Ethical dilemmas on social media: Swedish secondary teachers’ boundary management on Facebook

References

• Andrzejewski, C. E., and H. A. Davis. 2008. “Human Contact in the Classroom: Exploring How Teachers Talk About and Negotiate Touching Students.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (3): 779–794. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., G. E. Kreiner, and M. Fugate. 2000. “All in a Day’s Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions.” Academy of Management Review 25 (3): 472–491. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3363315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aultman, L. P., M. R. Williams-Johnson, and P. A. Schutz. 2009. “Boundary Dilemmas in Teacher–Student Relationships: Struggling with ‘the Line’.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (5): 636–646. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. E., J. E. Casey, R. D. Visser, and K. N. Headley. 2012. “How Do Teachers Make Judgments about Ethical and Unethical Behaviors? Toward the Development of a Code of Conduct for Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (6): 890–898. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergem, T. 1990. “The Teacher as Moral Agent.” Journal of Moral Education 19 (2): 88–100. doi:10.1080/0305724900190203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergem, T. 1993. “Examining Aspects of Professional Morality.” Journal of Moral Education 22 (3): 297–312. doi:10.1080/0305724930220308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlak, A., and H. Berlak. 1981. Dilemmas of Schooling. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough Jr., R. V., and K. M. Hall-Kenyon. 2012. “On Teacher Hope, Sense of Calling, and Commitment to Teaching.” Teacher Education Quarterly 39 (2): 7–27. Accessed http://www.jstor.org/stable/23479669
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. 1997. “Connecting the Ethics of Teaching and Moral Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 48 (4): 255–263. doi:10.1177/0022487197048004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. 2000. “Professional Ethics in Teaching: Towards the Development of a Code of Practice.” Cambridge Journal of Education 30 (2): 203–221. doi:10.1080/03057640050075198.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 2000. Professionalism and Ethics in Teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colnerud, G. 1997. “Ethical Conflicts in Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (6): 627–635. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)80005-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colnerud, G. 2006. “Teacher Ethics as a Research Problem: Syntheses Achieved and New Issues.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (3): 365–385. doi:10.1080/13450600500467704.
   Google Scholar
• Cothran, D. J., and C. D. Ennis. 1997. “Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Conflict and Power.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (5): 541–553. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)85542-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, N., and V. Berry. 2003. “Blindfolded in a Minefield: Ethical Decision-Making.” Cambridge Journal of Education 33 (3): 457–477. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122069.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg, N. 2012. Lärares möten med sociala medier: Applikationer i behov av explikationer. [Teachers’ Encounters with Social Media: Applications in Need of Explications]. Doctoral thesis. Luleå: University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T., and M. van Harmelen. 2007. Web 2.0 for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Commissioned by The Observatory of Borderless Higher Education. London: The Observatory of Borderless Higher Education. Accessed https://www.franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/Web2-Content-learning-and-teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1990. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin. Original work published 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. A., D. Wilkinson, and B. A. Huberman. 2007. “Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network.” In Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference, edited by C. T. Steinfield, B. Pentland, M. Ackerman, and N. Contractor, 41–66. London: Springer-Verlag Limited.10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J., R. Soder, and K. Sirotnik. 1990. The Moral Dimensions of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. T. 1998. “The Moral is in the Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 14 (6): 643–655. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00014-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. T. 2001. Exploring the Moral Heart of Teaching: Towards a Teacher’s Creed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, F. 1998. The Ethical School. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernwall, P. 2006. “Multicultural Pupils and Digital Technology: Reflections on the Implementation of ICT in Multiethnic Schools.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 1 (2): 126–136. Accessed https://www.idunn.no/dk/2006/02/multicultural_pupils_and_digital_technology_-_reflections_on_the_implement
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F. 2011. “Students’ and Teachers’ Use of Facebook.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2): 662–676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, A., and Forte, A. 2006. “Crossing Boundaries: Identity Management and Student/Faculty Relationships on the Facebook.” Poster presented at the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Canada. Accessed https://www.cc.gatech.edu/~aforte/HewittForteCSC-WPoster2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Husu, J., and K. Tirri. 2001. “Teachers’ Ethical Choices in Sociomoral Settings.” Journal of Moral Education 30 (4): 361–375. doi:10.1080/03057240120094850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, K., M.-M. Chen, and M. Hauman. 2013. “Use, Perception and Attitude of University Students Towards Facebook and Twitter.” The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation 16 (3): 201–211. Accessed www.ejise.com
   Google Scholar
• Kakabadse, A., N. Korac-Kakabadse, and A. Kouzmin. 2003. “Ethics, Values and Behaviours: Comparison of Three Case Studies Examining the Paucity of Leadership in Government.” Public Administration 81 (3): 477–508. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp, A., H. Lambrecht Lund, and H. Søndergaard Hvid. 2011. “Negotiating Time, Meaning and Identity in Boundaryless Work.” Journal of Workplace Learning 23 (4): 229–242. doi:10.1108/13665621111128655.
   Google Scholar
• Kolek, E. A., and D. Saunders. 2008. “Online Disclosure: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Facebook Profiles.” NASPA Journal 45 (1): 1–25. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.1905.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., N. Ellison, and C. Steinfield. 2008. “Changes in Use and Perception of Facebook.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 721–730. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1460563.1460675.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., J. Kaufman, and N. Christakis. 2008. “The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (1): 79–100. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01432.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovat, T. J. 1998. “Ethics and Ethics Education: Professional and Curricular Best Practice.” Curriculum Perspectives 18 (1): 1–7. Accessed http://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:9625.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., R. E. Murphy, and C. J. Simonds. 2009. “The Effects of Teacher Self‐disclosure Via Facebook on Teacher Credibility.” Learning, Media and Technology 34 (2): 175–183. doi:10.1080/17439880902923655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, C., S. R. Katz, and L. J. Dance. 1999. “Investing in Teaching and Learning: Dynamics of the Teacher–Student Relationship from Each Actor’s Perspective.” Urban Education 34 (3): 292–337. doi:10.1177/0042085999343003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Union of Teachers in Sweden. 2010. Elever och lärare online: Var går gränsen? [Pupils and Teachers Online: Where is the Line?]. Stockholm: National Union of Teachers in Sweden. Accessed https://www.lr.se/opinionpaverkan/undersokningar/arkiv/eleverochlarareonlinevargargransen.5.4ff660ce12b12fe7dbb80003297.html
   Google Scholar
• Nippert-Eng, C. 1996. Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226581477.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 1992. The Challenge to Care in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pempek, T. A., Y. A. Yermolayeva, and S. Calvert. 2009. “College Students’ Social Networking Experiences on Facebook.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30 (3): 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, M., and E. Thunman. 2017. “A Model for Studies of Boundary Work Tactics: The Case of Swedish Secondary Teacher’s Use of Facebook as Work Tool.” HumanIT 13 (3): 24–48. Accessed https://humanit.hb.se/article/viewFile/505/623.
   Google Scholar
• Riesch, H. 2010. “Theorizing Boundary Work as Representation and Identity.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (4): 452–473. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. 1993. “Why a Center for the Advancement of Ethics and Character.” Journal of Education 175 (2): 1–11. Accessed http://www.jstor.org/stable/42742284.
   Google Scholar
• Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. 2011. “Teachers’ Critical Incidents: Ethical Dilemmas in Teaching Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (3): 648–656. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. P., and S. J. Gross. 2008. Ethical Educational Dilemmas in Turbulent Times: (Re)solving Moral Dilemmas. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, H. 1990. “Accountability, Trust, and Ethical Codes of Practice.” In The Moral Dimensions of Teaching, edited by J. Goodlad, R. Soder, and K. Sirotnik, 224–250. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, H. 1993. The Moral Base for Teacher Professionalism. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1971. “The Humanities Curriculum Project: The Rationale.” Theory Into Practice 10 (3): 154–162. doi:10.1080/00405847109542322.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., and P. N. Shamdasani. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, K., and J. Soltis. 1992. The Ethics of Teaching. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, K. A., and P. L. Ternasky. 1993. Ethics for Professionals in Education: Perspectives for Preparation and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, S. M. 1989. “The Ethical Dimension of Teaching.” In Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher, edited by M. C. Reynolds, 267–276. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzman, F. 2006. “An Evaluation of Identity-Sharing Behavior in Social Network Communities.” International Digital and Media Arts Journal 3 (1): 10–18. Accessed http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.91.617&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2009. Redovisning av uppdrag om uppföljning av IT-användning och IT-kompetens i förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning [Presentation of the Assignment of a Follow-Up of ICT Use and ICT Skills in Preschool, School and Adult Education]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education. Accessed https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2192
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2013. IT-användning och IT-kompetens i skolan [ICT Use and ICT Skills in Schools]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education. Accessed https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3005
   Google Scholar
• Teclehaimanot, B., and T. Hickman. 2011. “Student–Teacher Interaction on Facebook: What Students Find Appropriate.” TechTrends 55 (3): 19–30. doi:10.1007/s11528-011-0494-8.
   Google Scholar
• Thunman, E., and M. Persson. 2013. “Teachers’ Access to and Use of ICT: An Indicator of Growing Inequity in Swedish Schools.” Contemporary Educational Technology 4 (3): 155–171. Accessed http://www.cedtech.net/articles/43/431.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, K., J. Guiller, A. Margaryan, A. Littlejohn, and D. Nicol. 2008. Learning from Digital Natives: Bridging Formal and Informal Learning: Final Report. Commissioned by The Higher Education Academy. Heslington, York: The Higher Education Academy. Accessed https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/LDN%20Final%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2004. “Focus Group Research.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 177–199. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. L., and A. Quan-Haase. 2013. “Privacy Protection Strategies on Facebook: The Internet Privacy Paradox Revisited.” Information, Communication and Society 16 (4): 479–500. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. 1991. The Fine Line. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar