Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 21, 2017 - Issue 2
304
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Situating teachers’ developmental engineering experiences in an inquiry-based, laboratory learning environment

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 243-268 | Received 23 Sep 2014, Accepted 29 Jan 2016, Published online: 22 Sep 2016

References

  • ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2012. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs”. Accessed December 14, 2013. http://www.abet.org
  • Aldridge, Jonathan M., and Barry J. Fraser. 2000. “A Cross-cultural Study of Classroom Learning Environments in Australia and Taiwan.” Learning Environments Research 3: 101–134.10.1023/A:1026599727439
  • Asunda, Paul A., and Roger B. Hill. 2008. “Preparing Technology Teachers to Teach Engineering Design.” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 45 (1): 26–53.
  • Atman, Cynthia J., Deborah Kilgore, and Ann McKenna. 2008. “Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-methods Study of Engineering Designers’ Use of Language.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 309–326.10.1002/jee.2008.97.issue-3
  • Baker-Doyle, Kira J., and Susan A. Yoon. 2011. “In Search of Practitioner-based Social Capital: A Social Network Analysis Tool for Understanding and Facilitating Teacher Collaboration in a US-based STEM Professional Development Program.” Professional Development in Education 33 (1): 75–93.10.1080/19415257.2010.494450
  • Banasiak, Rached, and Joy Beimer. 2007. “Providing Concrete Experiences prior to Introducing Formal Geology Definitions.” Iowa Science Teachers Journal 34 (3): 4–7.
  • Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman & Company.
  • Barnes, Marianne B., Emilia M. Hodge, Melinda Parker, and Mary Jo Koroly. 2006. “The Teacher Research Update Experience: Perceptions of Practicing Science, Math and Technology Teachers.” Journal of Science Teaching Education 17: 243–263.10.1007/s10972-006-9007-6
  • Basista, Beth, and Susann Mathews. 2002. “Integrated Science and Mathematics Professional Development Programs.” School Science and Mathematics 102: 359–371.10.1111/ssm.2002.102.issue-7
  • Battey, Dan, and Megan L. Franke. 2008. “Transforming Identities: Understanding Teachers across Professional Development and Classroom Practice.” Teacher Education Quarterly 35 (3): 127–149.
  • Borgatti, Stephen P., and Pacey C. Foster. 2003. “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.” Journal of Management 29 (6): 991–1013.10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
  • Borko, Hilda. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Brand, Brends R., and Sandra J. Moore. 2011. “Enhancing Teachers’ Application of Inquiry-based Strategies Using a Constructivist Sociocultural Professional Development Model.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (7): 889–913.10.1080/09500691003739374
  • Brophy, Sean, Meredith Portsmore, and Chris Rodgers. 2008. “Advancing Engineering Education in P–12 Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education 1: 369–387. 10.1002/jee.2008.97.issue-3
  • Brown, Sheeri, and Claudia Melear. 2007. “Preservice Teachers’ Research Experiences in Scientists’ Laboratories.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 18: 573–597.10.1007/s10972-007-9044-9
  • Charness, Neil, Michael Tuffiash, and Tiffany Jastrzembski. 2004 “Motivation, Emotion and Expert Skill Acquisition.” In Motivation, Emotion and Cognition. Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, edited by David Yun Dai and Robert J. Sternberg, 299–322, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Clark, Robin, and Jane Andrews. 2010. “Researching Primary Engineering Education: UK Perspectives, and Exploratory Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (5): 585–595.10.1080/03043797.2010.497551
  • Corno, Lyn. 1995. “Comments on Winne: Analytic and Systemic Research Are Both Needed.” Educational Psychologist 30 (4): 201–206.10.1207/s15326985ep3004_5
  • Creswell, John W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed-method Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Custer, Rodney L., and Jenny L. Daugherty. 2009. “Professional Development for Teachers of Engineering: Research and Related Activities.” In The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, edited by George Bugliarello and Carol R. Arenberg, 18–24. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
  • Dai, David Yun, and Robert J. Sternberg. 2004. “Beyond Cognitivism: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Intellectual Functioning and Development.” In Motivation, Emotion and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, edited by David Yun Dai and Robert J. Sternberg, 3–40. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Daugherty, Jenny Lynn. 2009. “Engineering Professional Development Design for Secondary School Teachers: A Multiple Case Study.” Journal of Technology Education 21 (1): 10–24.
  • Daugherty, Jenny Lynn, and Rodney L. Custer. 2012. “Secondary Level Engineering Professional Development: Content, Pedagogy, and Challenges.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22: 51–64.10.1007/s10798-010-9136-2
  • Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2003. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1–42. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • DeVellis, Robert F. 2012. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Donham, Jean. 2010. “Deep Learning through Concept-based Inquiry.” School Library Monthly 27 (1): 8–15. Accessed May 19, 2011. http://www.schoollibrarymonthly.com/articles/Donham2010-v27n1p8.html
  • Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, Barbara M. Moskal, Rosamond Parkhurst, Tomas Bigley, Chris Hays, Brent K. Jesiek, et al. 2006. “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently.” Journal of Engineering Education 95: 107–122.10.1002/jee.2006.95.issue-2
  • Dresner, Marion, and Elizabeth Worley. 2006. “Teacher Research Experiences, Partnerships with Scientists and Teacher Networks: Sustaining Factors from Professional Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17: 1–14.10.1007/s10972-005-9000-5
  • Duderstadt, James J. 2008. Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research and Education. Ann Arbor: The Millenium Project, University of Michigan Press.
  • Duke, Daniel L. 2004. The Challenges of Educational Change. New York: Pearson.
  • Dweck, Carol S., Jennifer A. Mangels, and Catherine Good. 2004. “Motivational Effects on Attention, Cognition and Performance.” In Motivation, Emotion and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, edited by David Yun Dai and Robert J. Sternberg, 41–56. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Fraenkel, Jack R., and Norman Wallen. 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Goodnough, Karen, Sharon Pelech, and Mary Stordy. 2014. “Effective Professional Development in STEM Education: The Perceptions of Primary/Elementary Teachers.” Teacher Education and Practice 27 (2/3): 402–423.
  • Guskey, Thomas R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3/4): 381–391.10.1080/135406002100000512
  • Hadar, Linor, and David Brody. 2010. “From Isolation to Symphonic Harmony: Building a Professional Development Community among Teacher Educators.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 1641–1651.10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.015
  • Hanegan, Nikki, Kelley K. Friden, and C. Riley Nelson. 2009. “Authentic and Simulated Professional Development: Teachers Reflect What is Modeled.” School Science and Mathematics 109 (2): 79–94.10.1111/ssm.2009.109.issue-2
  • Hardré, Patricia L. 2007. “Preventing Motivational Dropout: A Systemic Analysis in Four Rural High Schools.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 6 (3): 231–265.10.1080/15700760701263824
  • Hardré, Patricia L., and Sherry Kollmann. 2013. “Dynamics of Instructional and Perceptual Factors in ID Competence Development.” Journal of Learning Design 6 (1): 34–48.
  • Hardré, Patricia L., Chen Ling, Randa L. Shehab, Mark A. Nanny, Matthias U. Nollert, Hazem Refai, Christopher Ramseyer, et al. 2013. “Teachers in an Interdisciplinary Learning Community: Engaging, Integrating and Strengthening K–12 Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (5): 410–426. doi:10.1177/0022487113496640.
  • Hardré, Patricia L., Mark A. Nanny, Hazem Refai, et al. 2010. “Re-engineering a Dynamic Science Learning Environment for K–12 Teachers.” Teacher Education Quarterly 37 (2): 157–178.
  • Hardré, Patricia L., Randa L. Shehab, Chen Ling, Mark A. Nanny, Jason Herron, Matthias U. Nollert, Hazem Refai, et al. 2013. “Designing and Evaluating a K–12 STEM Teacher Learning Opportunity in the Research University.” Evaluation and Program Planning 43C: 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.11.002.
  • Hardré, Patricia L., Janis Slater, Mark Nanny, Hazem Refai, Randa Shehab, and Chen Ling. 2016. “Building a Learning Environment, Supporting a Learning Community: Facilitating STEM Teachers’ Planned and Integrative Skill and Strategy Transfer.” Teacher Education and Practice 28 (2–3): 412–434.
  • Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen, and Matthias Faeth. 2010. “The Role of Emotion and Skilled Intuition in Learning.” In Mind, Brain & Education: Neuroscience Implications for the Classroom, edited by David A. Sousa, 69–84. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
  • IET (Institute of Engineering and Technology). 2008. Studying STEM: What Are the Barriers? Stevenage: Author.
  • IET (Institute of Engineering and Technology). 2012. Education and Skills Policy Statement. Stevenage: Author.
  • John-Steiner, Vera. 2000. Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelley, Todd R., and Robert C. Wicklein. 2009. “Teacher Challenges to Implement Engineering Design in Secondary Education.” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 46 (3): 34–50.
  • Kubicek, John P. 2005. “Inquiry-based Learning, the Nature of Science and Computer Technology: New Possibilities in Science Education.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 31 (1): 1–9. Accessed May 10, 2009. http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/149/142
  • Lamote, Carl, and Nadine Engels. 2010. “The Development of Student Teachers’ Professional Identity.” European Journal of Teacher Education 33 (1): 3–18.10.1080/02619760903457735
  • Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  • Lenz, L. E., and S. E. Lange. 2005. “Aligning in the Mentoring Partnership.” In Aligning for Learning Strategies for Teaching Effectiveness, edited by Donald H. Wulff, 106–119. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Linn, Marcia C., and Sherry Hsi. 2000. Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mertens, Donna M. 2010. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Musanti, Sandra J., and Lucretia Pence. 2010. “Collaboration and Teacher Development: Unpacking Resistance, Constructing Knowledge and Navigating Identities.” Teacher Education Quarterly 37 (1): 73–89.
  • National Academy of Sciences. 2007. Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Science Foundation. 2009. Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Research Council. Accessed July 22, 2015. http://www.nextgenscience.org/nextgeneration-sciencestandards
  • Park, Kyunsun, and Sunhee Park. 2012. “Development of Professional Engineers’ Authentic Contexts in Blended Learning Environments.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 43 (1): E14–E18.
  • Powell-Moman, Amy D., and Valerie B. Brown-Schild. 2012. “The Influence of a Two-year Professional Development Institute on Teacher Self-efficacy and Use of Inquiry-based Instruction.” Science Educator 20 (2): 47–53.
  • Reynolds, Cecil R., Ronald B. Livingston, and Victor Willson. 2006. Measurement and Assessment in Education. New York: Pearson.
  • Robbins, Philip, and Murat Aydede. 2009. “A Short Primer on Situated Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 3–10. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sawyer, R. Keith, and James G. Greeno. 2009. “Situativity and Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 347–367. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seraphin, Kanesa D., Joanna Philippoff, Lauren Kaupp, and Lisa M. Vallin. 2012. “Metacognition as Means to Increase the Effectiveness of Inquiry-based Science Education.” Science Education International 23 (4): 366–382.
  • Sheppard, Sheri D., Kelly Macatangay, Anne Colby, and William M. Sullivan. 2009. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Smith, Eliot R., and Frederica R. Conrey. 2009. “The Social Context of Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 454–466. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stake, Robert E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Thornkildsen, Theresa A. 2005. Fundamentals of Measurement in Applied Research. New York: Pearson.
  • Trowbridge, Leslie W., Rodger W. Bybee, and Janet Carlson Powell. 2004. Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Wolf, Stephen James, and Barry Fraser. 2008. “Learning Environment, Attitudes and Achievement among Middle-school Science Students Using Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities.” Research in Science Education 38: 321–341. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y.
  • Yin, Robert K. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.