreneurial Transformations in the Swedish University System: The Case of Chalmers University of Technology.” Research Policy 32 (9): 1555–1568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00024-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J., H. Mohr, M. Gajdacz, S. Z. Ahmed, J. H. Czarkowski, C. Weidner, J. Rafner, J. J. Sørensen, K. Mølmer, and J. F. Sherson. 2020. “Crowdsourcing Human Common Sense for Quantum Control.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:2004.03296.  arxiv.org/pdf/2004.03296.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B., and L. Frederiksen. 2006. “Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-hosted User Communities? the Case of Computer-controlled Music Instruments.” Organization Science 17 (1): 45–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., S. Wuchty, and B. Uzzi. 2008. “Multi-university Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science.” Science 322 (5905): 125962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., J. Milde, and R. S. Cowan. 2017. “Symbiont Practices in Boundary Spanning: Bridging the Cognitive and Political Divides in Interdisciplinary Research.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (4): 1387–1414. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S., and S. Levin. 1987. “Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 128 (1): 11–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80029-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., and W. R. Goe. 2004. “The Role of Social Embeddedness in Professorial Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UC Berkeley and Stanford.” Research Policy 33 (5): 691–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. C., L. B. Lazarević, E. Baranski, T. E. Hardwicke, S. Piechowski, L.-S. Falkenberg, C. Kennett, A. Slowik, C. Sonnleitner, and C. Hess-Holden. 2016. “Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.” PLoS Biology 14 (5): e1002456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. Adler. 2015. “Social Scientists’ Data Sharing Behaviors: Investigating the Roles of Individual Motivations, Institutional Pressures, and Data Repositories.” International Journal of Information Management 35 (4): 408–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittur, A., L. Yu, T. Hope, J. Chan, H. Lifshitz-Assaf, K. Gilon, F. Ng, R. E. Kraut, and D. Shahaf. 2019. “Scaling up Analogical Innovation with Crowds and AI.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (6): 1870–1877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807185116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knöchelmann, M. 2019. “Open Science in the Humanities, Or: Open Humanities?” Publications 7 (4): 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7040065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., C. Egido, and J. Galegher. 1988. “Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, Portland Oregon USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, C., and J. Wagner. 2010. “Knowledge on Stage: Scientific Policy Advice.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (6): 812–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909357912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and A. Rip. 2018. “Next-generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 448–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., and J. Taylor. 2016. Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. Vol. 38. Australia: Anu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. R., H. Lifshitz-Assaf, and M. L. Tushman. 2013. “Open Innovation and Organizational Boundaries: Task Decomposition, Knowledge Distribution and the Locus of Innovation.” In Handbook of Economic Organization, edited by A. Grandori, pp. 355-382. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. R., L. B. Jeppesen, P. A. Lohse, and J. A. Panetta. 2007. The Value of Openess in Scientific Problem Solving. Division of Research, Boston, USA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. R., and R. G. Wolf. 2003. “Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/open Source Software Projects.” SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=443040
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2010. “From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial scientists’?Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University—industry Boundaries.” Social Studies of Science 40 (2): 307–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709349963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2011. “What Motivates Academic Scientists to Engage in ResearchCommercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘Ribbon’ or ‘Puzzle’?” Research Policy 40 (10): 1354–1368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2015. “Academic Scientists and Knowledge Commercialization: Self-determination and Diverse Motivations.” In  Isabell M. Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan, Margit Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and Performance, 173–187. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., S. Haustein, and K. Börner. 2015. “Long-distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact.” PloS One 10 (3): e0122565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., S. Haustein, and P. Mongeon. 2015. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.” PloS One 10 (6): e0127502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2006. “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (2): 131–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. 2013. “Academic Patenting: The Importance of Industry Support.” Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (4): 509–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9266-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. P. 2004. “Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship.” American Economic Review 94 (2): 208–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., C. M. Beckman, and T. L. Stanko. 2017. “Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research.” Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (1): 105–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216665364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledford, H. 2015. “How to Solve the World’s Biggest Problems.” Nature 525 (7569): 308–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/525308a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-F., and M. Miozzo. 2015. “How Does Working on University–industry Collaborative Projects Affect Science and Engineering Doctorates’ Careers? Evidence from a UK Research-based University.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (2): 293317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. 2000. “The Sustainability of University-industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment.” Journal of Technology Transfer 25 (2): 111–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895322042.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., and J. R. Dee. 2012. “Understanding Academic Work in a Changing Institutional Environment.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by J. Smart and M. Paulsen, 123–206. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lengwiler, M. 2008. “Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 186–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir, T., and C. Lecuyer. 1997. “Instrument Makers and Discipline Builders: The Case of NMR.” In Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines, edited by T. Lenoir, 239-294. Stanford, USA: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, N., and S. Leonelli. 2017. “How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (2): 280–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A. 1997. “Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes.” Management Science 43 (7): 934–950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., S. Ross, and T. Holden. 2012. “The How and Why of Academic Collaboration: Disciplinary Differences and Policy Implications.” Higher Education 64 (5): 693–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf, H. 2018. “Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 63 (4): 746–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf, H., S. Lebovitz, and L. Zalmanson. 2020. “Minimal and Adaptive Coordination: How Hackathons’ Projects Accelerate Innovation without Killing It.” Academy of Management Journal in press. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0712.
   Google Scholar
• Lilien, G. L., P. D. Morrison, K. Searls, M. Sonnack, and E. von Hippel. 2002. “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-generation Process for New Product Development.” Management Science 48 (8): 1042–1059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindau Guidelines. 2020. “Guideline Goals.” Accessed 19 June 2020. http://www.lindauguidelines.org/goals.html
   Google Scholar
• Linek, S. B., B. Fecher, S. Friesike, and M. Hebing. 2017. “Data Sharing as Social Dilemma: Influence of the Researcher’s Personality.” PloS One 12 (8): e0183216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., D. S. Siegel, and B. Bozeman. 2017. “An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Formal University Technology Transfer.” In Universities and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, edited by D. B. Audretsch and A. N. Link, 641–655. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., P. Llerena, M. McKelvey, and B. Sanditov. 2008. “Academic Patenting in Europe: New Evidence from the KEINS Database.” Research Evaluation 17 (2): 87–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X287171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llopis, O., and P. D’Este. 2016. “Beneficiary Contact and Innovation: The Relation between Contact with Patients and Medical Innovation under Different Institutional Logics.” Research Policy 45 (8): 1512–1523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. A. 2003. “Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 3 (2): 327–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., and A. Malhotra. 2020. Unleashing the Crowd: Collaborative Solutions to Wicked Business and Societal Problems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, R. H., M. G. Endres, J. H. Paik, R. A. Sergeev, H. Aerts, C. L. Williams, K. R. Lakhani, and E. C. Guinan. 2019. “Use of Crowd Innovation to Develop an Artificial Intelligence–based Solution for Radiation Therapy Targeting.” JAMA Oncology 5 (5): 654–661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manafò, E., L. Petermann, V. Vandall-Walker, and P. Mason-Lai. 2018. “Patient and Public Engagement in Priority Setting: A Systematic Rapid Review of the Literature.” PloS One 13 (3): e0193579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniadis, Z., and F. Tufano. 2017. “The Research Reproducibility Crisis and Economics of Science.” The Economic Journal 127 (605): F200–F8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. W., E. Hanson, L. Desai, C. Tiampo, K. O’Donnell, A. Ketheeswaran, M. Sun, E. Walter, and E. Michelle. 2019. Mind the Gap: A Landscape Analysis of Open Source Publishing Tools and Platforms. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21428/6bc8b38c.2e2f6c3f.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. 1998. “The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 7 (3): 203–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. C. 1982. “Varieties of Interdisciplinary Approaches in the Social Sciences: A 1981 Overview.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (1): 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and L. Leydesdorff. 2015. “A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics.” European Journal of Operational Research 246 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1993. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2018. “The Future (S) of Open Science.” Social Studies of Science 48 (2): 171–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., P. N. Schofield, and T. M. Bubela. 2016. “Sustaining Large-scale Infrastructure to Promote Pre-competitive Biomedical Research: Lessons from Mouse Genomics.” New Biotechnology 33 (2): 280–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2015.10.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molas-Gallart, J., and P. Tang. 2011. “Tracing ‘Productive Interactions’ to Identify Social Impacts: An Example from the Social Sciences.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 219–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moog, P., A. Werner, S. Houweling, and U. Backes-Gellner. 2015. “The Impact of Skills, Working Time Allocation and Peer Effects on the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Scientists.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (3): 493–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9347-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. 2018. “Towards a Sociology of Institutional Transparency: Openness, Deception and the Problem of Public Trust.” Sociology 52 (2): 416–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516686530.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N., and B. Clarysse. 2005. “Institutional Change and Resource Endowments to Science-based Entrepreneurial Firms.” Research Policy 34 (7): 1010–1027. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosey, S., M. Wright, and B. Clarysse. 2012. “Transforming Traditional University Structures for the Knowledge Economy through Multidisciplinary Institutes.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (3): 587–607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mote, J., G. Jordan, J. Hage, W. Hadden, and A. Clark. 2016. “Too Big to Innovate? Exploring Organizational Size and Innovation Processes in Scientific Research.” Science and Public Policy 43 (3): 332–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv045.
   Google Scholar
• Moutinho, P., S. Figueiredo, M. Fontes, and M. M. Godinho. 2007. “Do Individual Factors Matter? A Survey of Scientists’ Patenting in Portuguese Public Research Organisations.” Scientometrics 70 (2): 355–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0207-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N. Sampat, and A. A. Ziedonis. 2001. “The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980.” Research Policy 30 (1): 99–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhonen, R., P. Benneworth, and J. Olmos-Peñuela. 2020. “From Productive Interactions to Impact Pathways: Understanding the Key Dimensions in Developing SSH Research Societal Impact.” Research Evaluation 29 (1): 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murillo, L., R. Felipe, K. Pietari, L. P. Priego, J. Wareham, and A. Katz. 2019. Open Hardware Licences: Parallels and Contrasts: Open Science Monitor Case Study.  Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mustar, P., M. Wright, and B. Clarysse. 2008. “University Spin-off Firms: Lessons from Ten Years of Experience in Europe.” Science and Public Policy 35 (2): 67–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X282862.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nature editorial. 2018. “The Best Research Is Produced When Researchers and Communities Work Together.” Nature 562 (7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0369-7.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G., A. Wiggins, A. Crall, E. Graham, S. Newman, and K. Crowston. 2012. “The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 298–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/110294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. 2011. Reinventing Discovery: How Online Tools are Transforming Science. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P., and A. Scott. 2007. “Peer Review and the Relevance Gap: Ten Suggestions for Policy-makers.” Science and Public Policy 34 (8): 543–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X254396.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor. 2018. “The Preregistration Revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11): 2600–2606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., G. Alter, G. C. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. D. Bowman, S. Breckler, S. Buck, C. D. Chambers, G. Chin, and G. Christensen. 2015. “Promoting an Open Research Culture.” Science 348 (6242): 1422–1425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2006. “Re-thinking Science: Mode 2 in Societal Context.” In Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia, edited by E. G. Carayannis and D. F. J. Campbell, 39–51. London: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nowviskie, B. 2011. “Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship.” Profession 2011 (1): 169–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.169.
   Google Scholar
• O’Kane, C., V. Mangematin, W. Geoghegan, and C. Fitzgerald. 2015. “University Technology Transfer Offices: The Search for Identity to Build Legitimacy.” Research Policy 44 (2): 421–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., A. Kothari, and N. Mays. 2019. “The Dark Side of Coproduction: Do the Costs Outweigh the Benefits for Health Research?” Health Research Policy and Systems 17 (33): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Peñuela, J., P. Benneworth, and E. Castro-Martínez. 2016. “Does It Take Two to Tango? Factors Related to the Ease of Societal Uptake of Scientific Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 43 (6): 751–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., and W. W. Powell. 2001. “To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (12): 99–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007892413701.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M. 2012. “Building Research Equipment with Free, Open-source Hardware.” Science 337 (6100): 1303–1304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfield, T., M. J. Baker, R. Scoble, and M. C. Wykes. 2014. “Assessment, Evaluations, and Definitions of Research Impact: A Review.” Research Evaluation 23 (1): 21–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pénin, J., and T. Burger-Helmchen. 2011. “Crowdsourcing of Inventive Activities: Definition and Limits.” International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 5 (2): 246–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2011.043068.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and H. Schildt. 2015. “Open Data Partnerships between Firms and Universities: The Role of Boundary Organizations.” Research Policy 44 (5): 1133–1143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. 2008. “Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1884–1891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., R. Fini, J.-M. Ross, A. Salter, C. Silvestri, and V. Tartari. 2015. “Accounting for Universities’ Impact: Using Augmented Data to Measure Academic Engagement and Commercialization by Academic Scientists.” Research Evaluation 24 (4): 380–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, A. Geuna, R. Grimaldi, and A. Hughes. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. 2011. The Promise of Dialogue: The Dialogic Turn in the Production and Communication of Knowledge. Vol. 12. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1972. “The Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Relationships.” In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, edited by L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud, 127–139. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Piezunka, H., and L. Dahlander. 2015. “Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (3): 856–880. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowar, H., J. Priem, V. Larivière, J. P. Alperin, L. Matthias, B. Norlander, A. Farley, J. West, and S. Haustein. 2018. “The State of OA: A Large-scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles.” PeerJ 6 (2): e4375. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C. 2019. “Data Cleaners for Pristine Datasets: Visibility and Invisibility of Data Processors in Social Science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (1): 52–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918781268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poetz, M. K., and M. Schreier. 2012. “The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas?” Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (2): 245–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poliakoff, E., and T. L. Webb. 2007. “What Factors Predict Scientists’ Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?” Science Communication 29 (2): 242–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1): 116–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priego, P., L. Pujol, and J. D. Wareham. 2019. “Open Targets: Pre-competitive Collaborative Research in Life Sciences.” Academy of Management Proceedings 79 (1): 11674. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11674abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N., and L. Schiebinger. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, USA: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pronk, T. E. 2019. “The Time Efficiency Gain in Sharing and Reuse of Research Data.” Data Science Journal 18 (1): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-010.
   Google Scholar
• Pujol, L., and J. Wareham. 2019. REANA: Reproducible Research Data Analysis Platform. Open Science Monitor Case Study Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/reana.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Puschmann, C. 2014. “(Micro) Blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication.” In Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet Is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, edited by S. Bartling and S. Friesike, 89–106. Germany: SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R., M. A. Glynn, and M. Tushman. 2019. “Frame Flexibility: The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Framing in Innovation Adoption by Incumbent Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 40 (7): 1013–1039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafner, J., Z. Grujić, C. Bach, J. A. Bærentzen, B. Gervang, R. Jia, S. Leinweber, M. Misztal, and J. Sherson. 2019. “Geometry of Turbulent Dissipation and the Navier-Stokes Regularity Problem, 1-9.” arXiv Preprint. arXiv:1909.10408. arxiv.org/pdf/1909.10408.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., and M. Meyer. 2010. “Diversity and Network Coherence as Indicators of Interdisciplinarity: Case Studies in Bionanoscience.” Scientometrics 82 (2): 263–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E., and M. Wright. 2015. “How Can Universities Facilitate Academic Spinoffs? an Entrepreneurial Competency Perspective.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (5): 782–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renault, C. S. 2006. “Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (2): 227–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, M., and H. Sauermann. 2010. “A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-selection into Research Careers in Industry.” Research Policy 39 (3): 422–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross-Hellauer, T. 2017. “What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review.” F1000Research 6 (588): 1–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.1.
   Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., and W. Boeker. 2008. “Old Technology Meets New Technology: Complementarities, Similarities, and Alliance Formation.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (1): 47–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N. 2016. “The What, Why, and How of Born-open Data.” Behavior Research Methods 48 (3): 1062–1069. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0630-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousi, A. M., and M. Laakso. 2020. “Journal Research Data Sharing Policies: A Study of Highly-cited Journals in Neuroscience, Physics, and Operations Research.” Scientometrics in press, 124: 131-152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowhani-Farid, A., A. Aldcroft, and A. G. Barnett. 2020. “Did Awarding Badges Increase Data Sharing in BMJ Open? A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Royal Society Open Science 7 (3): 191818. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushforth, A., T. Franssen, and S. de Rijcke. 2019. “Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (2): 209–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918786431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, M. R., T. K. Lant, S. M. Fiore, and E. Salas. 2012. “Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams through Integrative Capacity.” Small Group Research 43 (5): 527–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412453622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., K. Vohland, V. Antoniou, B. Balázs, C. Göbel, K. Karatzas, P. Mooney, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, and R. Samson. 2020. “Citizen Science and Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 49 (5): 103978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., and P. Stephan. 2013. “Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science.” Organization Science 24 (3): 889–909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, and J. Fröhlich. 2006. “Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants.” In Innovation, Networks, and Knowledge Spillovers, edited by M. M. Fischer, 13566. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheliga, K., S. Friesike, C. Puschmann, and B. Fecher. 2018. “Setting up Crowd Science Projects.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (5): 515–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516678514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyer, T. 1984. “On Finalization in Science.” Theory and Society 13 (5): 715–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160915.
   Google Scholar
• SciNote. Accessed 19 June 2020. https://www.scienceathome.org/education/scinote-researchtool/
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., M. Cattaneo, M. Meoli, and P. Malighetti. 2019. “Self-citations as Strategic Response to the Use of Metrics for Career Decisions.” Research Policy 48 (2): 478–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S. K., and C. C. M. Mody. 2014. Creating a Context for Entrepreneurship: Examining How Users’ Technological and Organizational Innovations Set, Governing Knowledge Commons. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and R. Khurana. 2003. “Bringing Individuals Back In: The Effects of Career Experience on New Firm Founding.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (3): 519–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.3.519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, et al. 2012. “Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design.” Ecology & Society 17 (2): 207–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2008. “Audit Culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability.” Anthropological Theory 8 (3): 278–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedlok, F., P. Hibbert, and N. Beech. 2014. “Learning Practices and Interpretative Modes in Collaborative Contexts.” Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Philadelphia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., D. Waldman, and A. Link. 2003. “Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Relative Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study.” Research Policy 32 (1): 27–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvertown, J. 2009. “A New Dawn for Citizen Science.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (9): 467–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D., S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler. 2019. “Introduction: Science and Public Policy - Relations in Flux.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 1-10. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A., and A. Drach-Zahavy. 2013. “Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation: The Role of Team Composition and Climate for Innovation.” Journal of Management 39 (3): 684–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokowski, P., E. Kulczycki, A. Sorokowska, and K. Pisanski. 2017. “Predatory Journals Recruit Fake Editor.” Nature News 543 (7646): 481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/543481a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. 2010. “The Importance of Open and Closed Styles of Energy Research.” Social Studies of Science 40 (6): 903–930. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710373842.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E. 1996. “The Economics of Science.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1199–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E., and A. El-Ganainy. 2007. “The Entrepreneurial Puzzle: Explaining the Gender Gap.” Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (5): 475–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9033-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. J. 2004. “The Enactment of Bayh–Dole.” Journal of Technology Transfer 29 (1): 93–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011183.40867.52.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., S. J. Lock, and J. Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513518154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. 2011. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, D.C., USA: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, B., J. Baudry, D. Mahr, G. Sanchez, and E. Tancoigne. 2019. ““Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation.” Science & Technology Studies 32 (2): 52–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suber, P. 2012. Open Access. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suess-Reyes, J., K. Hyslop, S. Beck, and M. Poetz. 2020. “May the Force Be with Them: Exploring Strategies to Overcome Challenges of Co-Created Citizen Science.” Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Tahamtan, I., and L. Bornmann. 2020. “Altmetrics and Societal Impact Measurements: Match or Mismatch? A Literature Review.” El profesional de la información (EPI) 29 (1): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tartari, V., and A. Salter. 2015. “The Engagement Gap: Exploring Gender Differences in University–Industry Collaboration Activities.” Research Policy 44 (6): 1176–1191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, V., M. Perkmann, and A. Salter. 2014. “In Good Company: The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1189–1203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, V., and S. Breschi. 2012. “Set Them Free: Scientists’ Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University–industry Research Collaboration.” Industrial and Corporate Change 21 (5): 1117–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasley, S., and S. Wolinsky. 2001. “Scientific Collaborations at a Distance.” Science 292 (5525): 2254–2255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1061619.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenopir, C., N. M. Rice, S. Allard, L. Baird, J. Borycz, L. Christian, B. Grant, R. Olendorf, and R. J. Sandusky. 2020. “Data Sharing, Management, Use, and Reuse: Practices and Perceptions of Scientists Worldwide.” PloS One 15 (3): e0229003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., and D. Hanley. 2018. “Science Is Shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial.” Paper presented at the DRUID Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Thune, T. 2010. “The Training of “Triple Helix Workers”? Doctoral Students in University– Industry–government Collaborations.” Minerva 48 (4): 463–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9158-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., C. Haeussler, M. C. Thursby, and L. Jiang. 2018. “Prepublication Disclosure of Scientific Results: Norms, Competition, and Commercial Orientation.” Science Advances 4 (5): eaar2133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., and M. C. Thursby. 2004. “Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University– Industry Licensing.” Contemporary Economic Policy 22 (2): 162–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinati, R., M. Luczak-Roesch, E. Simperl, and W. Hall. 2017. “An Investigation of Player Motivations in Eyewire, a Gamified Citizen Science Project.” Computers in Human Behavior 73: 527–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Olave, B., A. M. Brown, L. F. Carrera, and C. Ballinas. 2020. “Not Waving but Striving: Research Collaboration in the Context of Stratification, Segmentation, and the Quest for Prestige.” Journal of Higher Education 91 (2): 275–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1631074.
   Google Scholar
• Trouille, L., C. J. Lintott, and L. F. Fortson. 2019. “Citizen Science Frontiers: Efficiency, Engagement, and Serendipitous Discovery with Human-machine Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (6): 1902–1909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807190116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. 2014. “Depicting and Researching Disciplines: Strong and Moderate Essentialist Approaches.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1720–1731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbull, D. J., R. Bonney, D. Bascom, and A. Cabral. 2000. “Thinking Scientifically during Participation in a Citizen‐science Project.” Science Education 84 (2): 265–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. C. 2012. “Play, Imagination, and Creativity: A Brief Literature Review.” Journal of Education and Learning 1 (2): 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p15.
   Google Scholar
• Tucci, C. L., A. Afuah, and G. Viscusi. 2018. Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuertscher, P., R. Garud, and A. Kumaraswamy. 2014. “Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN.” Organization Science 25 (6): 1579–1608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D., R. Lave, S. Randalls, and C. Thorpe. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., S. Mukherjee, M. Stringer, and B. Jones. 2013. “Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact.” Science 342 (6157): 468–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaish, R., S. S. Gaikwad, G. Kovacs, A. Veit, R. Krishna, I. A. Ibarra, C. Simoiu, M. Wilber, S. Belongie, and S. Goel. 2017. “Crowd Research: Open and Scalable University Laboratories.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Québec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. 2015. “Interdisciplinary Research by the Numbers.” Nature 525 (7569): 306–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedel, J. B., and A. Irwin. 2017. “‘This Is What We Got, What Would You Like?’: Aligning and Unaligning Academic-industry Relations.” Social Studies of Science 47 (3): 417–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716689346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vicente-Sáez, R., and C. Martínez-Fuentes. 2018. “Open Science Now: A Systematic Literature Review for an Integrated Definition.” Journal of Business Research 88 (7): 428–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E., and G. Von Krogh. 2003. “Open Source Software and the “Privatecollective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science.” Organization Science 14 (2): 209–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VSNU, NFU, KNAW, NWO, and ZonMw. 2019. “Room for Everyone’s Talent: Towards a New Balance in the Recognition and Rewards of Academics.” https://www.nwo.nl/binaries/content/documents/nwo- en/common/documentation/application/nwo/policy/position-paper-2018-recognitionand-rewards/9±recognition±and±rewards±position±paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2015. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. M. 2013. “Education Online: The Virtual Lab.” Nature News 499 (7458): 268–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/499268a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., Y.-N. Lee, and L. Tang. 2019. “Pathogenic Organization in Science: Division of Labor and Retractions.” Research Policy 48 (2): 444–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L., and M. Nedeva. 2015. Toward European Science: Dynamics and Policy of an Evolving European Research Space. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• West, S. E., and R. M. Pateman. 2016. “Recruiting and Retaining Participants in Citizen Science: What Can Be Learned from the Volunteering Literature?” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 2011. “Changing Governance and Authority Relations in the Public Sciences.” Minerva 49 (4): 359–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9182-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A., and K. Crowston. 2011. “From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. D., M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos, and P. E. Bourne. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3: 160018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. J., J. M. Cooks, M. May, J. Peranteau, E. Reifsnider, and M. A. Hargraves. 2010. “Walk Together Children with No Wasted Steps: Community-academic Partnering for Equal Power in NIH Proposal Development.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 4 (4): 263–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2010.0013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willinsky, J. 2005. “The Unacknowledged Convergence of Open Source, Open Access, and Open Science.” First Monday 10 (8). doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i8.1265.
   Google Scholar
• Woelfle, M., P. Olliaro, and M. H. Todd. 2011. “Open Science Is a Research Accelerator.” Nature Chemistry 3 (10): 745–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooten, J. O., and K. T. Ulrich. 2015. “The Impact of Visibility in Innovation Tournaments: Evidence from Field Experiments.” SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2214952
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization. 2004. WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Vol. 489. Geneva, Switzerland: WIPO.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., A. Lockett, B. Clarysse, and M. Binks. 2006. “University Spin-out Companies and Venture Capital.” Research Policy 35 (4): 481–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., D. Wang, and J. A. Evans. 2019. “Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology.” Nature 566 (7744): 378–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts, S., M. G. Colombo, S. Dutta, and B. Nooteboom. 2005. “Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58 (2): 277–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, Y. 2018. “How to Crack Pre-registration: Toward Transparent and Open Science.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (1831): 1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zastrow, M. 2020. “Open Science Takes on the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Nature 581 (7806): 10910. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01246-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and J. S. Armstrong. 2002. “Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology.” Management Science 48 (1): 138–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar