Fostering professional responsibility through high-quality professional learning opportunities

References

• Birks, M., K. Hoare, and J. Mills. 2019. “Grounded Theory: The FAQs.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919882535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, C. H. 2007. “Coaches’ Voices Bring 6 Lessons to Light.” Journal of Staff Development 28 (1): 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 1996. “The Search for Meanings – Grounded Theory.” In Rethinking Methods in Psychology, edited by J. A. Smith, R. Harré, and L. Van Langenhove, 27–49. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2017. “Constructivist Grounded Theory.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 299–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., R. C. Wei, and A. Andree. 2010. How High-Achieving Countries Develop Great Teachers. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005.
   Google Scholar
• Dorph, G. Z., and B. W. Holtz. 2000. “Professional Development for Teachers: Why Doesn’t the Model Change?” Journal of Jewish Education 66 (1–2): 67–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0021624000660107.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. 2004. “What Is a ‘Professional Learning Community’?” Educational Leadership 61 (80): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, S. 2012. “Intelligent Accountability: Re-thinking the Concept of ‘Accountability’ in the Popular Discourse of Education Policy.” Journal of Thought 47 (2): 19–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.47.2.19.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, M., and E. Morath. 2018. “Teachers Quit Jobs at Highest Record on Rate.” Wall Street Journal, December 28. https://www.wsj.com/articles/teachers-quit-jobs-at-highest-rate-on-record-11545993052?ns=prod/accounts-wsj
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. 2007. “5 Key Points to Building a Coaching Program.” The Learning Professional 28 (1): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., K. McCormick, J. Louie, and P. Buffington. 2018. “Using One-to-One Mobile Technology to Support Student Discourse.” In Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education, edited by L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H.-S. Siller, M. Tabach, and C. Vale, 59–81. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., and K. K. McCormick. 2020. “Screencasts Support Early Learning in Math.” YC Young Children 75 (4): 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. M. 2012. Perceptions of Elementary Mathematics Coaching. Canada: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. Mudry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGatha, M. 2008. “Levels of Engagement in Establishing Coaching Relationships.” Teacher Development 12 (2): 139–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530802038147.
   Google Scholar
• McGatha, M. B., J. M. Bay-Williams, B. M. Kobett, and J. A. Wray. 2018. Everything You Need for Mathematics Coaching: Tools, Plans, and a Process that Works for Any Instructional Leader, Grades K–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGatha, M. B., R. Davis, and A. Stokes-Levine. 2017. “Mathematics Specialists: What Does the Research Say?” In Elementary Mathematics Specialists: Developing, Refining, and Examining Programs that Support Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by M. B. McGatha and N. R. Rigelman, 153–166. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. 2005. “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2): 250–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J., and H. Fernando. 2010. “On the Geography of Accountability: Comparative Analysis of Teachers’ Experiences across Seven European Countries.” Journal of Educational Change 11 (4): 307–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9126-x.
   Google Scholar
• NCSM (National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics). 2019. NCSM Essential Actions: Coaching in Mathematics Education. Englewood, CO: NCSM.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). 2014. Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, J. 2012. “Benefits of a Teacher and Coach Collaboration: A Case Study.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 31 (2): 290–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, S. 2014. “Teacher Professional Learning Communities: Going beyond Contrived Collegiality toward Challenging Debate and Collegial Learning and Professional Growth.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 54 (2): 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankake, A., and G. Moller. 2007. “What the Teacher Leader Needs from the Principal.” The Learning Professional 28 (1): 32–34, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, B. H. Cheng, and N. Sabelli. 2011. “Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design.” Educational Researcher 40 (7): 331–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmount, R. S. 1978. “New Dimensions of Professional Responsibility.” The Journal of the Legal Profession 3: 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. V., P. Nathaniel Von der Embse, L. L. Pendergast, E. Saeki, N. Segool, and S. Schwing. 2017. “Leaving the Teaching Profession: The Role of Teacher Stress and Educational Accountability Policies on Turnover Intent.” Teaching and Teacher Education 66: 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki, E., L. Pendergast, N. K. Segool, and P. Nathaniel. 2015. “Potential Psychosocial and Instructional Consequences of the Common Core State Standards: Implications for Research and Practice.” Contemporary School Psychology 19 (2): 89–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0043-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2010a. “Rethinking Accountability in a Knowledge Society.” Journal of Educational Change 11 (1): 45–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2010b. “The Secret to Finland’s Success: Educating Reachers.” Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education 2: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. 2011. “Good Teaching in Difficulty Times: Demoralization in the Pursuit of Good Work.” American Journal of Education 118 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/662010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1994. “Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 273–285. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• West, L., and F. C. Staub. 2003. Content-Focused Coaching: Transforming Mathematics Lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. N., and S. L. Morrow. 2009. “Achieving Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: A Pan-Paradigmatic Perspective.” Psychotherapy Research 19 (4–5): 576–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K., and A. Nicotera. 2003. “Enhancing Teacher Quality: Peer Coaching as A Professional Development Strategy. A Preliminary Synthesis of the Literature.” Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar