Secondary students’ perceptions of their teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: a scale development study

References

• Abell, S. K. 2007. “Research on Science Teacher Knowledge.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 1105–1149. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Abell, S. K. 2008. “Twenty Years Later: Does Pedagogical Content Knowledge Remain a Useful Idea?” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afacan, O., M. Karakus, and M. Usak. 2013. “Turkish Adaptation of the Scale of ‘Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Knowledge (SPOTK)’ and Examining in the Aspect of Some Variables.” Journal of Educational Sciences Research 3 (1): 185–200. doi:10.12973/jesr.2013.3110a.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, F., and J. Aziz. 2009. “Students’ Perception of the Teachers’ Teaching of Literature Communicating and Understanding through the Eyes of the Audience.” European Journal of Social Sciences 7 (3): 17–26. https://shidaedu702eportfolio.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ejss_7_3_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aksu, Z., M. Metin, and A. C. Konyalioglu. 2014. “Development of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale for Pre-Service Teachers: The Validity and Reliability Study.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 (20): 1365–1377. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1365.
   Google Scholar
• Ampadu, E. 2012. “Students’ Perceptions of Their Teachers’ Teaching of Mathematics: The Case of Ghana.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 4 (2): 351–358. http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423904313.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S. 2012. “Examination of Chemistry Teachers’ Topic-Specific Nature of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Electrochemistry and Radioactivity.” PhD diss., Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., and Y. Boz. 2012. “Review of Studies Related to Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Context of Science Teacher Education: Turkish Case.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 12 (1): 479–505. http://www.edam.com.tr/kuyeb/pdf/tr/e64199c18390e5ce4d3eb6d2fc0250a026a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., and Y. Boz. 2013. “The Nature of Integration among PCK Components: A Case Study of Two Experienced Chemistry Teachers.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14: 615–624. doi:10.1039/C3RP00095H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, F., J. Leach, and B. Moon. 2005. “Extract from New Understandings of Teachers’ Pedagogic Knowledge.” Curriculum Journal 16 (3): 331–340. doi:10.1080/09585170500256446.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. 2001. “Learning about and Learning from Expert Teachers.” International Journal of Educational Research 35 (5): 463–482. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A., J. Loughran, and J. H. van Driel. 2008. “Revisiting the Roots of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1271–1279. doi:10.1080/09500690801998885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucat, R. 2004. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a Way Forward: Applied Research in Chemistry Education.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 5 (3): 215–228. doi:10.1039/B4RP90025A.
   Google Scholar
• Bukova-Guzel, E., B. Canturk-Gunhan, S. Kula, Z. Ozgur, and A. N. Elci. 2013. “Scale Development for Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions Related to Their Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” South African Journal of Education 33 (2): 1–21. doi:10.15700/saje.v33n2a690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. S. 1999. “Domains of Teacher Knowledge.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman, 133–144. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cokluk, O., G. Sekercioglu, and S. Buyukozturk. 2012. Sosyal Bilimler Için Çok Değiskenli Istatistik: SPSS Ve LISREL Uygulamaları [Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications]. 2nd ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Corral, S., and E. Calvete. 2000. “Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the Mach IV and Its Relation to Self-Monitoring in a Spanish Sample.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 3 (1): 3–13. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/SJOP/article/viewFile/SJOP0000110003A/29491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, E. A. 2003. “Knowledge Integration in Science Teaching: Analyzing Teachers’ Knowledge Development.” Research in Science Education 34: 21–53. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawis, R. V. 1987. “Scale Construction.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 34 (4): 481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evens, M., J. Elen, and F. Depaepe. 2015. “Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Lessons Learned from Intervention Studies.” Education Research International 1–23. doi:10.1155/2015/790417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., D. Wegener, R. C. MacCallum, and E. J. Strahan. 1999. “Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research.” Psychological Methods 4 (3): 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferketich, S. 1991. “Focus on Psychometrics: Aspects of Item Analysis.” Research in Nursing & Health 14: 165–168. doi:10.1002/nur.4770140211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. 2014. “Knowledge Base for Teaching and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Some Useful Models and Implications for Teachers’ Training.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 60: 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., and N. E. Wallen. 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1998. “Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications.” Learning Environments Research 1: 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009932514731.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P., D. Lankford, P. Brown, E. Pareja, M. Volkmann, and S. Abell. 2007. “The PCK of Future Science Teachers in an Alternative Certification Program.” Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, April 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. M., and T. M. Dana. 2003. “Using a Card-Sorting Task to Elicit and Clarify Science-Teaching Orientations.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 14 (4): 291–309. doi:10.1023/B:JSTE.0000009551.37237.b3.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 2015. “A Model of Teacher Professional Knowledge and Skill Including PCK: Results of the Thinking from the PCK Summit.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 28–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L. 1990. The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. H., W. J. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Halim, L., S. I. S. S. Abdullah, and T. S. Meerah. 2014. “Students’ Perceptions of Their Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Science Education Technology 23: 227–237. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9484-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, D. Berliner, M. Cochran-Smith, M. McDonald, and K. Zeichner. 2005. “How Teachers Learn and Develop.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, 358–389. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Henze, I., and J. van Driel. 2015. “Toward a More Comprehensive Way to Capture PCK in Its Complexity.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 120–134. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoe, S. L. 2008. “Issues and Procedures in Adopting Structural Equation Modeling Technique.” Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 3 (1): 76–83. http://jaqm.ro/issues/volume-3,issue-1/pdfs/hoe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S.-J. 2011. “Assessing College Students’ Perceptions of a Case Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge Using a Newly Developed Instrument.” Higher Education 61 (6): 663–668. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9355-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S.-J., S.-Y. Guan, and H.-F. Hsieh. 2009. “Developing an Instrument for Assessing College Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 1: 596–606. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.107.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S.-J., M.-F. Tsai, and H.-Y. Chen. 2013. “Development of PCK for Novice and Experienced University Physics Instructors: A Case Study.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.678329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedege, O. J. 1989. “Integrated Science Students’ Assessment of Their Teachers for Characteristics of Effective Science Teaching.” Research in Science & Technological Education 7 (2): 235–247. doi:10.1080/0263514890070210.
   Google Scholar
• Joye, S. W., and J. H. Wilson. 2015. “Professor Age and Gender Affect Student Perceptions and Grades.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 15 (4): 126–138. doi:10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13466.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, V. 2009. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education: Perspectives and Potential for Progress.” Studies in Science Education 45 (2): 169–204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. 2015. “On the Beauty of Knowing Then Not Knowing: Pinning down the Elusive Qualities of PCK.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 1788–1795. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principal and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., and H. C. Waxman. 1991. Analyzing Effective Teaching of Hispanic Students’ Problem-Solving Strategies in Spanish. Paper presented at NABE Annual Conference Journal, 1988–1989. Washington, DC: National Association for Bilingual Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED340206.pdf#page=130
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R., W. Graber, D. Coleman, and A. C. Kemp. 1999. “Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of the Knowledge Base for Teaching Chemistry at the Gymnasium.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 10 (4): 269–286. doi:10.1023/A:1009473505639.
   Google Scholar
• Lorte, D. C. 1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., P. Mulhall, and A. Berry. 2004. “In Search of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science: Developing Ways of Articulating and Documenting Professional Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 370–391. doi:10.1002/tea.20007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T. 2007. “Application of Effective Schools and Teacher Quality Research to Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 18 (3): 345–348. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9042-y.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., J. Krajcik, and H. Borko. 1999. “Nature, Sources and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman, 95–132. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. K., Z. Yin, and H. Mayall. 2006. “Classroom Management Training, Teaching Experience and Gender: Do These Variables Impact Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs toward Classroom Management Style?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX, February 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Matsunaga, M. 2010. “How to Factor-Analyze Your Data Right: Do’s, Don’ts, and How-to’s.” International Journal of Psychological Research 3 (1): 97–110. doi:10.21500/20112084.854.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., M. Gonzalez-Howard, R. Katsh-Singer, and S. Loper. 2016. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation: Using Classroom Contexts to Assess High-Quality PCK Rather than Pseudoargumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (2): 261–290. doi:10.1002/tea.21252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuangchalerm, P. 2011. “In-Service Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Studies in Sociology of Science 2 (2): 33–37. doi:10.3968/j.sss.1923018420110202.034.
   Google Scholar
• Ozel, M., B. Timur, S. Timur, and K. Bilen. 2013. Öğretim Elemanlarının Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerini Değerlendirme Anketinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması Çalışması [The Adaptation of Students’ Perceptions of College Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Questionnaire into Turkish].” Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (1): 407–428. http://kefad.ahievran.edu.tr/archieve/pdfler/Cilt14Sayi1/JKEF_14_1_2013_407-428.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, K., A. M. Ponce-de-Leon, F. M. Rembado, and A. Garritz. 2008. “Undergraduate Professors’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of ‘Amount of Substance’.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1389–1404. doi:10.1080/09500690802187033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., and J. K. Suh. 2015. “From Portraying toward Assessing PCK: Drivers, Dilemmas, and Directions for Future Research.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 104–119. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rohaan, E. J., R. Taconis, and W. M. Jochems. 2009. “Measuring Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Primary Technology Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 27 (3): 327–338. doi:10.1080/02635140903162652.
   Google Scholar
• Salta, K., and D. Koulougliotis. 2015. “Assessing Motivation to Learn Chemistry: Adaptation and Validation of Science Motivation Questionnaire II with Greek Secondary School Students.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16: 237–250. doi:10.1039/c4rp00196f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. L. 2000. “Value-Added Assessment from Student Achievement Data: Opportunities and Hurdles.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14 (4): 329–339. doi:10.1023/A:1013008006096.
   Google Scholar
• Scharfenberg, F.-J., and F. X. Bogner. 2015. “A New Role Change Approach in Pre-service Teacher Education for Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Context of A Student Outreach Lab.” Research in Science Education 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9478-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., H. Moosbrugger, and H. Muller. 2003. “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness of Fit Measurement.” Methods of Psychological Research Online 8 (2): 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., and K. Plasman. 2011. “Science Teacher Learning Progressions: A Review of Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development.” Review of Educational Research 81 (4): 530–565. doi:10.3102/0034654311423382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 2015. “PCK: Its Genesis and Exodus.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 3–13. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. S., and E. R. Banilower. 2015. “Assessing PCK: A New Application of the Uncertainty Principle.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 88–103. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tairab, H. H., and W. J. Wilkinson. 1991. “Evaluation of Biology Trainee Teachers’ Effectiveness Using Their Students’ Perceptions of Teaching Behaviour.” Research in Science & Technological Education 9 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1080/0263514910090105.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, H.-L., H.-P. Chang, K.-H. Wang, and D. Treagust. 2000. “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (4): 385–398. doi:10.1080/095006900289804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uner, S. 2016. “Kimya öğretmenlerinin pedagojik alan bilgisinin konuya özgü doğasının incelenmesi ve öğrencilerin öğretmenlerinin pedagojik alan bilgisine ilişkin algıları [Examination of the Topic-Specific Nature of Chemistry Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Students’ Perceptions of Their Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge].” PhD diss., Gazi University.
   Google Scholar
• Veal, W. R., and J. G. MaKinster. 1999. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 3 (4). http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B. G., D. L. Fisher, and J. Dorman. 2009. “Identifying Exemplary Science Teachers through Their Students’ Perceptions of the Assessment Process.” Research in Science & Technological Education 27 (1): 117–129. doi:10.1080/02635140802658958.
   Google Scholar