Innovation Configuration mapping as a professional development tool: the case of one-to-one laptop computing

References

• Abell, J. 2006. “Planning and Implementing Effective Professional Learning Programs Using Innovation Configuration Maps.” Access 20 (4): 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Young, S. 2010. Teaching with the Tools Kids Really Use: Learning with Web and Mobile Technologies. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., and J. Polman. 2006. “The Impact of Ubiquitous Wireless Computers in the Internet Age: How Middle School Teachers Adapted to the Technology in the Initial Stages of Implementation.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 (2): 363–385.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., S. Dexter, and W. F. Heinecke. 2007. “What Added Value Does a 1:1 Student to Laptop Ratio Bring to Technology-Supported Teaching and Learning?” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (5): 440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. 2006. “Bridging the Digital Divide.” International Journal of Learning 13 (5): 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, C., A. Kennedy, L. Reid, and S. Mckinney. 2007. “Teachers’ Continuing Professional Development: Contested Concepts, Understandings and Models.” Journal of In-Service Education 33 (2): 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., A. A. George, and W. L. Rutherford. 1979. Measuring Stages of Concern about the Innovation: A Manual for Use of the Soc Questionnaire. 2nd ed. Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, L. 2009. “Results & Lessons Learned from 1:1 Laptop Initiatives: A Collective Review.” Techtrends 53 (6): 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M., and S. F. Loucks. 1980. A Concerns-Based Model for the Delivery of In-Service. Austin: Texas University Research Development Center for Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M., S. M. Stiegelbauer, G. E. Hall, and A. A. George. 2006. Measuring Implementations in Schools: Innovation Configurations. Austin: SEDL.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, P. 2009. 1-to-1 Learning: Laptop Programs that Work. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: International Society of Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• McGrail, E. 2007. “Challenges to Teacher Control in the English Laptop Classroom.” Georgia Educational Researcher 5 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 1998. Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mouza, C., A. Cavalier, and L. Nadolny. 2008. “Implementation and Outcomes of a Laptop Initiative in Career and Technical High School Education.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 38 (4): 411–452.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, A., S. Farsaii, G. Knezek, and R. Christensen. 2006. “Teaching in the One-to-One Classroom: It’s not about Laptops, It’s about Empowerment!” Learning and Leading with Technology 33 (4): 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. 2004. “Taking Measure: Innovation Configurations Gauge the Progress of a New Initiative.” Tools for Schools 8 (2): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Spires, H. A., E. Wiebe, C. A. Young, K. Hollebrands, and J. K. Lee. 2009. Towards a New Learning Ecology: Teaching and Learning in 1:1 Environments. Friday Institute White Paper Series. Raleigh: Friday Institute For Educational Innovation, North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A. 2007. Task Design, Implementation and Assessment: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in English Language Teaching and Learning. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., and W. Fareed. 2012. “Professional Learning during a One-to-One Laptop Innovation.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 20 (3): 331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., and W. Fareed. 2014. “Growing in Digital Maturity: Students and Their Computers in an Academic Laptop Programme in Singapore.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/02188791.2013.876387.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., W. Fareed, and V. Vaish. 2012. Multimodal Literacy in English Language and Literacy Teaching: The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a One-to-One Wireless Laptop Programme in a Singapore High School. Research Brief No. 11-006. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., and M. Vallance. 2013. “Making the Right Decisions: Leadership in 1-to-1 Computing in Education.” International Journal of Educational Management 27 (3): 260–272.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. 2006. Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. 2011. Learning in the Cloud: How (and Why) to Transform Schools with Digital Media. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., D. Grant, G. D. Real, and M. Rousseau. 2004. “Promoting Academic Literacy with Technology: Successful Laptop Programs in K–12 Schools.” System 32 (4): 525–537.
   Google Scholar