Teachers’ experience from a school-based collaborative teacher professional development programme: reported impact on professional development

References

• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2009. Tolkning och reflection [Interpretation and Reflection]. Vetnenskapsfilosofi och Kvalitativ Metod [Philosophy of Science and Qualitative Methods]. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., and J. Heritage, eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A., and J. Loughran. 2010. “What Do We Know about Effective CPD for Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge?” Paper presented at the International Seminar, Professional Reflections, National Science Learning Centre, York, February. Downloaded August 2014. https://www.sciencelearningcentres.org.uk/media/filer_public/46/e7/46e762ac-d138-4ca6-8bdd-3b169b1c288f/nslc_uyseg_seminar_berry.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bolam, R., A. McMahon, L. Stoll, S. Thomas, and M. Wallace. 2005. Creating and Substaining Effective Professional Learning Communities. Research Report 637. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., and S. Loucks-Horsley. 2000. “Advancing Technology Education: The Role of Professional Development.” The Technology Teacher 60: 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cakir, M. 2008. “Constructivist Approaches to Learning in Science and Their Implication for Science Pedagogy: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Enviromental and Science Education 3 (4): 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., and H. Hollingsworth. 1994. “Reconceptualising Teacher Change.” In Challenges in Mathematics Education: Constraints on Construction, edited by G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, and J. Geake, 153–164, Vol. 1. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Traditions. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1995. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 76 (8): 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199.10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916. Democrazy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A., and C. S. Dweck, eds. 2007. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. 2002. Bridging the Gap between Standards and Achievement: The Imperative for Professional Development in Education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., S. Bragg, J. Craig, I. Cunningham, M. Eraut, S. Gillinson, M. Horne, C. Robinson, and J. Thorp. 2005. Factors Influencing the Transfer of Good Practice. Research Brief RB615. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2001. Leading in a Culture of Change. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 381–391.10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, A., and T. Nyen. 2009. “Kompetanseutvikling for lærere” [Teacher Professional Development]. In I Utdanning 2009 læringsutbytte og kompetanse [In 2009 Education Learning and Skills], 149–165. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway].
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and M. Jones. 2010. “Professional Learning Communities and System Improvement.” Improving Schools 13 (2): 172–181.10.1177/1365480210376487
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W. 2007. “Teacher Professional Development in Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 1179–1203. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., R. Mamlok, and B. Hug. 2001. “Modern Content and the Enterprise of Science: Science Education in the Twentieth Century.” In Education across a Century: The Centennial Volume, edited by L. Corno, 205–238. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M., and M. Rolfsen. 2004. Arbeid i team [Working in Teams]. Læring og utvikling i team [Learning and Development Team]. Bergen: Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. H., and A. S. Marcus. 2010. “How the Structure and Focus of Teachers’ Collaborative Activities Facilitate and Constrain Teacher Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 389–398.10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., E. A. Davis, and P. Bell. 2004. “Inquiry and Technology.” In Internet Enviroments for Science Education, edited by M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, and P. Bell, 3–27. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., and C. Matsumoto. 1999. “Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene.” School Science and Mathematics 99: 258–271.10.1111/ssm.1999.99.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. 2004. “Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule against Pure Discovery Learning?” American Psychologist 59 (1): 14–19.10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1994. Fallstudien som forskningsmetod [Case study research in education]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., A. J. Levy, and J. Century. 2010. “Inquiry-Based Science Instruction – What is It and Does It Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 474–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, M. S. 2000. Professional Learning Communities: An Ongoing Exploration. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Accessed January 25, 2014, available at the National Academies Press online: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9596
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407.10.3102/0034654311413609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermeier, C., M. Prenzel, and R. Duit. 2010. “Improving Science and Mathematics Instruction: The SINUS Project as an Example for Reform as Teacher Professional Development.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (3): 303–327.10.1080/09500690802535942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise, L. M., and J. P. Spillane. 2010. “Teacher Learning and Instructional Change: How Formal and On-the-Job Learning Opportunities Predict Change in Elementary School Teachers’ Practice.” The Elementary School Journal 110 (3): 323–346.10.1086/648981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J. 2007. “Teachers’ Professional Development. Not Whether or What, but How.” In New Designs for Teachers’ Professional Learning, edited by J. Pickering, C. Daly, and N. Pachler, 192–216. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2010. Kvalitativ metode [Qualitative Method]. En innføring med fokus på fenomenologi, etnografi og kasusstudier [An Introduction Focusing on Phenomenology]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget [University Press].
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. J., and R. M. Felder. 2006. “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons and Research Bases.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2): 123–138.10.1002/jee.2006.95.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., and H. Borko. 2000. “What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning?” Educational Researcher 29 (1): 4–15.10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. 2011. Student-Centered Leadership. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, edited by G. Jefferson, Vol. 2, 222–238. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Søndenå, K. 2007. “Refleksjonen, dialogen og demokratiet” [Reflection, Dialogue and Democracy]. In Veiledning i pedagogisk arbeid [Guidance in Educational Work], edited by T. Kroksmark and K. Åberg, 210–222. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., T. Angelo, H. Matthews, Søndenå, K.B. O’Steen, and J. Robertson. 2007. “How Effective is Inquiry-Based Learning in Linking Teaching and Research?” Paper prepared for an International Colloquium on International Policies and Practices for Academic Enquiry, Marwell, Winchester, UK, April 19–21. http://www.intellcontrol.com/files/EBL/how%20effective%20is%20inquiry-based%20learning%20in%20linking%20teaching%20and%20research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, M., and D. Jorde. 2012. “Improving Science Education through European Models of Sustainable Teacher Professional Development.” In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe, edited by D. Jorde and J. Dillon, 375–393. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 443–466. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, L., A. Yates, L. H. Meyer, C. Hall, M. Taylor, and S. Stevens. 2009. “Professional Development Design: Embedding Educational Reform in New Zealand.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 181–189.10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S-TEAM. 2010. S-TEAM. Preliminary Report – Work Package 2. Deliverable 2a, January 2010. Listed on NTNU website https://www.ntnu.no/wiki/download/attachments/8325736/WP2+report+complete.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1274257046000
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taitelbaum, D., R. Mamlok-Naaman, M. Carmeli, and A. Hofstein. 2008. “Evidence for Teachers’ Change While Participating in a Continuous Professional Development Programme and Implementing the Inquiry Approach in the Chemistry Laboratory.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (5): 593–617.10.1080/09500690701854840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller, T. 2006. Aksjonslæring- forskende partnerskap i skolen [Action Learning-Research Partnership in School]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget [Norwegian Academic Press].
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., A. Wilson, H. Barrar, and I. Fung. 2007. “Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES].” International Academy of Education. International Bureau of Education. Accessed November 29, 2015. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/48727127.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. 2007. “School Innovation in Science: A Model for Supporting School and Teacher Development.” Research in Science Education 37: 189–216.10.1007/s11165-006-9022-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., D. Ross, and A. Adams. 2008. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 80–91.10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R., and A. Manning. 2008. “Factors Influencing the Transformation of New Teaching Approaches from a Programme of Professional Development to the Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (5): 689–709.10.1080/09500690701854881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. 2003. “Inquiry Projects in Science Teacher Education: What Can Investigative Experiences Reveal about Teacher Thinking and Eventual Classroom Practice?” Science Education 87: 112–143.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar