Transforming teacher behaviour to increase student participation in classroom discourse

References

• Adey, P. 2006. “A Model for Professional Development of Teachers Thinking.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 1 (1): 49–56.10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., J. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730.10.3102/00028312040003685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, L., and S. Wallace. 2012. Qualitative Research in Education. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473957602
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, L., and J. Fitzgerald. 2002. “Dialogic Discussion and the Paideia Seminar.” American Educational Research Journal 39 (4): 907–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., J. Jacobs, E. Eiteljorg, and M. E. Pittman. 2008. “Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 417–436.10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., and D. Rubin. 2002. “Elaborated Student Talk in an Elementary ESoL Classroom.” Research in the Teaching of English 36 (4): 495–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., and D. Rubin. 2006. “How Contingent Questioning Promotes Extended Student Talk: A Function of Display Questions.” Journal of Literacy Research 38 (2): 141–169.10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C., and D. Myhill. 2004. “Interactive or Inactive? A Consideration of the Nature of Interaction in Whole Class Teaching.” Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (1): 35–49.10.1080/0305764042000183115
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., H. Novak Lauscher, S. Jarvis-Selinger, and B. Beckingham. 2004. “Collaboration and Self-regulation in Teachers’ Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 35–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candela, A. 2005. “Students’ Participation as Co-authoring of School Institutional Practices.” Culture & Psychology 11 (3): 321–337.10.1177/1354067X05055523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., R. C. Anderson, and M. A. Waggoner. 2001. “Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion.” Reading Research Quarterly 36 (4): 378–411.10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, S., E. Jansen, and W. van de Grift. 2013. “Profiling Teachers‘ Continuing Professional Development and the Relation with Their Beliefs about Learning and Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 33: 78–89.10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J., and F. Sahlstrom. 2008. “The Price of Participation: Teacher Control versus Student Participation in Classroom Interaction.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52 (2): 205–223.10.1080/00313830801915853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., and D. Cox. 1992. “Participation and Withdrawal among Fourth-grade Pupils.” American Educational Research Journal 29: 141–162.10.3102/00028312029001141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., P. Smagorinski, and S. Valencia. 1999. “Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach.” American Journal of Education 108 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F., and J. Kessels. 1999. “Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education.” Educational Researcher 28 (4): 4–17.10.3102/0013189X028004004
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F., J. Kessels, B. Kosters, B. Lagerwerf, and T. Wubbels. 2001. Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., and K. Kumpulainen. 2007. “The Social Construction of Participation in an Elementary Classroom Community.” International Journal of Educational Research 46 (3–4): 141–158.10.1016/j.ijer.2007.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., and L. Lipponen. 2010. “Productive Interaction as Agentic Participation in Dialogic Enquiry.” In Educational Dialogues. Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and C. W. Howe, 48–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2008. “Changing Classroom Practice through the English National Literacy Strategy: A Micro-Interactional Perspective.” American Educational Research Journal 45 (3): 701–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., M. Israeli, I. Pollak, and M. Bozo-Schwartz. 2013. “Investigating Dilemmas in Teaching: Towards a New Form of Pedagogical Scholarship.” Studia Paedagogica 18 (4): 9–36.10.5817/SP2013-4-2
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2014. Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Luneberg, M., and F. Korthagen. 2009. “Experience, Theory and Practical Wisdom in Teaching and Teacher Education.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15 (2): 225–240.10.1080/13540600902875316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and C. Howe. 2012. “Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value of Sociocultural Theory.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (1): 12–21.10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., and C. Mameli. 2013. “Process Quality of Classroom Discourse: Pupil Participation and Learning Opportunities.” International Journal of Educational Research 62: 249–258.10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., and C. Mameli. 2015. “Triadické interakce ve výukové komunikaci” [Triadic Interactions in Classroom Discourse]. Studia Paedagogica 20 (3): 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2008. “Bad Boys and Good Girls? Patterns of Interaction and Response in Whole Class Teaching.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (3): 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’? An Investigation of Teacher-Student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406.10.1093/applin/21.3.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, and C. Prendergast. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. 2010. “Engaging Students in Guided Science Inquiry Discussions: Elementary Teachers’ Oral Strategies.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (7): 747–765.10.1007/s10972-009-9168-1
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., and J. Hurry. 2007. “Teachers’ Use of Questioning and Modelling Comprehension Skills in Primary Classrooms.” Educational Review 59 (3): 299–314.10.1080/00131910701427298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehmer, A. K., A. Gröschner, and T. Seidel. 2015. “Fostering and Scaffolding Student Engagement in Productive Classroom Discourse: Teachers’ Practice Changes and Reflections in Light of Teachers Professional Development.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 7: 12–27.10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, S. D., and K. L. McNeill. 2013. “Conducting Talk in Secondary Science Classrooms: Investigating Instructional Moves and Teachers’ Beliefs.” Science Education 97 (3): 367–394.10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblin, N. P., and L. Margalef. 2013. “Learning From Dilemmas: Teacher Professional Development through Collaborative Action and Reflection.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 19 (1): 8–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., J. Ametller, E. Mortimer, and J. Emberton. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Disciplinary Knowledge.” In Educational Dialogues. Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and C. W. Howe, 289–303. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., Z. Salamounova, and R. Svaricek. 2014. “Troubles with Dialogic Teaching.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3 (4): 274–285.10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., M. Sedlacek, and R. Svaricek. 2016. “Teacher Professional Development as a Means of Transforming Student Classroom Talk.” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 14–25.10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., R. Svaricek, and Z. Salamounova. 2012. Komunikace ve školní třídě [Communication in the Classroom]. Prague: Portál.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, K., and S. Higgins. 2006. “Facilitating Metacognitive Talk: A Research and Learning Tool.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 29 (1): 39–53.10.1080/01406720500537353
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., M. L. Franke, M. Ing, J. Wong, C. H. Fernandez, N. Shin, and A. C. Turrou. 2014. “Engaging with Others’ Mathematical Ideas: Interrelationships among Student Participation, Teachers Instructional Practices, and Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 63: 79–93.10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and M. R. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428.10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar