Large-scale assessment as professional development: teachers’ motivations, ability beliefs, and values

References

• Bandura, A. 1994. “Self-Efficacy.” In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, edited by V. S. Ramachaudran, Vol. 4, 71–81. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Encyclopedia of Mental Health, edited by H. Friedman. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 1997. “New Forms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Staff Development.” Theory into Practice 36 (4): 231–238. doi:10.1080/00405849709543773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., R. Elliott, and K. Uchiyama. 2002. “Professional Development: A Key to Kentucky’s Educational Reform Effort.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 969–987. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00054-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. E., E. R. Banilower, J. D. Pasley, and I. R. Weiss. 2003. Progress and Pitfalls: A Cross-Site Look at Local Systemic Change Through Teacher Enhancement. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, A., and M. Mulloy. 2010. “How Do Cognitive and Motivational Factors Influence Teachers’ Degree of Program Implementation? A Qualitative Examination of Teacher Perspectives.” National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal 27 (4): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2000. “Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California.” Teachers College Record 102: 292–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13: 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, V. L. P., and J. W. Creswell. 2008. The Mixed Methods Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2015. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and B. Falk. 2013. Teacher Learning Through Assessment: How Student-Performance Assessments Can Support Teacher Learning. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and E. Rustique-Forrester. 2005. “The Consequences of Student Testing for Teaching and Teacher Quality.” Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 104: 289–319. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2005.00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychology Inquiry 11: 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B. 2007. “Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Rethinking the Connection Between High-Stakes Testing Policy and Classroom Instruction.” Sociology of Education 80: 285–313. doi:10.1177/003804070708000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., T. F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. L. Meece, and C. Midgley. 1983. “Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors.” In Achievement and Achievement Motivation, edited by J. T. Spence, 75–146. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., A. Wigfield, C. A. Flanagan, C. Miller, D. A. Reuman, and D. Yee. 1989. “Self-Concepts, Domain Values, and Self-Esteem: Relations and Changes at Early Adolescence.” Journal of Personality 57: 283–310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00484.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., A. Wigfield, R. D. Harold, and P. Blumenfeld. 1993. “Age and Gender Differences in Children’s Self- and Task Perceptions during Elementary School.” Child Development 64: 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, W. J. G., A. Brouwers, and W. Tomic. 2002. “Burnout and Self-Efficacy: A Study on Teachers’ Beliefs When Implementing an Innovative Educational System in the Netherlands.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (2): 227–243. doi:10.1348/000709902158865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, B., and S. Ort. 1998. “Sitting Down to Score: Teacher Learning through Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 80: 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., and H. F. Ladd. 2008. “School Accountability and Student Achievement.” In Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, edited by H. F. Ladd and E. B. Fiske, 166–182. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., D. Mayrowetz, and J. Fairman. 1998. “Performance-Based Assessment and Instructional Change: The Effects of Testing in Maine and Maryland.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 20: 95–113. doi:10.3102/01623737020002095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambell, T. 2004. “Teachers Working around Large-Scale Assessment: Reconstructing Professionalism and Professional Development.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 3 (2): 48–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gambell, T., and D. Hunter. 2004. “Teacher Scoring of Large-Scale Assessment: Professional Development or Debilitation?” Journal of Curriculum Studies 36: 697–724. doi:10.1080/0022027032000190696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaith, G., and H. Yaghi. 1997. “Relationships among Experience, Teacher Efficacy, and Attitudes toward Implementation of Instructional Innovation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13: 451–458. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A. 2002. “Large-Scale Assessment and Teachers’ Assessment Capacity: Learning Opportunities for Teachers in the National Education Monitoring Project in New Zealand.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 9 (3): 343–361. doi:10.1080/0969594022000027663
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L. T., and D. Schifter. 1997. “Understanding Teachers in Transition: Characteristics of a Model for the Development of Mathematics Teaching.” In Mathematics Teachers in Transition, edited by E. Fennema and B. Scott Nelson, 19–54. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gorozidis, G., and A. Papaioannou. 2011. “Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Achievement Goals, Attitudes and Intentions to Implement the New Greek Physical Education Curriculum.” European Physical Education Review 17: 231–253. doi:10.1177/1356336X11413654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, E., and W. F. Velicer. 1988. “Relation of Sample Size to the Stability of Component Patterns.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (2): 265–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. 2012. Reading Statistics and Research. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Jesus, S. N., and W. Lens. 2005. “An Integrated Model for the Study of Teacher Motivation.” Applied Psychology 54: 119–134. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00199.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D., S. Barron, K. Mitchell, and B. Stecher. 1996. Perceived Effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (Report no. MR-792-PCT/FF). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D., K. Mitchell, S. I. Barron, and S. Keith. 1996. Perceived Effects of the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Assessment (University of California at Los Angeles).
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and K. L. Kelly. 2003. “The Impact of Engagement in Large-Scale Assessment on Teachers’ Professional Development: The Emergent Literacy Baseline Project.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 18: 18–36. doi:10.1080/02568540309595020
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H., and D. L. Lauen. 2010. “Status Versus Growth: The Distributional Effect of School Accountability Policies.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29: 426–450. doi:10.3102/0162373709353129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A., C. Czerniak, C. Haney, and S. Beltyukova. 2012. “Beliefs about Teaching Science: The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Participation in Professional Development and Student Achievement.” International Journal of Science Education 34: 153–166. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. 2006. “Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ Experiences of School Science in Their Own Words.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane, R. J., and E. Levy. 1996. “Teaching to New Standards.” In Rewards and Reform: Creating Educational Incentives that Work, edited by S. H. Fuhrman and J. A. O’Day, 257–292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Peters-Burton, E., and W. M. Frazier. 2012. “Voices from the Front Lines: Exemplary Science Teachers on Education Reform.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (3): 179–190. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00131.x
   Google Scholar
• Pop, M. M., P. Dixon, and C. M. Grove. 2010. “Research Experiences for Teachers (RET): Motivation, Expectations, and Changes to Teaching Practices Due to Professional Program Involvement.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21: 127–147. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9167-2
   Google Scholar
• Pope, N., S. K. Green, R. L. Johnson, and M. Mitchell. 2009. “Examining Teacher Ethical Dilemmas in Classroom Assessment.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 778–782. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 2006. “Needed: A Dose of Assessment Literacy.” Educational Leadership 63: 84–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, P. W., and H. M. G. Watt. 2006. “Who Chooses Teaching and Why? Profiling Characteristics and Motivations across Three Australian Universities.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 34: 27–56. doi:10.1080/13598660500480290
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M., R. C. Wei, and L. Darling-Hammond. 2008. “Improving Teachers’ Assessment Practices through Professional Development: The Case of National Board Certification.” American Educational Research Journal 45: 669–700. doi:10.3102/0002831208316955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnellert, L. N., D. L. Butler, and S. K. Higginson. 2008. “Co-Constructors of Data, Co-Constructors of Meaning: Teacher Professional Development in an Age of Accountability.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 725–750. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J., R. Hopkin, S. James, G. Peacock, L. Kelly, D. Davies, and R. Bowker. 2009. “Teacher Preparation and the National Primary Science Curriculum: A Twentieth-Anniversary Perspective.” Research Papers in Education 24: 247–263. doi:10.1080/02671520902725770
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. G., R. Hopkin, and B. Lewthwaite. 2011. “Teacher Perceptions of Science in the National Curriculum.” International Journal of Science Education 33: 2407–2436. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.550698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. K., and S. A. Southerland. 2007. “Reforming Practice or Modifying Reforms? Elementary Teachers’ Response to the Tools of Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (3): 396–423. doi:10.1002/tea.20165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. 2009. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. 2004. “New Assessment Beliefs for a New School Mission.” Phi Delta Kappan 86: 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, M. M., and E. McIntyre. 2013. “Prospective Teachers’ Goal Orientation: An Examination of Different Teachers’ Typologies with Respect to Motivations and Beliefs about Teaching.” Teacher Development 17 (4): 409–430. doi:10.1080/13664530.2013.804001
   Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., and J. L. Fava. 1998. “Affects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery.” Psychological Methods 3 (2): 231–251. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. G., and P. W. Richardson. 2007. “Motivational Factors Influencing Teaching as a Career Choice: Development and Validation of the FIT-Choice Scale.” Journal of Experimental Education 75: 167–202. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. G., and P. W. Richardson. 2012. “An Introduction to Teaching Motivations in Different Countries: Comparisons Using the FIT-Choice Scale.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 40: 185–197. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.700049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., J. S. Eccles, K. Yoon, R. D. Harold, A. A. Arbreton, C. Freedman-Doan, and P. C. Blumenfeld. 1997. “Change in Children’s Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values across the Elementary School Years: A 3-Year Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 451–469. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, L. S., R. P. Ang, W. H. Chong, V. S. Huan, and C. L. Quek. 2008. “Teacher Efficacy in the Context of Teaching Low Achieving Students.” Current Psychology 27: 192–204. doi:10.1007/s12144-008-9034-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar