The effect of the ‘teacher-led PD for teachers’ professional development program on students’ achievement: an experimental study

References

• Allen, D. E., R. S. Donham, and K. Tanner. 2004. “Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Lesson Study – Building Communities of Learning among Educators.” Cell Biology Education 3 (1): 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arya, P., T. Christ, and M. M. Chiu. 2013. “Facilitation and Teacher Behaviors: An Analysis of Literacy Teachers’ Video-Case Discussions.” Journal of Teacher Education 65 (2): 111–127. doi:10.1177/0022487113511644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balta, N., M. Arslan, and H. Duru. 2015. “The Effect of In-Service Training Courses on Teacher Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 3 (5): 254–263. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i5.1037.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., and J. Gilbert. 1996. Teacher Development: A Model from Science Education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M., E. Gottlieb, and I. Gideon. 2018. “Coaching between Experts – Opportunities for Teachers’ Professional Development.” Teacher Development 22 (3): 303–313. doi:10.1080/13664530.2018.1438310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K., and N. de las Alas. 2012. “Effects of Teacher Professional Development on Gains in Student Achievement: How Meta-Analysis Provides Scientific Evidence Useful to Education Leaders.” July 8. http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2009/Effects_of_Teacher_Professional_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2018. “Evaluating the Impact of Professional Development.” RELC Journal 49 (2): 195–216. doi:10.1177/0033688218784371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., A. Gamoran, and J. Bowdon. 2008. “A Randomized Trial of Teacher Development in Elementary Science: First-Year Achievement Effects.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 1 (4): 237–264. doi:10.1080/19345740802328273.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, K. 2004. “The Real Value of Teachers: Using New Information about Teacher Effectiveness to Close the Achievement Gap.” Thinking K–16 8 (1): 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2000. “Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California.” Teachers College Record 102 (2): 294–343. doi:10.1111/tcre.2000.102.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. B., P. M. Shields, and A. A. Zucker. 1998. The SSIs and Professional Development for Teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, A., J. Coggshall, M. Dolan, E. Powers, and J. Killion. 2010. Job Embedded Professional Development: What It Is, Who Is Responsible, and How to Get It Done Well (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, G., and S. Blom. 2006. “Learning through Participation. The Potential of School-Based Teacher Education for Developing a Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22: 647–660. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1995. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 76 (8): 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and P. Youngs. 2002. “Defining ‘High-Qualified Teachers’: What Does ‘Scientifically-Based Research’ Actually Tell Us?” Educational Researcher 31 (9): 13–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X031009013.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, P., D. Mayer, and S. Glazerman. 2004. The Effects of Teach for America on Students: Findings from a National Evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L., A. C. Porter, M. Garet, K. S. Yoon, and B. Birman. 2002. “Does Professional Development Change Teachers’ Instruction? Results from a Three-Year Study.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (2): 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., R. W. Marx, S. Best, and R. T. Tal. 2003. “Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19: 643–658. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., and N. E. Wallen. 1996. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, C., A. Kennedy, L. Reid, and S. Mckinney. 2007. “Teacher CPD: Contested Concepts, Understandings and Models.” Journal of In-Service Education 33: 153–170. doi:10.1080/13674580701292913.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depth of Educational Reform. New York: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. M. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Y., R. Goddard, and M. Tschannen-Moran. 2007. “A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Teacher Collaboration for School Improvement and Student Achievement in Public Elementary Schools.” The Teachers College Record 109 (4): 877–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 1994. “Results-Oriented Professional Development: In Search of an Optimal Mix of Effective Practices.” Journal of Staff Development 15 (4): 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2013. “Defining Student Achievement.” In Handbook of Student Achievement, edited by J. Hattie and E. M. Anderman, 3–6. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., K. R. Daehler, N. Wong, M. Shinohara, and L. W. Miratrix. 2012. “Differential Effects of Three Professional Development Models on Teacher Knowledge and Student Achievement in Elementary Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (3): 333–362. doi:10.1002/tea.21004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., and B. J. Dijkstra. 2010. “Effective Teacher Professionalization in Networks?” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 1031–1040. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K., and E. Bruegmann. 2009. “Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers (no. W15202).” National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed May 2018. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A. 2010. “Designing and Implementing an Integrated Technological Pedagogical Science Knowledge Framework for Science Teachers Professional Development.” Computers and Education 55 (3): 1259–1269. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. R., and B. Showers. 2002. Student Achievement through Staff Development. 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. 1998. Form and Substance of Inservice Teacher Education. Research Monograph No. 13. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Kiemer, K., A. Gröschner, A. K. Pehmer, and T. Seidel. 2015. “Effects of a Classroom Discourse Intervention on Teachers’ Practice and Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics and Science.” Learning and Instruction 35: 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, F. 2016. “Teacher Professional Development to Support Teacher Professional Learning: Systemic Factors from Irish Case Studies.” Teacher Development 20 (4): 574–594. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1161661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S. 2003. “Professional Development as Policy Pathway.” Review of Research in Education 27 (1): 109–157. doi:10.3102/0091732X027001109.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., M. L. Franke, E. Kazemi, H. Ghousseini, A. C. Turrou, H. Beasley, A. Cunard, and K. Crowe. 2013. “Keeping It Complex: Using Rehearsals to Support Novice Teacher Learning of Ambitious Teaching.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (3): 226–243. doi:10.1177/0022487112473837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., and I. Tshuchida. 1998. “A Lesson is Like a Swiftly Flowing River: How Research Lessons Improve Japanese Education.”American Educator 14 (17): 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., D. Hayes, M. Mills, and P. Christie. 2003. Leading Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., N. Love, K. E. Stiles, S. Y. Mundry, and P. W. Hewson. 2009. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ming Cheung, W., and W. Yee Wong. 2014. “Does Lesson Study Work? A Systematic Review on the Effects of Lesson Study and Learning Study on Teachers and Students.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 3 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1108/IJLLS-05-2013-0024.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., J. Callahan, P. Pyke, A. Hay, M. Dance, and J. Pfiester. 2013. “Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers.” The Journal of Educational Research 106 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.667014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qablan, A. 2016. “Teaching and Learning about Science Practices: Insights and Challenges in Professional Development.” Teacher Development 20 (1): 76–91. doi:10.1080/13664530.2015.1111929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and C. Lockhart. 1992. “Teacher Development through Peer Observation.” Tesol Journal 1 (2): 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A. 2004. “School-Based Coaching. A Revolution in Professional Development – Or Just the Latest Fad?” Harvard Education Letter 20 (4): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2006. “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17 (4): 323–346. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, R., N. Kersting, K. B. Givvin, and J. W. Stigler. 2010. “Problem Implementation as a Lever for Change: An Experimental Study of the Effects of a Professional Development Program on Students’ Mathematics Learning.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 4 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/19345747.2010.498562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikalepo, E. E. 2019. “Teacher Recruitment, Motivation and Retention at Rural Schools in Namibia.” The European Educational Researcher 2 (2): 127–144. doi:10.31757/euer.224.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimić Šašić, S., A. Šimunić, A. Ivković, and A. Ključe. 2018. “The Correlation of Perceptions of Professional Roles and Teacher Beliefs with the Quality of Teacher Interaction.” Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 1 (2): 207–227. doi:10.31756/jrsmte.125.
   Google Scholar
• Soine, K. M., and A. Lumpe. 2014. “Measuring Characteristics of Teacher Professional Development.” Teacher Development 18 (3): 303–333. doi:10.1080/13664530.2014.911775.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., and H. M. Turner. 2000. “The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (9): 963–980. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tienken, C. H. 2003. “The Effect of Staff Development in the Use of Scoring Rubrics and Reflective Questioning Strategies on Fourth-Grade Students’ Narrative Writing Performance.” Dissertation Abstracts International 64(02): 388A. (UMI No. 3081032).
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. “The Right to Education and the Teaching Profession.” Accessed August 14. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002348/234820E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valiandes, S., and L. Neophytou. 2018. “Teachers’ Professional Development for Differentiated Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms: Investigating the Impact of a Development Program on Teachers’ Professional Learning and on Students’ Achievement.” Teacher Development 22 (1): 123–138. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, A. J., K. S. Yoon, P. Zhu, S. Cronen, and M. S. Garet. 2008. “Experimenting with Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods.” Educational Researcher 37 (8): 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., L. Darling-Hammond, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. “Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the US and Abroad Technical Report.” National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., M. Garet, B. Birman, and R. Jacobson. 2007. Examining the Effects of Mathematics and Science Professional Development on Teachers’ Instructional Practice: Using Professional Development Activity Log. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., T. Duncan, S. W. Y. Lee, B. Scarloss, and K. L. Shapley. 2007. Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues and Answers, REL 2007-No. 033. Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1).
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, R. C., T. Wubbels, S. Bolhuis, and T. C. Bergen. 2008. “Teacher Learning through Reciprocal Peer Coaching: An Analysis of Activity Sequences.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (4): 982–1002. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar