Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 22, 2018 - Issue 5
597
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A tool for capacity building: teacher professional learning about teaching writing

&
Pages 685-702 | Received 19 Jul 2016, Accepted 11 Jan 2018, Published online: 05 Jul 2018

References

  • Aguilar, E. 2013. The Art of Coaching: Effective Strategies for School Transformation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley Jossey-Bass.
  • Ainley, J., and E. Gebhardt. 2013. Measure for Measure: A Review of Outcomes of School Education in Australia, edited by Australian Council for Educational Leaders [ACEL], Melbourne, VIC. Melbourne: ACER.
  • Althauser, K. 2015. “Job-Embedded Professional Development: Its Impact on Teacher Self-Efficacy and Student Performance.” Teacher Development 19 (2): 210–225. doi:10.1080/13664530.2015.1011346.
  • Au, W. 2007. “High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Educational Researcher 36 (5): 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523.
  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2013. “NAP History.”Accessed February 7, 2015. http://www.nap.edu.au/about/why-nap.html.
  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. 2011. National Professional Standards for Teachers. Education Services Australia. http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/.
  • Bambrick-Santoyo, P. 2010. Driven by Data: A Practical Guide to Improve Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Barker, B. 2007. “The Leadership Paradox: Can School Leaders Transform Student Outcomes?” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18 (1): 21–43. doi:10.1080/09243450601058618.
  • Board of Studies New South Wales. 2012. English K-10 Syllabus: NSW Syllabus for the Australian Curriculum. Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies NSW. http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/english/.
  • Carroll, B., L. Levy, and D. Richmond. 2008. “Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm.” Leadership 4 (4): 363–379. doi:10.1177/1742715008095186.
  • Chamez, K. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 509–535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Claire, W.-S., and G. Castleton. 2005. “Examining How Teachers Judge Student Writing: An Australian Case Study.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (2): 131–154. doi:10.1080/0022027032000242887.
  • Connor, M., and J. Pokora. 2012. Coaching and Mentoring at Work: Developing Effective Practice. 2nd ed. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill.
  • Conway, J. M., and L. Abawi. 2013. “Creating Enduring Strength through Commitment to Schoolwide Pedagogy.” Improving Schools 16 (2): 175–185. doi:10.1177/1365480213493714.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2004. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative Research. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Creswell, J. W., and J. David Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., and A. Lieberman. 2012. Teacher Education around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. London: Routledge.
  • Datnow, A., V. Park, and B. Kennedy-Lewis. 2013. “Affordances and Constraints in the Context of Teacher Collaboration for the Purpose of Data Use.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 341–362. doi:10.1108/09578231311311500.
  • Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
  • Dinham, S., and F. Crowther. 2011. “Sustainable School Capacity Building – One Step Back, Two Steps Forward?” Journal of Educational Administration 49 (6): 616–623. doi:10.1108/09578231111186926.
  • DuFour, R., and R. Marzano. 2011. Leaders of Learning: How District, School, and Classroom Leaders Improve Student Achievement. Bloominging, IN: Solution Tree Press.
  • Dulfer, N., J. Polesel, and S. Rice. 2012. “The Experience of Education: The Impacts of High Stakes Testing on School Students and Their Families.” http://www.whitlam.org/the_program/high_stakes_testing.
  • Feser, C., F. Mayol, and R. Srinivasan. 2015. “Decoding Leadership: What Really Matters.” http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/leading_in_the_21st_century/decoding_leadership_what_really_matters.
  • Fletcher, S., and C. A. Mullen, eds. 2012. SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. London: SAGE.
  • Flick, U. 2008. Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Fullan, M. 2007. “The New Meaning of Educational Change.” 4th Ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fullan, M. 2008. The Six Secrets of Change: What The Best Leaders Do to Help Their Organisations Survive and Thrive. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
  • Fullan, M. 2014. The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley Jossey-Bass.
  • Gable, A., and B. Lingard. 2013. NAPLAN and the Performance Regime in Australian Schooling: A Review of the Policy Context. University of Queensland, UQ Social Policy Unit Research Paper No. 5. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:314964/naplan_and_the_performance_regime.pdf.
  • Geyer, R. 2012. “Can Complexity Move UK Policy beyond ‘Evidence-Based Policy Making’ and the ‘Audit Culture’? Applying a ‘Complexity Cascade’ to Education and Health Policy.” Political Studies 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00903.x.
  • Gurr, D., and L. Drysdale. 2012. “Tensions and Dilemmas in Leading Australia’s Schools.” School Leadership and Management 32 (5): 403–420. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.723619.
  • Hardy, I. 2013. “A Logic of Appropriation: Enacting National Testing (NAPLAN) in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.782425.
  • Hargreaves, A., and D. Shirley. 2009. The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Hargreaves, A., and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
  • Hitt, D. H., and P. D. Tucker. 2015. “Systematic Review of Key Leadership Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement: A Unified Framework.” Review of Educational Research, first published on November 12, 2015. http://rer.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/11/12/0034654315614911.full. doi: 10.3102/0034654315614911
  • Katz, S., and L. A. Dack. 2014. “Towards a Culture of Inquiry for Data Use in Schools: Breaking down Professional Learning Barriers through Intentional Interruption.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 35–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006.
  • Klenowski, V. 2011. “Assessment for Learning in the Accountability Era: Queensland, Australia.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 78–83. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006.
  • Klenowski, V., and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2012. “The Impact of High Stakes Testing: The Australian Story.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 19 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.592972.
  • Kvale, S. 1996. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Leithwood, K., and J. Sun. 2012. “The Nature and Effects of Transformational School Leadership a Meta-Analytic Review of Unpublished Research.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (3): 387–423. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436268.
  • Leithwood, K., K. S. Louis, S. Anderson, and K. Wahlstrom. 2004. Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  • Lingard, B., G. Thompson, and S. Sellar. 2016. “National Testing from an Australian Perspective.” In National Testing in Schools: An Australian Assessment, edited by B. Lingard, G. Thompson, and S. Sellar, 1–17. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lynch, D., J. Madden, and B. A. Knight. 2014. “Harnessing Professional Dialogue, Collaboration and Content in Context: An Exploration of a New Model for Teacher Professional Learning.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 1 (3): 1–15.
  • Lynch, D., R. Smith, S. Provost, and J. Madden. 2016. “Improving Teaching Capacity to Increase Student Achievement: The Key Role of Data Interpretation by School Leaders.” Journal of Educational Administration 54 (5): 575–592. doi:10.1108/JEA-10-2015-0092.
  • Marsh, J. A. 2012. “Interventions Promoting Educators’ Use of Data: Research Insights and Gaps.” Teachers College Record 114 (11): 1–48.
  • Marsh, J. A., and C. C. Farrell. 2015. “How Leaders Can Support Teachers with Data-Driven Decision Making: A Framework for Understanding Capacity Building.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 43 (2): 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229.
  • Marzano, R., T. Waters, and M. Brian. 2005. School Leadership that Works: From Research to Results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Application in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mills, J., A. Bonner, and K. Francis. 2006. “The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1177/160940690600500103.
  • Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs [MCEETYA]. 2008. Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html.
  • Nadelson, L. S., M. Fuller, P. Briggs, D. Hammons, K. Bubak, and M. Sass. 2012. “The Tension between Teacher Accountability and Flexibility: The Paradox of Standards-Based Reform.” Teacher Education and Practice 25 (2): 196–220.
  • Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum Implementation.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221.
  • Pettit, P. 2010. “From Data-Informed to Data-Led? School Leadership within the Context of External Testing.” Leading and Managing 16 (2): 90–107.
  • Punch, K. F. 2013. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Robinson, J., S. Myran, R. Strauss, and W. Reed. 2014. “The Impact of an Alternative Professional Development Model on Teacher Practices in Formative Assessment and Student Learning.” Teacher Development 18 (2): 141–162. doi:10.1080/13664530.2014.900516.
  • Sharratt, L., and M. Fullan. 2012. Putting FACES on the Data: What Great Leaders Do!Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Kindle edition.
  • Siemens, G., and P. Long. 2011. “Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education.” Educause Review 46 (5): 30–32.
  • Spillane, J. P. 2012. “Data in Practice: Conceptualizing the Data-Based Decision-Making Phenomena.” American Journal of Education 118 (2): 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283.
  • Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steiner, K., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thompson, G. 2012. The Effects of NAPLAN: Executive Summary. Perth: Murdoch University. http://effectsofnaplan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Executive-Summary.pdf.
  • Thompson, G. 2014. “NAPLAN, MySchool and Accountability: Teacher Perceptions of the Effects of Testing.” International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 12 (2): 62–84.
  • Thoonen, E. E. J., P. J. C. Sleegers, F. J. Oort, T. T. D. Peetsma, and F. P. Geijsel. 2011. “How to Improve Teaching Practices: The Role of Teacher Motivation, Organizational Factors, and Leadership Practices.” Educational Administration Quarterly 47 (3): 496–536. doi:10.1177/0013161X11400185.
  • Waters, T., R. J. Marzano, and M. Brian. 2003. Balanced Leadership: What 30 Years of Research Tells Us about the Effect of Leadership on Student Achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
  • Wenger, E., R. A. McDermott, and W. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  • Willis, J. W., and M. Jost. 2007. Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Wu, M. 2016. “The Performative Politics of NAPLAN and MySchool.” In National Testing in Schools: An Australian Assessment, edited by B. Lingard, G. Thompson, and S. Sellar, 18–29. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zembylas, M. 2003. “Interrogating ‘Teacher Identity’: Emotion, Resistance and Self-Formation.” Educational Theory 53 (1): 107–127. doi:10.1080/13540600309378.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.