Four types of teachers’ voices on critical incidents in teaching

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and P. C. Meijer. 2011. “A Dialogical Approach to Conceptualising Teacher Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 308–319. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. 2010. “Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.” (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Badia, A., and L. Becerril. 2016. “Renaming Teaching Practice through Teacher Reflection Using Critical Incidents on a Virtual Training Course.” Journal of Education for Teaching 42 (2): 224–238. doi:10.1080/02607476.2016.1143146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badia, A., and L. Chumpitaz-Campos. 2018. “Teachers Learn about Student Learning Assessment through a Teacher Education Process.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 58: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 2010. Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakkenes, I., J. D. Vermunt, and T. Wubbels. 2010. “Teacher Learning in the Context of Educational Innovation: Learning Activities and Learning Outcomes of Experienced Teachers.” Learning and Instruction 20 (6): 533–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2006. Teacher Cognition and Language Education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Calandra, B., L. Brantley-Dias, J. K. Lee, and D. L. Fox. 2009. “Using Video Editing to Cultivate Novice Teachers’ Practice.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42 (1): 73–94. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782542.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, C. W. 2018. “Analysis of Six Taiwanese EFL Student Teachers’ Professional Learning from Writing, Discussing, and Analysing Critical Incidents.” Teacher Development 22 (3): 339–354. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1403368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. 1997. “Critical Incident Analysis: A Strategy for Developing Reflective Practice.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 3 (2): 169–188. doi:10.1080/1354060970030201.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Philadelphia: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L. 2003. “Using Critical Incidents to Promote and Assess Reflective Thinking in Preservice Teachers.” Reflective Practice 4 (2): 207–220. doi:10.1080/14623940308274.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. K., and R. Lee. 2011. “Exploring the Use of Critical Incident Analysis and the Professional Learning Conversation in an Initial Teacher Education Programme.” Journal of Education for Teaching 37 (2): 199–217. doi:10.1080/02607476.2011.558285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijen, Ä., and K. Kullasepp. 2013. “All Roads Lead to Rome: Developmental Trajectories of Student Teachers’ Professional and Personal Identity Development.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 26 (2): 104–114. doi:10.1080/10720537.2013.759023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaranen, K., and K. Stenberg. 2020. “Making Beliefs Explicit – Student Teachers’ Identity Development through Personal Practical Theories.” Journal of Education for Teaching 1–15. doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1749994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, R. 2016. “Critical Incident Analysis: Reflections of a Teacher Educator.” Research in Teacher Education 6 (1): 25–29. doi:10.15123/PUB.5093.
   Google Scholar
• Monereo, C., C. Weise, and I. Alvarez. 2013. “Changing University Teacher’s Identity: Training Based on Dramatized Incidents.” Infancia y Aprendizaje 36 (3): 323–340. doi:10.1174/021037013807533043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S., and M. Oliver. 1999. “Critical Incident-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.” Instructional Science 27 (5): 329–354. doi:10.1007/BF00892030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, B. 2007. The Characterisation of Reflection by Student Teachers Using the Critical Incident Technique. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
   Google Scholar
• Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. 2011. “Teachers’ Critical Incidents: Ethical Dilemmas in Teaching Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (3): 648–656. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisson, J. H. 2016. “The Significance of Critical Incidents and Voice to Identity and Agency.” Teachers and Teaching 22 (6): 670–682. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1158956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenberg, K., L. Karlsson, H. Pitkaniemi, and K. Maaranen. 2014. “Beginning Student Teachers’ Teacher Identities Based on Their Practical Theories.” European Journal of Teacher Education 37 (2): 204–219. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.882309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenberg, K., and K. Maaranen. 2020. “The Differences between Beginning and Advanced Student Teachers’ Teacher Identities Based on Their Practical Theories.” Education Inquiry 1–15. doi:10.1080/20004508.2020.1716541.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. 1994. “Teachers’ Lives, Critical Incidents, and Professional Practice.” Qualitative Studies in Education 7 (1): 65–76. doi:10.1080/0951839940070105.
   Google Scholar
• Vandamme, R. 2018. “Teacher Identity as a Dialogical Construction.” In The Dialogical Self Theory in Education, edited by F. Meijers and H. Hermans, 111–127. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wopereis, I. G., P. B. Sloep, and S. H. Poortman. 2010. “Weblogs as Instruments for Reflection on Action in Teacher Education.” Interactive Learning Environments 18 (3): 245–261. doi:10.1080/10494820.2010.500530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W. M. 2018. “Critical Incidents as a Reflective Tool for Professional Development: An Experience with In-Service Teachers.” Reflective Practice 19 (6): 763–776. doi:10.1080/14623943.2018.1539652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar