Within the teacher evaluation policies black box: two case studies

References

• Burns, B., and J. Luque. 2014. Great Teachers: How to Raise Student Learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Development Forum Series. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Corvalán, J., and R. McMeekin, eds. 2008. Accountability educacional: posibilidades y desafíos para América Latina a partir de la experiencia internacional [Educational Accountability: Opportunities and Challenges for Latin America from the International Experience]. Santiago: PREAL-CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. 2006. Teacher Leadership that Strengthens Professional Practice. Alexandria: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2004. “Standards, Accountability and School Reform.” Teachers College Record 106 (6): 1047–1085.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. “Assessing Teacher Education: The Usefulness of Multiple Measures for Assessing Program Outcomes.” Journal of Teacher Education 57 (2): 120–138.10.1177/0022487105283796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., D. Holtzman, S. J. Gatlin, and J. V. Heilig. 2005. “Does Teacher Preparation Matter? Evidence about Teacher Certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 13 (42): 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and G. Sykes. 2003. “Wanted: A National Teacher Supply Policy for Education: The Right Way to Meet the ‘Highly Qualified Teacher’ Challenge.” Educational Policy Analysis Archives 11 (33): 33. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v11n33.2003. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/261.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., P. Sammons, G. Stobart, A. Kington, and Q. Gu. 2007. Teachers Matter: Connecting Lives, Work and Effectiveness. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gershberg, A. I., and B. Meade. 2006. Accountability of Educational Reform in Latin America: How can Decentralization Increase (or Not) Accountability? Santiago: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D. 2006. “National Board Teachers Are More Effective, But Are They in the Classrooms Where They're Needed the Most?” Education Finance and Policy 1 (3): 372–382.10.1162/edfp.2006.1.3.372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R., T. Kane, and D. Staiger. 2006. Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, B. 2009. Effectiveness of Teachers Performance. Review of International Literature and its Relevance to Improve Latin American Education. Document No. 43. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Kaztman, R., A. Aristimuño, and L. Monteiro. 2003. Uruguay. Empiric Information. How it is Used, and its Impact on National Learning Evaluations in the Improvement of Public Education in Uruguay? Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Final Reports, Educational Research Fund. Montevideo: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Labadie, G., A. Mizala, A. Retamoso, R. Opertti, and P. Romaguera. 2006. Gestión Educativa, Remuneraciones e Incentivos: Análisis Comparado de las Experiencias de Chile y Uruguay [Educational Management, Remunerations and Incentives: Comparative Analysis of the Chilean and Uruguayan Experience]. Documento de Trabajo No. 20. Montevideo: Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad ORT-Uruguay.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morduchowicz, A. 2002. Carreras, Incentivos y Estructuras Salariales Docentes [Teacher Career, Incentives and Salary Structure]. Working Paper No. 23. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Morduchowicz, A. 2009. Supply, Demand, and Teachers’ Salary: Model for Working Document No. 45. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, F. J. 2006. Evaluation of Teacher Performance and Professional Career. America and Europe, An Overview. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, F. J., and M. Román. 2010. “Challenges in the Assessment of Teaching Quality in Latin America.” Ibero-American Magazine of Education 53: 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, G. 2003. “What Do We Understand by Education for Social Responsibility?” In Educando para la Resonsabilidad Social: La Universidad en su función docente (Tomo 3) [Educating for Social Responsibility 3: The University and its Teaching Role], edited by C. Ardiles, 21–45. Santiago: Funny.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Building a High-Quality Teaching Profession – Lessons from around the World. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Teachers for the 21st Century, Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. TALIS. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peirano, C., D. Falck, and M. Dominguez. 2007. “Evaluación Docente en América Latina [Teacher Evaluation in Latin America].” Working paper for the working group of teacher development PREAL, Washington, DC: Santiago de Chile..
   Google Scholar
• Poggi, Margarita. 2008. “El Sistema Educativo: De la rendición de cuentas a las responsabilidades [The Education System: From Accountability to Responsibilites].” Revista El monitor de la Educación 5 (17): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ravela, P. 2002. What is Being Assessed by This Test? Abbreviated Version. Document No. 7. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. 2005. “Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73 (2). Accessed October 14, 2007. http://edpro.stanford.edu/Hanushek/admin/pages/files/uploads/teachers.econometrica.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco, T. S., L. A. Bliss, S. Gallagher, and A. Perez-Prado. 2003. “Taking the Next Step: Mixed Methods Research in Organisational Systems.” Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal 21 (1): 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie, eds. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Terigi, F. 2009. School Career, from Individual Problems to the Challenge of an Education Policy. Buenos Aires, National Ministry of Education / OAS. http://www.porlainclusionmercosur.educ.ar
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO/OREALC. 2012. Background and Criteria for the Making of Teaching Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Strategic Regional Project on Teachers. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO-OREALC.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. 2010. “Capacidades docentes para la educación del mañana [Teacher Capacity for Tomorrow’s Education].” Pensamiento Iberoamericano 7: 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. 2012. “La gobernanza educativa y los incentivos docentes: el caso de Chile y de Uruguay [Educational Governance and Teacher Incentives: Chile and Uruguay].” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 21: 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D., and C. Rossel, eds. 2006. Docentes en Latinoamérica hacia una radiografía de la profesión [Teachers in Latin America: An X-ray of the Profession]. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H. 2002. “How Schools Matter: The Link between Teacher Classroom Practices and Student Academic Performance.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (12): 1–30.
   Google Scholar