A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university

References

• Abreu, M., P. Demirel, V. Grinevich, and M. Karataş-Özkan. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Practices in Research-intensive and Teaching-led Universities.” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 695–717. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9754-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42 (2): 408–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and E. E. Lehmann. 2013. “The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 41 (4): 757–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., and Z. Griliches. 1996. “Measuring Science: An Exploration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (23): 12664–12670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12664.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal, A., and R. M. Henderson. 2002. “Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT.” Management Science 48 (1): 44–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge, T, and D.B. Audretsch. 2010. “Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists.„ Research Policy 39(5): 583–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge, T. T., and D. Audretsch. 2011. “The Bayh-Dole Act and Scientist Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1058–1067. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allee, V. 2000. “Reconfiguring the Value Network.” Journal of Business Strategy 21 (4): 36–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/eb040103.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 2007. “Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Growth.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23 (1): 63–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 2014. “From the Entrepreneurial University to the University for the Entrepreneurial Society.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 39 (3): 313–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2019. “Public/private Technology Partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported Research.” In The Social Value of New Technology. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., E. E. Lehmann, and S. Warning. 2005. “University Spillovers and New Firm Location.” Research Policy 34 (7): 1113–1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. Belitski. 2017. “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Cities: Establishing the Framework Conditions.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (5): 1030–1051. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. Belitski. 2019. “Science Parks and Business Incubation in the United Kingdom: Evidence from University Spin-Offs and Staff Start-Ups.” In Amoroso S., A. Link , M.  Wright  (Eds.)  Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development. 99–122. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. Belitski. 2020. “Towards an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Typology for Regional Economic Development: The Role of Creative Class and Entrepreneurship.” Regional Studies 55(4): 735-756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., M. C. Keilbach, and E. E. Lehmann. 2006. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Oxford University Press INC, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., M. Kenney, P. Mustar, D. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2014. “Entrepreneurial Innovation Ecosystems and Context.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1097–1108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avison, D., J. Jones, P. Powell, and D. Wilson. 2004. “Using and Validating the Strategic Alignment Model.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (3): 223–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2004.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartell, M. 2003. “Internationalization of Universities: A University Culture-based Framework.” Higher Education 45 (1): 43–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021225514599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., C. Bergenholtz, M. Bogers, T. M. Brasseur, M. L. Conradsen, D. Di Marco, and S. M. Xu. 2020. “The Open Innovation in Science Research Field: A Collaborative Conceptualisation Approach.” Industry and Innovation 1–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., M. Mahdad, K. Beukel, and M. Poetz. 2019. “The Value of Scientific Knowledge Dissemination for scientists—A Value Capture Perspective.” Publications 7 (3): 54. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitski, M., A. Aginskaja, and R. Marozau. 2019. “Commercializing University Research in Transition Economies: Technology Transfer Offices or Direct Industrial Funding?” Research Policy 48 (3): 601–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitski, M., and K. Heron. 2017. “Expanding Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystems.” Journal of Management Development 36 (2): 163–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2016-0121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitski, M., R. Caiazza, and E. E. Lehmann. 2021. “Knowledge Frontiers and Boundaries in Entrepreneurship Research.” Small Business Economics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and M. Feldman. 2008. “Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level.” Organization Science 19 (1): 69–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet, M. 2008. How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-wage Nation. Vol. 3. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S., C. S. Hayter, and A. N. Link. 2013. “Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 9 (6): 571–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000048.
   Google Scholar
• Bramwell, A., and D. A. Wolfe. 2008. “Universities and Regional Economic Development: The Entrepreneurial University of Waterloo.” Research Policy 37 (8): 1175–1187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunerhjelm, P., Z. J. Acs, D. B. Audretsch, and B. Carlsson. 2010. “The Missing Link: Knowledge Diffusion and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth.” Small Business Economics 34 (2): 105–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiazza, R., D. Audretsch, T. Volpe, and J. Debra Singer. 2014. “Policy and Institutions Facilitating Entrepreneurial Spin-offs: USA, Asia and Europe.” Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy 3 (2): 186–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-04-2013-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, V. S., M. Gilman, and C. Serbanica. 2017. “Aligning University–industry Interactions: The Role of Boundary Spanning in Intellectual Capital Transfer.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 123: 199–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., and M. Bogers. 2014. “Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation.” In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, edited by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 3‐28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Civera, A., M. Meoli, and S. Vismara. 2020. “Engagement of Academics in University Technology Transfer: Opportunity and Necessity Academic Entrepreneurship.” European Economic Review 123: 103376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauss, T., A. Moussa, and T. Kesting. 2018. “Entrepreneurial University: A Stakeholder-based Conceptualisation of the Current State and an Agenda for Future Research.” International Journal of Technology Management 77 (1–3): 109–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., and E. Piva. 2008. “Strengths and Weaknesses of Academic Start-ups: A Conceptual Model.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55 (1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912807.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., T. Luukkonen, P. Mustar, and M. Wright. 2010. “Venture Capital and High-tech Start-ups.” Venture Capital 12 (4): 261–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2010.486153.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. A., M. Menter, and C. O’Kane. 2018. “Value Creation in the Quadruple Helix: A Micro Level Conceptual Model of Principal Investigators as Value Creators.” R&D Management 48 (1): 136–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and D. M. Gann. 2010. “How open is innovation?.” Research Policy 39 (6): 699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? the Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (3): 316–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedrick, J., and K. L. Kraemer. 2015. “Who Captures Value from Science-based Innovation? the Distribution of Benefits from Gmr in the Hard Disk Drive Industry.” Research Policy 44 (8): 1615–1628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degroof, J. J., and E. B. Roberts. 2004. “Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-off Ventures.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 (3): 327–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034126.23592.23.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Social Science Information 42 (3): 293–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 2016. “The Entrepreneurial University: Vision and Metrics.” Industry and Higher Education 30 (2): 83–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B. R. Cantisano Terra. 2000. “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm.” Research Policy 29 (2): 313–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–industry–government Relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayolle, A. 2007. Entrepreneurial Process Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fini, R., K. Fu, M. T. Mathisen, E. Rasmussen, and M. Wright. 2017. “Institutional Determinants of University Spin-off Quantity and Quality: A Longitudinal, Multilevel, Cross-country Study.” Small Business Economics 48 (2): 361–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N, M.K. Poetz, and M. Schreier. 2014. “Integrating problem solvers from analogous markets in new product ideation.„ Management Science 60(4): 1063–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzoni, C., and H. Sauermann. 2014. “Crowd Science: The Organization of Scientific Research in Open Collaborative Projects”.” Research Policy 43 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers, R. D., and S. Newell. 2003. “Back to the Future: From Knowledge Management to the Management of Information and Data.” Information Systems and e-Business Management 1 (1): 5–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683507.
   Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and L. J. Nesta. 2006. “University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence.” Research Policy 35 (6): 790–807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianiodis, P. T., G. D. Markman, and A. Panagopoulos. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Universities and Overt Opportunism.” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 609–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9753-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, A., and P. Hannon. 2006. “Towards the Entrepreneurial University.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 4 (1): 73–110.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., M. Kenney, D. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2011. “30 Years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1045–1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., and D. Urbano. 2014. “Academics’ Start-up Intentions and Knowledge Filters: An Individual Perspective of the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship”.” Small Business Economics 43 (1): 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9526-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., D. Urbano, and A. Fayolle. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness: Evidence from European Entrepreneurial Universities.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41 (1): 105–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., J. A. Cunningham, and D. Urbano. 2015. “Economic Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities’ Activities: An Exploratory Study of the United Kingdom.” Research Policy 44 (3): 748–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayter, C. S. 2016. “A Trajectory of Early-stage Spinoff Success: The Role of Knowledge Intermediaries within an Entrepreneurial University Ecosystem.” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 633–656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. C., and H. Venkatraman. 1993. “Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations.” IBM Systems Journal 32 (1): 472–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, J. 2006. “Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux.” Research Policy 35 (7): 953–969. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., and F. Kitagawa. 2012. “Regional Policy and University Knowledge Transfer: Perspectives from Devolved Regions in the UK.” Regional Studies 46 (6): 817–832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.583913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyghe, A., M. Knockaert, E. Piva, and M. Wright. 2016. “Are Researchers Deliberately Bypassing the Technology Transfer Office? an Analysis of TTO Awareness.” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 589–607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9757-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. J. 2010. “How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution.” Harvard Business Review 88: 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., and D. Patton. 2009. “Reconsidering The Bayh-Dole Act And The Current University Invention Ownership Model.” Research Policy 38 (9): 1407–1422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., and R. W. Goe. 2004. “The Role of Social Embeddedness in Professorial Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UC Berkeley and Stanford.” Research Policy 33 (5): 691–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, D. 2006. “Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (5): 599–603. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9061-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, D. A., M. Guerrero, and D. Urbano. 2011. “Making Universities More Entrepreneurial: Development of a Model.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l’Administration 28 (3): 302–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., and D. Jones-Evans. 2000. “Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe—The Case of Sweden and Ireland.” Small Business Economics 14 (4): 299–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008184601282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R. 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. London H.M. Treasury. Accessed 6 April 2017. http://www.ncub.co.uk/reports/lambert-review.html
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and A. J. Salter. 2014. “The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration.” Research Policy 43 (5): 867–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, N., S. Leonelli, D. Weckowska, D. Castle, and J. Dupré. 2016. “How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship between Open Science Policies and Research Practice. Bulletin of Science.” Technology & Society 36 (2): 128–141.
   Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., and D. S. Siegel. 2005. “University-based Technology Initiatives: Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence.” Research Policy 34 (3): 253–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2019. “Technological Change in the Production of New Scientific Knowledge: A Second Look.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1705004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., and R. M. Sarala. 2019. “Advancing Conceptualisation of University Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Role of Knowledge-intensive Entrepreneurial Firms.” International Small Business Journal 37 (3): 289–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618821720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., D. Blumenthal, M. E. Gluck, and M. A. Stoto. 1989. “Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviours among Life Scientists.” Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (1): 110–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2392988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. T., and J. R. Pandian. 1992. “The Resource‐based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (5): 363–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., P. H. Phan, D. B. Balkin, and P. T. Gianiodis. 2005. “Entrepreneurship and University-based Technology Transfer.” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2): 241–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinuzzi, A., V. Blok, A. Brem, B. Stahl, and N. Schönherr. 2018. “Responsible Research and Innovation in industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives.” Sustainability 10 (3): 702. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., and M. Holmen. 2009. Learning to Compete in European Universities: From Social Institution to Knowledge Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Meoli, M., and S. Vismara. 2016. “University Support and the Creation of Technology and Non-technology Academic Spin-offs.” Small Business Economics 47 (2): 345–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9721-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., M. McAdam, and R. McAdam. 2014. “The Changing University Business Model: A Stakeholder Perspective.” R&D Management 44 (3): 265–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., R. McAdam, and M. McAdam. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of University Technology Transfer from A Quadruple Helix Perspective: Toward A Research Agenda.” R&D Management 48 (1): 7–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., and B. N. Sampat. 2004. “The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (1): 115–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4361-z.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., and R. R. Nelson. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-industry Technology before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N. Sampat, and A. A. Ziedonis. 2001. “The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Uni-versities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.” Research Policy 30 (1): 99–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F., and S. Stern. 2007. “Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? an Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis”.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63 (4): 648–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’kane, C., V. Mangematin, W. Geoghegan, and C. Fitzgerald. 2015. “University Technology Transfer Offices: The Search for Identity to Build Legitimacy.” Research Policy 44 (2): 421–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, R. P., C. Fitzgerald, H. Chugh, and T. Allen. 2014. University-based Entrepreneurship: A Synthesis of the Literature. Building technology transfer within Research Universities: An entrepreneurial approach, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Commercialising Public Research: New Trends and Strategies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264193321-en.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Brostro¨m, P. D’Este, and S. Krabel. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University– Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., M. Goold, and K. Luchs. 1996. “From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Managing the Multibusiness Company.” Strategic Issues for Diversified Groups 285: 285–314.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C. 1992. “Organizational Alignment as Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (2): 119–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E., Ø. Moen, and M. Gulbrandsen. 2006. “Initiatives to Promote Commercialization of University Knowledge.” Technovation 26 (4): 518–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosell, C., and A. Agrawal. 2009. “Have University Knowledge Flows Narrowed? Evidence from Patent Data.” Research Policy 38 (1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., C. Franzoni, and K. Shafi. 2019. “Crowdfunding Scientific Research: Descriptive Insights and Correlates of Funding Success.” PloS One 14 (1): e0208384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2000. “The Neo-liberal University.” New Labor Forum 6: 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and L. L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbano, D., and M. Guerrero. 2013. “Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Context.” Economic Development Quarterly 27 (1): 40–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412471973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia, W. D. 2013. University Start-ups: Critical for Improving Technology Transfer. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente-Sáez, R., and C. Martínez-Fuentes. 2018. “Open Science Now: A Systematic Literature Review for an Integrated Definition.” Journal of Business Research 88: 428–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., and M. Broadbent. 1998. Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. 2003. “How Open Is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies.” Research Policy 32 (7): 1259–1285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. 2014. “Challenges of Funding Open Innovation Platforms.” In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, edited by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 22–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. K., Y. P. Ho, and A. Singh. 2007. “Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” Model to Support Knowledge-based Economic Development: The Case of the National University of Singapore.” World Development 35 (6): 941–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M., B. Clarysse, A. Lockett, and M. Knockert. 2008. “Mid-range Universities’ in Europe Linkages with Industry: Knowledge Types and the Role of Intermediaries.” Research Policy 37 (8): 1205–1223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusef, S. 2008. “Intermediating Knowledge Exchange between Universities and Businesses.” Research Policy 37 (8): 1167–1174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.011.
   Google Scholar