Proposing an internationally focused typology to measure the impact of CPD for teachers – the Chinese internationalisation project

References

• Akankshay, K. 2010. “The Role of Teachers in Improving Learning in Burundi, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda: Great Expectations, Little Support – The Improving Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools (ILOPS) Project.” Research Report on Teacher Quality, ActionAid.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur et al. et al. 2012. Unpublished research presented at internal teaching and learning conference 2012 Oxford, Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. M., W. R. Coe, and L. Hedges. 2017. Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J. 2012. Research and Research Methods in Education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, F., and M. Akhtar. 2014. “Impact of Training on Teachers Competencies at Higher Education Level in Pakistan.” Researchers World 5 (1): 222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., O. Herber, and J. Taylor. 2014. “How Theory Is Used and Articulated in Qualitative Research: Development of a New Typology.” Social Science & Medicine 120C: 135–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.014.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, E., M. Sargeant, and J. Kelly. 2008. “Change or Transformation? A Critique of A Nationally Funded Programme of Continuous Professional Development for the Further Education System.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 324 (November): 427–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802538145.
   Google Scholar
• CEA District Education Authority. 2011. “Education Development Scheme during the Twelfth Five-Year Period in CEA District, Beijing.” CEA District Commission of Development and Reform of Beijing Municipality. Vol. 12. CEA District Education Authority .
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-H. 2014. The Confluence of Academia and Industry: A Case Study of Innovation Systems. Review of Policy Research. New York: Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Higher Education. 2014. Handbook on Typology for Outcome Based Education. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2000. Continuing Professional Development: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Schools. 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. 1999. “Professional Development and Reflective Practice: Purposes, Processes and Partnerships.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 72: 221–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200057.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, V., and L. Daguo. 2011. Confucius, Constructivisim and the Impact of Continuing Professional Development on Teachers of English in China. London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• EL-Deghaidy, H., S. Al-Shamrani, and N. Mansour. 2015. “Science Teachers’ Typology of CPD Activities: A Socio-Constructivist Perspective.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5: 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. 2000. Causing Concern but Improving: A Review of Schools’ Experience. London: Department for Education and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, X., and N. Saville. 2012.” Impact of Cambridge English: Key for Schools and Preliminary for Schools – Parents’ Perspectives in China.” University of Cambridge Research Notes 50: 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. 2012. A Self-Improving School System in International Context. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, J., and K. Kinder. 1997. “Teachers’ Continuing Professional Development: Framing a Model of Outcomes.” British Journal of In-service Education 231: 71–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13674589700200005.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2001. “Building the Capacity for School Improvement.” School Leadership and Management 213: 261–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430120074419.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. 2005. “Professional Development of Secondary EFL Teachers: Lessons from China.” Teachers College Record 107 (4): 654–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, I., and Yuan, L. 2005.“The status of action research in the People’s Republic of China.“ Action Research 3 (4): 383–402.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., and E. Calhoun, et al. 1999. Models of Teaching: Tools for Learning. Phoenix: The Phoenix Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Maden, M., and J. Hillman. 1996. Success against the Odds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1986. “Phenomenography – A Research Approach Investigating Different Understandings of Reality.” Journal of Thought 2 (212): 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• MOE (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China). 2001. “Student-Oriented Quality Education.” Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Netolicky, D., and N. Barnes. 2017. “Method as A Journey: A Narrative Dialogic Partnership Illuminating Decision-Making in Qualitative Educational Research.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 6 (2): 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2015. Education in China – A Snap Shot. Brussels: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., G. J. J. Biesta, S. Philippou, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Teacher and the Curriculum: Exploring Teacher Agency.” In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, edited by D. Wyse, L. Hayward, and J. Pandya. London: SAGE Publications p 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Punch, R. 2016. “Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers.” UK Higher Education OUP Humanities & Social Sciences Study.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2015. Real World Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2003. The Activist Teaching Professional. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, J. Y. 2011. “The Impact of In-Service Teacher Training: A Case Study of Teachers’ Classroom Practice and Perception Change.” Thesis, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, J. E., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1994. “Teacher Professionalism in Local School Contexts.” American Journal of Education 102 (2): 123–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/444062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TDA (Training Development Agency for Schools). 2010. “Impact Evaluation – A Model, Guidance and Practical Examples.” Training and Development Agency for Schools 12: 230 .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2004. “A Typology of Approaches to Facilitator Education.” Journal of Experiential Education 2 (5): 345–357.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M., and C. Palermo. 2014. “Preservice Teachers‘ Understanding of Their Professional Goals: Case Studies from Three Different Typologies.” Teaching and Teacher Education 44: 56–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A. 2017. “The Efficacy of Phenomenography as a Cross-Cultural Methodology for Educational Research.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 5 (1): 483–499.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. 1981. “A Typology of Teaching for Use in Teacher Education.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 6 (2): 345–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1981v6n2.1.
   Google Scholar