Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 22, 2018 - Issue 4
2,397
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers’ technology adoption and practices: lessons learned from the IWB phenomenon

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 481-496 | Received 11 Mar 2016, Accepted 02 Mar 2017, Published online: 04 Sep 2017

References

  • Aubusson, P. , P. Burke , S. Schuck , M. Kearney , and B. Frischknecht . 2014. “Teachers Choosing Rich Tasks: The Moderating Impact of Technology on Student Learning, Enjoyment and Preparation.” Educational Researcher 43 (5): 219–229.10.3102/0013189X14537115
  • Ayhan Kursat, E. , I. Muge , and K. Sukru . 2015. “Learning Mathematics with Interactive Whiteboards and Computer-based Graphing Utility.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18 (2): 299–312.
  • Bennett, S. , and L. Lockyer . 2008. “A Study of Teachers’ Integration of Interactive Whiteboards into Four Australian Primary School Classrooms.” Learning, Media and Technology 33 (4): 289–300. doi:10.1080/17439880802497008.
  • Blackwell, C. K. , A. Lauricella , and E. Wartella . 2014. “Factors Influencing Digital Technology Use in Early Childhood Education.” Computers & Education 77: 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013.
  • Bonk, C. J. , and C. Graham . 2006. The Handbook of Blended Learning Environments: Global Perspectives, Local Designs . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
  • Buabeng-Andoh, C. 2012. “Factors Influencing Teachers’ Adoption and Integration of Information and Communication Technology into Teaching: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT) 8 (1): 136–155.
  • Bull, G. , A. Thompson , M. Searson , J. Garofalo , J. Park , C. Young , and J. Lee . 2008. “Connecting Informal and Formal Learning: Experiences in the Age of Participatory Media.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 8 (2): 100–107.
  • Clarke, C. 2004. “Opening Address to the BETT Conference.” London, January 7, 2004.
  • Cogill, J. 2010. “A Model of Pedagogical Change for the Evaluation of Interactive Whiteboard Practice.” In Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice , edited by M. Thomas and E. C. Schmid , 162–178. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2
  • Cuban, L. , H. Kirkpatrick , and C. Peck . 2001. “High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 813–834.10.3102/00028312038004813
  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations . 2010 . “ICT Innovation Fund Guidelines 2010–2012.” Accessed July 21, 2017. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/264
  • Dunn, K. , and G. Rakes . 2010. “Learner-centeredness and Teacher Efficacy: Predicting Teachers’ Consequence Concerns regarding the Use of Technology in the Classroom.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 18 (1): 57–83.
  • Erickson, F. 1986. “Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching , edited by M. Wittrock , 119–161. New York : Macmillan.
  • Ertmer, P. A. 1999. “Addressing First- and Second-Order Barriers to Change: Strategies for Technology Integration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 47 (4): 47–61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597.
  • Ertmer, P. A. 2005. “Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration?” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (4): 25–39.10.1007/BF02504683
  • Ertmer, P. A. , and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich . 2010. “Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42 (3): 255–284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
  • Ertmer, P. A. , A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich , O. Sadik , E. Sendurur , and P. Sendurur . 2012. “Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration Practices: A Critical Relationship.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
  • Gillen, J. , J. Staarman , K. Littleton , N. Mercer , and A. Twiner . 2007. “A ‘Learning Revolution’? Investigating Pedagogic Practice around Interactive Whiteboards in British Primary Classrooms.” Learning, Media and Technology 32 (3): 243–256. doi:10.1080/17439880701511099
  • Gray, C. 2010. “Meeting Teachers’ Real Needs: New Tools in the Secondary Modern Foreign Languages Classroom.” In Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice , edited by M. Thomas and E. Cutrim-Schmid , 69–85. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2
  • Greenhow, C. , and C. Lewin . 2016. “Social Media and Education: Reconceptualizing the Boundaries of Formal and Informal Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (1): 6–30.10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
  • Hayes, D. , S. Schuck , G. Segal , J. Dwyer , and C. McEwen . 2001. Net Gain? The Integration of Computer-based Learning in Six NSW Government Schools, 2000 . Sydney: The University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Hedberg, J. 2006. “E-learning Futures? Speculations for a Time Yet to Come.” Studies in Continuing Education 28 (2): 171–183. doi:10.1080/01580370600751187.
  • Hennessy, S. , and L. London . 2013. Learning from International Experiences with Interactive Whiteboards: The Role of Professional Development in Integrating the Technology . OECD Publishing. (Report No. 89).
  • Higgins, S. , G. Beauchamp , and D. Miller . 2007. “Reviewing the Literature on Interactive Whiteboards.” Learning, Media and Technology 32 (3): 213–225. doi:10.1080/17439880701511040.
  • Hillman, T. 2014. “Finding Space for Student Innovative Practices with Technology in the Classroom.” Learning, Media and Technology 39 (2): 169–183. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.803256.
  • Judson, E. 2006. “How Teachers Integrate Technology and Their Beliefs about Learning: Is There a Connection?” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 (3): 581–597.
  • Kearney, M. , and S. Schuck . 2008. “Exploring Pedagogy with Interactive Whiteboards in Australian Schools.” Australian Educational Computing 23 (1): 8–13.
  • Kennewell, S. 2006. “Reflections on the Interactive Whiteboard Phenomenon: A Synthesis of Research from the UK.” Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia, November.
  • Law, N. 2008. “Teacher Learning beyond Knowledge for Pedagogical Innovations with ICT.” In International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education , edited by J. Voogt and G. Knezek , 425–434. New York : Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  • Lincoln, Y. , and E. Guba . 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Newhouse, C. 2014. “Learning with Portable Digital Devices in Australian Schools: 20 Years on!” Australian Educational Researcher 41: 471–483. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0139-3.
  • Perrotta, C. 2013. “Do School-level Factors Influence the Educational Benefits of Digital Technology? A Critical Analysis of Teachers' Perceptions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (2): 314–327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x.
  • Royle, K. , S. Stager , and J. Traxler . 2014. “Teacher Development with Mobiles: Comparative Critical Factors.” Prospects 44: 29–42. doi:10.1007/s11125-013-9292-8.
  • Rushby, N. 2012. “Editorial: An Agenda for Mobile Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (3): 355–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01313.x.
  • Salomon, G. , and D. Perkins . 1998. “Individual and Social Aspects of Learning.” Review of Research in Education 23: 1–24.
  • Schuck, S. , P. Aubusson , M. Kearney , and K. Burden . 2013. “Mobilising Teacher Education: A Study of a Professional Learning Community.” Teacher Development 17 (1): 1–18.10.1080/13664530.2012.752671
  • Schuck, S. , and M. Kearney . 2008. “Classroom-based Use of Two Educational Technologies: A Socio-cultural Perspective.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education: Current Practices 8 (4): 394–406.
  • Sweeney, T. 2010. “Transforming Pedagogy through Interactive Whiteboards: Using Activity Theory to Understand Tensions in Practice.” Australian Educational Computing 24 (2): 28–34.
  • Teo, T. 2014. “Unpacking Teachers’ Acceptance of Technology: Tests of Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences.” Computers & Education 75: 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.014.
  • Thomas, M. , and E. Schmid . 2010. Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice . Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2
  • Trust, T. 2012. “Professional Learning Networks Designed for Teacher Learning.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 28 (4): 133–138.10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693
  • Türel, Y. K. , and T. Johnson . 2012. “Teachers’ Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 15 (1): 381–394.
  • Voogt, J. , and G. Knezek . 2008. “IT in Primary and Secondary Education: Emerging Issues.” In International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education , edited by J. Voogt and G. Knezek , xxix–xxxix. New York : Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Warwick, P. , and R. Kershner . 2008. “Primary Teachers’ Understanding of the Interactive Whiteboard as a Tool for Children’s Collaborative Learning and Knowledge‐Building.” Learning, Media and Technology 33 (4): 269–287. doi:10.1080/17439880802496935.
  • Weston, M. E. , and A. Bain . 2010. “The End of Techno-critique: The Naked Truth about 1:1 Laptop Initiatives and Educational Change.” Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 9 (6): 1–25.
  • Winzenried, A. , B. Dalgarno , and J. Tinkler . 2010. “The Interactive Whiteboard: A Transitional Technology Supporting Diverse Teaching Practices.” Australian Journal of Educational Technology 26 (4): 534–552.
  • Wong, K. , T. Teo , and P. Goh . 2014. “Development of the Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance Scale (IWBAS): An Initial Study.” Educational Technology & Society 17 (4): 268–277.
  • Xerri, D. 2014. “Teachers’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Continuing Professional Development.” In The Social Classroom: Integrating Social Network Use in Education , edited by G. Mallia , 441–464. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/AETID

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.