Do European firms obey the rules? Environmental innovativeness in light of institutional frameworks

References

• Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L., and C. P. Vinci. 2020. “Climate Change and Knowledge Spillovers for Cleaner Production: New Insights.” Journal of Cleaner Production 271 (October): 122729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122729.
   Google Scholar
• Babutsidze, Z., and A. Chai. 2018. “Look at Me Saving the Planet! The Imitation of Visible Green Behavior and Its Impact on the Climate Value-Action Gap.” Ecological Economics 146: 290–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.017. April.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., C. Ghisetti, M. Gilli, G. Marin, and F. Nicolli. 2016. “A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis.” Journal of Economic Surveys 30 (3): 596–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, T., G. Clarke, A. Groff, P. Keefer, and P. Walsh. 2000. “The Database of Political Institutions.” Policy Research Working Paper (February): 2283. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, A. 2016. “The Climate Change Impact of Material Use.” Intereconomics 51 (4): 209–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-016-0604-0.
   Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., A. Fosfuri, L. Gelabert, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2013. “Necessity as the Mother of ‘Green’ Inventions: Institutional Pressures and Environmental Innovations.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (8): 891–909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. J., and C. J. Coyne. 2009. “Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 5 (3): 135–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000018.
   Google Scholar
• Borghesi, S., G. Cainelli, and M. Mazzanti. 2015. “Linking Emission Trading to Environmental Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Manufacturing Industry.” Research Policy 44 (3): 669–683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, M. L., and S. P. Jenkins. 2013. “Regression Analysis of Country Effects Using Multilevel Data: A Cautionary Tale.” IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 7583. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, M. L., and S. P. Jenkins. 2016. “Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale.” European Sociological Review 32 (1): 3–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, W., and G. Li. 2018. “The Drivers of Eco-innovation and Its Impact on Performance: Evidence from China.” Journal of Cleaner Production 176 (March): 110–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capros, P., L. Mantzos, L. Parousos, N. Tasios, G. Klaassen, and T. Van Ierland. 2011. “Analysis of the EU Policy Package on Climate Change and Renewables.” Energy Policy 39 (3): 1476–1485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., F. Crespi, G. Orsatti, and A. Palma. 2015. “Policy Inducement Effects in Energy Efficiency Technologies. An Empirical Analysis of the Residential Sector.” In Green Energy and Efficiency: An Economic Perspective, edited by A. Ansuategi, J. Delgado, and I. Galarraga, 201–232. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva Rabêlo, O., and A. S. S. De Azevedo Melo. 2019. “Drivers of Multidimensional Eco-innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Brazilian Industry.” Environmental Technology 40 (19): 2556–2566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1447022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, E. 2010. “Testing for Comparability of Human Values across Countries and Time with the Third Round of the European Social Survey.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 51 (3): 171–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715210363534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovic, D., N. Harring, and S. C. Jagers. 2019. “The Contingent Effects of Environmental Concern and Ideology: Institutional Context and People’s Willingness to Pay Environmental Taxes.” Environmental Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882.
   Google Scholar
• Del Río, P., D. Romero-Jordán, and C. Peñasco. 2017. “Analysing Firm-Specific and Type-Specific Determinants of Eco-Innovation.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 23 (2): 270–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1072749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas, M., and M. W. Toffel. 2004. “Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework.” Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 209–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.409.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, P., and E. Kesidou. 2011. “Stimulating Different Types of Eco-innovation in the UK: Government Policies and Firm Motivations.” Ecological Economics 70 (8): 1546–1557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deters, H. 2019. “European Environmental Policy at 50: Five Decades of Escaping Decision Traps?” Environmental Policy and Governance 29 (5): 315–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-García, C., A. González-Moreno, and F. J. Sáez-Martínez. 2015. “Eco-innovation: Insights from a Literature Review.” Innovation 17 (1): 6–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. 1975. “The Impact of Political Orientation on Environmental Attitudes and Actions.” Environment and Behavior 7 (4): 428–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657500700402.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 1997. “Systems of Innovation Approaches: Their Emergence and Characteristics.” In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, edited by C. Edquist, 1–35. London: Routledge London.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., C. Marcantonini, and A. Zaklan. 2016. “The European Union Emissions Trading System: Ten Years and Counting.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10 (1): 89–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. The Raw Materials Initiative - Meeting Our Critical Needs for Growth and Jobs in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020 – A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011a. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011b. Innovation for a Sustainable Future - the Eco-innovation Action Plan (Eco-ap). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Closing the Loop: An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “2030 Climate & Energy Framework.” European Commission. Accessed 06 February 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en
   Google Scholar
• Garrone, P., L. Grilli, and B. Mrkajic. 2018. “The Role of Institutional Pressures in the Introduction of Energy-efficiency Innovations.” Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (8): 1245–1257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, S., and A. McMeekin. 2011. “Eco-Innovation Systems and Problem Sequences: The Contrasting Cases of US and Brazilian Biofuels.” Industry and Innovation 18 (3): 301–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, X., and K. G. Huang. 2016. “Informal Institutions and the Geography of Innovation: An Integrative Perspective.” In Global Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Challenges and Experiences from East and West, edited by S. E. Little, F. M. Go, and T. Shuk-Ching, 61–78. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• González-López, M. 2011. “The Institutions-Innovation Dilemma: The Case of Coastal Fisheries.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 6 (3): 184–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000300014.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric Analysis. England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., and S. Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2006. “What are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnik, J. 2017. In Pursuit of Eco-innovation: Drivers and Consequences of Eco-innovation at Firm Level. Koper: University of Primorska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. 2008. “Determinants of Environmental Innovation - New Evidence from German Panel Data Sources.” Research Policy 37 (1): 163–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. 2016. “Empirical Determinants of Eco-innovation in European Countries Using the Community Innovation Survey.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 19: 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., C. Rammer, and K. Rennings. 2012. “Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact - the Role of Regulatory Push/pull, Technology Push and Market Pull.” Ecological Economics 78: 112–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., V. Oltra, and J. Belin. 2013. “Determinants and Specificities of Eco-innovations Compared to Other Innovations - an Econometric Analysis for the French and German Industry Based on the Community Innovation Survey.” Industry and Innovation 20 (6): 523–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.833375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, K. 2018. “Shaping System Innovation: Transformative Environmental Policies.” In New Developments in Eco-Innovation Research, edited by J. Horbach and C. Reif, 81–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Kapás, J. 2019. “The Interaction of Individual Values and Sticky Formal Institutions in Economic Development.” The European Journal of Comparative Economics 16 (1): 41–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and V. Oltra. 2011. “Research Insights and Challenges on Eco-Innovation Dynamics.” Industry and Innovation 18 (3): 249–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.562399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesidou, E., and P. Demirel. 2012. “On the Drivers of Eco-innovations: Empirical Evidence from the UK.” Research Policy 41 (5): 862–870. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., J. Yliskylä-Peuralahti, E. Olaniyi, T. Haukioja, S. Repka, G. Prause, and O. De Andres Gonzalez. 2019. “The Impacts of the Sulphur Emission Regulation on the Sulphur Emission Abatement Innovation System in the Baltic Sea Region.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 21 (5): 987–1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01684-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, T., M. Sato, M. Grubb, and C. Comberti. 2013. “Assessing the Effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System.” Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper: 126. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, É. 2020. “The European Green Deal: Bring Back the New.” In OFCE Policy Brief No. 63. Paris: Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (OFCE) Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. C., and S. H. Law. 2017. “Roles of Formal Institutions and Social Capital in Innovation Activities: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Global Economic Review 46 (3): 203–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2017.1292859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Y.-C., and K.-H. Tsai. 2019. “Bridging Market Demand, Proactivity, and Technology Competence with Eco-innovations: The Moderating Role of Innovation Openness.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26 (3): 653–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Z. 2018. “Institutional Pressure, Knowledge Acquisition and a Firm’s Environmental Innovation.” Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (7): 849–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R. J., K. H. Tan, and Y. Geng. 2013. “Market Demand, Green Product Innovation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Vietnam Motorcycle Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 40 (February): 101–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Machnik-Słomka, J., and I. Kłosok-Bazan. 2017. “The Problem of Environmental Awareness in Terms of the Eco-Innovation Implementation in Enterprises.” Economic and Environmental Studies 17 (42): 221–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.42.5.
   Google Scholar
• Madaleno, M., M. Robaina, M. Ferreira Dias, and M. Meireles. 2020. “Dimension Effects in the Relationship between Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance: A European Comparison.” The 6th International Conference on Energy and Environment Research - Energy and environment: challenges towards circular economy, Aveiro, Portugal, 6 (February): 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.038.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. 2010. “Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 1129–1155. Vol. 2. Burlington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, V., M. Sahakian, P. Van Griethuysen, and F. Vuille. 2017. “Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 497–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 2005. Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2004. “The Environment, Left-wing Political Orientation and Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 51 (3): 167–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, M., and M. P. Timmer. 2009. “Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database.” The Economic Journal 119 (538, June): 374–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, D., R. G. Newell, and A. B. Jaffe. 2010. “Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 873–937. Vol. 2. Burlington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and C. Van Der Linde. 1995. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. 2000. “Redefining Innovation - Eco-innovation Research and the Contribution from Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 32 (2): 319–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K., and C. Rammer. 2011. “The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance.” Industry and Innovation 18 (3): 255–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.561027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian, and F. Trebbi. 2004. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2): 131–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, G. 2004. “Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 109–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A., and R. Boschma. 2020. “Diversifying in Green Technologies in European Regions: Does Political Support Matter?” Regional Studies 1–14. April. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1744122.
   Google Scholar
• Schläpfer, F., A. Roschewitz, and N. Hanley. 2004. “Validation of Stated Preferences for Public Goods: A Comparison of Contingent Valuation Survey Response and Voting Behaviour.” Ecological Economics 51 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silve, F., and A. Plekhanov. 2015. “Institutions, Innovation and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence.” Working Paper (February): 177. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Srholec, M. 2015. “Understanding the Diversity of Cooperation on Innovation across Countries: Multilevel Evidence from Europe.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 24 (1–2): 159–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.897864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., and H. Baumgartner. 1998. “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (1): 78–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/209528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. I. 2017. “The Environmental Kuznets Curve after 25 Years.” Journal of Bioeconomics 19 (1): 7–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-017-9243-1.
   Google Scholar
• Tebaldi, E., and B. Elmslie. 2013. “Does Institutional Quality Impact Innovation? Evidence from Cross-country Patent Grant Data.” Applied Economics 45 (7): 887–900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töbelmann, D., and T. Wendler. 2020. “The Impact of Environmental Innovation on Carbon Dioxide Emissions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 244 (January): 118787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118787.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP, 2016. Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Assessment Report for the UNEP International Resource Panel. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2013. “Environmental and Climate Innovation: Limitations, Policies and Prices.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (1): 11–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuuren, J. 2017. “Does Environmental Law Encourage Obstruct Eco-Innovations? Evidence from Case Studies in the Netherlands.” European Energy and Environmental Law Review 26 (2): 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., and P. Llerena. 2011. “Eco-Innovation through Integration, Regulation and Cooperation: Comparative Insights from Case Studies in Three Manufacturing Sectors.” Industry and Innovation 18 (8): 747–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.621744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., J. Huang, H. Zhou, C. Deng, and C. Fang. 2020. “Analysis of Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources Based on the Improved Water Resources Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China.” Journal of Environmental Management 262: 110331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110331. May.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, N., T. Vorley, and C. Williams. 2017. Entrepreneurship and Institutions: The Causes and Consequences of Institutional Asymmetry. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, C. R. 2009. “Informal Institutions Rule: Institutional Arrangements and Economic Performance.” Public Choice 139 (3–4): 371–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9399-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar