Teacher quality, professionalism and professional development: findings from a European project

References

• Angrist, J. D., and V. Lavy. 2001. “Does Teachers Training Affect Pupil Learning? Evidence from Matched Comparisons in Jerusalem Public Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 19(2): 343–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T., and D. Middlewood. 2005. Leading and Managing People in Education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. 1995. Transforming Professional Development for Teachers. A Guide for State Policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8(1): 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. “Reconhecer e potenciar a eficácia docente: Guia para decisores políticos.” In A avaliação de professores numa perspectiva internacional: sentidos e implicações, edited by M. A. Flores, 197–235. Porto: Areal Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., J. D. Holtzmann, S. Gatlin, and V. J. Heiling. 2005. “Does Teacher Preparation Matter? Evidence about Teacher Certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 13(42): 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. 1999. Developing Teachers: The Challenges of Lifelong Learning. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. 2004. A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., M. A. Flores, and I. Viana. 2007. “Effects of National Policies on Teachers’ Sense of Professionalism: Findings from an Empirical Study in Portugal and in England.” European Journal of Teacher Education 30(3): 249–266.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., and J. Sachs. 2004. “Professionalism, Performativity and Empowerment: Discourses in the Politics, Policies and Purposes of Continuing Professional Development.” In International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, edited by C. Day and J. Sachs, 3–23. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estrela, M. T. 2001. “Questões de Profissionalidade e Profissionalismo Docente.” In Ser Professor no Limiar do Século XXI, edited by M. Teixeira, 113–142. Porto: ISET.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2007. Improving the Quality of Teacher Education, COM 392 Final. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed July 10, 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/education/com392_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. D., and C. Mills. 1992. “Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection.” To Improve the Academy 11: 37–155.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. 2005. “Teachers’ Views on Recent Curriculum Changes: Tensions and Challenges.” The Curriculum Journal 16(3): 401–413.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. 2012. “Teachers’ Work and Lives: A European Perspective.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher and School Development, edited by C. Day, 94–107. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., G. Hilton, A. Klonari, E. Nilsen, and M. Snoek. 2008. “Identifying Teacher Quality: Theoretical Backgrounds of a Reflection Toolbox.” Paper presented at the 53rd World Assembly of the International Council on Education for Teaching (ICET), “Learning, Leading and Linking: The Impact of Policy and Research upon Practice”, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, July 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., and E. Shiroma. 2003. “Teacher Professionalisation and Professionalism in Portugal and Brazil: What Do the Policy Documents Tell?” Journal of Education for Teaching 29(1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., R. Rajala, A. M. V. Simão, A. Tornberg, V. Petrovic, and I. Jerkovic. 2007. “Learning at Work. Potential and Limits for Professional Development.” In Making a Difference: Challenges for Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education, edited by J. Butcher and L. McDonald, 141–156. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and D. Nachmias. 1996. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1995. “The Limits and the Potential of Professional Development.” In Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, edited by T. R. Guskey and M. Huberman, 253–267. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1999. Change Forces: The Sequel. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Does your Assessment Support Your Students’ Learning?” Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 32(2): 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. 1992. “Sponsoring the Teacher’s Voice: Teachers’ Lives and Teacher Development.” In Understanding Teacher Development, edited by A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, 110–121. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusek, A. E., F. J. Kain, and G. S. Rivkin. 2005. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73(2): 417–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2000. “Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 6(2): 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and I. Goodson. 1996. “Teachers’ Professional Lives: Aspirations and Actualities.” In Teachers’ Professional Lives, edited by I. Goodson and A. Hargreaves, 1–27. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G. 2000. “Multiple Truths and Contested Realities: The Changing Faces of Teacher Professionalism in England.” In The Life and Work of Teachers, International Perspectives in Changing Times, edited by C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge and J. Moller, 93–108. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. 2002. “Development of a National Standards Framework for the Teaching Profession.” Accessed July 5, 2012. http://research.acer.edu.au/teaching_standards/7available.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. 2009. “O comprometimento profissional para além do contrato: Autocompreensão, vulnerabilidade e reflexão dos professores.” In Aprendizagem e desenvolvimento profissional de Professores: Contextos e Perspectivas, edited by M. A. Flores and A. M. Veiga Simão, 61–98. Mangualde: Edições Pedago.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. 2004. “In Search of the Essence of a Good Teacher: Towards a More Holistic Approach in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A. 1996. “Practices that Support Teacher Development. Transforming Conceptions of Professional Learning.” In Teacher Learning. New Policies, New Practices, edited by M. W. McLaughlin and I. Oberman, 185–201. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. 2006. Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education. Understanding Teaching and Learning about Teaching. London/New York: Routledge/Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcelo, C. 1994. Formación del profesorado para el cambio educativo. Barcelona: PPU.
   Google Scholar
• Mena Marcos, J., E. Sanchez, and H. H. Tillema. 2011. “Promoting Teacher Reflection: What is Said to Be Done.” Journal of Education for Teaching 37(1): 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirink, J. A., P. C. Meijer, N. Verloop, and T. C. M. Bergen. 2009. “How do Teachers Learn in the Workplace? An Examination of Teacher Learning Activities.” European Journal of Teacher Education 32(3): 209–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2000. “The Activist Professional.” Journal of Educational Change 1(1): 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2003. “Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or Developing Teaching.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 9(2): 175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2011. “Accountability, Standards and Teacher Activism: An Unholy Trinity or the Way for the Profession to Shape the Future?” Paper presented at Post Primary Teachers Association Professional Conference, Wellington, April 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2005. “New Methods and Perspectives on Teacher Evaluation. Who Evaluates What and for Which Purposes?” In Teacher Professional Development in Changing Conditions, edited by D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G. Morine-Dershimer and H. Tillema, 95–114. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. 2008. “Changing Modes of Teacher Professionalism: Traditional, Managerial, Collaborative and Democratic.” In Exploring Professionalism, edited by B. Cunningham, 28–49. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar