Measuring characteristics of teacher professional development

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. B. 2009. “Powerful Teaching and Learning Facilitator Guide.” Unpublished document. Bothell, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., and M. Mourshed. 2007. How the World’s Best-performing School Systems Come Out on Top. London: McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, R. S. 2007. “Risk.” In The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. 2nd ed., 211–218. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K., N. de las Alas, and C. Smith. 2008. Does Teacher Professional Development Have Effects on Teaching and Learning? Analysis of Evaluation Finding From Programs for Mathematics and Science Teachers in 14 States. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K., J. Smithson, A. Porter, D. Nunnaley, and E. Osthoff. 2006. “Improving Instruction Through Schoolwide Professional Development.” ERS Spectrum 24 (2): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1986. Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1996. The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., E. Fennama, P. L. Peterson, C. P. Chaing, and M. Loef. 1989. “Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study.” American Educational Research Journal 26 (4): 499–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2000. “Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California.” Teachers College Record 102 (2): 294–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., S. Beltyukova, J. Struble, J. J. Haney, and A. T. Lumpe. 2006. “Do You See What I See? The Relationship Between a Professional Development Model and Student Achievement.” In Exemplary Science in Grades 5–8: Standards-Based Success Stories, edited by R. E. Yager, 13–43. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., R. Chung Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council and School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1940. Education Today. New York: GP Putnam’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, R., R. Eaker, and R. Dufour. 2005. “Recurring Themes of Professional Learning Communities and the Assumptions They Challenge.” In On Common Ground: The Power of Professional Learning Communities, edited by R. Dufour, R. Eaker, and R. Dufour, 7–29. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 2000. “Getting to Scale With Good Educational Practice.” In Leading Professional Development in Education, edited by B. Moon, J. Butcher, and E. Bird, 30–51. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 2007. “Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Achievement: The Imperative for Professional Development in Education.” School Reform From the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance, edited by R. F. Elmore, 89–132. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B. J., R. W. Marx, S. Best, and R. T. Tal. 2003. “Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (6): 643–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1995. “The Limits and Potential of Professional Development.” In Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, edited by T. R. Guskey and M. Huberman, 253–267. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., J. P. Gall, and W. Borg. 2007. Educational Research: An Introduction. 8th ed. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., and N. J. Salkind. 2008. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 1995. “Professional Development in Education: In Search of the Optimal Mix.” In Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, edited by T. R. Guskey and M. Huberman, 114–131. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3/4): 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2003. “The Characteristics of Effective Professional Development: A Synthesis of Lists.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 21–25, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., and G. Sykes. 2007. “Continuous School Improvement.” In The Keys to Effective Schools: Educational Reform as Continuous Improvement, edited by W. D. Hawley and D. L. Rollie. 2nd ed., 153–172. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., and L. Valli. 1999. “The Essentials of Effective Professional Development: A New Consensus.” In Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, 127–150. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., and L. Valli. 2007. “Design Principles for Learner-centered Professional Development.” In The Keys to Effective Schools: Educational Reform as Continuous Improvement, edited by W. D. Hawley and D. L. Rollie. 2nd ed., 117–137. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. 2004. “Professional Development Standards and Practices in Elementary School Mathematics.” The Elementary School Journal 104 (3): 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, D., K. Thomas, and F. Lawrenz. 2003. “Relationship Between Professional Development, Teachers' Instructional Practices, and the Achievement of Students in Science and Mathematics.” School Science and Mathematics 103 (3): 378–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., M. Meiers, and A. Beavis. 2005. “Factors Affecting the Impact of Professional Development Programs on Teachers' Knowledge, Practice, Student Outcomes and Efficacy [Electronic Version].” Educational Policy Analysis Archives 13: 1–28. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n10/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., and B. Showers. 2002. Student Achievement Through Staff Development. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. 1974. “An Index of Factorial Simplicity.” Psychometrika 39: 32–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., E. F. Holton, and R. A. Swanson. 2005. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th ed. San Francisco: Elsevier, Butterworth, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, P. A. 2003. “Teachers as Adult Learners: A New Perspective.” In New Perspectives on Designing and Implementing Professional Development of Teachers of Adults, edited by P. A. Lawler and K. P. King, 15–22. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 1982. “Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success.” American Educational Research Journal 19 (3): 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 1999. “Organizing Schools for Teacher Learning.” In Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, 233–262. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., R. D. Abbott, L. B. Green, S. N. Beretvas, S. Cox, T. Q. Potter, and A. L. Gray. 2002. “Beginning Literacy: Links Among Teacher Knowledge, Teacher Practice, and Student Learning.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 35 (1): 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, W. 2008. “Teacher Perceptions, Lesson Study and Science Achievement.” Unpublished PhD diss., Seattle Pacific University.
   Google Scholar
• National Staff Development Council. 2010. “NSDC’s Definition of Professional Development.” Accessed February 2010. http://www.nsdc.org/standfor/definition.cfm
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 2002. Accessed February 2010. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., S. Konstantopoulos, and L. Hedges. 2004. “How Large Are Teacher Effects?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26 (3): 237–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. 2009. “Test and Item Specifications: Grades 3–5 Mathematics.” Accessed February 2010. http://www.k12.wa.us/mathematics/assessment/itemspec_gr3-5_12-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. 3rd ed. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum Implementation.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett, M. A., N. R. Lackey, and J. J. Sullivan. 2003. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., and M. W. Hall. 1998. “Learning Organizations for Sustainable Education Reform.” Daedalus 127 (4): 89–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., and P. Placier. 1996. “Teacher Change.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, and E. Guyton. 2nd ed., 905–947. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. L., and S. P. Horn. 1998. “Research Findings From the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implication for Educational Evaluation and Research.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12 (3): 247–256.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W. M., C. N. Goldenberg, and R. Gallimore. 2009. “Increasing Achievement by Focusing Grade-Level Teams on Improving Classroom Learning: A Prospective, Quasi-Experimental Study of Title I Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 46 (4): 1006–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, G., M. Gearhart, and N. Nasir. 2001. “Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Mathematics: A Study of Three Contrasting Approaches to Professional Support.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4: 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoker, M. 2006. Results NOW: How We Can Achieve Unprecedented Improvements in Teaching and Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, G. S., and P. Bylsma. 2004. Characteristics of Improved School Districts: Themes From Research. Olympia, WA: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D. J. 2007. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. 4th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 2004. “Communities of Learners and Communities of Teachers.” In The Wisdom of Practice: Essays on Teaching, Learning, and Learning to Teach, edited by S. M. Wilson, 485–500. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sprinthall, R. C. 2007. Basic Statistical Analysis. 8th ed. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., and G. R. Norman. 1995. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A. 2001. “Translating Teaching Practice Into Improved Student Achievement.” In From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, edited by S. Fuhrman, 81–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A. 2002. “Developing Communities of Instructional Practice.” Teachers College Record 104 (8): 1591–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W. 2000. Montecarlo PCA for Parallel Analysis [ Computer Program]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, A., K. Yoon, P. Zhu, S. Cronen, and M. Garet. 2008. “Experimenting With Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods.” Educational Researcher 37: 469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., and J. Kesselring. 2005. “Link Between Faculty Group Development and Elementary Student Performance on Standardized Tests.” The Journal of Educational Research 98 (6): 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., T. Duncan, S. W.-Y. Lee, B. Scarloss, and K. Shapley. 2007. Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033) (Vol. 2009). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
   Google Scholar