How do changing institutional logics affect innovation? The cases of Online Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle in Korea

References

• ATC. 2016. Global Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Leading the Hydrogen Economy – Development Trend, Market Prospect, Participating firms’ Strategies. Seoul: Argo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., and J. M. Wittmayer. 2016. “Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1993. “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries.” Industrial and Corporate Change 2 (2): 157–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/2.2.157.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. “Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis.” Research Policy 37)3 (3): 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., A. J. Wieczorek, and R. Raven. 2017. “Avoiding Environmental Convergence: A Possible Role for Sustainability Experiments in Latecomer Countries?” Institutions and Economies 3 (2): 367–385.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 393 (3): 364–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431.
   Google Scholar
• Bévort, F., and R. Suddaby. 2016. “Scripting Professional Identities: How Individuals Make Sense of Contradictory Institutional Logics.” Journal of Professions and Organization 3 (1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D., D. Ornston, and S. Samford. 2018. “Mission Critical: The Ends, Means, and Design of Innovation Agencies.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., and Y. Aoyama. 2018. “Fragmented Authorities, Institutional Misalignments, and Challenges to Renewable Energy Transition: A Case Study of Wind Power Curtailment in China.” Energy Research & Social Science 41:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H., S. Park, and J. D. Lee. 2011. “Government-Driven Knowledge Networks as Precursors to Emerging Sectors: A Case of the Hydrogen Energy Sector in Korea.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (3): 751–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, J. C. P., M. C. Hu, and T. T. Y. Shih. 2019. “Green Transformation: Lessons from the Fuel Cell Innovation System in Taiwan.” Journal of Cleaner Production 240:118182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choung, J. Y., and H. R. Hwang. 2019. “Institutional Capabilities and Technology Upgrading: The Case of the Nuclear Industry in Korea.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choung, J. Y., H. R. Hwang, and W. Song. 2014. “Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea.” World Development 54:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, D. 2020. “Reflexive Institutional Reform and the Politics of the Regulatory State of the South.” Regulation & Governance Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations Culture and Environment, edited by L. G. Zucker, 3–21. Cambridge: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Duygan, M., M. Stauffacher, and G. Meylan. 2021. “What Constitutes Agency? Determinants of actors’ Influence on Formal Institutions in Swiss Waste Management.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162:120413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. L., F. Kern, and K. S. Rogge. 2019. “The Co-Evolution of Policy Mixes and Socio-Technical Systems: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Policy Mix Feedback in Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 48 (10): 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 144 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (5): 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. R. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., and R. Suddaby. 2006. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H2 Research. 2021. “Global Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Market Trend (2017~2030).” H2 Research, Accessed April 26, 2022. ( Text in Korean) https://h2research.co.kr.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., and S. Maguire. 2008. “Institutional entrepreneurship.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 198–217. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n8.
   Google Scholar
• Haunschild, P., and D. Chandler. 2008. “Institutional-Level Learning: Learning as a Source of Institutional Change.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 624–649. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n27.
   Google Scholar
• Herriott, R. E., and W. A. Firestone. 1983. “Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability.” Educational Researcher 12 (2): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X012002014.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppmann, J., J. Huenteler, and B. Girod. 2014. “Compulsive Policy-Making—the Evolution of the German Feed-In Tariff System for Solar Photovoltaic Power.” Research Policy 43 (8): 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaist Wptrc. 2010 “Online Electric Vehicle - KAIST OLEV.” Online Electric Vehicle Business Affiliation 1 (1): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D. I., and J. Y. Choung. 2021. “Repercussions of Innovation actors’ Pursuit of Institutional Transition: Evidence from Emerging Innovations in Korea.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 35 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1971189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D. I., I. J. Kang, Y. J. Kim, C. M. Nguyen, and J. Y. Choung. 2021. “Academic Entrepreneurship and Attentional Discrepancy Among Key Stakeholders: Evidence from Research Universities in Korea.” Science and Public Policy 48 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F. 2011. “Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Explaining Policy Divergence in Fostering ‘System innovations’ Towards Sustainability.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (6): 1116–1134. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., and M. Howlett. 2009. “Implementing Transition Management as Policy Reforms: A Case Study of the Dutch Energy Sector.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W. 2019. “Footprints of Korea’s Promotion for the ‘Hydrogen economy’.” Monthly Electrical Journal, Accessed January 13, 2020. ( Text in Korean) http://www.keaj.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2615.
   Google Scholar
• KISTEP. 2010. “Transportation System Innovation Business Based on Online Electric Vehicle: Preliminary Review Report 2009.” Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning 1 (1): 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., and K. S. Rogge. 2022. “Interplay of Policy Experimentation and Institutional Change in Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Mobility as a Service in Finland.” Research Policy 51 (1): 104412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., and M. Scully. 2007. “The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields.” Organization Studies 28 (7): 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. B., J. Markard, and A. D. Andersen. 2019. “Policies, Actors and Sustainability Transition Pathways: A Study of the Eu’s Energy Policy Mix.” Research Policy 48 (10): 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel, A. F., and E. Fischer. 2020. “Collaborative Market Driving: How Peer Firms Can Develop Markets Through Collective Action.” Journal of Marketing 84 (5): 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920917982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., and C. Hardy. 2006. “The Emergence of New Global Institutions: A Discursive Perspective.” Organization Studies 27 (1): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, R., and R. R. Nelson. 2007. “Public Research Institutions and Economic Catch-Up.” Research Policy 36 (10): 1512–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2011. The Entrepreneurial State. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, W. R., and M. S. Wood. 2016. “Navigating a Sea of Change: Identity Misalignment and Adaptation in Academic Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40 (5): 1093–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, C., and Z. Liu. 2014. “Experiment-Based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? The Case of Urban Housing Reform in China.” Policy Sciences 47 (3): 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9185-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micelotta, E., M. Lounsbury, and R. Greenwood. 2017. “Pathways of Institutional Change: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 436 (6): 1885–1910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699522.
   Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., G. R. Weaver, and H. Elms. 2008. “Ending Corruption: The Interplay Among Institutional Logics, Resources, and Institutional Entrepreneurs.” Academy of Management Review 333 (3): 750–770. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465769.
   Google Scholar
• MKE. 2008. “Vision and Development Strategies for the New Growth Engine.” Ministry of Knowledge Economy 1 (1): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• MOLIT. 2019. “Concept and Principle of Wireless Charging Electric Bus.” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Trade. Accessed September 15, 2017. ( Text in Korean) http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/WPGE0201/m_35391/DTL.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberg, J., P. Söderholm, H. Hellsmark, and S. Nordqvist. 2018. “Crossing the Biorefinery Valley of Death? Actor Roles and Networks in Overcoming Barriers to a Sustainability Transition.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27:83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOTIE. 2005 “A National Vision of the Hydrogen Economy and the Action Plan.” Ministry of Commerce Industry and Energy 1 (1): 1–251.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 2004. “The Challenge of Building an Effective Innovation System for Catch-Up.” Oxford Development Studies 32 (3): 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000260575.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 2007. “The Changing Institutional Requirements for Technological and Economic Catch Up.” International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1 (1): 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2007.015016.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 2008. “Institutions and the Performance of Economies Over Time.” In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edited by C. Ménard and M. M. Shirley, 21–30. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, K., and K. Rogge. 2016. “How the Policy Mix Impacts Innovation: Findings from Company Case Studies on Offshore Wind in Germany.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18:62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring, I., C. Schröter-Schlaack, S. Sausenthaler, O. Herbarth, I. Lehmann, B. Schaaf, and U. Krämer. 2011. “Passive Smoking and Behavioural Problems in Children: Results from the LISAplus Prospective Birth Cohort Study.” Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research 111 (8): 1173–1179. Issue No.2/2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., and K. Reichardt. 2013. “Towards a More Comprehensive Policy Mix Conceptualization for Environmental Technological Change: A Literature Synthesis.” Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S3/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., and K. Reichardt. 2016. “Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: An Extended Concept and Framework for Analysis.” Research Policy 45 (8): 1620–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, K., and N. C. Bandelow. 2009. “Politikfeldanalyse: Dimensionen und Fragestellungen.” Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2 (2): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests 3rd Ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., and W. D. Creed. 2002. “Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 272 (2): 222–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., and D. Jiang. 2020. “Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China’s New Reforms on Environmental Governance.” Journal of Environment & Development 30 (1): 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496520961136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, P., H. Hellsmark, J. Frishammar, J. Hansson, J. Mossberg, and A. Sandström. 2019. “Technological Development for Sustainability: The Role of Network Management in the Innovation Policy Mix.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 138:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., and R. Greenwood. 2005. “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H., E. Thurbon, S. Y. Kim, and J. A. Mathews. 2021. “Overcoming Incumbent Resistance to the Clean Energy Shift: How Local Governments Act as Change Agents in Coal Power Station Closures in China.” Energy Policy 149:112058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Dam, E. M., and M. Waardenburg. 2020. “Logic Fluidity: How Frontline Professionals Use Institutional Logics in Their Day-To-Day Work.” Journal of Professions and Organization 7 (2): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990.” American Journal of Sociology 1053 (3): 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TIME. 2010. “Road-Embedded Rechargers.” In the 50 Best Inventions of 2010. TIME. Accessed January 11, 2020. http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2029497_2030622_2029703,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., and B. K. Sovacool. 2020. “Exploring the Role of Failure in Socio-Technical Transitions Research.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37:267–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., S. Sonenshein, and D. Boje. 2016. “Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations: Approaches and Directions for Future Research.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 495–560. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wry, T., and J. G. York. 2017. “An Identity-Based Approach to Social Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review 42 (3): 437–460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q., and A. Klarin. 2021. “Subordinate Actors’ Institutional Maintenance in Response to Coercive Reforms.” Journal of Management Inquiry 30 (1): 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619868027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, X. S., and B. Truffer. 2019. “Shaping Selection Environments for Industrial Catch-Up and Sustainability Transitions: A Systemic Perspective on Endogenizing Windows of Opportunity.” Research Policy 484 (4): 1030–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th Edition). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., and D. Gibbs. 2020. “Unravelling the Role of Green Entrepreneurs in Urban Sustainability Transitions: A Case Study of China’s Solar City.” Urban Studies 57 (14): 2901–2917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019888144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar