Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 17, 2013 - Issue 3: Teacher Education Futures
538
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

From splendid isolation to crossed boundaries? The futures of teacher education in the light of activity theory

Pages 307-321 | Received 30 Jul 2012, Accepted 06 Jan 2013, Published online: 01 Aug 2013

Scenario publications

  • ATEERDC19. 2003. “Scenarios for the Future of Teacher Education in Europe.” European Journal of Teacher Education 26 (1): 21–36.
  • Bennell, P. 2004. AIDS in Africa: Three Scenarios for the Education Sector. Report Prepared for the UNAIDS Project, AIDS in Africa: Scenarios for the Future. Geneva: UNAIDS.
  • Berry, B. 2011. Teaching 2030: What We Must Do for Our Students and Our Public Schools: Now and in the Future. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Bigum, C., and J. Kenway. 1998. “New Information Technologies and the Ambiguous Future of Schooling – Some Possible Scenarios.” In International Handbook of Educational Change, Part 1, edited by A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, and D. Hopkins, Vol. 2, 375–395. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Business Educa. 2011. “Learning Scenarios.” http://learningscenarios.org/.
  • Cachia, R. 2011. How Do We Foresee Teacher Collaboration Networks in 2025? Seville: European Commission Joint Research Centre/Institute For Prospective Technological Studies.
  • Craig, J., and C. Fieschi. 2007. DIY Professionalism: Futures for Teaching. London: DEMOS.
  • Daanen, H., and K. Facer. 2007. 2020 and Beyond: Future Scenarios for Education in the Age of New Technologies. Slough: Futurelab.
  • Facer, K. 2009. Educational, Social and Technological Futures: A Report from the Beyond Current Horizons Programme. Slough: Futurelab.
  • Freeman, O., and R. Watson. 2008. Teaching for Uncertain Futures. The Open Book Scenarios – A Project Exploring Possible Futures of Teaching. Canberra: Teaching Australia – Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited.
  • Geake, J., and P. Cooper. 2003. “Cognitive Neuroscience: Implications for Education?” Westminster Studies in Education 26 (1): 7–20.
  • Goodwin, B., L. Lefkowits, C. Woempner, and E. Hubbell. 2011. The Future of Schooling. Educating America in 2020. Aurora, CO: McREL.
  • Harris, G. 2006. The Future of Public Primary Education in the United States. San Francisco: Global Business Network.
  • Hume, W. R. 2007. UC2025: The Power and Promise of Ten. Oakland CA: University Of California.
  • Johnston, R. 2000. Focus on the Future of Vocational Education & Training. Scenario Planning Project, an ANTA National Project. Melbourne: Victorian Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education.
  • Kirk, D. 2009. Physical Education Futures. London: Routledge.
  • Knowledgeworks. 2011. “2020 Forecast: Creating the Future of Learning.” Accessed July 15 2012. http://futureofed.org/.
  • Lefkowits, L., and V. Urquhart. 2005. The Future of Schooling: Educating America in 2014. Aurora, CO: McREL.
  • Leicester, G., K. Bloomer, and D. Stewart. 2009. Transformative Innovation in Education. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
  • Miller, R. 2003. “The Future of the Tertiary Education Sector: Scenarios for a Learning Society.” Paper prepared for the OECD/Japanese seminar on the future of universities, Tokyo, December 11–12.
  • Moon, B., J. Leach, and M. P. Stevens. 2005. Designing Open and Distance Learning for Teacher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Toolkit for Educators and Planners. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Moynagh, M., and R. Worsley. 2003. Learning from the Future: Scenarios for Post-16 Learning. Hertford: Learning & Skills Research Centre.
  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. 2006. “The Secondary Futures Project.” In Think Scenarios, Rethink Education, edited by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 145–154. Paris: OECD.
  • Newby, M. 2005. “Looking to the Future.” Journal of Education for Teaching 31 (4): 253–261.
  • Niemi, H. 2000. “Teacher Education in Finland – Current Trends and Future Scenarios.” Paper presented at the conference on Teacher Education Policies in the European Union and Quality of Lifelong Learning, Loulé, Portugal, May 22–23.
  • Norwich, B., and I. Lunt. 2005. Future Schooling that Includes Children with SEN/Disability: A Scenario Planning Approach. Paper presented at Future Schooling for SEN/Disability: Policy seminar, Institute of Education, London University, NASEN, London, September 22.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2001. What Schools for the Future? Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2006a. Four Future Scenarios for Higher Education. Paris: OECD.
  • Ogilvy, J. 1992. “Three Scenarios for Higher Education.” The Deeper News (Global Business Network) 3 (1): 3–35.
  • Ogilvy, J. 1995. “Education & Community: Four Scenarios for the Future of Public Education.” The Deeper News (Global Business Network) 6 (1): 1–34.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education – English-Speaking System. 2006. “The Future of ‘Teaching as a Profession’.” In Think Scenarios, Rethink Education, edited by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 155–166. Paris: OECD.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education – French-Speaking System. 2006. “The Vision 2020 Initiative.” In Think Scenarios, Rethink Education, edited by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 167–181. Paris: OECD.
  • Schmelkes, S. 2008. “Tomorrow’s Schools in Mexico: Three Scenarios.” Journal of International Cooperation in Education 11 (1): 97–112.
  • Schuck, S., and P. Aubusson. 2010. “Educational Scenarios for Digital Futures.” Learning, Media and Technology 35 (3): 293–305.
  • Scottish Enterprise Glasgow. 2006. Learning Futures – New Design for Learning. Initial Report. Glasgow: Scottish Enterprise Glasgow.
  • Seed, A. H. 2008. “Redirecting the Teaching Profession.” Phi Delta Kappan 14 (4): 586–589.
  • Sellin, B. 2002. Scenarios and Strategies for Vocational Education and Lifelong Learning in Europe: Summary of Findings and Conclusions of the Joint CEDEFOP/ETF Project (1998–2002). CEDEFOP Panorama Series 40. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Snoek, M. 2011. “Leraar 2020” [Teacher 2020]. Accessed 15 July 2012. http://www.leraar2020.nl.
  • Snoek, M. 2003a. “Scenarios for Dutch Teacher Education. A Trip to Rome: Coach Bus Company or Travel Agency?” European Journal of Teacher Education 26 (1): 123–135.
  • Song, H. 2008. “Four Scenarios of Leapfrog for Teacher Training Curriculum in China.” Futures Research Quarterly 24 (1): 45.
  • South Australia Department for Education and Children’s Services. 2006. Creating the Future. Adelaide: Department for Education and Children’s Services, South Australia.
  • Taylor, N., B. Fleisch, and J. Shindler. 2007. “Education Scenarios for 2019.” Paper prepared for the Key Driving Forces Scenarios 2019, the Office of the Presidency South Africa, June 11–12.
  • Van Wieringen, F., B. Sellin, and G. Schmidt. 2003. Future Education: Learning the Future. Scenarios and Strategies in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Victoria Office of Learning and Teaching. 2006. Using Future Thinking Tools to Build School and System Thinking and Leadership. Initial and Interim Report. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Education and Training, State of Victoria.
  • Volman, M. 2005. “A Variety of Roles for a New Type of Teacher: Educational Technology and the Teaching Profession.” Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (1): 15–31.
  • Willumsen, J. 1999. “Educational Scenarios – Denmark as a Leading Country? On the Latest Developments in Teacher Education in Denmark.” TNTEE Publications 2 Teacher Education in Europe in the Late 1990s: Evaluation and Quality 2 (2): 95–102.
  • Young, M., and J. Muller. 2010. “Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: Lessons from the Sociology of Knowledge.” European Journal of Education 45 (1): 11–27.

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169.
  • Benammer, K., L. Dale, J. Poortinga, H. Schwab, and M. Snoek. 2006. The Scenario Method for Education. Facilitator Manual. Amsterdam: Hogeschool Van Amsterdam.
  • Bødker, S., and E. Christiansen. 1997. “Scenarios as Springboards in CSCW Design.” In Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, edited by G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star, W. Turner, and L. Gasser, 217–233. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Codd, J. A., M. Brown, J. Clark, J. Mcpherson, H. O’Neill, J. O’Neill, H. Waitere-Ang, and N. Zepke. 2002. Review of Future-Focused Research on Teaching and Learning. Wellington: Ministry of Education New Zealand.
  • Cornelissen, F. 2011. Knowledge Processes in School–University Research Networks. Dissertation. Eindhoven: Eindhoven School of Education.
  • Donaldson, G. 2010. Teaching Scotland’s Future. Report of a Review of Teacher Education in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  • Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156.
  • Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Gorodetsky, M., and J. Barak. 2008. “The Educational-Cultural Edge: A Participative Learning Environment for Co-Emergence of Personal and Institutional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (7): 1907–1918.
  • Gunsteren, H. R. 1976. The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs. London: Wiley.
  • Lebel, L. 2010. Scenarios as Boundary Objects in the Allocation of Water Resources and Services in the Mekong Region. USER Working Paper PN67-2010-21. Chiang Mai: Unit for Social and Environmental Research, Chiang Mai University.
  • Ministerie van OCW. 2011. Actieplan Leraar 2020. Een Krachtig Beroep! [Action Plan Teacher 2020. A Powerful Profession!]. The Hague: Ministerie van OCW.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2006b. Think Scenarios, Rethink Education. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2007. The Starters Pack: Futures Thinking in Action. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/55/38981492.pdf.
  • Pulver, S., and S. VanDeveer. 2007. “Global Environmental Futures Interrogating the Practice and Politics of Scenarios.” Background Paper Presented at the Conference Global Environmental Futures – Interrogating the Practice and Politics of Scenarios, Providence, RI, March 23–24.
  • Samaras, A. P., A. R. Freese, and C. Kosnik. 2008. Learning Communities in Practice. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
  • Snoek, M. 2003b. “The Use and Methodology of Scenario Making.” European Journal of Teacher Education 26 (1): 9–19.
  • Snoek, M. 2005. Scenario Writing in Education. Teaching Guidelines for an In-Service Course for Teachers and Teacher Educators. Brussels/Amsterdam: Association for Teacher Education in Europe/HvA.
  • Snoek, M., A. Swennen, and M. Van Der Klink. 2011. “The Quality of Teacher Educators in the European Policy Debate: Actions and Measures to Improve the Professionalism of Teacher Educators.” Professional Development in Education 37 (5): 651–664.
  • Star, S. L. 1989. “The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem-Solving.” In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, edited by L. Gasser and M. Huhns, Vol. 2, 37–54. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Swennen, J. M. H.2012. “Van Oppermeesters Tot Docenten Hoger Onderwijs: De Ontwikkeling Van Het Beroep En De Identiteit Van Lerarenopleiders” [The Development of the Profession and Identity of Teacher Educators]. Doctoral thesis, Vrije Universiteit.
  • Tsui, A., and D. Y. K. Law. 2007. “Learning as Boundary-Crossing in School–University Partnership.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (8): 1289–1301.
  • US Department of Education. 2011. Our Future, Our Teachers: The Obama Administration’s Plan for Teacher Education Reform and Improvement. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  • Van Der Heijden, K. 2005. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. London: Wiley.
  • Van Notten, P. 2006. “Scenario Development: A Typology of Approaches.” In Think Scenarios, Rethink Education, edited by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 69–92. Paris: OECD.
  • Van Notten, P. W. F., J. Rotmans, M. Van Asselt, and D. S. Rothman. 2003. “An Updated Scenario Typology.” Futures 35 (5): 423–443.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.